Despite the growing prevalence of cohabitation, past attempts to identify mental health outcomes from cohabitation do not differentiate by cohabitation duration. The current study investigated the mental health implications from long-term cohabitation, defined as those lasting more than 3 years. Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, I compared the average individual mental health scores between time spent single, or time spent in a short-term cohabitation, and time spent in a long-term union. Results indicated that externalizing distress, defined as heavy episodic drinking, was lower during time spent in a long-term cohabitation than it was during time spent single. Unexpectedly, the average emotional distress rates were greater during time spent in a long-term cohabitation than they were during time spent single; men appeared to be driving that effect. Overall, long-term cohabitation did not provide an additional mental health benefit above and beyond short-term cohabitation.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.
2.
ArnettJ. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
3.
BerwickD.MurphyJ.GoldmanP.WareJ.BarskyA.WeinsteinM. (1991). Performance of a five-item mental health-screening test. Medical Care, 29, 169–176.
4.
BlekesauneM. (2008). Partnership transitions and mental distress: Investigating temporal order. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 879–890.
5.
BrownS. L. (2000). The effect of union type on psychological well-being: Depression among cohabitors versus married. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 241–255.
6.
BrownS. L. (2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583–601.
7.
BushK.KivlahanD. R.McDonellM. B.FihnS. D.BradleyK. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1789–1795.
8.
CarrollJ. S.WilloughbyB.BadgerS.NelsonL. J.McNamara BarryC.MadsenS. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 219–247.
9.
Center for Human Resource Research. (2013). NLSY handbook. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
10.
CherlinA. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.
11.
CloggC. C.PetkovaE.HaritouA. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261–1293.
12.
DemirM. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 293–313.
13.
DuncanG. J.WilkersonB.EnglandP. (2006). Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43, 691–710.
14.
EdinK. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage?Social Problems, 47, 112–133.
15.
EdwardsJ.RothbardN. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.
16.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
17.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. (2015). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.
18.
FlemingC. B.WhiteH. R.CatalanoR. F. (2010). Romantic relationships and substance use in early adulthood: An examination of the influences of relationship type, partner substance use, and relationship quality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 153–167.
19.
FrechA.WilliamsK. (2007). Depression and the psychological benefits of entering marriage. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48, 149–163.
20.
FriedmanD. (1995). Towards a structure of indifference: The social origins of maternal custody. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
FurstenbergF. F. (2011). The recent transformation of the American family: Witnessing and exploring social change. In CarlsonM. J.EnglandP. (Eds.), Social class and changing families in unequal America (pp. 192–220). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
GagnéF.LydonJ. (2003). Identification and the commitment shift: Accounting for gender differences in relationship illusions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 907–919.
23.
GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.
24.
HorwitzA. V.WhiteH. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505–514.
25.
HuangP. M.SmockP. J.ManningW. D.Bergstrom-LynchC. (2011). He says, she says: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 876–905.
26.
JohnsonD. R. (2005). Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1061–1075.
27.
JohnsonD. R.YoungR. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 926–945.
28.
KennedyS.BumpassL. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663–1692.
29.
KimH. K.McKenryP. C. (2002). The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 885–911.
30.
KroegerR. A.SmockP. J. (2014). Cohabitation: Recent research and implications. In TreasJ. K.ScottJ.RichardsM. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 217–235). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
LambK. A.LeeG. R.DeMarisA. (2003). Union formation and depression: Selection and relationship effects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 953–962.
32.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.
33.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
34.
LichterD. T.QianZ. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878.
35.
LichterD. T.QianZ.MellottL. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43, 223–240.
36.
LichterD. T.TurnerR. N.SasslerS. (2010). National estimates of the rise of serial cohabitation. Social Science Research, 39, 754–765.
37.
ManningW. D. (2013). Trends in cohabitation: Over twenty years of change, 1987–2010(Family Profile FP-13-12). Bowling Green, OH: Center for Family & Marriage Research, Bowling Green State University.
38.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559–575.
39.
MarcussenK. (2005). Explaining differences in mental health between married and cohabiting individuals. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 239–257.
40.
MernitzS. E.DushC. K. (2016). Emotional health across the transition to first and second unions among emerging adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 233–244.
41.
MusickK.BumpassL. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: Union formation and changes in well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 1–18.
42.
OstroffJ.WoolvertonK.BerryC.LeskoL. (1996). Use of the mental health inventory with adolescents: A secondary analysis of the RAND health insurance study. Psychological Assessment, 8, 105–107.
43.
ProulxC. M.HelmsH. M.BuehlerC. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576–593.
44.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
45.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC.ArriagaX. (2011). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2., pp. 218–231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
RusbultC. E.HannonP. A.StockerS. L.FinkelE. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In WorthingtonE. L.Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–205). New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
Sandberg-ThomaS. E.Kamp DushC. M. (2014). Indicators of adolescent mental health and relationship progression in emerging adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 191–206.
48.
Saphire-BernsteinS.TaylorS. E. (2013). Close relationships and happiness. In DavidS. A.BoniwellI.AyersA. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp.821–833). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49.
SasslerS. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505.
50.
SasslerS.GoldscheiderF. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 139–166.
51.
SchneiderD. (2011). Wealth and the marital divide. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 627–667.
52.
SeedatS.ScottK.AngermeyerM.BerglundP.BrometE.BrughaT.…KesslerR. (2009). Cross-national associations between gender and mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 785–795.
53.
SetterstenR. A.RayB. (2010). What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20, 19–41.
54.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39.
55.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2015). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. In ArnettJ. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 230–244). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
56.
SkinnerK.BahrS.CraneD.CallV. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, and remarriage: A comparison of relationship quality over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 74–90.
57.
SigmonS. T.PellsJ. J.BoulardN. E.Whitcomb-SmithS.EdenfieldT. M.HermannB. A.KubikE. (2005). Gender differences in self-reports of depression: The response bias hypothesis revisited. Sex Roles, 53, 401–411.
58.
SimonR. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1065–1096.
59.
SmockP. J.ManningW. D.PorterM. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.
60.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.FinchamF. D. (2011). Understanding romantic relationships among emerging adults: The significant roles of cohabitation and ambiguity. In FinchamF.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 234–251). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), The handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
TaylorS.KleinL.LewisB.GruenewaldT.GurungR.UpdegraffJ. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.
63.
UeckerJ. E. (2012). Marriage and mental health among young adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53, 67–83.
64.
UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B.WilliamsK. (2013). Family status and mental health: Recent advances and future directions. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 405–431). New York, NY: Springer.
65.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Table MS-2. Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to present. Families and living arrangements. Retrieved February 28, 2017, fromhttps://www.census.gov/hhes/families/files/ms2.csv
66.
VeitC. T.WareJ. E. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730–742.
67.
von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83–117.
68.
WillettsM. C. (2006). Union quality comparisons between long-term heterosexual cohabitation and legal marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 110–127.
69.
WilliamsonI.GonzalesM. H. (2007). The subjective experience of forgiveness: Positive construals of the forgiveness experience. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 407–446.
70.
WillisR. J. (2006). The economics of fatherhood. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 90, 378–382.
71.
WilloughbyB.CarrollJ. (2015). On the horizon: Marriage, timing, beliefs, and consequences in emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 280–295). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
