In a mixed-methods longitudinal study, we examined the relationship between Erikson’s construct of generativity, measured at ages 23 and 26, and environmentalism at age 32. Over a hundred Canadian youth completed a questionnaire that measured generative concerns. Environmentalism was assessed by questionnaires on involvement, identity, and attitudes, as well as through narratives about personal experiences with the environment. Narratives were coded for meaning, vividness, and impact of environmentalism. Stronger generative concern in emerging adulthood positively predicted environmentalism after controlling for liberal political orientation and benevolence values. Qualitative analyses of the environmental narrative of participants high in generative concerns revealed three themes that highlight the developmental process that ties generative concerns to environmentalism: (1) wanting to feel more empowered to help the environment, (2) the role of having children as a focus for crystallizing environmentalism, and (3) the passing on of specific family traditions from earlier generations. Environmentalism thus may be one important domain of expression for generative care in youth.
AlisatS.NorrisJ. E.PrattM. W.MatsubaM. K.McAdamsD. P. (2014). Caring for the earth: Generativity as a mediator for the prediction of environmental narratives from identity among activists and nonactivists. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 14, 177–194.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for?Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68–73.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2013). The evidence for Generation We and against Generation Me. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 5–10.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
6.
BuschH.HoferJ. (2011). Identity, prosocial behavior, and generative concern in German and Cameroonian Nso adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 629–638.
7.
ChanT. S. (2009). Environmental sustainability as a generative concern: An exploratory study of the narrative identities of leaders in the environmental sustainability movement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
8.
ChawlaL. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 15–26.
9.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ConnellyJ.SmithG. (2004). Politics and the environment: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
DamonW.MenonJ.BronkK.C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 119–128.
13.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
14.
EmmonsR. A. (1989). The personal striving approach to personality. In PervinL. (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social personality (pp. 87–126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
16.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62.
17.
FortunaK.KnafoA. (2014). Parental and genetic contributions to prosocial behavior during childhood. In Padilla-WalkerL.CarloG. (Eds.), The complexities of raising prosocial children: An examination of the multidimensionality of prosocial behaviors (pp. 70–89). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
FrenschK. M.PrattM. W.NorrisJ. E. (2007). Foundations of generativity: Personal and family correlates of adolescents’ generative life story themes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 45–62.
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
20.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 5–17.
21.
GuineyM. S.OberhauserK. S. (2009). Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology, 1, 187–197.
22.
HartH.McAdamsD. P.HirschB. J.BauerJ. J. (2001). Generativity and social involvement among African-Americans and White adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 208–230.
23.
HorwitzW. A. (1996). Developmental origins of environmental ethics: The life experiences of activists. Ethics and Behavior, 6, 29–54.
24.
JostJ. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.
25.
LawfordH.PrattM. W.HunsbergerB.PancerS. M. (2005). Adolescent generativity: A longitudinal study of two possible contexts for learning concern for future generations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 261–273.
26.
MatsubaM. K.PrattM. W. (2013). The making of an environmental activist: A developmental psychological perspective. In MatsubaM. K.KingP. E.BronkK. C. (Eds.), Exemplar methods and research. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 142, pp. 59–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
MatsubaM. K.PrattM. W.NorrisJ. E.MohleE.AlisatS.McAdamsD. P. (2012).Environmentalism as a context for expressing generativity and identity: Patterns among activists and uninvolved youth and midlife adults. Journal of Personality, 80, 1091–1115.
28.
McAdamsD. P. (2001). The psychology of the life story. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.
29.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
McAdamsD. P. (2013). Life authorship: A psychological challenge for emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 151–158.
31.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.
32.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (1998). Generativity and adult development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
33.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE.LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.
34.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.
35.
McLeanK. C. (2005). Late adolescent identity development: Narrative meaning-making and memory telling. Developmental Psychology, 41, 683–691.
36.
McLeanK. C.PrattM. W. (2006). Life’s little (and big) lessons: Identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 42, 714–722.
37.
MooreK. D.NelsonM. P. (2010). Moral ground: Ethical action for a planet in peril. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press.
38.
PetersonB. E.StewartA. J. (1996). Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and aging, 11, 21.
39.
PrattM. W.LawfordH. L. (2014). Early generativity and types of civic engagement in adolescence and emerging adulthood. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 410–436). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
ScharfM.MayselessO. (2011). Buds of parenting in emerging adult males: What we learned from our parents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 479–505.
41.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42.
SoucieK. M.LawfordH.PrattM. W. (2012). Personal stories of empathy in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58, 141–158.
43.
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
44.
StewartA. J.VandewaterE. (1998). The course of generativity. In McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (Eds.), Generativity and adult development (pp. 75–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
45.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.FreemenE. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1045–1062.
46.
UrienB.KilbourneW. (2011). Generativity and self-enhancement values in eco-friendly behavioral intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behaviour. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 69–90.
47.
Wray-LakeL.FlanaganC. A.OsgoodD. W. (2010). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours across three decades. Environment and Behavior, 42, 61–85.
48.
ZavalL.MarkowitzE. M.WeberE. U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26, 231–236.
