The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explain and describe the perceptions of college-going, emerging adults who grew up in foster care (FC) regarding educational factors related to their journey to college. Thematic analysis of the narratives of 24 ethnically-diverse participants revealed academic barriers and academic supports unique to their status as young adults who lived in FC. The study introduces the Foster Youth Academic Achievement Model, a framework to help contextualize themes related to factors that serve as barriers and supports for this vulnerable yet resilient group.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AhrenK. R.DuBoisD. L.RichardsonL. P.FanM.LozanoP. (2008). Youth in foster care with adult mentors during adolescence have improved adult outcomes. Pediatrics, 121, e246-e252. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0508
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
5.
BempechatJ. (2000). Getting our kids back on track: Educating children for the future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BerlinerB.LezinN. (2010). Grappling with the gaps: Toward a research agenda to meet the educational needs of children and youth in foster care. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
7.
BerlinerB.LezinN. (2012). Building a research agenda to improve educational outcomes for children and youth in foster care: What the experts say. (Policy Perspectives). San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
8.
BernardB. (2004). Resiliency: What we have learned. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
9.
BrouseC. H.BaschC. E.LeBlancM.McKnightK. R.LeiT. (2010). College students’ academic motivation: Differences by gender, class, and source of payment. College Quarterly, 13, 1-10.
10.
BurrellS. (2003). Getting out of the “red zone”: Youth from juvenile justice and child welfare systems speak out about the obstacles to completing their education, and what could help. Washington, DC: Youth Law Center.
11.
Casey Family Programs. (2004). A road map for learning: Improving educational outcomes in foster care. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
Casey Family Programs. (2007). National educational outcomes for children and youth in foster and out-of-home care. Seattle, WA: Author.
13.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2013). Foster care statistics 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
14.
ChoiceP.D’AndradeA.GuntherK.DownesD.SchaldachJ.CsiszarC.AustinM. J. (2001). Education for foster children: Removing barriers to academic success. Berkeley, CA: Bay Area Social Services Consortium, Center for Social Services Research, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
15.
CourtneyM. E.DworskyA.LeeJ. S.RaapM. (2010). Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at ages 23 and 24. Chicago. IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
16.
ElzeD. E.AuslanderW. F.StiffmanA. R.McMillenC. (2005). Educational needs of youth in foster care. In MallonG. P.HessP. M. (Eds.), Child welfare for the twenty-first century: A handbook of practices, policies, and programs (pp. 185–204). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
17.
FestingerT. (1983). No one ever asked us … : A postscript to foster care. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
20.
GreesonJ. K. P. (2013). Foster youth and the transition to adulthood: The theoretical and conceptual basis for natural mentoring. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 40-51. doi:10.1177/2167696812467780
21.
HornL. J.CarrollC. D. (1997). Confronting the odds: Students at risk and the pipeline to higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
22.
HoweM. J. A. (1999). Genius explained. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
KennyM. E.GualdronL.ScanlonD.SparksE.BlusteinD.JerniganM. (2007). Urban adolescents’ construction of supports and barriers to their educational career attainment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 336-343.
24.
MarzanoR. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
MasonM. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews [63 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11, Art. 8. Retrieved fromhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387
26.
MarrowA. J. (1969). The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27.
McMillenC.AuslanderW.ElzeD.WhiteT.ThompsonR. (2003). Educational experiences and aspirations of older youth in foster care. Child Welfare, 82, 475-495.
28.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MunsonM. R.McMillenJ. C. (2009). Natural mentoring and psychosocial outcomes among older youth transitioning from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 104-111.
31.
NancyC. Detert Common Sense and Compassion Independent Living Act, FLA. STAT 2013-178 (2013). Retrieved fromhttp://laws.flrules.org/2013/178
32.
National Working Group on Foster Care and Education. (2008). Foster care and education: Tools and resources for improving the education success of children and youth in foster care. Washington, DC: Author.
PecoraP. J.KesslerR.WilliamsJ.O’BrienK.DownsA.EnglishD.…HolmesK. (2005). Improving family foster care: Findings from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study. Seattle, WA: Casey Family Programs.
35.
RumbergerR. W.LarsonK. A.ReamR. K.PalardyG. J. (1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools. Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education.
36.
RyanG. W.BernardH. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 1, 85-109.
37.
Search Institute. (2003). Boosting student achievement: New research on the power of developmental assets. Search Institute Insights & Evidence, 1, 1-10.
38.
SteinbergL. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York, NY: Touchstone.
39.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage(Original work published 1990).
40.
Sui-ChuE. S.WillmsJ. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126-141.
41.
SyedM.AzmitiaM.CooperC. R. (2011). Identify and academic success among underrepresented ethnic minorities: An interdisciplinary review and integration. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 442-468.
