Five studies (N = 5,150) relying on an exhaustive procedure addressed whether volunteer bias (VB) exists in friendship research among emerging adults (EAs). Consistently, the studies showed that women are more willing than men to participate in research on same-sex best friendship (SSBF). Studies 2 through 5 showed that friendship duration is not related to volunteering. Studies 3 and 4 showed that the friendships of volunteers were higher in positive friendship experiences compared to nonvolunteers. Finally, Study 5 showed that a significant portion of nonvolunteers ended up participating in research on SSBF. VB in research on friendship is an artifact that presents a concern for the generalizability and validity of findings relative to the friendship experiences of EAs. Recruitment strategies that could alleviate this problem are discussed.
BarryC. M.MadsenS. D.DeGraceA. (2016). Growing up with a little help from their friends in emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 215–229). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
BarryC. M.MadsenS. D.NelsonL. J.CarrollJ. S.BadgerS. (2009). Friendship and romantic relationship qualities in emerging adulthood: Differential associations with identity development and achieved adulthood criteria. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 209–222. doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9067-x
3.
BermanM. E.FallonA. E.CoccaroE. F. (1998). The relationship between personality psychopathology and aggressive behavior in research volunteers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 651–658. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.107.4.651
4.
BeyersW.Seiffge-KrenkeI. (2010). Does identity precede intimacy? Testing Erikson’s theory on romantic development in emerging adults of the 21st century. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 387–415. doi:10.1177/0743558410361370
5.
BoucherR. G.HilgardE. R. (1962). Volunteer bias in hypnotic experimentation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 5, 49–51. doi:10.1080/00029157.1962.10401928
6.
BountressK.HallerM. M.ChassinL. (2013). The indirect effects of parent psychopathology on offspring affective disorder through difficulty during the leaving home transition. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 196–206. doi:10.1177/2167696813477089
7.
BoyntonP. M. (2003). I’m just a girl who can’t say no? Women, consent, and sex research. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 29, 23–32. doi:10.1080/713847130
8.
CallahanC. A.HojatM.GonnellaJ. S. (2007). Volunteer bias in medical education research: An empirical study of over three decades of longitudinal data. Medical Education, 41, 746–753. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02803.x
9.
CarlsonR. (1971). Where is the person in personality research?Psychological Bulletin, 75, 203–219.
10.
CarnahanT.McFarlandS. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603–614. doi:10.1177/0146167206292689
11.
CataniaJ. A.GibsonD. R.ChitwoodD. D.CoatesT. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339–362. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339
12.
ChanD. K. S.ChengG. H. L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305–320. doi:10.1177/0265407504042834
13.
CollinsA.van DulmenM. (2006). Friendships and romance in emerging adulthood: Assessing distinctiveness in close relationships. In ArnettJeffrey JensenTannerJennifer Lynn (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 219–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11381-009
14.
CooperC. A.McCordD. M.SochaA. (2011). Evaluating the college sophomore problem: The case of personality and politics. The Journal of Psychology, 145, 23–37. doi:10.1080/00223980.2010.528074
15.
CudrinJ. M. (1969). Intelligence of volunteers as research subjects. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 33, 501–503.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
17.
DemirM. (2010). Close relationships and happiness among emerging adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 293–313. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9141-x
18.
DemirM. (2015). Friendship and happiness: Across the lifespan and cultures. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
19.
DemirM.DavidsonI. (2013). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between friendship and happiness: Perceived responses to capitalization attempts, feelings of mattering, and satisfaction of basic psychological needs in same-sex best friendships as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 525–550. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9341-7
20.
DemirM.OrthelH.AndersonA. K. (2013). Friendship and happiness. In DavidS.BoniwellI.AyersA. C. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 860–870). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
DemirM.Orthel-ClarkH.ÖzdemirM.ÖzdemirS. B. (2015). Friendship and happiness among young adults. In DemirM. (Ed.), Friendship and happiness: Across the lifespan and cultures (pp. 117–135). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
22.
DemirM.ÖzdemirM. (2010). Friendship, need satisfaction and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 243–259. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9138-5
23.
DemirM.ÖzdemirM.WeitekampL. A. (2007). Looking to happy tomorrows with friends: Best and close friendships as they predict happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 243–271.
24.
DePauloB. (2014). Single in a society preoccupied with couples. In CoplanR.BowkerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 302–316). Chicago: John Wiley.
25.
DindiaK.AllenM. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106
26.
