Response Time to Craving-Item Ratings as an Implicit Measure of Craving-Related Processes

Abstract

Drug craving is typically measured through explicit ratings of craving levels. We examined response time to craving ratings as an implicit measure of craving processes in cigarette smokers. Response time and interitem variability were investigated as potential indices of certainty in craving ratings. Cigarette smokers, categorized as tobacco dependent or nondependent, completed multiple cue-reactivity sessions with smoking and neutral cues. After each cue presentation, craving level and response time were assessed. Significant inverted-U relationships emerged between craving level and both response time and interitem variability across conditions, sessions, and groups. Faster response times and less interitem variability emerged after neutral cues relative to smoking cues for nondependent smokers and after smoking cues relative to neutral cues for dependent smokers. Response time provided incremental validity beyond craving level in predicting dependence. Results support use of response time as an implicit measure of craving processes and further distinguish craving experiences between dependent and nondependent smokers.

Keywords

craving implicit response time certainty smoking tobacco dependence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akrami

Hedlund

L.-E.

Ekehammar

(2007). Personality scale response latencies as self-schema indicators: The inverted-U effect revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 611–618. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.005

Asendorpf

J. B.

Banse

Mücke

(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380

Avant

L. L.

Bevan

Wing

(1968). Effects of varying length of stimulus series and response scale upon response latency, response uncertainty, and transmitted information. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 449–452. doi:10.3758/BF03205753

Bassili

J. N.

(1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637–653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637

Behar

(1963). On the relation between response uncertainty and reaction time in category judgments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 16, 595–596. doi:10.2466/pms.1963.16.2.595

Brown

S. D.

Marley

A. A. J.

Donkin

Heathcote

(2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychological Review, 115, 396–425. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.396

Carter

B. L.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2001). The cue-availability procedure: The effects of cigarette availability on cue reactivity in smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 183–190. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.9.2.183

Casey

M. M.

Tryon

W. W.

(2001). Validating a double-press method for computer administration of personality inventory items. Psychological Assessment, 13, 521–530. doi:10.I037//1040-3590.13.4.521

Coffey

S. F.

Saladin

M. E.

Libet

J. M.

Drobes

D. J.

Dansky

B. S.

(1999). Differential urge and salivary responsibility to alcohol cues in alcohol-dependent patients: A comparison of traditional and stringent classification approaches. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 7, 464–472. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.7.4.464

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

De Houwer

(2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In Wiers

R. W.

Stacy

A. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

De Houwer

Teige-Mocigemba

Spruyt

Moors

(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. doi:10.1037/a0014211

13.

DeMarree

K. G.

Petty

R. E.

Briñol

(2007). Self-certainty: Parallels to attitude certainty. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 159–188.

14.

DiFranza

J. R.

Sanouri Ursprung

W. W.

Biller

(2012). The developmental sequence of tobacco withdrawal symptoms of wanting, craving, and needing. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 100, 494–497. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2011.10.018

15.

Domier

C. P.

Monterosso

J. R.

Brody

A. L.

Simon

S. L.

Mendrek

Olmstead

. . . London

E. D.

(2007). Effects of cigarette smoking and abstinence on Stroop task performance. Psychopharmacology, 195, 1–9. doi:10.1007/s00213-007-0869-x

16.

Erblich

Bovbjerg

D. H.

Sloan

R. P.

(2011). Exposure to smoking cues: Cardiovascular and autonomic effects. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 737–742. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.011

17.

Fazio

R. H.

Olson

M. A.

(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225

18.

Gass

J. C.

Motschman

C. A.

Tiffany

S. T.

(in press). The relationship between craving and tobacco use behavior in laboratory studies: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

19.

Germeroth

L. J.

Wray

J. M.

Gass

J. C.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2013). Diagnostic utility of craving in predicting nicotine dependence: Impact of craving content and item stability. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12, 1988–1995.

20.

Goedeker

K. C.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2008). On the nature of nicotine addiction: A taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 896–909. doi:10.1037/a0013296

21.

Gross

S. R.

Holtz

Miller

(1995). Attitude certainty. In Petty

R. E.

Krosnick

J. A.

(Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

22.

Hommer

D. W.

(1999). Functional imaging of craving. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 187–196.

23.

Kraus

S. J.

(1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75. doi:10.1177/0146167295211007

24.

Kühn

Gallinat

(2011). Common biology of craving across legal and illegal drugs: A quantitative meta-analysis of cue-reactivity brain response. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 1318–1326. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07590.x

25.

Kuiper

N. A.

(1981). Convergent evidence for the self as a prototype: The “inverted-U RT effect” for self and other judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 438–443. doi:10.1177/014616728173012

26.

Kulas

J. T.

Stachowski

A. A.

(2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 489–493. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.005

27.

LaRowe

S. D.

Saladin

M. E.

Carpenter

M. J.

Upadhyaya

H. P.

(2007). Reactivity to nicotine cues over repeated cue reactivity sessions. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2888–2899. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.025

28.

Mignault

Marley

A. A.

Chaudhuri

(2008). Inverted-U effects generalize to the judgment of subjective properties of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1274–1288. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1274

29.

Moberg

(2013). Engaging in anthropological theory: A social and political history. New York, NY: Routledge.

30.

Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003). State estimates of substance use from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume II. Individual state tables and technical appendices (DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-2826, NHSDA Series H-20). Rockville, MD: Author.

31.

Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2004). Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3964, NSDUH Series H-25). Rockville, MD: Author.

32.

Orleans

C. T.

Rimer

B. K.

Cristinzio

Keintz

M. K.

Fleisher

(1991). A national survey of older smokers: Treatment needs of a growing population. Health Psychology, 10, 343–351. doi:10.1037/02786133.10.5.343

33.

Paulhus

D. L.

Vazire

(2007). The self-report method. In Robins

R. W.

Fraley

R. C.

Kruger

R. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

34.

Payne

Smith

Adams

Diefenbach

(2006). Pretreatment cue reactivity predicts end-of-treatment smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 702–710. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.053

35.

Perkins

K. A.

(2009). Does smoking cue-induced craving tell us anything important about nicotine dependence? Addiction, 104, 1610–1616. doi:10.1111/j.13600443.2009.02550.x

36.

Piper

M. E.

Bolt

D. M.

Kim

S.-Y.

Japuntich

S. J.

Smith

S. S.

Niederdeppe

. . . Baker

T. B.

(2008). Refining the tobacco dependence phenotype using the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 747–761. doi:10.1037/a0013298

37.

Piper

M. E.

McCarthy

D. E.

Baker

T. B.

(2006). Assessing tobacco dependence: A guide to measure evaluation and selection. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 8, 339–351. doi:10.1080/14622200600672765

38.

Piper

M. E.

McCarthy

D. E.

Bolt

D. M.

Smith

S. S.

Lerman

Benowitz

. . . Baker

T. B.

(2008). Assessing dimensions of nicotine dependence: An evaluation of the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS) and the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM). Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 1009–1020. doi:10.1080/14622200802097563

39.

Piper

M. E.

Piasecki

T. M.

Federman

E. B.

Bolt

D. M.

Smith

S. S.

Fiore

M. C.

Baker

T. B.

(2004). A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: The Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 139–154. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.139

40.

Read

J. P.

Wood

M. D.

Lejuez

C. W.

Palfai

T. P.

Slack

(2004). Gender, alcohol consumption, and differing alcohol expectancy dimensions in college drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 298–308. doi: 10.1037/10641297.12.4.298

41.

Robinson

T. E.

Berridge

K. C.

(1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P

42.

Rosenberg

(2009). Clinical and laboratory assessment of the subjective experience of drug craving. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 519–534. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.002

43.

Saladin

M. E.

Gray

K. M.

Carpenter

M. J.

LaRowe

S. D.

DeSantis

S. M.

Upadhyaya

H. P.

(2012). Gender differences in craving and cue reactivity to smoking and negative affect/stress cues. The American Journal on Addictions, 21, 210–220. doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.00232.x

44.

Sayette

M. A.

Hufford

M. R.

(1995). Urge and affect: A facial coding analysis of smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 3, 417–423. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.3.4.417

45.

Sayette

M. A.

Martin

C. S.

Wertz

J. M.

Shiffman

Perrott

M. A.

(2001). A multi-dimensional analysis of cue-elicited craving in heavy smokers and tobacco chippers. Addiction, 96, 1419–1432. doi:10.1080/09652140120075152

46.

Sayette

M. A.

Shiffman

Tiffany

S. T.

Niaura

R. S.

Martin

C. S.

Shadel

W. G.

(2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95, S189–S210. doi:10.1080/09652140050111762

47.

Sayette

M. A.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2013). Peak provoked craving: An alternative to smoking cue reactivity. Addiction, 108, 1019–1025. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04013.x

48.

Shiffman

Dunbar

Kirchner

T. R.

Tindle

H. A.

Anderson

S. J.

Scholl

S. M.

(2013). Smoker reactivity to cues: Effects on craving and on smoking behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 264–280. doi:10.1037/a0028339

49.

Shiffman

Dunbar

Kirchner

T. R.

Tindle

H. A.

Anderson

S. J.

. . . Ferguson

S. G.

(2013). Cue reactivity in non-daily smokers. Psychopharmacology, 226, 321–333. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2909-4

50.

Shiffman

Kassel

J. D.

Paty

Gnys

Zettler-Segal

(1994). Smoking typology profiles of chippers and regular smokers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6, 21–35. doi:10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90052-3

51.

Smolka

M. N.

Bühler

Klein

Zimmermann

Mann

Heinz

Braus

D. F.

(2006). Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery. Psychopharmacology, 184, 577–588. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0080-x

52.

Sobell

L. C.

Sobell

M. B.

(1996). Timeline followback user’s guide: A calendar method for assessing alcohol and drug use. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.

53.

Stacy

A. W.

Wiers

R. W.

(2010). Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 551–575. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444

54.

Tiffany

S. T.

(1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147–168. doi:10.1037/0033295X.97.2.147

55.

Tiffany

S. T.

Friedman

Greenfield

S. F.

Hasin

D. S.

Jackson

(2012). Beyond drug use: A systematic consideration of other outcomes in evaluations of treatments for substance use disorders. Addiction, 107, 709–718. doi:10.1111/j.13600443.2011.03581.x

56.

Tiffany

S. T.

Warthen

M. W.

Goedeker

K. C.

(2009). The functional significance of craving in nicotine dependence. In Bevins

R. A.

Caggiula

A. R.

(Eds.), The motivational impact of nicotine and its role in tobacco use (pp. 171–197). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

57.

Tiffany

S. T.

Wray

J. M.

(2012). The clinical significance of drug craving. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1248, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.17496632.2011.06298.x

58.

Vollstädt-Klein

Kobiella

Bühler

Graf

Fehr

Mann

Smolka

M. N.

(2010). Severity of dependence modulates smokers’ neuronal cue reactivity and cigarette craving elicited by tobacco advertisement. Addiction Biology, 16, 166–175. doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00207.x

59.

Waters

A. J.

Sayette

M. A.

(2006). Implicit cognition and tobacco addiction. In Wiers

R. W.

Stacy

A. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 309–338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

60.

Waters

Shiffman

Sayette

Paty

Gwaltney

Balabanis

(2004). Cue provoked craving and nicotine replacement therapy in smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1136–1143. doi:10.1037/0022006X.72.6.1136

61.

Wiers

R. W.

Stacy

A. W.

(2006). Implicit cognition and addiction: An introduction. In Wiers

R. W.

Stacy

A. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

62.

Wray

J. M.

Gass

J. G.

Miller

E. I.

Wilkins

D. G.

Rollins

D. E.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2014). An evaluation of self-report measures of cigarette use in nondaily smokers. Manuscript in preparation.

63.

Wray

J. M.

Gass

J. G.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2013). The magnitude and reliability of cue specific craving in nondependent smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 134, 304–308. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts268

64.

Wray

J. M.

Godleski

S. A.

Tiffany

S. T.

(2011). Cue-reactivity in the natural environment of cigarette smokers: The impact of photographic and in vivo smoking stimuli. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 733–737. doi:10.1037/a0023687