This study examined whether emerging adults’ attachment preference for their romantic partner is complementary to their attachment preferences for their mother, father, and friends using a cross-sectional research design. Participants were 1,021 emerging adults recruited in the Czech Republic (mean age = 21.46, SD = 1.55) who filled out questionnaires. The attachment preference for the romantic partner correlated inversely with the attachment preference for friends but not with the preference for the mother or for the father. Our regression analyses revealed that emerging adults who were currently in a romantic relationship and had a longer romantic relationship were more likely to prefer their partner and less likely to prefer their friends. However, those emerging adults were not necessarily less likely to prefer their parents. For females, the length of romantic relationship was positively linked to their preferences for their mother. Hence, the results of this study accord with the claim that emerging adults’ attachment preferences are shifted to the romantic partner only from friends and not from the parents.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1982). Attachment: Retrospect and prospect. In Stevenson-HindeJ.ParksC. M. (Eds.), The place of attachment in human behavior (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
2.
AinsworthM. D. S. (1989). Attachment bonds beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.709
3.
AquilinoW. S. (2006). Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 193–218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
5.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
ArnettJ. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: APA Books.
BeyersW.GoossensL.Van CalsterB.DuriezB. (2005). An alternative substantive factor structure of the emotional autonomy scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 147. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.147
9.
BeyersW.GoossensL.VansantI.MoorsE. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351–365. doi:10.1023/A:1024922031510
10.
BosmaH. A. (1985). Identity development in adolescence. Coping with commitments(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen: Groningen, the Netherlands.
11.
BosmaH. A.KunnenE. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 39–66. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0514
12.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969)
13.
BranjeS.Laninga-WijnenL.YuR.MeeusW. (2014). Associations among school and friendship identity in adolescence and romantic relationships and work in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 6–16. doi:10.1177/2167696813515851
14.
Clarke-StewartK. A. (1978). And daddy makes three: The father’s impact on mother and young child. Child Development, 49, 466–478. doi:10.2307/1128712
15.
CummingsE. M. (1980). Caregiver stability and attachment in infant day care. Developmental Psychology, 16, 31–37. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.1.31
16.
DubasJ. S.PetersenA. C. (1996). Geographical distance from parents and adjustment during adolescence and young adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996, 3–19. doi:10.1002/cd.23219967103
17.
EndersC. K. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 27–31. doi:10.1111/cdep.12008
18.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
19.
FraleyR. C.DavisK. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131–144. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x
20.
FrankS. J.AveryC. B.LamanM. S. (1988). Young adults’ perceptions of their relationships with their parents: Individual differences in connectedness, competence, and emotional autonomy. Developmental Psychology, 24, 729. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.729
21.
FreemanH.BrownB. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 653–674. doi:10.1023/A:1012200511045
22.
FriedmanS. R.WeissbrodC. S. (2005). Work and family commitment and decision-making status among emerging adults. Sex Roles, 53, 317–325. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-6755-2
23.
GoossensL. (1995). Identity status development and students’ perception of the university environment: A cohort-sequential study. In OosterwegelA.WicklundR. (Eds.), The self in European and North American culture: Development and processes (pp. 19–32). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
24.
GrotevantH. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203–222. doi:10.1177/074355488723003
25.
GutmanL. M.EcclesJ. S. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43, 522–537. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.522
26.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 151–178). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
27.
JežekS.MacekP.MichalčákováR.BoušaO. (2014). Concepts of autonomy in emerging adulthood and their perception by Czech emerging adults. In AdamczykK.WysotaM. (Eds.), Functioning of young adults in a changing world (pp. 51–66). Kraków, Poland: WydawnictwoLibron—Filip Lohner.
28.
JoynerK.CampaM. (2006). How do adolescent relationships influence the quality of romantic relationships in young adulthood? In CrouterA.BoothA. (Eds.), Romance and sex in emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 93–101). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
KerenE.MayselessO. (2013). The freedom to choose secure attachment relationships in adulthood. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174, 271–290. doi:10.1080/00221325.2012.681326
30.
KernsK. A.TomichP. L.KimP. (2006). Normative trends in children’s perceptions of availability and utilization of attachment figures in middle childhood. Social Development, 15, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00327.x
31.