DoaneA. N.KelleyM. L.ChiangE. S.PadillaM. A. (2013). Development of the cyberbullying experiences survey. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 207–218. doi:10.1177/2167696813479584
27.
DoğanA.YüzbaşıD. V.DemirM. (2016). The transition to adulthood in Turkey: Views from university students and workers. In ŽukauskieneR. (Ed.), Emerging adulthood in a European context (pp. 94–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
DollingerS. J.LeongF. T. (1993). Volunteer bias and the five-factor model. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 29–36. doi:10.1080/00223980.1993.9915540
29.
DregerR. M.JohnsonW. E. (1974). Characteristics of volunteers, nonvolunteers, and no shows in a clinical follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 746. doi:10.1037/h0037087
30.
FioriK.DencklaC. (2015). Friendship and happiness among middle-aged adults. In DemirM. (Ed.), Friendship and happiness: Across the lifespan and cultures (pp. 137–154). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
31.
FreydJ. J. (2012). A plea to university researchers. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 13, 497–508. doi:10.1080/15299732.2012.708613
32.
FurmanW.RobbinsP. (1985). What’s the point? Issues in the selection of treatment objectives. In SchneiderB. H.RubinK. H.LedinghamJ. E. (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 41–54). New York, NY: Springer.
33.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE. A.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
34.
GreenbergJ. (1987). The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12, 157–159. doi:10.5465/AMR.1987.4306516
35.
GrundT. (2014). Network size and network homophily: Same–sex friendships in 595 Scandinavian schools. In ManzoG. (Ed.), Analytical sociology: Actions and networks (pp. 299–316). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118762707.ch12
36.
HarthS. C.JohnstoneR. R.ThongY. H. (1992). The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: A controlled study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18, 86–93. doi:10.1136/jme.18.2.86
37.
HaysR. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.48.4.909
38.
HaysR. B. (1988). Friendship. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 391–408). New York, NY: Wiley.
39.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
40.
HillC. T.RubinZ.PeplauL. A.WillardS. G. (1979). The volunteer couple: Sex differences, couple commitment, and participation in research on interpersonal relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 415–420. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3033813
41.
HoweE. S. (1960). Quantitative motivational differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a psychological experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 115–120. doi:10.1037/h0045002
42.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
43.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
KaatsG. R.DavisK. E. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 7, 26–34.
45.
KarneyB. R.DavilaJ.CohanC. L.SullivanK. T.JohnsonM. D.BradburyT. N. (1995). An empirical investigation of sampling strategies in marital research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 909–920.
46.
KitsonG. C.SussmanM. B.WilliamsG. K.ZeehandelaarR. B.ShickmanterB. K.SteinbergerJ. L. (1982). Sampling issues in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 965–981.
47.
KnappM. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
48.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M.CouchmanC. E.DeciE. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367–384. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367
49.
LaursenB.BukowskiW. M. (1997). A developmental guide to the organisation of close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 747–770. doi:10.1080/016502597384659
50.
LefkowitzE. S.BooneT. L.ShearerC. L. (2004). Communication with best friends about sex-related topics during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 339–351. doi:10.1023/B:JOYO.0000032642.27242.c1
51.
LewisR. J.WinsteadB. A.DerlegaV. J. (1989). Gender differences in volunteering for friendship research. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 4, 623–632.
52.
LykkenD. T.TellegenA.DeRubeisR. (1978). Volunteer bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds. Biodemography and Social Biology, 25, 1–9. doi:10.1080/19485565.1978.9988312
53.
MarshallS. K. (2001). Do I matter? Construct validation of adolescents’ perceived mattering to parents and friends. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 473–490. doi:10.1006/jado.2001.0384
54.
MaslowA. H.SakodaJ. M. (1952). Volunteer-error in the Kinsey study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 259–262. doi:10.1037/h0054411
55.
MatsumotoD.JonesC. A. L. (2009). Ethical issues in cross-cultural psychology. In MertensD. M.GinsbergP. E. (Eds.), Handbook of social science research ethics (pp. 323–336). London, England: Sage.
MendelsonM. J.AboudF. E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 130–132. doi:10.1037/h0087080
58.
NirenbergT. D.WinczeJ. P.BansalS.LiepmanM. R.Engle-FriedmanM.BeginA. (1991). Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics’ sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 371–379. doi:10.1007/BF01542617
59.
