Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant upheaval for couples and families, particularly in terms of living arrangements. Emerging adults had to make quick decisions about where and with whom to shelter in place. In this grounded theory study, we explored how 22 young adults, predominantly living in the United States, navigated relationship decisions during the pandemic. The results suggest that participants were intentional about their choices, particularly in terms of moving in together (or not). The pandemic sometimes changed the timing of cohabitation or the pace of dating relationships; however, these decisions unfolded in tandem with common developmental tasks, such as college graduation and launching a career. More broadly, our findings suggest that participants’ responses to the pandemic both reflected core aspects of emerging adulthood (e.g., instability, feeling in-between) and also challenged them (e.g., other focus, limited exploration).

Keywords

cohabitation decision-making emerging adulthood romantic development qualitative methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnett

J. J.

(2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Barton

A. W.

Lavner

J. A.

Stanley

S. M.

Johnson

M. D.

Rhoades

G. K.

(2020). Will you complete this survey too?” Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000583

Bevan

J. L.

Lannutti

P. J.

(2021). Introduction to the special issue: Relationships in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1753–1758. Advance online. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211018506

Brown

A. R.

(2022). High school seniors’ attitudes toward cohabitation as a testing ground for marriage, 2020. Family Profiles, FP-22-03. National Center for Family & Marriage Research. https://doi.org/10.25035/ncfmr/fp-22-03

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

Clavél

F. D.

Cutrona

C. E.

Russell

D. W.

(2017). United and divided by stress: How stressors differentially influence social support in African American couples over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217704195

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.

Diamond

L. M.

Hicks

A. M.

(2012). It’s the economy, honey!” Couples’ blame attributions during the 2007–2009 economic crisis. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01380.x

Doherty

W. J.

Harris

S. M.

Wilde

J. L.

(2015). Discernment counseling for “mixed-agenda” couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(2), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12132

10.

Dotson

M. P.

Castro

E. M.

Magid

N. T.

Hoyt

L. T.

Suleiman

A. B.

Cohen

A. K.

(2022). “Emotional Distancing”: Change and strain in US young adult college students’ relationships during COVID-19. Emerging Adulthood, 10(2), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211065531

11.

Estlein

Gewirtz-Meydan

Opuda

(2022). Love in the time of COVID‐19: A systematic mapping review of empirical research on romantic relationships one year into the COVID‐19 pandemic. Family Process, 61(3), 1208–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12775

12.

Farris

S. G.

Kibbey

M. M.

Fedorenko

E. J.

DiBello

A. M.

(2021). A qualitative study of COVID-19 distress in university students. Emerging Adulthood, 9(5), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211025128

13.

Fetters

(2020, July 17). Move in? Get divorced? The pandemic forces couples to decide: Romantic partners are emerging from quarantine with a newfound sense of clarity. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/opinion/coronavirus-relationships-decisions.html

14.

Gordon

K. C.

Mitchell

E. A.

(2020). Infidelity in the Time of COVID-19. Family Process, 59(3), 956–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12576

15.

Günther-Bel

Vilaregut

Carratala

Torras-Garat

Pérez-Testor

(2020). A mixed-method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the state-regulated COVID-19 lockdown in Spain. Family Process, 59(3), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12585

16.

Jamison

T. B.

(2018). Cohabitation transitions among low-income parents: A qualitative investigation of economic and relational motivations. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9546-3

17.

Jamison

T. B.

Sanner

C. M.

(2021). Relationship form and function: Exploring meaning-making in young adults’ romantic histories. Personal Relationships, 28(4), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12400

18.

Lebow

J. L.

(2020). Family in the age of COVID-19. Family Process, 59(2), 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12543

19.

Lehmiller

J. J.

Garcia

J. R.

Gesselman

A. N.

Mark

K. P.

(2020). Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 43(1–2), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016

20.

Levitt

H. M.

(2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184

21.

Samp

J. A.

(2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on same-sex couples’ conflict avoidance, relational quality, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1819–1843. Advance online. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211006199

22.

Luetke

Hensel

Herbenick

Rosenberg

(2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185

23.

Manning

W. D.

Smock

P. J.

(2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00189.x

24.

McKee

G. B.

Pierce

B. S.

Tyler

C. M.

Perrin

P. B.

Elliott

T. R.

(2022). The COVID-19 pandemic’s influence on family systems therapists’ provision of teletherapy. Family Process, 61(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12665

25.

Monk

J. K.

Ogolsky

B. G.

(2019). Contextual relational uncertainty model: Understanding ambiguity in a changing sociopolitical context of marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12325

26.

Morse

J. M.

(2015). Data were saturated…. Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699

27.

Neff

L. A.

Gleason

M. E. J.

Crockett

E. E.

Ciftci

(2021). Blame the pandemic: Buffering the association between stress and relationship quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 522–532. Advance Online.https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211022813

28.

Ohannessian

C. M.

(2021). Introduction to the special issue: The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the lives of emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 9(5), 431–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211030875

29.

Owen

Rhoades

G. K.

Stanley

S. M.

(2013). Sliding versus deciding in relationships: Associations with relationship quality, commitment, and infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.779097

30.

Park

Impett

E. A.

MacDonald

(2021). Generalizability of results from dyadic data: Participation of one versus two members of a romantic couple is associated with breakup likelihood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220920167

31.

Rhoades

G. K.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

(2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08324388

32.

Sassler

(2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.x

33.

Sassler

Lichter

D. T.

(2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617

34.

Shulman

Connolly

(2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330

35.

Stafford

Merolla

A. J.

Castle

J. D.

(2006). When long-distance dating partners become geographically close. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506070472

36.

Stanley

S. M.

Carlson

R. G.

Rhoades

G. K.

Markman

H. J.

Ritchie

L. L.

Hawkins

A. J.

(2019). Best practices in relationship education focused on intimate relationships. Family Relations, 69(3), 497–519. https://doi/10.1111/fare.12419

37.

Stanley

S. M.

Markman

H. J.

(2020). Helping couples in the shadow of COVID‐19. Family Process, 59(3), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12575

38.

Stanley

S. M.

Rhoades

G. K.

Markman

H. J.

(2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55(4), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x

39.

Umberson

Montez

J. K.

(2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(Suppl), S54–S66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501, http://jhsb.sagepub.com

40.

Vennum

Fincham

F. D.

(2011). Assessing decision making in young adult romantic relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023287

41.

Vennum

Monk

J. K.

Pasley

B. K.

Fincham

F. D.

(2017). Emerging adult relationship transitions as opportune times for tailored interventions. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 293–305. https://doi/10.1177/2167696817705020

42.

Williamson

H. C.

Zheng

Neff

L. A.

(2021). Blame the pandemic: Stress spillover in the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. National Council on Family Relations. https://www.ncfr.org/ncfr-report/summer-2021/blame-pandemic-stress-spillover-recovery

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

Young Adults’ Cohabitation and Dating Decisions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Exploration of Romantic and Developmental Context

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material