Research suggests that COVID-19-related restrictions affected individuals’ ability to engage in relationship maintenance behaviors and have led to poorer romantic relationship quality. Poor relationship quality may be especially problematic for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, and otherwise non-heterosexual or-cisgender (LGBTQ+) college students, who often lack family support and are at greater risk for mental health issues. We used a social exchange theory lens to examine correlates of relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ college students during the early months of the pandemic. The analytic sample consists of 175 LGBTQ+ students (Mage = 20.5) who completed an online survey and reported being in a romantic relationship. Our findings demonstrate that LGBTQ+ students with more supportive partners were more satisfied with their relationships. These results can inform clinicians how to better support LGBTQ+ college couples when they experience relationship stress.
AndresenE. M.MalmgrenJ. A.CarterW. B.PatrickD. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 10(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6
2.
BalsamK. F.BeauchaineT. P.RothblumE. D.SolomonS. E. (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.102
3.
BalzariniR. N.MuiseA.ZoppolatG.Di BartolomeoA.RodriguesD. L.Alonso-FerresM.UrganciB.DebrotA.PichayayothinN. B.DharmaC.ChiP.KarremansJ. C.SchoebiD.SlatcherR. B. (2022). Love in the time of COVID: Perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with COVID-related stressors. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221094437
4.
BeckmeyerJ. J.HerbenickD.Eastman-MuellerH. (2021). Sexting with romantic partners during college: Who does it, who doesn’t and who wants to. Sexuality and Culture, 26(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09878-x
5.
ByersE. S.WangA. (2004). Understanding sexuality in close relationships from the social exchange perspective. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.). The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 203–234). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
CramerD. (2004). Emotional support, conflict, depression, and relationship satisfaction in a romantic partner. The Journal of Psychology, 138(6), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.138.6.532-542
8.
CramerD. (2006). How a supportive partner may increase relationship satisfaction. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 34(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880500483141
9.
CurrinJ. M.JayneC. N.HammerT. R.BrimT.HubachR. D. (2016). Explicitly pressing send: Impact of sexting on relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1145086
10.
CutronaC. E. (1996). Social support as a determinant of marital quality. In PierceG. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.). Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 173–194). Springer.
11.
DürrbaumT.SattlerF. A. (2020). Minority stress and mental health in lesbian, gay male, and bisexual youths: A meta-analysis. Journal of LGBT Youth, 17(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2019.1586615
12.
EllisL.DavisM. (2017). Intimate partner support: A comparison of gay, lesbian, and heterosexual relationships. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12186
13.
GalovanA. M.DrouinM.McDanielB. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017
14.
GilmourA. L.WhismanM. A.WhittonS. W. (2022). A dyadic analysis of relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms among same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 36(3), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000912
15.
GriffinM.JaiswalJ.MartinoR. J.LoSchiavoC.Comer-CarruthersC.KrauseK. D.StultsC. B.HalkitisP. N. (2022). Sex in the time of COVID-19: Patterns of sexual behavior among LGBTQ+ individuals in the U.S. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02298-4
16.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
17.
HerbenickD.HenselD. J.Eastman-MuellerH.BeckmeyerJ.FuT.-c.Guerra-ReyesL.RosenbergM. (2022). Sex and relationships pre-and early-COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a probability sample of U.S. undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02265-5
18.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.
19.
MontanoG. T.ThomaB. C.PaglisottiT.WeissP. M.ShultzM. K.McCauleyH. L.MillerE.MarshalM. P. (2018). Disparities in parental support and parental attachment between heterosexual and sexual minority youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(2), S32–S33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.065
PietromonacoP. R.CollinsN. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 531–542. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Famp0000129
22.
PietromonacoP. R.OverallN. C. (2021). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. The American Psychologist, 76(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
23.
RhoadesG. K.Kamp DushC. M.AtkinsD. C.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023627
24.
RoelsR.JanssenE. (2020). Sexual and relationship satisfaction in young, heterosexual couples: The role of sexual frequency and sexual communication. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(9), 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.013
25.
RogersS. L.CruickshankT. (2021). Change in mental health, physical health, and social relationships during highly restrictive lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Australia. PeerJ, 9, Article e11767. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11767
26.
ScroggsB.LoveH. A.TorgersonC. (2021). COVID-19 and LGBTQ emerging adults: Risk in the face of social distancing. Emerging Adulthood, 9(5), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820968699
27.
SmithA.LyonsA.FerrisJ.RichtersJ.PittsM.ShelleyJ.SimpsonJ. M. (2011). Sexual and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual men and women: The importance of desired frequency of sex. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 37(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.560531
28.
SommanticoM.ParrelloS.De RosaB. (2020). Lesbian and gay relationship satisfaction among Italians: Adult attachment, social support, and internalized stigma. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(5), 1811–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01736-5
29.
TadrosE.BarbiniM.DuranteK. A.CappettoM. (2021). The impact of physical health, race, and financial status on relational satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211058830
30.
TaiT. O.BaxterJ.HewittB. (2014). Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries. Demographic Research, 31, 71–104. https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.3
31.
ThomasM. F.BinderA.MatthesJ. (2022). Love in the time of corona: Predicting willingness to engage in sexting during the first COVID-19-related lockdown. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02292-w
WilliamsonH. C. (2020). Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on relationship satisfaction and attributions. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972688
34.
YucelD. (2018). The dyadic nature of relationships: Relationship satisfaction among married and cohabiting couples. Applied Research Quality Life, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9505-z
35.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.PetherickJ. (2006). Intimacy dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406063636
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
