Do Measures of Posttrauma Factors Better Explain PTSD Severity Than Pretrauma Factors? An Empirical Reply to Ogle et al. (2016)

Abstract

Ogle, Rubin, and Siegler (2016) concluded that postevent risk factors account for PTSD symptomatology much better than pretrauma factors. However, in their study several postevent predictors such as involuntary recall and physical reactions to trauma memory were related to and assessed simultaneously with PTSD symptomatology. Removing content-related items from the PTSD measure would, according to the authors, ensure that results were not being driven by potential content overlap. In the present prospective study (N = 887) we test their assumption that removing such items prevents that results are overlap driven. Correlational and multiple regression analyses showed that the associations between pre-event mental health and neuroticism on the one side and PTSD symptomatology on the other were equal regardless of if and which symptom cluster of PTSD was removed from our PTSD measure. Based on these findings we conclude that Ogle et al.’s assumption needs to be rejected.

Keywords

PTSD trauma risk factors mental health neuroticism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Asukai

Kato

Kawamura

Kim

Yamamoto

Kishimoto

. . . Nishizono-Maher

(2002). Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the Impact of Event Scale–Revised (IES-R-J): Four studies of different traumatic events. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 175–182.

Baumert

Simon

Gündel

Schmitt

Ladwig

K. H.

(2004). The Impact of Event Scale–Revised: Evaluation of the subscales and correlations to psychophysiological startle response patterns in survivors of a life-threatening cardiac event: An analysis of 129 patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. Journal of Affective Disorders, 82, 29–41.

Bosmans

M. W. G.

van der Velden

P. G.

(2015). Longitudinal interplay between posttraumatic stress symptoms and coping self-efficacy: A four-wave prospective study. Social Science & Medicine, 134, 23–29.

Brewin

C. R.

Andrews

Valentine

J. D.

(2000). Meta-analysis or risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748–766.

Craparo

Faraci

Rotondo

Gori

(2013). The Impact of Event Scale–Revised: Psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 1427–1432.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde

Deary

De Fruyt

Ostendorf

(Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (pp. 7–28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Horowitz

M. J.

Wilner

Alvarez

(1979). Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.

10.

Lee

I. A.

Preacher

K. J.

(2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org

11.

Luszczynska

Benight

C. C.

Cieslak

(2009). Self-efficacy and health-related outcomes of collective trauma: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 14, 49–60.

12.

Naifeh

J. A.

Elhai

J. D.

Kashdan

T. B.

Grubaugh

A. L.

(2008). The PTSD Symptom Scale’s latent structure: An examination of trauma-exposed medical patients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 1355–1368.

13.

Ogle

C. M.

Rubin

D. C.

Siegler

I. C.

(2016). Accounting for posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity with pre- and posttrauma measures: A longitudinal study of older adults. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 272–286.

14.

Price

van Stolk-Cooke

(2015). Examination of the interrelations between the factors of PTSD, major depression, and generalized anxiety disorder in a heterogeneous trauma-exposed sample using DSM 5 criteria. Journal of Affective Disorders, 186, 149–155.

15.

van der Ploeg

Mooren

T. T.

Kleber

R. J.

van der Velden

P. G.

Brom

(2004). Construct validation of the Dutch version of the Impact of Event Scale. Psychological Assessment, 16, 16–26.

16.

van der Velden

P. G.

Bosmans

M. W. G.

Scherpenzeel

A. C.

(2013). The burden of research on trauma for respondents: A prospective and comparative study on respondents evaluations and predictors. PLoS ONE, 8, e77266.

17.

van der Velden

P. G.

Wittmann

(2008). The independent predictive value of peritraumatic dissociation for PTSD symptomatology after type I trauma: A systematic review of prospective studies. Clinical Psychology Reviews, 28, 1009–1020.

18.

Ware

J. E.

Sherbourne

C. D.

(1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.

19.

Weiss

D. R.

Marmar

C. R.

(1997). The Impact of Event Scale–Revised. In Wilson

J. P.

(Ed.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399–411). New York, NY: Guilford.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB