Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are under-researched in autistic individuals. We explored the experience of trauma and PTSD symptoms in a sample of autistic adolescents (n = 30) aged 10–16 years (without a maltreatment history; 47% female), compared to a group of typically-developing (TD; n = 29) and a group of (non-autistic) maltreatment-exposed adolescents (n = 28), matched on key demographics. Caregiver reports indicated that a wide range of events were deemed traumatic to autistic adolescents, including those not meeting DSM-5’s Criterion A for trauma for a PTSD diagnosis (e.g., bullying and bereavement). Caregiver- and self-reports converged to show more severe PTSD symptoms, and higher rates of probable PTSD, in autistic adolescents (43–57%) relative to the TD adolescents (7–32%). Symptom severity and rates of probable PTSD were comparable between the autistic and maltreatment-exposed adolescents (50–54%), except that, for autistic adolescents, the index trauma mostly did not match DSM-5 criteria, whereas it did for maltreatment-exposed adolescents. This short report’s early findings supports the need for improved assessment of trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms in autistic adolescents. A flexible approach to how trauma is defined in this population may be needed, considering subjective experiences and autism-related processing differences.

Plain Language Summary

Psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are not well studied in autistic young people. We looked at experiences of trauma and PTSD symptoms in autistic adolescents aged 10–16 years (n = 30; 47% female) who did not have a history of maltreatment. We compared them with two groups of adolescents: typically developing (TD; n = 29) and maltreatment-exposed (n = 28), with similar ages and other key characteristics. Caregivers reported that autistic adolescents experienced a wide range of events as traumatic, including events that would not usually count as trauma under standard PTSD rules (DSM-5), such as bullying or the death of a loved one. Both caregiver and adolescent reports showed that autistic adolescents had more severe PTSD symptoms and higher rates of probable PTSD (43–57%) compared with TD adolescents (7–32%). Interestingly, the severity of symptoms and rates of probable PTSD in autistic adolescents were similar to those in the maltreatment-exposed group (50–54%). However, while the maltreatment group’s trauma usually met DSM-5 criteria, the traumatic experiences in the autistic group often did not. These early findings highlight the importance of recognising trauma and PTSD symptoms in autistic adolescents, even when the events do not meet standard definitions of trauma. Assessments may need to be more flexible and consider each young person’s subjective experience, as well as differences in how autistic adolescents process events. Overall, the study suggests that autistic adolescents can be highly affected by stressful or upsetting experiences, and mental health support should take their unique perspectives into account.

Keywords

autism trauma PTSD adolescent maltreatment mental health

Introduction

Psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have historically been under-researched in autistic people (Hernández-González et al., 2023), but are increasingly recognised as a research priority by the autism community. PTSD appears to affect approximately 14% of autistic children and adolescents and 44% of autistic adults (Quinton et al., 2024; Rumball, 2018), compared to 7.8% developing PTSD by age 18 in non-autistic samples (Lewis et al., 2019) and 6.8–-9.2% of adults in the general population (Goldstein et al., 2016; Kessler & Berglund, 2005). Such estimates overall must be interpreted with caution, as they could be biased/inflated due to methodological issues, including confounding factors, lack of control comparisons, clinical sample recruitment, and reliance on single informants. Only one previous study has considered child self-report (Hoover & Romero, 2019) – an essential perspective as internalising symptoms can often be missed by informants (e.g., Lei et al., 2024). Further, maltreatment history is a major risk for PTSD (Copeland et al., 2007) and frequently co-occurs with autism (Davidson et al., 2022; Gajwani & Minnis, 2023) but is seldom accounted for.

What is perceived as “trauma” may be different for autistic people, and strict definitions of trauma could risk poor identification and support (Brewin et al., 2019; van den Berg et al., 2017). Rumball and colleagues (2020) found that over 40% of autistic adults met criteria for probable PTSD in response to events deemed as subjectively “traumatic” (e.g., bullying, bereavement, and relationship difficulties), but which did not meet the definition of trauma required for a PTSD diagnosis in the DSM-5 Criterion A – “exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence” (APA; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Similarly, autistic adults and caregivers of autistic children, interviewed by Kerns and colleagues (2022), described various experiences as traumatic outside of standardised measures, including ones which reflected a conflict between autistic characteristics and the environment (e.g., sensory traumas). There has yet to be a quantitative exploration of PTSD symptoms associated with such experiences of trauma exposure in autistic individuals during adolescence, a period of peak mental health vulnerability (Solmi et al., 2021).

Our aim was to build on this important prior work to raise the possibility that our understanding of PTSD in autistic adolescents may need to consider a wider range of stressors. Drawing on a small yet unique dataset, we conducted an exploration of experiences of trauma and PTSD symptoms and, for the first time in autistic adolescents, distinguished DSM-5 versus no-DSM-5-qualifying events, combined self- and caregiver-reports, and explored selected individual differences previously linked to autistic cognition (Rumball, 2018). Our autism group had no maltreatment history, and as trauma/PTSD were not mentioned in recruitment materials, we somewhat minimised potential inflation of probable PTSD rates. Contrasting this group with a demographically-matched control group and a maltreatment-exposed (non-autistic) group provided preliminary indications of how autism may uniquely relate to PTSD risk.

Methods

Participants

Eighty-seven adolescents (and their caregivers) took part during Covid-19 pandemic (September 2021–April 2022) in a wider study on cognition and mental health (Lau-Zhu, Chan, et al., 2024; Lau-Zhu, Stacey, et al., 2024). The study comprised three groups of adolescents aged 10–16 years. The autism group (n = 30) met DSM/ICD criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (verified with diagnostic documentation provided by keyworkers/caregivers) and no maltreatment history (abuse/neglect). The TD group (n = 29) had neither an ASD diagnosis nor a maltreatment history. The maltreatment group (n = 28) had maltreatment histories but no ASD diagnoses nor first/second-degree relatives with ASD. All adolescents had no diagnosis of learning disability and were required to read English. Consent was obtained from adolescents aged 16 and all parents/caregivers, and assent was obtained from adolescents aged below 16. See Lau-Zhu, Chan, et al. (2024) for full recruitment strategy and Table 1 for further sample characterisation. The West Midlands – Solihull Research Ethics Committee (21/WM/0125) provided ethical approval. See Supplemental Materials for additional details on recruitment and selection strategy.

Table 1.

Background Variables Including Demographics and Clinical Measures, by Group

	Autism (n = 30)	Maltreatment (n = 28)	TD (n = 29)	Group comparisons^a (p-value)
Age, years: mean (SD)	12.47 (1.98)	13.57 (2.08)	12.93 (1.98)	.118
Sex (at birth)^b: n females (%)	14 (47%)	17 (61%)	15 (52%)	.557
Ethnicity; n white (%)	28 (93%)^c	19 (68%)^d	18 (62%)^d	.013
Socioeconomic status (SES)^e, parental education: n (%) at university level	21 (70%)	13 (54%)	19 (68%)	.437
Diagnoses of neurodevelopmental disorders (not autism)^f: n (%)	13 (43%)^c	2 (7%)^d	0^d	<.001
Diagnoses of PTSD: n (%)	2 (6%)	1 (4%)	0	NA^g
Diagnoses of emotional disorders (others)^h: n (%)	8 (27%)^c	2 (7%)^d	0^d	.004
Medication, yes: n (%)	14 (48%)^c	1 (4%)^d	0^d	<.001
Talking therapy, yes: n (%)	13 (43%)^c	18 (64%)^c	0^d	<.001
Cognitive behavioural intervention	6	5	0
Evidence-based trauma-focused intervention	1	1	0
Recruitment source				<.001
Healthcare	14	5	0
Social care	0	23	0
Community	16	0	29

Note. TD = typical development (i.e., non-autistic and non-maltreatment control group).

^aOverall group comparisons were done using chi-square tests for categorical variables and with one-way ANOVA for continuous variables (p-values).

^bOne autistic participant (female assigned at birth) identified as transgender.

^c,dWithin each row, group values that have different superscript letters (a, b) are significantly different from each other (p < .05). Group values sharing the same letter are not significantly different. Independent sample t-tests were used for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

^eMissing data were as follows: maltreatment, n = 4; TD, n = 1.

^fIncluded ADHD, Tourette’s syndrome, dyspraxia, dyscalculia, dyslexia, and sensory processing disorder.

^gObserved frequencies were <5 and thus statistical comparisons were not run

^hIncluded obsessive compulsive disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder.

Measures

See Supplemental Materials for additional details on measures.

Trauma Exposure

The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen – Caregiver Version (CATS; Sachser et al., 2017) has 14 items assessing potentially traumatic events based on DSM-5 criteria, including physical harm, sexual assault and natural disasters. To assess non-DSM-5 traumas, two additional questions (following Rumball et al., 2020) asked: “any other events that have happened to your child that they would consider stressful, scary, traumatic or extremely unpleasant?” and/or “… causing nightmares or memories of the event(s) to come back into their mind, when they did not want to think about them?”. Caregivers were asked to identify a specific index event before reporting PTSD symptoms in the CATS, which was also checked to see if it matched the DSM-5 criteria.

PTSD Symptomatology

The CATS (Sachser et al., 2017) provides caregiver report for 20 items measuring symptom frequency on intrusion, avoidance, negative mood/cognition, and hyperarousal, with a cut-off score for probable PTSD of ≥ 21 (Nilsson et al., 2020). A novel exploratory item on vocal/motor tics was added after consultation with caregivers of autistic adolescents. The 8-item Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES; Perrin et al., 2005) was selected for adolescent self-report due to its brevity to minimise completion burden. This covers symptoms of re-experiencing and avoidance, with a cut-off score for probable PTSD of ≥ 17 (Perrin et al., 2005). Symptoms in the CRIES are reported without the need for the adolescent to self-describe the index trauma.

Individual Differences

Autistic traits were measured with the Social Communication Questionnaire – Current Form (Rutter et al., 2003). Cognitive traits considered were executive functioning, using the Dysexecutive Questionnaire – Children (Emslie et al., 2003); general cognitive ability, using the abbreviated 9-item form of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test (Bilker et al., 2012); and trait imagery vividness, using the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Andrade et al., 2014).

Procedure

Adolescents and their caregivers completed separate online questionnaires. These were reviewed for suitability (ease of comprehension and perceived burden) by autistic/maltreatment-exposed adolescents and caregivers/practitioners. Recruitment materials did not mention trauma/PTSD in autism. See Supplemental Materials for additional details.

Analytical Approach

Data were checked for normality and outliers. Group differences were assessed with ANOVAs, independent-sample/Welch’s t-tests (for continuous variables), and Chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests (for categorical variables, e.g., yes vs. no experience of each traumatic event separately). Associations were assessed with Pearson’s/Spearman’s correlations (for continuous variables), and Chi-square tests (for categorical variables). Parametric tests for nonnormal data are reported when these converged with nonparametric tests, unless otherwise stated. Fisher’s Exact Tests were used to compare correlation sizes. Qualitative descriptions of traumatic events (unlinked to group membership) were double-coded (by ALZ and RRD; yes vs. no) as whether each met DSM-5 Criterion A required for a PTSD diagnosis (APA, 2013), with almost perfect agreement, Cohen’s kappa = 0.91 (Altman, 1991).

Results

Trauma Exposure

DSM-5 Traumatic Events

Relative to the TD group, both the autism and maltreatment groups reported higher incidence of physical assaults, traumatic bereavements and stressful medical procedures (p’s < .05; Figure 1). The maltreatment group additionally reported higher incidence of familial physical violence, sexual harm, or community violence (p’s < .05). The median number of DSM-5 events endorsed was 1 (IQR = 2) for autistic adolescents; 3 (IQR = 4) for maltreatment-exposed adolescents; and 0 (IQR = 0) for TD adolescents.

Figure 1.

Percentage of DSM-5 and non-DSM-5 traumatic events (within groups) reported by caregivers

Non-DSM-5 Traumatic Events

Caregivers of 17 autistic (56.7%), 18 maltreatment-exposed (69.2%), and 8 TD (27.6%) adolescents, reported an event that the adolescents found traumatic, but which did not match DSM-5 criterion (Figure 1). The most reported events were bullying, bereavements, and events involving change/uncertainty in the autism group; and events related to out-of-home care in the maltreatment-exposed group.

Overlap in Traumatic Events

Each trauma-exposed adolescent across groups was categorised based on event types endorsed (i.e., DSM-5-only, non-DSM-5-only, or both). Autistic (n = 14/30, 46.7%) and maltreatment-exposed adolescents (n = 15/26, 57.7%) reported both DSM-5 and non-DSM-5 traumas simultaneously more frequently than TD adolescents (n = 2/29, 6.9%; p’s < .002). Autistic, maltreatment-exposed and TD groups were compared by their frequencies of reporting DSM-5-only (n’s = 2–8; 6.9–32.0%) or non-DSM-5-only events (n’s = 2–5, 7.7–17.2%) and did not differ significantly (p’s > .05).

PTSD Symptomatology

According to caregiver- and self-reports (Table 2), the autistic and maltreatment-exposed adolescents reported more severe PTSD symptoms overall compared to TD (d’s = 0.55–1.04). Both autistic (by self-report only) and maltreatment-exposed (by both informants) adolescents reported significantly more intrusion symptoms. They also reported significantly more avoidance, hyperarousal, and negative mood/cognition symptoms (by caregiver report only in both groups). Symptom severity did not significantly differ between the autism and maltreatment groups (d’s = 0.01–0.25), but the autistic group reported relatively more tics in response to the index event.

Table 2.

PTSD Symptoms by Caregiver and Self Report, by Group

	Autism	Maltreatment	TD
CATS - caregiver reports available^a	n = 23	n = 26	n = 10^a
Total (max = 60), mean (SD)^b	21.39 (11.52)^c	25.04 (17.46)^c	10.20 (9.98)^d
Intrusion (max = 15), mean (SD)	4.13 (3.43)^c,d	5.42 (4.60)^c	2.23 (1.89)^d
Avoidance (max = 6), mean (SD)	2.52 (2.27)^c	2.65 (2.31)^c	0.70 (0.95)^d
Negative mood & cognitions (max = 21), mean (SD)	7.21 (4.66)^c	9.04 (7.01)^c	3.20 (3.99)^d
Hyperarousal (max = 18), mean (SD)	7.65 (4.35)^c	7.92 (5.15)^c	4.00 (4.50)^d
Tics (novel item; max = 3), median (IQR)^e	1 (2)^c	0 (2)^d	0 (0)^d
Probable PTSD, n (%)^b	13 (43%)^c	13^c (50%)^c	2^d (7%)^d
CRIES - self-reports available^a	n = 28	n = 28	n = 28
Total (max = 40), mean (SD)	19.21 (12.18)^c	19.07 (13.44)^c	12.46 (10.43)^d
Intrusion (max = 20), mean (SD)	9.25 (6.39)^c	9.36 (7.30)^c	5.79 (5.12)^d
Avoidance (max = 20), mean (SD)	9.96 (6.98)^c	9.71 (7.08)^c	6.68 (5.74)^c
Probable PTSD, n (%)	16 (57%)^c	15 (54%)^c	9^d (32%)^d

Note. CATS = Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen; CRIES = Child Revised Impact of Event Scale; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; TD = typical development (i.e., non-autistic and non-maltreatment control group).

^aPTSD symptoms were reported in the CATS only when a traumatic event was identified by the caregiver, but in the CRIES for all adolescents as the latter does not require them to explicitly describe the index trauma. Thus, data were more available for self- rather than caregiver-reports.

^bScoring excludes the novel item.

^c,dWithin each row, group values that have different superscript letters (c, d) are significantly different from each other (p < .05). Group values sharing the same letter are not significantly different.

^eEndorsement of this item per group: autism, n = 16; maltreatment, n = 5; typical development, n = 0.

Reports from different respondents on overall symptom severity showed large and medium correlations in the maltreatment and autism group, respectively. The correlation between informant reports for intrusion (but not avoidance) was significantly bigger for the maltreatment-exposed than the autism group. We did not compute the corresponding correlation in the TD group because caregiver reports were insufficient (n = 10), reflecting low caregiver-reported trauma exposure in this group (see Table 2).

Autistic and maltreatment-exposed adolescents showed higher rates of probable PTSD than TD (Figure 2). Based on their caregiver’s selection of the index trauma, probable PTSD was mostly in response to non-DSM-5 events in autistic adolescents but was mostly in response to DSM-5 events in maltreatment-exposed adolescent. The association between groups and if the trauma was DSM-5 event or not was significant (p < .001).

Figure 2.

Percentage of cases endorsing trauma exposure and/or crossing cut-offs for probable PTSD, per group.

See Supplemental Materials for detailed results.

Exploring Individual Differences

Across groups, more severe PTSD symptomatology was positively and significantly correlated with executive dysfunction and female sex. These correlations were not significant when restricting to each group only, likely owing to reduced power (except for the correlation with sex in the maltreatment group). Correlations (across and within groups) were not significant between PTSD symptoms and remaining individual difference variables (i.e., autistic traits, cognitive ability, and trait imagery) and between exposure to DSM-5/non-DSM-5 traumas and sex. See Supplemental Materials for detailed results.

Discussion

We report, for the first time, preliminary high rates of PTSD symptoms in a sample of autistic adolescents in response to events not qualifying DSM-5’s Criterion A for trauma. These included bullying, bereavement, events involving change/uncertainty, and family stresses, echoing findings in autistic adults (Kerns, Lankenau, et al., 2022; Rumball et al., 2020) and qualitative data from caregivers of autistic children (Kerns, Lankenau, et al., 2022). While our sample size was modest, findings were of medium-to-large effects and relatively consistent across informants.

Our sample rate of 43–57% probable PTSD for autistic adolescents is comparable to data with autistic adults (47%; Rumball et al., 2020), but higher than in our demographically-matched TD group (7–32%), and recent estimates with autistic (14%; Quinton et al., 2024) and non-autistic youth (1.6%; Kessler et al., 2012). However, a meta-analysis with strict inclusion criteria only found 0–3.6% PTSD diagnostic rates in autistic individuals (Lai et al., 2019). Also, despite our tentative high estimates, only two autistic participants reported a formal PTSD diagnosis (Table 1). Formal diagnoses, unlike symptom measures, may underestimate the impact of trauma in autistic populations. Alternatively, questionnaire measures may be oversensitive. Accurate estimates will require sensitive and specific PTSD assessment tools in autistic adolescents (including validation of existing tools), to avoid risks of “conceptual bracket creep” and overmedicalisation (McNally, 2003). Autism-specific manifestations (beyond exacerbation of existing traits) may also need considering (Kerns & Kendall, 2012; Kerns, Robins, et al., 2022), such as stereotyped behaviours, as hinted by the present study’s novel stakeholder-developed item.

Brewin and colleagues (2019) have argued that strict definitions of trauma could hamper diagnoses – most autistic adolescents’ symptoms in our study were anchored to a caregiver-reported non-DSM-5 event rather than a traditional DSM-5 events, as in the maltreatment group (Figure 2), despite comparable symptom levels. While the definition of “trauma” remains controversial (McNally, 2003), emerging data (Kerns, Lankenau, et al., 2022; Rumball et al., 2020), alongside our clinical and empirical observations, encourage us to better attend to autistic lived experiences of “trauma”.

Autistic social communication differences may result in PTSD symptoms being missed by family and/or professionals, leading to potential under-recognition (Haruvi-Lamdan et al., 2018; Kerns et al., 2015). We also found lower concordance between self- and caregiver reports in the autistic relative to the maltreatment-exposed group, particularly on intrusion symptoms such as flashbacks/nightmares, often “invisible” to caregivers.

For individual differences, our finding of higher levels for (autistic) females is consistent with population findings (Olff, 2017). Executive dysfunction (but not autistic traits or cognitive abilities) was positively associated with more symptoms, aligning with adult data (Rumball et al., 2021). Unlike earlier suggestions (Bryant & Harvey, 1996), trait imagery ability did not seem important, but emotional aspects of imagery were not assessed (Di Simplicio et al., 2019; Iyadurai et al., 2019; Lau-Zhu et al., 2023). Potential mechanisms for (increased) PTSD symptoms in autism should be further investigated (e.g., detail-focused/sensory processing; see Hoover, 2015; Peterson et al., 2019; Rumball et al., 2021).

To better understand and assess PTSD symptoms in autistic adolescents, we may need to consider a less restrictive trauma definition (Brewin et al., 2019), multiple informants (including self-reports), and subjective experiences. Indeed, cognitive theories (Ehlers & Clark, 2000) and recent findings (Danese & Widom, 2020) highlight a subjective “sense of threat” as core to trauma. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems states that traumatic events within a PTSD diagnosis must be “extremely threatening or horrific” (ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019), and does not impose standardised event types. As the debate of what is “trauma” in autistic people remains ongoing, a neurodevelopmentally-informed, formulation-based approach, which integrates autistic cognition and meaning-making (e.g., Stark et al., 2021), could be useful.

As evidence-based psychological interventions are acceptable and effective for autistic adolescents (Quinton et al., 2024; Rumball, 2018), these should be adapted appropriately (Peterson et al., 2019) and empirically tested in autistic individuals in relation to distress linked to non-DSM-5 traumas. Intrusive imagery symptoms may also benefit from focal approaches, such as using visuospatial tasks (Lau-Zhu & Chan, 2025; Lau-Zhu et al., 2019, 2021; Rackham & Lau-Zhu, 2021), which could harness common autistic strengths/preferences (Muth et al., 2014).

In sum, this brief report’s early findings – from a community sample during a pandemic period – add to the emerging literature suggesting that current definitions of psychological trauma may not fully capture autistic experiences (Kerns, Lankenau, et al., 2022; Rumball et al., 2020). A better understanding of autism-related processing differences and their impact of trauma will be critical. Future studies should use improved tools, more diverse and representative samples across contexts, and closely involve the autism community.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Experiences of Trauma and PTSD Symptoms in Autistic Adolescents: Preliminary Findings

Supplemental Material for Experiences of Trauma and PTSD Symptoms in Autistic Adolescents: Preliminary Findings by Alex Lau-Zhu, Alice Quinton, James Stacey, Rebecca Roberts-Davis, Myra Cooper, Carmen Chan, Francesca Happé in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the sponsoring and supporting organisations for facilitating this work including advice on design and recruitment strategy (with key individuals highlighted): Berkshire Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (Dr Alice Farrington); Oxfordshire County Council ATTACH (Dr Claire Holdaway); Parents Talking Asperger’s (Karen Irvani); SAFE! Support for Young Victims (Chloe Purcell); St Frideswides Primary School in Oxford (Zoe Goodin); Autism Family Support Oxford; Autistica; and MQ Charity. Finally, we are particularly grateful for participating young people and families for their time and enthusiasm for completing this study through the challenging time of a global pandemic.

ORCID iDs

Alex Lau-Zhu

Alice M.G. Quinton

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Alex Lau-Zhu reports support from Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust for professional training in clinical psychology, Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship [MR/Y009460/1], John Fell Fund from the Oxford University Press, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre hosted at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (which also funds Alice Quinton), Oxfordshire Health Service Research Committee, and Committee for Children Junior Research Fellowship at Linacre College. Francesca Happé is part-funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. Rebecca Roberts-Davis reports support from a generous donation by Mr William Barnett CBE, facilitated by the University of Oxford Development Office.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.*

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Author Biographies

Dr Alex Lau-Zhu is an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellow. He directs the Reimagine Lab at the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, and practices as a Clinical Psychologist at Oxford Health CAMHS Horizon supporting young people affected by complex trauma.

Dr Alice M.G. Quinton is a postdoctoral researcher at the Reimagine Lab at the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford. She completed her PhD on trauma-related mental health in autistic young people at the Social, Genetic and Developmental Centre, King's College London.

Dr James Stacey is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist at the Oxon CAMHS Neurodevelopmental Conditions pathway, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust and works with autistic and ADHD children and young people, their families, and other parts of their support networks.

Rebecca Roberts-Davis is a DPhil Candidate at the Reimagine Lab at the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, and works part time as Senior Support Worker at Autism Family Support Oxfordshire.

Dr Myra Cooper is Research Director on the Oxford Clinical Psychology Doctorate Course, as well as an HCPC registered clinical psychologist, a Chartered Psychologist, and a Fellow of the British Psychological Society.

Dr Carmen Chan is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist specialised in treating PTSD across the lifespan, particularly following interpersonal trauma. Dr Chan founded Horizon, a service in Oxfordshire CAMHS that supports children and young people who have experienced sexual harm. Alongside this, she works in the Oxfordshire CAMHS Outreach team and is also the clinical lead for the PTSD and trauma provision.

Professor Francesca Happé is a Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London. She is a Fellow of the British Academy and the Academy of Medical Sciences, past-President of the International Society for Autism Research (INSAR; 2013-2015), and has received the British Psychological Society Spearman Medal and President's Award, the Experimental Psychology Society Prize and the Royal Society Rosalind Franklin Award, as well as a CBE for services to the study of autism.

References

Altman

D. G.

(1991). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall.

American Psychiatric Association . (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

Andrade

May

Deeprose

Baugh

Ganis

(2014). Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth sensory imagery questionnaire. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 105(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12050

Bilker

W. B.

Hansen

J. A.

Brensinger

C. M.

Richard

Gur

R. E.

Gur

R. C.

(2012). Development of abbreviated nine-item forms of the Raven’s standard progressive matrices test. Assessment, 19(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446655

Brewin

C. R.

Rumball

Happé

(2019). Neglected causes of post-traumatic stress disorder. BMJ, 365, l2372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2372

Bryant

R. A.

Harvey

A. G.

(1996). Visual imagery in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02103670

Copeland

W. E.

Keeler

Angold

Costello

E. J.

(2007). Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(5), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPSYC.64.5.577

Danese

Widom

C. S.

(2020). Objective and subjective experiences of child maltreatment and their relationships with psychopathology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(8), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0880-3

Davidson

Moran

Minnis

(2022). Autism and attachment disorders – how do we tell the difference? BJPsych Advances, 28(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJA.2022.2

10.

Di Simplicio

Lau-Zhu

Meluken

Taylor

Kessing

L. V.

Vinberg

Holmes

E. A.

Miskowiak

K. W.

(2019). Emotional mental imagery abnormalities in monozygotic twins with, at high-risk of, and without affective disorders: Present in affected twins in remission but absent in high-risk twins. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00801

11.

Ehlers

Clark

D. M.

(2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0

12.

Emslie

Wilson

F. C.

Burden

Nimmo-Smith

Wilson

B. A.

(2003). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome for children (BADS-C). Thames Valley Test Company.

13.

Gajwani

Minnis

(2023). Double jeopardy: Implications of neurodevelopmental conditions and adverse childhood experiences for child health. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00787-022-02081-9

14.

Goldstein

R. B.

Smith

S. M.

Chou

S. P.

Saha

T. D.

Jung

Zhang

Pickering

R. P.

Ruan

W. J.

Huang

Grant

B. F.

(2016). The epidemiology of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions-III. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(8), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00127-016-1208-5

15.

Haruvi-Lamdan

Horesh

Golan

(2018). PTSD and autism spectrum disorder: Co-morbidity, gaps in research, and potential shared mechanisms. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 10(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/TRA0000298

16.

Hernández-González

Fresno-Rodríguez

Spencer-Contreras

R. E.

Tárraga-Mínguez

González-Fernández

Sepúlveda-Opazo

(2023). Research mapping of trauma experiences in autism spectrum disorders: A bibliometric analysis. Healthcare, 11(9), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/HEALTHCARE11091267

17.

Hoover

D. W.

(2015). The effects of psychological trauma on children with autism spectrum disorders: A research review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2(3), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-015-0052-y

18.

Hoover

D. W.

Romero

E. M. G.

(2019). The interactive trauma scale: A web-based measure for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(4), 1686–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10803-018-03864-3/TABLES/1

19.

Iyadurai

Visser

R. M.

Lau-Zhu

Porcheret

Horsch

Holmes

E. A.

James

E. L.

(2019). Intrusive memories of trauma: A target for research bridging cognitive science and its clinical application. Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.08.005

20.

Kerns

C. M.

Kendall

P. C.

(2012). The presentation and classification of anxiety in autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 19(4), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/CPSP.12009

21.

Kerns

C. M.

Lankenau

Shattuck

P. T.

Robins

D. L.

Newschaffer

C. J.

Berkowitz

S. J.

(2022a). Exploring potential sources of childhood trauma: A qualitative study with autistic adults and caregivers. Autism, 26(8), 1987–1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211070637

22.

Kerns

C. M.

Newschaffer

C. J.

Berkowitz

S. J.

(2015). Traumatic childhood events and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(11), 3475–3486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2392-y

23.

Kerns

C. M.

Robins

D. L.

Shattuck

P. T.

Newschaffer

C. J.

Berkowitz

S. J.

(2022b). Expert consensus regarding indicators of a traumatic reaction in autistic youth: A Delphi survey. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPP.13666

24.

Kessler

R. C.

Avenevoli

Costello

E. J.

Georgiades

Green

J. G.

Gruber

M. J.

J. P.

Koretz

McLaughlin

K. A.

Petukhova

Sampson

N. A.

Zaslavsky

A. M.

Merikangas

K. R.

(2012). Prevalence, persistence, and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(4), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHGENPSYCHIATRY.2011.160

25.

Kessler

R. C.

Berglund

Demler

Jin

Merikangas

K. R.

Walters

E. E.

(2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593

26.

Lai

M. C.

Kassee

Besney

Bonato

Hull

Mandy

Szatmari

Ameis

S. H.

(2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5

27.

Lau-Zhu

Chan

(2025). A brief technique to reduce flashbacks of sexual trauma in an adolescent: Proof-of-concept case study using imagery interference. JMIR Formative Research, 9(1), Article e79708. https://doi.org/10.2196/79708

28.

Lau-Zhu

Chan

Gibson

Stark

Wang

Happé

Stacey

Cooper

(2024a). Specificity of episodic future thinking in adolescents: Comparing childhood maltreatment, autism spectrum and typical development. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 52(11), 1781–1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01232-7

29.

Lau-Zhu

Henson

R. N.

Holmes

E. A.

(2019). Intrusive memories and voluntary memory of a trauma film: Effects of a cognitive interference task after encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(2), 2154–2180. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000598

30.

Lau-Zhu

Henson

R. N.

Holmes

E. A.

(2021). Selectively interfering with intrusive but not voluntary memories of a trauma film: Accounting for the role of associative memory. Clinical Psychological Science, 9(6), 1128–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702621998315

31.

Lau-Zhu

Stacey

Gibson

Chan

Cooper

(2024b). Flashforward’ mental imagery in adolescents: Exploring developmental differences and associations with mental health. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 52(6), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465824000298

32.

Lau-Zhu

Williams

Steel

(2023). Attachment patterns and autobiographical episodic memory functioning: A systemic review of adult studies to advance clinical psychological science. Clinical Psychology Review, 101, 102254. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2023.102254

33.

Lei

Leigh

Charman

Russell

Hollocks

M. J.

(2024). Exploring the association between social camouflaging and self- versus caregiver-report discrepancies in anxiety and depressive symptoms in autistic and non-autistic socially anxious adolescents. Autism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241238251

34.

Lewis

S. J.

Arseneault

Caspi

Fisher

H. L.

Matthews

Moffitt

T. E.

Odgers

C. L.

Stahl

Teng

J. Y.

Danese

(2019). The epidemiology of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder in a representative cohort of young people in England and Wales. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30031-8

35.

McNally

(2003). Progress and controversy in the study of posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.54.101601.145112

36.

Muth

Hönekopp

Falter

C. M.

(2014). Visuo-spatial performance in autism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(12), 3245–3263. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10803-014-2188-5/FIGURES/4

37.

Nilsson

Dävelid

Ledin

Svedin

(2020). Psychometric properties of the child and adolescent trauma screen (CATS) in a sample of Swedish children. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 75(4), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2020.1840628

38.

Olff

(2017). Sex and gender differences in post-traumatic stress disorder: An update. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(sup4), 1351204. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1351204

39.

Perrin

Meiser-Stedman

Smith

(2005). The Children’s revised impact of event scale (CRIES): Validity as a screening instrument for PTSD. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465805002419

40.

Peterson

J. L.

Earl

R. K.

Fox

E. A.

Haidar

Pepper

Berliner

Wallace

A. S.

Bernier

R. A.

(2019). Trauma and autism spectrum disorder: Review, proposed treatment adaptations and future directions. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 12(4), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40653-019-00253-5

41.

Quinton

A. M. G.

Ali

Danese

Happé

Rumball

(2024). The assessment and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in autistic people: A systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 66(10), 1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14163.

42.

Rackham

L. A.

Lau-Zhu

(2021). Taxing working memory to modulate mental imagery of the 9/11 terrorist attacks following media exposure during childhood: A pilot study in young adult UK residents. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 34(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1870107

43.

Rumball

(2018). A systematic review of the assessment and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0133-9

44.

Rumball

Brook

Happé

Karl

(2021). Heightened risk of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with autism spectrum disorder: The role of cumulative trauma and memory deficits. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 110, 103848. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIDD.2020.103848

45.

Rumball

Happé

Grey

(2020). Experience of trauma and PTSD symptoms in autistic adults: Risk of PTSD development following DSM‐5 and non‐DSM‐5 traumatic life events. Autism Research, 13(12), 2122–2132. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2306

46.

Rutter

Bailey

Lord

(2003). The social communication questionnaire. Western Psychological Services.

47.

Sachser

Berliner

Holt

Jensen

T. K.

Jungbluth

Risch

Rosner

Goldbeck

(2017). International development and psychometric properties of the child and adolescent trauma screen (CATS). Journal of Affective Disorders, 210, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.040

48.

Solmi

Radua

Olivola

Croce

Soardo

Salazar de Pablo

Il Shin

Kirkbride

J. B.

Jones

Kim

J. H.

Kim

J. Y.

Carvalho

A. F.

Seeman

M. V.

Correll

C. U.

Fusar-Poli

(2021). Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: Large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7

49.

Stark

Stacey

Mandy

Kringelbach

M. L.

Happé

(2021). Autistic cognition: Charting routes to anxiety. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(7), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.014

50.

van den Berg

L. J. M.

Tollenaar

M. S.

Spinhoven

Penninx

B. W. J. H.

Elzinga

B. M.

(2017). A new perspective on PTSD symptoms after traumatic vs stressful life events and the role of gender. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(1), 1380470. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1380470

51.

World Health Organization . (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). https://icd.who.int/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB