This conceptual article argues that young people’s brains are “wired for innovation” and that society should better engage this age-group to access its innovation potential. Research published in the neuroscience and developmental psychology literature shows that between 15 and 25 years of age adolescents and emerging adults possess traits of successful innovators. They are collaborative, creative, observant, curious, willing to experiment, willing to challenge the status quo, risk-takers, action oriented, and visionary. In addition, Millennials and Generation Z are coming of age in a context that provides them with innovation ability during adolescence and emerging adulthood beyond that of previous generations. This article proposes that organizations able to effectively engage young people will be more innovative. Also, when young people are meaningfully engaged, society is more likely to find solutions needed to tackle social, environmental, and economic challenges.
Arnett. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Arnett. (2013). The evidence for generation we and against generation me. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 5–10. doi:10.1177/2167696812466842
3.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M.LindenbergerU. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471
4.
BavelierD.GreenC. S.PougetA.SchraterP. (2012). Brain plasticity through the life span: Learning to learn and action video games. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 35, 391–416. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909
5.
BuckinghamD. (2008). Introducing Identity. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth Identity and Digital Media (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.001
6.
ClarkeA.DoughertyI. (2010). Youth-led social entrepreneurship: Enabling social change. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 8, 133–156.
7.
de JongJ. P. J.Den HartogD. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 41–64. doi:10.1108/14601060710720546
DriemeyerJ.BoykeJ.GaserC.BuchelC.ArneM. (2008). Changes in gray matter induced by learning—Revisited. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002669
11.
DyerJ.GregersenH.ChristensenC. M.FosterM. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
12.
EpsteinR. (2010). Teen 2.0: Saving our children and families from the torment of adolescence. Fresno, CA: Quill Driver Books.
13.
FarrJ. L.FordC. M. (1990). Individual innovation. In WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
14.
GarciaR.CalantoneR. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132.
15.
GelbM. J. (2000). How to think like Leonardo da Vinci: Seven steps to genius every day. New York, NY: Delta Trade Paperbacks.
HallG. S. (1916). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education. New York, NY: D. Appleton.
18.
HoE.ClarkeA.DoughertyI. (2015). Youth-led social change: Topics, engagement types, organizational types, strategies, and impacts. Futures, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.006
19.
HoweN.StraussW. (2009). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
20.
ItoM.HorstH.BittantiM.BoydD.Herr-StephensonB.LangeP.…RobinsonL. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Digital Media, 58. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1379.2010.01107.x
JensenF. E.Ellis NuttA. (2015). The teenage brain: A neuroscientist’s survival guide to raising adolescents and young adults. Toronto, Canada: Collins.
PerezA. D.HirschmanC. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the US population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35, 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x
Quan-HaaseA.BoydD. (2011). Teen communities. In BarnettG. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social networks (pp. 843–846). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
34.
RavenJ. C. (1948). The comparative assessment of intellectual ability. British Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1948.tb00198.x
35.
RavertR. D.MurphyL.DonnellanM. B. (2015). Best reasons to take risks across adulthood: A developmental tasks perspective. Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood Annual Conference, Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood, Miami, FL.
36.
ReynaV. F.FarleyF. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 7, 1–44. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x
37.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.SmithJ. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 166–184. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002
38.
RobinsonO. C. (2013). Values and adult age: Findings from two cohorts of the European social survey. European Journal of Ageing, 10, 11–23. doi:10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3
39.
RobinsonO. C.DemetreJ. D.LitmanJ. A. (2016). Adult life stage and crisis as predictors of curiosity and authenticity: Testing inferences from Erikson’s lifespan theory. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41. doi:10.1177/0165025416645201
SchwartzS. J. (2015a). Presidential address: Unanswered questions about emerging adulthood: An agenda for moving the field forward. Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood Annual Conference, Miami, FL. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ssea.org/conference/2015/index.htm
42.
SchwartzS. J. (2015b). Turning point for a turning point: Advancing emerging adulthood theory and research. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2167696815624640
43.
SchwartzS. J.ZamboangaB. L.LuyckxK.MecaA.RitchieR. a. (2013). Identity in emerging adulthood: Reviewing the field and looking forward. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 96–113. doi:10.1177/2167696813479781
44.
SchwartzS. J.CoteJ. E.ArnettJ. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood: Two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229. doi:10.1177/0044118X05275965
45.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701
46.
SimontonD. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.251
47.
SimpsonA. R. (2001). Raising teens: A synthesis of research and a foundation for action. Retrieved fromhttp://hrweb.mit.edu/worklife/rp_o
48.
SparrowB.LiuJ.WegnerD. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science (New York, NY), 333, 776–778. doi:10.1126/science.1207745
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
52.
SteinbergL. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
53.
SteinbergL.BelskyJ. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on psychopathology in adolescence. In CicchettiD.TothS. L. (Eds.), Adolescence: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 93–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
54.
TannerJ. L.ArnettJ. J. (2009). The emergence of “emerging adulthood”: The new life stage between adolescence and young adulthood. In FurlongA. (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 39–45). London, England: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
55.
TapscottD. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
TaylorP., & Pew Research Center. (2014). The next America: Boomers, millennials, and the looming generational showdown. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
58.
ThompsonJ. J.BlairM. R.HenreyA. J. (2014). Over the hill at 24: Persistent age-related cognitive-motor decline in reaction times in an ecologically valid video game task begins in early adulthood. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094215
59.
TwengeJ. M. (2013). The evidence for generation me and against generation we. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 11–16. doi:10.1177/2167696812466842
60.
WagnerT. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: Scribner.
WestleyF.ZimmermanB.PattonM. (2006). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Toronto, Canada: Vintage Canada.
64.
ZeldinS. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 75–90. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0802_2
