The Hierarchical Structure of Personal Identity in Emerging Adults: Is There an “I” Factor?

Abstract

Although multiple personal identity models have been proposed since Erikson’s pioneering conceptualizations, there is a lack of studies comparing the existing models. The present investigation aimed at reducing the 21 personal identity scales on the basic dimensions of identity in emerging adults. The study sample encompassed 385 participants (78.4% female), ages ranging from 18 to 29 years (M = 21.60, SD = 2.73). The psychometric properties of all the instruments used here were shown to be favourable in the Serbian context. The method used here is “bass-ackwards” sequential factors Principal Component Analysis. This method yielded five components: General Identity Factor, Firm Commitments, Deliberate Identity Construction, Immature Identity Style, and Deliberate Exploration. External correlates (internal locus of control, self-esteem, anxiety, and depression) of the five dimensions are meaningful and point to their (mal) adaptive nature. The study concludes with the limitations, especially pertaining to the general factor of identity (its possible artefactual nature).

Keywords

identity structure “bass-ackwards”factor analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

G. R.

Marshall

S. K.

(1996). A developmental social psychology of identity: Understanding the person-in-context. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0041

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469

Balistreri

Busch-Rossnagel

N. A.

Geisinger

K. F.

(1995). Development and preliminary validation of the ego identity process questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1995.1012

Bennion

L. D.

Adams

G. R.

(1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355488612005

Berzonsky

M. D.

(1988). Self-theorists, identity status, and social cognition. In Lapsley

D. K.

Power

F. C.

(Eds.), Self, ego, and identity (pp. 243–262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7834-5_12

Berzonsky

M. D.

(2003). Identity style and well-being: Does commitment matter? Identity, 3(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XID030203

Berzonsky

M. D.

(2004). Identity processing style, self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: A social-cognitive perspective. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000120

Berzonsky

M. D.

(2011). A social-cognitive perspective on identity construction. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 55–76). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_3

Berzonsky

M. D.

Soenens

Luyckx

Smits

Papini

D. R.

Goossens

(2013). Development and validation of the revised identity style inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032642

10.

Bosma

H. A.

Kunnen

(2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0514

11.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

12.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

13.

Caspi

Houts

R. M.

Belsky

D. W.

Goldman-Mellor

S. J.

Harrington

Israel

Meier

M. H.

Ramrakha

Shalev

Poulton

Moffitt

T. E.

(2013). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613497473

14.

Côté

J. E.

(1997). An empirical test of the identity capital model. Journal of Adolescence, 20(5), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1997.0111

15.

Côté

J. E.

(2002). The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualization thesis examined. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260220134403

16.

Côté

J. E.

(2016). The identity capital model: A handbook of theory, methods, and findings. [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Sociology, The University of Western Ontario.

17.

Côtè

J. E.

Schwartz

S. J.

(2002). Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 25(6), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0511

18.

Crocetti

Rubini

Meeus

(2007). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three‐dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002

19.

Crocetti

Schwartz

S. J.

Fermani

Klimstra

Meeus

(2012). A cross-national study of identity status in Dutch and Italian adolescents. European Psychologist, 17(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000076

20.

Crocetti

Schwartz

S. J.

Fermani

Meeus

(2010). The Utrecht-management of identity commitments scale (U-MICS): Italian validation and cross-national comparisons. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000024

21.

Crocetti

Scrignaro

Sica

L. S.

Magrin

M. E.

(2012). Correlates of identity configurations: Three studies with adolescent and emerging adult cohorts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(6), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9702-2

22.

Crocetti

Sica

L. S.

Schwartz

S. J.

Serafini

Meeus

(2010). The functions of identity scale: Validation in Italian late adolescents and emerging adults. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17(2), 55–71.

23.

Crocetti

Sica

L. S.

Schwartz

S. J.

Serafini

Meeus

(2013). Identity styles, dimensions, statuses, and functions: Making connections among identity conceptualizations. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2012.09.001

24.

Davies

S. E.

Connelly

B. S.

Ones

D. S.

Birkland

A. S.

(2015). The general factor of personality: The “Big One,” a self-evaluative trait, or a methodological gnat that won’t go away? Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.006

25.

Dimitrova

Hatano

Sugimura

Ferrer-Wreder

(2019) (In this issue). The Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory in adolescent samples: Factorial validity and equivalence of identity as measured from the United States and Japan. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 680–684. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000456

26.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Co.

27.

Erikson

E. H.

(1980). Identity and the life cycle. W W Norton & Co.

28.

Fabrigar

L. R.

Wegener

D. T.

(2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.

29.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

30.

Goldberg

L. R.

(2006). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.001

31.

Golino

Shi

Christensen

A. P.

Garrido

L. E.

Nieto

M. D.

Sadana

Thiyagarajan

J. A.

Martinez-Molina

(2020). Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial. Psychological Methods, 25(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255

32.

Grotevant

H. D.

(1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355488723003

33.

Guberinić

Ćirović

Opsenica Kostić

Mitrović

Janković

Spasić Šnele

(2025). Functions of identity scale: Validation in Serbian emerging adults. Psihologija. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI240210031G

34.

Horn

J. L.

(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289447

35.

L.-T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

36.

Hudson

Alexander

P. C.

(2024). EGAnet: Exploratory graph analysis – A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R package version 2.0.5. https://r-ega.net

37.

Ilić

Rokvić

N. M.

(2021) Adaptacija skale sinteze identiteta (EPSI) [Paper presentation] 69. Congress of Serbian Psychologists.

38.

Jovanović

(2010). Validacija kratke skale subjektivnog blagostanja. Primenjena Psihologija, 3(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2010.2.175-190

39.

Kerpelman

J. L.

Pittman

J. F.

Lamke

L. K.

(1997). Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescent identity development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743554897123002

40.

Kotov

Krueger

R. F.

Watson

Achenbach

T. M.

Althoff

R. R.

Bagby

R. M.

Brown

T. A.

Carpenter

W. T.

Caspi

Clark

L. A.

Eaton

N. R.

Forbes

M. K.

Forbush

K. T.

Goldberg

Hasin

Hyman

S. E.

Ivanova

M. Y.

Lynam

D. R.

Markon

Wright

A. G. C.

(2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258

41.

Kroenke

Spitzer

R. L.

Williams

J. B. W.

(2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

42.

Kroger

Marcia

J. E.

(2011). The identity statuses: Origins, meanings, and interpretations. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 31–53). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_2đ

43.

(2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093

44.

Lillevoll

K. R.

Kroger

Martinussen

(2013a). Identity status and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Identity, 13(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2013.799432

45.

Lillevoll

K. R.

Kroger

Martinussen

(2013b). Identity status and locus of control: A meta-analysis. Identity, 13(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2013.799471

46.

Loehlin

J. C.

Goldberg

L. R.

(2014). Do personality traits conform to lists or hierarchies? Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.018

47.

Luyckx

Goossens

Soenens

(2006). A developmental contextual perspective on identity construction in emerging adulthood: Change dynamics in commitment formation and commitment evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.366

48.

Luyckx

Goossens

Soenens

Beyers

(2005). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.008

49.

Luyckx

Schwartz

S. J.

Berzonsky

M. D.

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Smits

Goossens

(2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.004

50.

Luyckx

Schwartz

S. J.

Goossens

Beyers

Missotten

(2011). Processes of personal identity formation and evaluation. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 31–53). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_4

51.

Mannerström

Hautamäki

Leikas

(2016). Identity status among young adults: Validation of the dimensions of identity development scale (DIDS) in a Finnish sample. Nordic Psychology, 69(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2016.1245156

52.

Marcia

J. E.

(1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281

53.

Marcia

J. E.

(1967). Ego identity status: Relationship to change in self-esteem, “general maladjustment,” and authoritarianism¹. Journal of Personality, 35(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01419.x

54.

Marcia

J. E.

(1993). The ego identity status approach to ego identity. In Marcia

J. E.

Waterman

A. S.

Matteson

D. R.

Archer

S. L.

Orlofsky

J. L.

(Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 3–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8330-7_1

55.

Marinković

Borović

(2022). Personality traits and identity status of adolescents: A person-centered approach. ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ, 19(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.06

56.

Marsh

Morin

Parker

Kaur

(2014) (In this issue). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700

57.

Mastrotheodoros

Motti-Stefanidi

(2016). Dimensions of identity development scale (DIDS): A test of longitudinal measurement invariance in Greek adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(5), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1241175

58.

McNeish

Hancock

G. R.

(2018). The thorny relation between measurement quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286

59.

Meeus

(1996). Studies on identity development in adolescence: An overview of research and some new data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(5), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01537355

60.

Meeus

Iedema

Maassen

G. H.

(2002). Commitment and exploration as mechanisms of identity formation. Psychological Reports, 90(3), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3.771

61.

Meeus

Van De Schoot

Keijsers

Schwartz

S. J.

Branje

(2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five‐wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81(5), 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x

62.

Musek

(2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003

63.

Revelle

(2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University. R package version 2.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

64.

Revelle

Wilt

(2013) (In this issue). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.012

65.

