The slim but growing literature on solitude relies heavily on survey and experimental designs but lacks a substantive understanding of the lived experiences of time spent alone, and by extension, what those experiences might reveal about the psychological functions of time in solitude. Following Gibson’s theory of affordances, solitude was viewed as an environment that offers various meaningful possibilities for action. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 emerging adults who shared positive and negative experiences of solitude, motivations for being alone, and perceived benefits of time spent by themselves. Narratives were examined using thematic analysis (TA), revealing five positive affordances (focused attention, restoration, reflection, freedom, transcendence), two negative affordances (loneliness, rumination), and one mixed affordance (emotional expression). Affordances as an interactive match between environment and person, and the importance of purpose and the capacity to perceive such affordances, are discussed in relation to the benefits of solitude for emerging adults.
AdamsG. R.MarshallS. K. (1996). A developmental social psychology of identity: Understanding the person-in-context. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0041
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
3.
AverillJ. R.SundararajanL. (2013). Experiences of solitude: Issues of assessment, theory, and culture. In CoplanR.BowkerJ. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 90–108). Wiley and Sons.
4.
BorgM. E.WilloughbyT. (2022). Affinity for solitude and motivations for spending time alone among early and mid-adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01520-1
5.
BowkerJ. C.NelsonL. J.MarkovicA.LusterA. S. (2013). Social withdrawal during adolescence and emerging adulthood. In CoplanR.BowkerJ. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 167–183). Wiley and Sons.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV.HayfieldN.TerryG. (2019). Thematic analysis. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
9.
BuchholzE. (1997). The call of solitude: Alonetime in a world of attachment. Simon & Schuster.
10.
BuchholzE.HelbraunE. (1999). A psychobiological developmental model for an “alonetime” need in infancy. Menninger Clinic, Bulletin, 63(2), 143–158.
11.
CampbellS. W.RossM. Q. (2022). Re-conceptualizing solitude in the digital era: From “being alone” to “noncommunication. Communication Theory, 32(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab021
12.
ChoiY.PaulyT.GarzaE. Z.BroenT.GerstorfD.HoppmannC. A. (2022). Having time to oneself in times of extended togetherness: Solitude experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12401
13.
ChuaS. N.KoestnerR. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on the role of autonomy in solitary behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.148.5.645-648
14.
CoplanR. J.ArmerM. (2007). A “multitude” of solitude: A closer look at social withdrawal and nonsocial play in early childhood. Child Development Perspective: Society for Research in Child Development, 1(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00006.x
15.
CoplanR. J.OoiL. L.BaldwinD. (2019). Does it matter when we want to be alone? Exploring developmental timing effects in the implications of unsociability. New Ideas in Psychology, 53, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.01.001
16.
CoplanR. J.ZelenskiJ. M.BowkerJ. C. (2017). Leave well enough alone? The costs and benefits of solitude. In Subjective well-being and life satisfaction (pp. 129–147). Routledge.
17.
DiefenbachS.BorrmannK. (2019, May). The smartphone as a pacifier and its consequences: Young adults' smartphone usage in moments of solitude and correlations to self-reflection. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–14).
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
20.
GalanakiE. P. (2004). Are children able to distinguish among the concepts of aloneness, loneliness, and solitude?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(5), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000153
21.
GalanakiE. P. (2013). Solitude in children and adolescents: A review of the literature. Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Special Issue: Loneliness and Solitude in Children and Adolescents, 50(3–4), 79–88.
22.
GazelleH.DruhenM. J. (2009). Anxious solitude and peer exclusion predict social helplessness, upset affect, and vagal regulation in response to behavioral rejection by a friend. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016165
23.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Taylor & Francis.
24.
GoossensL. (2013). Affinity for aloneness in adolescence and preference for solitude in childhood. In CoplanR.BowkerJ. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 150–166). Wiley and Sons.
25.
GoossensL.MarcoenA. (1999). Adolescent loneliness, self-reflection, and identity: From individual differences to developmental processes. In RotenbergK. J.HymelS. (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 225–243). Cambridge University Press.
26.
HipsonW. E.CoplanR. J.DufourM.WoodK. R.BowkerJ. C. (2021). Time alone well spent? A person-centered analysis of adolescents' solitary activities. Social Development, 30(4), 1114–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12518
27.
JosselsonR. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.14.1.01jos
28.
