Chronic stress may lead to risky decision making, especially in university students and other emerging adults–those between the ages of 18-25. Research suggests that university students report higher chronic stress than their non-student peers, yet we do not know if this leads to increased risky behaviors. In a pre-registered study, we assessed chronic stress, risky cognitions, and behavior in emerging adult university students (n = 141) and non-student peers (n = 137; age range: 18-25 years). We collected self-reports of chronic stress and administered the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking Scale to assess risk cognitions, and the Balloon Analogue Risk Task to assess risk-taking behavior. In both groups, chronic stress was related to greater risk perception and risk aversion, but not greater risk-taking behavior. Non-students reported greater stress but lower risk-taking behavior than students. Results represent an important step in understanding how stress impacts decision making among emerging adults.
AgorastosA.ChrousosG. P. (2022). The neuroendocrinology of stress: The stress-related continuum of chronic disease development. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01224-9
2.
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.MassonniéJ.FlittonA.KirkhamN.EvershedJ. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behav Res, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
4.
BastenU.BieleG.HeekerenH. R.FiebachC. J. (2010). How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50), 21767–21772. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908104107
BendahanS.GoetteL.ThoresenJ.Loued-KhenissiL.HollisF.SandiC. (2017). Acute stress alters individual risk taking in a time-dependent manner and leads to anti-social risk. European Journal of Neuroscience, 45(7), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13395
7.
BlaisA.-R.WeberE. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500000334
BurnetteE. M.GrodinE. N.GhahremaniD. G.GalvánA.KohnoM.RayL. A.LondonE. D. (2021). Diminished cortical response to risk and loss during risky decision making in alcohol use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 218, 108391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108391
10.
CeccatoS.KudielkaB. M.ScwierenC. (2016). Increased risk taking in relation to chronic stress in adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02036
11.
DiorioD.ViauV.MeaneyM. (1993). The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (cingulate gyrus) in the regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. The Journal of Neuroscience, 13(9), 3839–3847. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-03839.1993
12.
DoonanA.BuchananT. W. (2022). Unheard risk: Considering the role of intrusive cognitions in relapse. Addiction Research and Theory, 31(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2140145
13.
DosenbachN. U. F.NardosB.CohenA. L.FairD. A.PowerJ. D.ChurchJ. A.NelsonS. M.WigG. S.VogelA. C.Lessov-SchlaggarC. N.BarnesK. A.DubisJ. W.FeczkoE.CoalsonR. S.PruettJ. R.BarchD. M.PetersenS. E.SchlaggarB. L. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science, 329(5997), 1358–1361. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194144
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FliegeH.RoseM.ArckP.WalterO. B.KocaleventR.-D.WeberC.KlappB. F. (2005). The perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: Validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000151491.80178.78
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2016). Most people are not WEIRD. In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed., pp. 113–114). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-007
19.
KandasamyN.HardyB.PageL.SchaffnerM.GraggaberJ.PowlsonA. S.FletcherP. C.GrunellM.CoatesJ. (2014). Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3608–3613. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317908111
20.
KuhnellR.WhitwellZ.ArnoldS.KingsleyM. I. C.HaleM. W.WahrendorfM.DraganoN.WrightB. J. (2019). Assessing the association of university stress and physiological reactivity with decision-making among students. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 23(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2019.1651285
21.
LederJ.HäusserJ. A.MojzischA. (2013). Stress and strategic decision-making in the beauty contest game. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016
22.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.JonesH. A.RichardsJ. B.StrongD. R.KahlerC. W.ReadJ. P. (2003a). The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
23.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.ZvolenskyM. J.PedullaC. M. (2003b). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26(4), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8
24.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.StrongD. R.BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
25.
LevensteinS.PranteraC.VarvoV.ScribanoM. L.BertoE.LuziC.AndreoliA. (1993). Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: A new tool for psychosomatic research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(93)90120-5
26.
LighthallN. R.MatherM.GorlickM. A. (2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task. PLoS One, 4(7), Article e6002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006002
27.
LiuY.BagaïniA.SonG.KapoorM.MataR. (2023). Life-course trajectories of risk-taking propensity: A coordinated analysis of longitudinal studies. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 78(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac175
28.
LupienS. J.MaheuF.TuM.FioccoA.SchramekT. E. (2007). The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 65(3), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.007
29.
LupienS. J.McEwenB. S.GunnarM. R.HeimC. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2639
30.
MarlerE. K.BruceM. J.AbaoudA.HenrichsenC.SuksatanW.HomvisetvongsaS.MatsuoH. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 10(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000294
31.
MatherM.LighthallN. R. (2012). Risk and reward are processed differently in decisions made under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429452
32.
McCleskeyJ.GrudaD. (2021). Risk-taking, resilience, and state anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A coming of (old) age story. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110485
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). College enrollment rates. In Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences.
35.
PetrowskiK.KliemS.AlbaniC.HinzA.BrählerE. (2019). Norm values and psychometric properties of the short version of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS) in a representative German sample. PLoS One, 14(11), Article e0222277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222277
36.
PorcelliA. J.DelgadoM. R. (2017). Stress and decision making: Effects on valuation, learning, and risk-taking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015
37.
Posit team (2025). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R.Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.posit.co/
QuinnM. E.ShieldsG. S. (2023). The insidious influence of stress: An integrated model of stress, executive control, and psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 11(5), 773–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221149736
40.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
41.
SchaeferS. M.Morozink BoylanJ.van ReekumC. M.LapateR. C.NorrisC. J.RyffC. D.DavidsonR. J. (2013). Purpose in life predicts better emotional recovery from negative stimuli. PLoS One, 8(11), Article e80329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080329
42.
SebriV.TribertiS.GranicG. D.PravettoniG. (2023). Reward-dependent dynamics and changes in risk taking in the balloon analogue risk task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2181065
StarckeK.BrandM. (2016). Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(9), 909–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000060
45.
Stewart-BrownS.EvansJ.PattersonJ.PetersenS.DollH.BaldingJ.RegisD. (2000). The health of students in institutes of higher education: An important and neglected public health problem?Journal of Public Health, 22(4), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/22.4.492
46.
TamblingR. R.RussellB. S.ParkC. L.FendrichM.HutchinsonM.HortonA. L.TomkunasA. J. (2021). Measuring cumulative stressfulness: Psychometric properties of the COVID-19 stressors scale. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120979912
47.
Tervo-ClemmensB.KarimZ. A.KhanS. Z.SomervilleL.SchusterR. M.GilmanJ.EvinsA. E. (2022). Adolescent risk-taking across population subgroups of the United States (preprint). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wpxrk
48.
TottenhamN.SheridanM. A. (2010). A review of adversity, the amygdala and the hippocampus: A consideration of developmental timing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.068.2009
49.
TuckerJ. A.BaconJ. P.ChandlerS. D.LindstromK.CheongJ. (2020). Utility of digital respondent driven sampling to recruit community-dwelling emerging adults for assessment of drinking and related risks. Addictive Behaviors, 110(2), 106536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106536
50.
van der MeerM.Kurth-NelsonZ.RedishA. D. (2012). Information processing in decision-making systems. The Neuroscientist, 18(4), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411435128
51.
Verdejo-GarciaA.ChongT.T.-J.StoutJ. C.YücelM.LondonE. D. (2018). Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 164, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2017.02.003
WemmS. E.WulfertE. (2017). Effects of acute stress on decision making. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 42(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9347-8
54.
WhiteT. L.LejuezC. W.de WitH. (2008). Test-retest characteristics of the balloon analogue risk task (BART). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(6), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014083
55.
WilloughbyT.HefferT.GoodM.MagnaccaC. (2021). Is adolescence a time of heightened risk taking? An overview of types of risk-taking behaviors across age groups. Developmental Review, 61(1), 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100980
56.
WoodD.CrapnellT.LauL.BennettA.LotsteinD.FerrisM.KuoA. (2018). Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course. In HalfonN.ForrestC. B.LernerR. M.FaustmanE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 123–143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
