The body of knowledge related to emerging adulthood has grown in the past decade. This study surveyed published empirical research studies on emerging adulthood, from 2000 to April 2015, using Academic Search Complete and PsycINFO databases and references from The Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood website resources. These studies (N = 1,334) consisted of peer-reviewed journal articles reporting on empirical research. This study adds to the current knowledge base for the field of emerging adulthood by providing a critical examination of the main topics, the methods, current research trends, and the most prolific authors and publishing outlets in the field. Implications from these results support emerging adulthood as a global and cross-cultural developmental period and field of study. Additionally, results reveal current research trends and expose the need for significant future research to further expand the emerging adulthood knowledge base.
AriasD. F.HernándezA. M. (2007). Emerging adulthood in Mexican and Spanish youth: Theories and realities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 476–503.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2007). Afterward: Aging out of care- toward realizing the possibilities of emerging adulthood. New Directions for Youth Development, 113, 151–161.
5.
ArnettJ. J. (2011). Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In JensenL. A. (Ed.), Bridging cultural and developmental approaches to psychology; New syntheses in theory, research, and policy (pp. 255–275). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2014). Presidential address: The emergence of emerging adulthood; A personal history. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 155–162.
7.
ArnettJ. J.KloepM.HendryL. B.TannerJ. L. (2011). Debating emerging adulthood; Stage or process?New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
BerkL. E. (2012). Infants, children, and adolescents (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
BlakesleeJ. E.KellerT. (2012). Building the youth mentoring knowledge base: Publishing trends and coauthorship networks. Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 845–859.
10.
BrownJ. D. (2006). Emerging adults in a media-saturated world. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st Century (pp. 279–299). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
BynnerJ. (2005). Rethinking the youth phase of the life-course: The case for emerging adulthood?Journal of Youth Studies, 8, 367–384.
12.
CôtéJ. E. (2014). The dangerous myth of emerging adulthood: An evidence-based critique of a flawed developmental theory. Applied Developmental Science, 18, 177–188.
13.
CreswellJ. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
14.
DaiY. D.SwansonJ. A.ChengH. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126–138.
15.
DorA.Cohen-FridelS. (2010). Preferred parenting styles: Do Jewish and Arab–Israeli emerging adults differ?Journal of Adult Development, 17, 146–155.
16.
FacioA.ResettS. (2014). Work, romantic relationships, and life satisfaction in Argentinean emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 27–35.
17.
GanevaZ.PavlenkoV. (2014). Conception of the transition to adulthood: Ukrainian case. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 8, 129–145.
18.
GuitartM. E. (2011). Ethnic identity in an intercultural geography: An empirical study. Canadian Social Science, 7, 64–71.
HendryL. B.KloepM. (2007). Redressing the emperor!—A rejoinder to Arnett. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 83–85.
21.
HirschJ. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/102/46/16569.pdf
22.
IsaacS.MichaelW. B. (1997). Handbook in research and evaluation: For education and the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing.
23.
Johnson-PynnJ. S. (2012). Ethnic identity, self-efficacy, and intercultural attitudes in East African and U.S. Youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 256–289.
24.
KonečnýŠ. (2009). Virtual environment and lying: Perspective of Czech adolescents and young adults. Cyberpsychology, 3, 1–10.
25.
LeaheyE.ReikowskyR. C. (2008). Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications), 38, 425–440. doi:10.1177/0306312707086190
26.
MacekP.BejčekJ.VaníčkováJ. (2007). Contemporary Czech emerging adults: Generation growing up in the period of social changes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 444–475.
27.
MehoL. I.YangK. (2007). A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of science, scopus, and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105–2125.
28.
MillerJ.PrichardI.HutchinsonA.WilsonC. (2014). The relationship between exposure to alcohol-related content on Facebook and predictors of alcohol consumption among female emerging adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 735–741.
29.
NosekB. A.GrahamJ.LindnerN. M.KesebirS.HawkinsC. B.HahnC.…TenneyE. R. (2010). Cumulative and career-stage impact of social-personality psychology programs and their members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1283–1300.
30.
NelsonL. J.BadgerS.WuB. (2004). The influence of culture in emerging adulthood: Perspectives of Chinese college students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 26–37.
31.
NelsonL. J.BarryC. M. (2005). Distinguishing features of emerging adulthood: The role of self-classification as an adult. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 242–262.
PapaliaD. E.OldsS. W.FeldmanR. D. (2007). Human development (10th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
34.
RawlingsC. M.McFarlandD. A.DahlanderL.WangD. (2015). Streams of thought: Knowledge flows and intellectual cohesion in a multidisciplinary era. Social Forces, 93, 1687–1722.
35.
ReitzleM. (2006). The connections between adulthood transitions and the self-perception of being adult in the changing contexts of East and West Germany. European Psychologist, 11, 25–38.
36.
RideoutV.FoehrU.RobertsD. (2010). Generation M3: Media in the lives of 8- to 18- year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
37.
RosenbaumJ. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
SchreiberM. (2008). To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics, 10, 040201. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/040201. Retrieved fromhttp://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/10/4/040201/fulltext/
39.
SetterstenR. A.FurstenbergF. F.RumbautR. G. (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
ShulmanS.VasalampiK.BarrT.LivneY.NurmiJ.-E.PrattM. W. (2014). Typologies and precursors of career adaptability patterns among emerging adults: A seven-year longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 1505–1515.
41.
SirschU.DreherE.MayrE.WillingerU. (2009). What does it take to be an adult in Austria? Views of adulthood in Austrian adolescents, emerging adults and adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 275–292.
Van DulmenM. H. M. (2013). Emerging adulthood—The journal. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 3–4.
47.
WalshJ. L.FielderR. L.CareyK. B.CareyM. P. (2013). Female college students’ media use and academic outcomes: Results from a longitudinal cohort study. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 219–232.