Rivnyák

Járdaházi

Arató

Péley

Láng

(2022). The assessment of dual-cycle identity models among secondary school students: The Hungarian adaptation of DIDS and U-MICS. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 804529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.804529

66.

Rokvić

(2019). The validation of the Serbian version of the general anxiety disorder scale (GAD7): A pilot study. Engrami, 41(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.5937/engrami1902068r

67.

Rokvic

Karataş

Crocetti

(2021). Validation of the Serbian version of the Utrecht-management of identity commitments scale (U-MICS) in an adult population. Identity, 22(4), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2021.1913166

68.

Rokvić

N. M.

Jovanović

(2021). Adaptacija skale Dimenzije razvoja identiteta (DIDS) [Paper presentation] 69. Congress of Serbian Psychologists.

69.

Rokvić

N. M.

Jovović

(2021). Validacija Skale rezolucije identiteta (Identity stage resolution index, ISRI) [Paper presentation] 69. Congress of Serbian Psychologists.

70.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.

71.

Rosenthal

D. A.

Gurney

R. M.

Moore

S. M.

(1981). From trust on intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10(6), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02087944

72.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

73.

Ryeng

M. S.

Kroger

Martinussen

(2013). Identity status and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Identity, 13(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2013.799431

74.

Schmitt

D. P.

Allik

(2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623

75.

Schmitt

T. A.

Sass

D. A.

Chappelle

Thompson

(2018). Selecting the “best” factor structure and moving measurement validation forward: An illustration. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1449116

76.

Schwartz

S. J.

(2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and, Neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity, 1(1), 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xschwartz

77.

Schwartz

S. J.

(2007). The structure of identity consolidation: Multiple correlated constructs or one superordinate construct? Identity, 7(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283480701319583

78.

Schwartz

S. J.

Zamboanga

B. L.

Wang

Olthuis

J. V.

(2009). Measuring identity from an Eriksonian perspective: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634266

79.

Serafini

T. E.

Adams

G. R.

(2002). Functions of identity: Scale construction and validation. Identity, 2(4), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0204_05

80.

Serafini

T. E.

Maitland

S. B.

(2013). Validating the functions of identity scale: Addressing methodological and conceptual matters. Psychological Reports, 112(1), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.07.20.pr0.112.1.160-183

81.

Sharp

Wright

A. G. C.

Fowler

J. C.

Frueh

B. C.

Allen

J. G.

Oldham

Clark

L. A.

(2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000033

82.

Spitzer

R. L.

Kroenke

Williams

J. B. W.

Löwe

(2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092

83.

Subotić

Knežević

Dimitrijević

Miholjčić

Šmit

Karać

Mijatović

(2015) (In this issue). The factor structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in a nonclinical sample. In Subotić

(Ed.), ZBORNIK RADOVA: MEĐUNARODNA KONFERENCIJA O DRUŠTVENOM I TEHNOLOŠKOM RAZVOJU (SVESKA I) (pp. 20–28). Univerzitet za poslovni inženjering i menadžment Banja Luka.

84.

Trapnell

P. D.

Campbell

J. D.

(1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.284

85.

Van Bork

Epskamp

Rhemtulla

Borsboom

Van Der Maas

H. L. J.

(2017). What is the p-factor of psychopathology? Some risks of general factor modeling. Theory & Psychology, 27(6), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317737185

86.

Velicer

W. F.

Eaton

C. A.

Fava

J. L.

(2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In Goffin

R. D.

Helmes

(Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment (pp. 41–71). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4397-8_3

87.

Vignoles

V. L.

Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

(2011). Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity. In Schwartz

S. J.

Luyckx

Vignoles

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 31–53). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_1

88.

Vosylis

Erentaitė

Crocetti

(2017). Global versus domain-specific identity processes. Emerging Adulthood, 6(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817694698

89.

Watts

A. L.

Makol

B. A.

Palumbo

I. M.

De Los Reyes

Olino

T. M.

Latzman

R. D.

DeYoung

C. G.

Wood

P. K.

Sher

K. J.

(2021). How robust is the p factor? Using multitrait-multimethod modeling to inform the meaning of general factors of youth psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 10(4), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211055170

90.

Zimmermann

Lannegrand-Willems

Safont-Mottay

Cannard

(2013). Testing new identity models and processes in French-speaking adolescents and emerging adults students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0005-7

91.

Zimmermann

Mahaim

E. B.

Mantzouranis

Genoud

P. A.

Crocetti

(2012). Brief report: The identity style inventory (ISI‐3) and the Utrecht‐management of identity commitments scale (U‐MICS): Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity in French‐speaking university students. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.11.013

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

0.41 MB