Marriage and divorce expectations predict family life and personal outcomes. Understanding how expectations are associated with varying characteristics over emerging adulthood (ages 18–28 years) will inform understanding of emerging adult development. Panel Study of Income Dynamics Transition into Adulthood 2005–2015 data were used in hybrid-effects ordinal logistic regression to parse interindividual and intraindividual variation associated with relationship experiences, socioeconomic and contextual characteristics, and mental and emotional well-being. Partnerships were associated with optimistic expectations: Both dating and cohabiting predicted greater marriage expectations and lower divorce expectations within individuals. Between individuals, greater time in full-time employment predicted more positive marital expectations, greater responsibility was associated with lower marital expectations, stronger religious identity predicted higher marital expectations and lower divorce expectations, having been arrested predicted greater divorce expectations, greater well-being predicted greater marriage expectations, and older age predicted lower marriage expectations. Both between and within individuals, greater worry predicted lower marriage expectations.
AmatoP. R. (1988). Parental divorce and attitudes toward marriage and family life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 453–461. doi:10.2307/352010
3.
AmatoP. R.DeBoerD. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage?Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038–1051. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038.x
4.
AmatoP. R.PattersonS. E. (2017). The intergenerational transmission of union instability in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 723–738. doi:10.1111/jomf.12384
5.
AndersonL. R. (2016). High school seniors’ expectations to marry (FP-16-14). Retrieved from National Center for Family & Marriage Research: https://bit.ly/2ym0w3y
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
7.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Meandering toward marriage emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
ArochoR. (2019). Do expectations of divorce predict union formation in the transition to adulthood?Journal of Marriage and Family, 81, 979–990. doi:10.1111/jomf.12571
9.
ArochoR.Kamp DushC. M. (2016). Anticipating the “ball and chain”? Reciprocal associations between marital expectations and delinquency. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 1371–1381. doi:10.1111/jomf.12328
10.
ArochoR.Kamp DushC. M. (2017). Like mother, like child: Offspring marital timing desires and maternal marriage timing and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 261–272. doi:10.1037/fam0000218
11.
ArochoR.Kamp DushC. M. (2018). Distant horizons: Marital expectations may be dampened by economic circumstances. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 7, 1–11. doi:10.1037/cfp0000095
12.
ArochoR.PurtellK. (2018). Will I stay married? Exploring predictors of expectations to divorce in unmarried young adults. Emerging Adulthood. doi:10.1177/2167696818790826
13.
Atzil-SlonimD.ReshefM.BermanE.PeriT.ShulmanS. (2016). Changes in romantic competence and career adaptability among emerging adults in psychotherapy. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 327–337. doi:10.1177/2167696815620964
14.
BakerL. A.EmeryR. E. (1993). When every relationship is above average: Perceptions and expectations of divorce at the time of marriage. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 439.
15.
BarrA. B.SimonsR. L.SimonsL. G. (2015). Nonmarital relationships and changing perceptions of marriage among African American young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1202–1216. doi:10.1111/jomf.12209
16.
Boyer-PenningtonM. E.PenningtonJ.SpinkC. (2001). Students’ expectations and optimism toward marriage as a function of parental divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 34, 71.
CarrollJ. S.BadgerS.WilloughbyB. J.NelsonL. J.MadsenS. D.McNamara BarryC. (2009). Ready or not? Criteria for marriage readiness among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 349–375. doi:10.1177/0743558409334253
19.
CarrollJ. S.WilloughbyB. J.BadgerS.NelsonL. J.McNamara BarryC.MadsenS. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 219–247. doi:10.1177/0743558407299697
20.
ChanM.TsaiK. M.FuligniA. J. (2015). Changes in religiosity across the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1555–1566. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0157-0
21.
CherlinA. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x
22.
CollinsW. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 1–24.
23.
CrisseyS. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 697–709. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00163.x
24.
DennisonR. P.KoernerS. S. (2008). A look at hopes and worries about marriage: The views of adolescents following a parental divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 48, 91–107. doi:10.1300/J087v48n03_06
25.
DePauloB. (2014). A singles studies perspective on mount marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 64–68. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.878173
26.
EdinK.KefalasM. (2005). Promises I can keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
EggebeenD.DewJ. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 108–121.
28.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.
29.
Gibson-DavisC.Gassman-PinesA.LehrmanR. (2018). “His” and “hers”: Meeting the economic bar to marriage. Demography, 55, 2321–2343. doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0726-z
30.
GoldscheiderF. K.KaufmanG.SasslerS. (2009). Navigating the “new” marriage market: How attitudes toward partner characteristics shape union formation. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 719–737. doi:10.1177/0192513x09331570
KefalasM. J.FurstenbergF. F.CarrP. J.NapolitanoL. (2011). “Marriage is more than being together”: The meaning of marriage for young adults. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 845–875. doi:10.1177/0192513x10397277
33.
KesslerR. C.BarkerP. R.ColpeL. J.EpsteinJ. F.GfroererJ. C.HiripiE.…WaltersE. E. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184–189.
34.
KingR. D.MassogliaM.MacmillanR. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45, 33–65. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00071.x
35.
KuoJ. C.-L.RaleyR. K. (2016). Is it all about money? Work characteristics and women’s and men’s marriage formation in early adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1046–1073. doi:10.1177/0192513x14530973
36.
ManningW. D.BrownS. L.PayneK. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 247–260. doi:10.1111/jomf.12090
37.
ManningW. D.CohenJ. A.SmockP. J. (2010). The role of romantic partners, family, and peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 115–149. doi:10.1177/0743558410376833
38.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559–575. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00392.x
39.
MernitzS. E.Kamp DushC. (2016). Emotional health across the transition to first and second unions among emerging adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 233–244.
40.
MillerA. J.SasslerS.Kusi-AppouhD. (2011). The specter of divorce: Views from working- and middle-class cohabitors. Family Relations, 60, 602–616. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00671.x
41.
O’brienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Perelli-HarrisB.BerringtonA.Sánchez GassenN.GalezewskaP.HollandJ. A. (2017). The rise in divorce and cohabitation: Is there a link?Population and Development Review, 43, 303–329. doi:10.1111/padr.12063
44.
PietromonacoP. R.Perry-JenkinsM. (2014). Marriage in whose America? What the suffocation model misses. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 108–113. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.876909
Sandberg-ThomaS. E.Kamp DushC. M. (2014). Indicators of adolescent depression and relationship progression in emerging adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 191–206. doi:10.1111/jomf.12081
47.
SetterstenR. A.Jr (2012). The contemporary context of young adulthood in the USA: From demography to development, from private troubles to public issues. In Alan BoothS. L. B.LandaleN. S.ManningW. D.McHaleS. M. (Eds.), Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Springer.
48.
SetterstenR.RayB. E. (2010). Not quite adults: Why 20-somethings are choosing a slower path to adulthood, and why it’s good for everyone. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
49.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39. doi:10.1177/2167696812467330
50.
SilvaJ. M. (2013). Coming up short: Working-class adulthood in an age of uncertainty. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
51.
SmockP. J.ManningW. D.PorterM. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.
52.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect*. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.
53.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15. College Station, TX: Statacorp LLC.
54.
Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research. (2008). The panel study of income dynamics’ child development supplement transition into adulthood 2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
UeckerJ. E.StokesC. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 835–846. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00530.x
57.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2010). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.
58.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
59.
WilliamsR. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal, 6, 58–82.
60.
WilliamsR. (2016). Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 40, 7–20. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2015.1112384
61.
WilloughbyB. J. (2014). Using marital attitudes in late adolescence to predict later union transitions. Youth & Society, 46, 425–440. doi:10.1177/0044118x12436700
62.
WilloughbyB. J.DworkinJ. (2009). The relationships between emerging adults’ expressed desire to marry and frequency of participation in risk-taking behaviors. Youth & Society, 40, 426–450. doi:10.1177/0044118x08318116
63.
WilloughbyB. J.HallS. S.LuczakH. P. (2015). Marital paradigms: A conceptual framework for marital attitudes, values, and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 188–211. doi:10.1177/0192513x13487677
64.
WilloughbyB. J.JamesS. L. (2017). The marriage paradox: Why emerging adults love marriage yet push it aside. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65.
WilloughbyB. J.MedarisM.JamesS.BartholomewK. (2015). Changes in marital beliefs among emerging adults: Examining marital paradigms over time. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 219–228. doi:10.1177/2167696814563381
66.
YoungR.JohnsonD. R. (2015). Handling missing values in longitudinal panel data with multiple imputation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 277–294. doi:10.1111/jomf.12144
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