KobakR.RosenthalN. L.ZajacK.MadsenS. D. (2007). Adolescent attachment hierarchies and the search for an adult pair-bond. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2007, 57–72. doi:10.1002/cd.194
32.
KrogerJ. (1993). Identity and context: How the identity statuses choose their match. In JosselsonR.LieblichA. (Eds.), The narrative study of lives (Vol. 1, pp. 130–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
LambM. E. (1977a). The development of infant-mother and father-infant attachments in the second year of life. Developmental Psychology, 13, 537–578. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.13.6.637
34.
LambM. E. (1977b). Father-infant and mother-infant interaction in the first year of life. Child Development, 78, 157–181. doi:10.2307/1128896
35.
LeeJ. M.BellN. J. (2003). Individual differences in attachment–autonomy configurations: Linkages with substance use and youth competencies. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 347–361. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00018-6
36.
MacekP.BejčekJ.VaníčkováJ. (2007). Contemporary Czech emerging adults generation growing up in the period of social changes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 444–475. doi:10.1177/0743558407305417
37.
MarciaJ. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558. doi:10.1037/h0023281
38.
MayselessO. (2004). Home-leaving to military service: Attachment concerns, transfer of attachment functions from parents to peers, and adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 533–558. doi:10.1177/0743558403260000
39.
MeeusW. H.BranjeS. J.van der ValkI.de WiedM. (2007). Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the saliency of the intimate partnership. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 569–580. doi:10.1177/0165025407080584
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
41.
NickersonA. B.NagleR. J. (2005). Parent and peer attachment in late childhood and early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 223–249. doi: 10.1177/0272431604274174
42.
NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2010). Self-determination theory and the relation of autonomy to self-regulatory processes and personality development. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 169–191). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
43.
NoomM. J.DekovićM.MeeusW. (2001). Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 577–595. doi:10.1023/A:1010400721676
44.
O’ConnorT. G.AllenJ. P.BellK. L.HauserS. T. (1996). Adolescent-parent relationships and leaving home in young adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 71, 39–52. doi:10.1002/cd.23219967105
45.
PitmanR.ScharfeE. (2010). Testing the function of attachment hierarchies during emerging adulthood. Personal Relationships, 17, 201–216. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01272.x
46.
QinL.PomerantzE. M.WangQ. (2009). Are gains in decision-making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80, 1705–1721. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.x
47.
RosenthalN. L.KobakR. (2010). Assessing adolescents’ attachment hierarchies: Differences across developmental periods and associations with individual adaptation. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 678–706. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00655.x
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
49.
RyanR. M.LynchJ. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340–356. doi:10.2307/1130981
50.
RyanR. M.StillerJ. D.LynchJ. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226–249. doi:10.1177/027243169401400207
51.
ScharfM.MayselessO. (2007). Putting eggs in more than one basket: A new look at developmental processes of attachment in adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 117, 1–22. doi:10.1002/cd.191
52.
Seiffge-KrenkeI. (2013). “She’s Leaving Home…” antecedents, consequences, and cultural patterns in the leaving home process. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 114–124. doi:10.1177/2167696813479783
53.
ShulmanS.LaursenB.DicksonD. J. (2014). Gender differences in the spillover between romantic experiences, work experiences, and individual adjustment across emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 36–47. doi:10.1177/2167696813515853
54.
SmetanaJ. G.Campione-BarrN.DaddisC. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75, 1418–1434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00749.x
StephenJ.FraserE.MarciaJ. E. (1992). Moratorium-achievement (Mama) cycles in lifespan identity development: Value orientations and reasoning system correlates. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 283–300. doi:10.1016/0140-1971(92)90031-Y
57.
TannerJ. L.ArnettJ. J. (2009). The emergence of “emerging adulthood”: A new life stage between adolescents and young adulthood. In FurlongE. (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 39–45). London, England: Routledge.
58.
TrinkeS. J.BartholomewK. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603–625. doi:10.1177/0265407597145002
59.
UmemuraT.JacobvitzD.MessinaS.HazenN. (2013). Do toddlers prefer the primary caregiver or the parent with whom they feel more secure? The role of toddler emotion. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 102–114. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.10.003
60.
Van PetegemS.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW. (2013). The jingle–jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: In search of an underlying structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 994–1014.
61.
WatersE.CummingsE. M. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. Child Development, 71, 164–172. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00130
