Emerging adults (EAs) aged 18–24 account for a large proportion of all sexually transmitted infections (STIs), HIV infections, and unintended pregnancies in the United States. Given the increased influence of online media on decision making, we examined how EA online networks were associated with sexual risk behaviors. We used egocentric network data collected from EAs aged 18–24 years old across the United States (N = 1,687) to examine how online social norms (e.g., acceptance of HIV infections, other STIs, and pregnancy) and network characteristics (i.e., network size and density; ties’ closeness, race, age, and sex similarities) were associated with participants’ unprotected vaginal intercourse in the last 30 days. Findings suggested that in male EAs, there was a strong association between online social norms, structural characteristics, and sexual risk behavior compared to females. Researchers and practitioners may wish to address online peer norms and EAs’ online network composition when developing online sexual risk prevention tools.
AllisonS.BauermeisterJ. A.BullS.LightfootM.MustanskiB.ShegogR.LevineD. (2012). The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: Moving the research agenda forward. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.012
2.
AndrewsJ. A.TildesleyE.HopsH.LiF. (2002). The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychology, 21, 349–357. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.349
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BanksS. M.PandianiJ. A.SchachtL. M.GauvinL. M. (2000). Age and mortality among white male problem drinkers. Addiction, 95, 1249–1254. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.958124911.x
5.
BauermeisterJ. A.ZimmermanM. A.JohnsM. M.GlowackiP.StoddardS.VolzE. (2012). Innovative recruitment using online networks: Lessons learned from an online study of alcohol and other drug use utilizing a web-based Respondent Driven Sampling (webRDS) strategy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 834–838. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.834
6.
BaumeisterR. F.CataneseK. R.VohsK. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
7.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology, 1, 137–173.
8.
BlackS. R.SchmiegeS.BullS. (2013). Actual versus perceived peer sexual risk behavior in online youth social networks. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 3, 312–319.
9.
BorgattiS. P.MehraA.BrassD. J.LabiancaG. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892–895. doi:10.1126/science.1165821
10.
BullS.LevineD.SantelliJ.BlackS.SchmiegeS. (2012). JUST/US: Social media for HIV prevention with networks of youth. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, S74–S74.
11.
ByrnesJ. P.MillerD. C.SchaferW. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.3.367
12.
CookS. H.BauermeisterJ. A.ZimmermanM.Gordon-MesserD. (2012). Online network influences on emerging adults’ alcohol and drug use. Submitted for publication. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1674–1686. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9869-1
13.
CourtenayW. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1385–1401.
14.
CoxJ. M.BatesS. B. (2011). Referent group proximity, social norms, and context: Alcohol use in a low-use environment. Journal of American College Health, 59, 252–259. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.502192
15.
CubbinsL. A.TanferK. (2000). The influence of gender on sex: A study of men’s and women’s self-reported high-risk sex behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 229–257. doi:10.1023/A:1001963413640
16.
DavisW. M. (2012). Youth and online sexual health services: Intersections of the social and the technical (Master of Science), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
17.
FelmleeD. H. (1999). Social norms in same-and cross-gender friendships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 53–67. doi:10.2307/2695825
18.
FielderR. L.CareyM. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
19.
FinchamF. D.CuiM. (2010). Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
FriedmanS. R.NeaigusA.JoseB.CurtisR.GoldsteinM.IldefonsoG.…Des JarlaisD. C. (1997). Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1289–1296. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.8.1289
21.
FrostJ. J.LindbergL. D.FinerL. B. (2012). Young adults’ contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: Associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 107–116. doi:10.1363/4410712
22.
GuadagnoR. E.MuscanellN. L.OkdieB. M.BurkN. M.WardT. B. (2011). Even in virtual environments women shop and men build: A social role perspective on second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 304–308. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.008
23.
HargittaiE. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
24.
HartzlerB.FrommeK. (2003). Heavy episodic drinking and college entrance. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 259–274. doi:10.2190/2L2X-F8E1-32T9-UDMU
25.
HenrichC. C.KupermincG. P.SackA.BlattS. J.LeadbeaterB. J. (2000). Characteristics and homogeneity of early adolescent friendship groups: A comparison of male and female clique and nonclique members. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 15–26. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_2
26.
IsraelB. A. (1982). Social networks and health status: Linking theory, research, and practice. Patient Counseling and Health Education, 4, 65–79. doi:10.1016/S0190-2040(82)80002-5
27.
JonasonP. K.FisherT. D. (2009). The power of prestige: Why young men report having more sex partners than young women. Sex Roles, 60, 151–159. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9506-3
28.
KrackhardtD.SternR. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140. doi:10.2307/2786835
29.
LefkowitzE. S.GillenM. M.ShearerC. L.BooneT. L. (2004). Religiosity, sexual behaviors, and sexual attitudes during emerging adulthood. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 150–159. doi:10.2307/3813649
30.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA.ZickuhrK. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED525056.pdf
31.
LewisK.KaufmanJ.GonzalezM.WimmerA.ChristakisN. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30, 330–342. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002
32.
LewisM. A.LeeC. M.PatrickM. E.FossosN. (2007). Gender-specific normative misperceptions of risky sexual behavior and alcohol-related risky sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 57, 81–90. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9218-0
33.
LewisM. A.NeighborsC. (2004). Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 334–339. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.4.334
34.
LivingstoneS. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393–411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
35.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
36.
MartensM. P.PageJ. C.MowryE. S.DamannK. M.TaylorK. K.CiminiM. D. (2006). Differences between actual and perceived student norms: An examination of alcohol use, drug use, and sexual behavior. Journal of American College Health, 54, 295–300. doi:10.3200/JACH.54.5.295-300
37.
MazurE.RichardsL. (2011). Adolescents’ and emerging adults’ social networking online: Homophily or diversity?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 180–188. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.03.001
38.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
39.
MuscanellN. L.GuadagnoR. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 107–112. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016
40.
NelsonL. J.BarryC. M. (2005). Distinguishing features of emerging adulthood the role of self-classification as an adult. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 242–262. doi:10.1177/0743558404273074
41.
NezlekJ. B.PilkingtonC. J. (1994). Perceptions of risk in intimacy and social participation. Personal Relationships, 1, 45–62. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00054.x
42.
PerkinsH. W.BerkowitzA. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. Substance Use & Misuse, 21, 961–976. doi:10.3109/10826088609077249
43.
PotardC.CourtoisR.RuschE. (2008). The influence of peers on risky sexual behaviour during adolescence. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 13, 264–270. doi:10.1080/13625180802273530
44.
RivestL. P. (1994). Statistical properties of Winsorized means for skewed distributions. Biometrika, 81, 373–383.
45.
SchwartzS. J.CôtéJ. E.ArnettJ. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood two developmental routes in the individualization process. Youth & Society, 37, 201–229. doi:10.1177/0044118X05275965
46.
ŠevčíkováA.SimonL.DanebackK.KvapilíkT. (2015). Bothersome exposure to online sexual content among adolescent girls. Youth & Society, 47, 486–501.
47.
ShklovskiI.KieslerS.KrautR. (2006). The Internet and social interaction. In KrautR.BryninM.KieslerS. (Eds.), Computer, phones, and the Internet (pp. 251–264). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SmithA.GriersonJ.WainD.PittsM.PattisonP. (2004). Associations between the sexual behaviour of men who have sex with men and the structure and composition of their social networks. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, 455–458. doi:10.1136/sti.2004.010355
49.
SmithK. P.ChristakisN. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601
50.
StoddardS.BauermeisterJ. A.Gordon-MesserD.JohnsM. M.ZimmermanM. A. (2012). Permissive norms and young adults’ alcohol and marijuana use: The role of online communitiesJournal of Studies on Alcohol, 73, 968–975. doi:10.15288/jsad.2012.73.968
51.
ThelwallM. (2009). Homophily in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 219–231. doi:10.1002/asi.v60:2
52.
ValenteT. W. (2010). Social networks and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Oxford.
53.
ValenteT. W.FujimotoK.ChouC.Spruijt-MetzD. (2009). Adolescent affiliations and adiposity: A social network analysis of friendships and obesity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 202–204. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.01.007
54.
WassermanS. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
WeinstockH.BermanS.CatesW. (2004). Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 6–10. doi:10.1363/psrh.36.6.04
56.
WilliamsD.ConsalvoM.CaplanS.YeeN. (2009). Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59, 700–725. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01453.x
57.
YbarraM. L.SumanM. (2008). Reasons, assessments and actions taken: Sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information. Health Education Research, 23, 512–521. doi:10.1093/her/cyl062
58.
YoungS. D.JordanA. H. (2013). The influence of social networking photos on social norms and sexual health behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 243–247.
59.
YoungS. D.RiceE. (2011). Online social networking technologies, HIV knowledge, and sexual risk and testing behaviors among homeless youth. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 253–260. doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9810-0