KorpelaK.StaatsH. (2013). The restorative qualities of being alone with nature. In CoplanR.BowkerJ. (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 351–367). Wiley and Sons.
29.
LarsonR. W. (1990). The solitary side of life: An examination of the time people spend alone from childhood to old age. Developmental Review, 10(2), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(90)90008-r
LarsonR. W.CsikszentmihalyiM.GraefR. (1982). Time alone in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? In PeplauL.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 40–53). John Wiley & Sons.
32.
LayJ. C.PaulyT.GrafP.MahmoodA.HoppmannC. A. (2020). Choosing solitude: Age differences in situational and affective correlates of solitude-seeking in midlife and older adulthood. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(3), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby044
33.
LeungL. (2015). Using tablet in solitude for stress reduction: An examination of desire for aloneness, leisure boredom, tablet activities, and location of use. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.068
34.
LevittH. M. (2020). Telling your qualitative story: How the purpose of your research influences your reporting. In LevittH. M. (Ed.), Reporting qualitative research in psychology: How to meet APA style journal article reporting standards (pp. 19–27). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000179-002
35.
Littman-OvadiaH. (2019). Doing-being and relationship-solitude: A proposed model for a balanced life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1953–1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0018-8
36.
LongC. R.AverillJ. R. (2003). Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00204
37.
LongC. R.SeburnM.AverillJ. R.MoreT. A. (2003). Solitude experiences: Varieties, settings, and individual differences. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005003
38.
MaslowA. H. (1964). Religions, values, and peak experiences. Ohio State University Press.
39.
McMillanR. L.KaufmanS. B.SingerJ. L. (2013). Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(626), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00626
40.
ModellA. H. (1992). The private self and private space. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 20, 1–14.
41.
NguyenT. V. T.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2018). Solitude as an approach to affective self-regulation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217733073
42.
NguyenT. V. T.WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2021). The possibilities of aloneness and solitude: Developing an understanding framed through the lens of human motivation and needs. In: The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 224–239). Wiley-Blackwell Press.
43.
NguyenT. V. T.WernerK. M.SoenensB. (2019). Embracing me-time: Motivation for solitude during transition to college. Motivation and Emotion, 43(4), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09759-9
44.
NormanD. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
45.
Ost MorS.PalgiY.Segel-KarpasD. (2021). The definition and categories of positive solitude: Older and younger adults’ perspectives on spending time by themselves. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 943–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020957379
46.
PerlmanD.PeplauL. A. (1982). Theoretical approaches to loneliness. In PeplauL.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 123–134). John Wiley & Sons.
RyanW. S.RyanR. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162
49.
ShrimptonD.McGannD.RibyL. M. (2017). Daydream believer: Rumination, self-reflection, and the temporal focus of mind wandering content. European Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1425
50.
SuedfeldP. (1982). Aloneness as a healing experience. In PeplauL.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 54–67). John Wiley & Sons.
51.
SyedM.NelsonS. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
52.
ThomasV. (2021). Solitude skills and the private self. Qualitative Psychology. Advanceonline publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000218
53.
ThomasV.AzmitiaM. (2016). Tapping into the app: Updating the experience sampling method for the 21st century. Emerging Adulthood, 4(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815618489
54.
ThomasV.AzmitiaM. (2019). Motivation matters: Development and validation of the motivation for solitude scale-short form (MSS-SF). Journal of Adolescence, 70(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.004
55.
ThomasV.Balzer CarrB.AzmitiaM.WhittakerS. (2021). Alone and online: Understanding the relationships between social media, solitude, and psychological adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000287
56.
WangH.-T.PoerioG.MurphyC.BzkokD.JefferiesE.SmallwoodJ. (2018). Dimensions of experience: Exploring the heterogeneity of the wandering mind. Psychological Science, 29(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617728727
57.
WangJ. M.RubinK. H.LaursenB.Booth-LaForceC.Rose-KrasnorL. (2013). Preference-for-solitude and adjustment difficulties in early and late adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(6), 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.794700
58.
WeinsteinN.NguyenT. V.HansenH. (2021). What time alone offers: Narratives of solitude from adolescence to older adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(714518), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714518
59.
WinnicottD. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39(5), 416–420.
60.
WithagenR.De PoelH. J.AraújoD.PeppingG. J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003
61.
YadenD. B.HaidtJ.HoodR. W.JrVagoD. R.NewbergA. B. (2017). The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
