Previous research on the meaning of adulthood among youth has focused on the move from traditional markers towards individualistic criteria for adulthood. We interview 30 young adults in Spain to investigate how they see adulthood. From our thematic analysis, we extract three major themes (and 16 subthemes): socio-demographic markers (residential independence, age, occupation, family), societal expectations (independence, duties, on your own, nontriviality, other-orientation), and personal resources (autonomy, purpose, thoughtfulness, resilience, realism, responsibility, relational maturity). Our results show that some emerging adults still consider traditional markers of adulthood. A wide range of sub-themes relate to societal expectations, which young people refer to somewhat negatively. In a context in which young people mostly see adulthood with an individualistic lens, two sub-themes emerge which make references to others –being other-oriented and able to establish mature relationships; even if quantitatively these were not as frequent as other sub-themes, we find these deserve further attention.
AndrewM.Eggerling-BoeckJ.SandefurG. D.SmithB. (2006). The “Inner Side” of the transition to adulthood: How young adults see the process of becoming an adult. Advances in Life Course Research, 11, 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(06)11009-6
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10842426
BensonJ. E.FurstenbergF. F. (2006). Entry into adulthood: Are adult role transitions meaningful markers of adult identity?Advances in Life Course Research, 11(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(06)11008-4
7.
BlattererH. (2007). Contemporary adulthood: Reconceptualizing an uncontested category. Current Sociology, 55(6), 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107081985
CôtéJ. (2000). Arrested adulthood: The changing nature of maturity and identity. NYU Press.
10.
CôtéJ. (2016). The identity capital model: A handbook of theory, methods, and findings (Vol. 38). Sociology Publications.
11.
CôtéJ.BynnerJ. M. (2008). Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260801946464
12.
CôtéJ. E. (2014). The dangerous myth of emerging adulthood: An evidence-based critique of a flawed developmental theory. Applied Developmental Science, 18(4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.954451
13.
CôtéJ. E.LevineC. (2015). Identity formation, youth, and development: A simplified approach. Psychology Press.
14.
DonatiP.ArcherM. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge University Press.
15.
HartmannD.SwartzT. T. (2006). The new adulthood? The transition to adulthood from the perspective of transitioning young adults. Advances in Life Course Research, 11(3), 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(06)11010-2
16.
HillP. L.EdmondsG. W.PetersonM.LuyckxK.AndrewsJ. A. (2016). Purpose in life in emerging adulthood: Development and validation of a new brief measure. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1048817
17.
INE. (2022). Indicadores de fecundidad. Resultados nacionales.
18.
KagitcibasiC. (2013). Adolescent autonomy-relatedness and the family in cultural context: What is optimal?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12041
19.
KirwanE. M.O’SúilleabháinP. S.BurnsA.OgoroM.AllenE.CreavenA.-M. (2023). Exploring loneliness in emerging adulthood: A qualitative study. Emerging Adulthood, 11(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231194380
20.
Labouvie-ViefG.DiehlM. (2000). Cognitive complexity and cognitive-affective integration: Related or separate domains of adult development?Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.490
21.
LawfordH. L.RameyH. L.HoodS. (2023). The associations between early generative concern, moral identity, and well-being in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 52(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1972948
22.
LittlefieldA. K.StevensA. K.EllingsonJ. M.KingK. M.JacksonK. M. (2016). Changes in negative urgency, positive urgency, and sensation seeking across adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.024
23.
MacmillanR. (2006). “Constructing adulthood”: Agency and subjectivity in the transition to adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research, 11, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(06)11001-1
24.
MaguireM.DelahuntB. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3). https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335.
25.
MehtaC. M.LaRiviereK. (2023). “You have those adult responsibilities, but you’re still getting your feet on the ground”: The lived experience of established adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 30(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09410-x
26.
MorenoA. M. (2012). The transition to adulthood in Spain in a comparative perspective: The incidence of structural factors. Young Children, 20(1), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881102000102
27.
Moreno MínguezA. (2018). The youth emancipation in Spain: A socio-demographic analysis. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 23(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2018.1438299
28.
Moreno MínguezA.Ortega-GasparM.Gamero-BurónC. (2019). A socio-structural perspective on family model preferences, gender roles and work–family attitudes in Spain. Social Sciences, 8(1), 4. https://www.mdpi.com/386404
29.
MouchrekN.BensonM. (2023). The theory of integrated empowerment in the transition to adulthood: Concepts and measures. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 893898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.893898
30.
MulderC. H. (2009). Leaving the parental home in young adulthood. In Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 203–210). Routledge.
31.
NelsonL. J. (2021). The theory of emerging adulthood 20 years later: A look at where it has taken us, what we know now, and where we need to go. Emerging Adulthood, 9(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820950884
32.
NicoM.CaetanoA. (2021). Structure and agency in young people’s lives: Theory, methods and agendas (NicoM.CaetanoA. (Eds.)). Routledge.
33.
OECD (2024). Infra-annual labour statistics (database).
34.
ProudfootK. (2022). Inductive/Deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
35.
ReherD.RequenaM. (2019). Childlessness in twentieth-century Spain: A cohort analysis for women born 1920–1969. European Journal of Population = Revue Europeenne de Demographie, 35(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9471-7
36.
RobertsS. E.CôtéJ. E. (2014). The identity issues inventory: Identity stage resolution in the prolonged transition to adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 21(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9194-x
37.
SchwartzS. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and, Neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity, 1(1), 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XSCHWARTZ
38.
SchwartzS. J.ZamboangaB. L.LuyckxK.MecaA.RitchieR. A. (2013). Identity in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813479781
39.
SharonT. (2016). Constructing adulthood: Markers of adulthood and well-being among emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815579826
40.
SimónP.ClaveríaS.García-AlbaceteG.López OrtegaA.TorreM. (2021). Informe Juventud en España 2020. INJUVE.
41.
SpederZ.MurinkoL.SetterstenR. A. (2014). Are conceptions of adulthood universal and unisex? Ages and social markers in 25 European countries. Social Forces, 92(3), 873–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot100
42.
TagliabueS.CrocettiE.LanzM. (2016). Emerging adulthood features and criteria for adulthood: Variable- and person-centered approaches. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1074985
43.
TagliabueS.LanzM.BeyersW. (2014). The transition to adulthood around the mediterranean: Contributions of the special issue. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1405–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.001
44.
VosylisR.KaniušonytėG.RaižienėS. (2015). What does it mean to be an Adult? Perceptions of adulthood among Lithuanian emerging adults. In Emerging adulthood in a European context (1st ed., pp. 54–78). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750620-6
45.
WoodmanD. (2009). The mysterious case of the pervasive choice biography: Ulrich Beck, structure/agency, and the middling state of theory in the sociology of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260902807227
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