OswaldL. M.WandG. S.ZhuS.SelbyV. (2013). Volunteerism and self-selection bias in human positron emission tomography neuroimaging research. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 7, 163–176. doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9210-3
60.
PetersonR. A. (2001). On the use of college students in Social Science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461. doi:10.1086/323732
61.
RiggsM. M.KaessW. (1955). Personality differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers. The Journal of Psychology, 40, 229–245. doi:10.1080/00223980.1955.9712981
62.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1969). Artifacts in behavioral research. New York, NY: Academic Press.
63.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1975). The volunteer subject. New York, NY: John Wiley.
64.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR. (1976). The volunteer subject revisited. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28, 97–108. doi:10.1080/00049537608255268
65.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR. (1997). People studying people: Artifacts and ethics in behavioral research. New York, NY: WH Freeman.
66.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the lab: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515
67.
SharpE. C.PelletierL. G.LévesqueC. (2006). The double-edged sword of rewards for participation in psychology experiments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science [Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement], 38, 269–277. doi:10.1037/cjbs2006014
68.
ShulmanS.ConnollyJ. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 27–39. doi:10.1177/2167696812467330
69.
ShulmanS.LaursenB.DicksonD. J. (2013). Gender differences in the spillover between romantic experiences, work experiences, and individual adjustment across emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2. doi:10.1177/2167696813515853
70.
SiegmanA. W. (1956). Responses to a personality questionnaire by volunteers and nonvolunteers to a Kinsey interview. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 280–281. doi:10.1037/h0047875
71.
SiessT. F. (1973). Personality correlates of volunteers’ experiment preferences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science [Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement], 5, 253–263. doi:10.1037/h0082350
72.
SignorellaM. L.VegegaM. E. (1984). A note on gender stereotyping of research topics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 107–109. doi:10.1177/0146167284101012
73.
SilvermanI.MargulisS. (1973). Experiment title as a source of sampling bias in commonly used “subject-pool” procedures. Canadian Psychologist [Psychologie Canadienne], 14, 197–201. doi:10.1037/h0082218
74.
SpeerD. C.ZoldA. (1971). An example of self-selection bias in follow-up research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 64–68. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197101)27:13.0.CO;2-9
75.
StrahanR. F.HowardM. B. (1979). Connotations of psychology experiment titles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 41–42. doi:10.3758/BF03329394
76.
StrassbergD. S.LoweK. (1995). Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 369–382. doi:10.1007/BF01541853
77.
TaniguchiH. (2015). Interpersonal mattering in friendship as a predictor of happiness: The case of Tokyoites. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1475–1491. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9570-z
78.
TermanL. M. (1948). Kinsey’s “sexual behavior in the human male”: Some comments and criticisms. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 443–459. doi:10.1037/h0060435
79.
ToddM.DavisK. E.CaffertyT. P. (1983). Who volunteers for adult development research? Research findings and practical steps to reach low volunteering groups. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 18, 177–184.
80.
UmemuraT.LacinováL.MacekP. (2015). Is emerging adults’ attachment preference for the romantic partner transferred from their attachment preferences for their mother, father, and friends?Emerging Adulthood, 3, 179–193. doi:10.1177/2167696814561767
van DulmenM. H. M. (2013). Emerging adulthood—The journal. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 3–4. doi:10.1177/2167696812469356
83.
VaterlausM.BeckertT.BirdC. (2015). “At a certain age it’s not appropriate to monitor one’s child”: Perceptions of parental mediation of emerging adult interactive technology use. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 353–358. doi:10.1177/2167696815581277
84.
WatersL.KirkW. E. (1969). Characteristics of volunteers and nonvolunteers for psychological experiments. The Journal of Psychology, 73, 133–136. doi:10.1080/00223980.1969.10543524
85.
WickerA. W. (1968). Overt behaviors toward the church by volunteers, follow-up volunteers, and non-volunteers in a church survey. Psychological Reports, 22, 917–920.
86.
WiedermanM. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66.
87.
WilloughbyB. J.MedarisM.JamesS.BartholomewK. (2014). Changes in marital beliefs among emerging adults: Examining marital paradigms over time. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 219–228. doi:2167696814563381
88.
WooJ. S.BrottoL. A.YuleM. A. (2010). Do East Asian and Euro-Canadian women differ in sexual psychophysiology research participation?Journal of Sex Research, 47, 345–354. doi:10.1080/00224490902999294
89.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 53. doi:10.1037/a0028601
