This longitudinal study describes women’s media use during their first year of college and examines associations between media use and academic outcomes. Female students (N = 483, Mage = 18.1 years) reported on their use of 11 media forms and their grade point average (GPA), academic behaviors, academic confidence, and problems affecting schoolwork. Allowing for multitasking, women reported nearly 12 hr of media use per day; use of texting, music, the Internet, and social networking was heaviest. In general, media use was negatively associated with academic outcomes after controlling for prior academics and demographics. Exceptions were newspaper reading and music listening, which were positively associated with academic outcomes. There were significant indirect effects of magazine reading and social networking on GPA via academic behaviors, confidence, and problems. Results show that female college students are heavy users of new media, and that some forms of media use may adversely impact academic performance.
Aluja-FabregatA.Torrubia-BeltriR. (1998). Viewing of mass media violence, perception of violence, personality and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 973–989.
2.
American College Health Association. (2010). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference group data report Spring 2010. Linthicum, MD: Author.
3.
AndersonD. R.HustonA. C.SchmittK. L.LinebargerD. L.WrightJ. C. (2001). Early childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior: the recontact study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66(1), I–VIII, 1–147.
4.
AndersonP.de BruijnA.AngusK.GordonR.HastingsG. (2009). Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44, 229–243.
5.
AndersonS. A.FullerG. B. (2010). Effect of music on reading comprehension of junior high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 178–187.
6.
ArmfieldG. G.HolbertR. L. (2003). The relationship between religiosity and Internet use. Journal of Media and Religion, 2, 129–144.
7.
ArmstrongG. B.ChungL. (2000). Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research, 27, 327–352.
8.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
9.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
ArnettJ. J. (2007). Socialization in emerging adulthood: From the family to the wider world, from socialization to self-socialization. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 208–231). New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
BoonS. D.LomoreC. D. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults. Human Communication Research, 27, 432–465.
12.
BowmanL. L.LevineL. E.WaiteB. M.GendronM. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927–931.
13.
BuddenC.AnthonyJ.BuddenM.JonesM. (2007). Managing the evolution of a revolution: Marketing implications of internet media usage among college students. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 3, 5–10.
14.
ChemersM. M.HuL.GarciaB. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 55–64.
15.
ChenS.-Y.FuY.-C. (2009). Internet use and academic achievement: Gender differences in early adolescence [Article]. Adolescence, 44, 797–812.
16.
ChenS.-Y.TzengJ.-Y. (2010). College female and male heavy internet users’ profiles of practices and their academic grades and psychosocial adjustment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 257–262.
17.
ChenY.-F.KatzJ. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 179–191.
18.
ChenY.-F.PengS. S. (2008). University students’ Internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 467–469.
19.
CollinsW. (1982). Cognitive processing in television viewing. In PearlD.BouthiletL.LazarJ. (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2, pp. 9–23). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
ConardM. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 339–346.
21.
CôtéJ. E. (2006). Emerging adulthood as an institutionalized moratorium: Risks and benefits to identity formation. In ArnettJ. J.TannerJ. L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 85–116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
CredéM.RochS. G.KieszczynkaU. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80, 272–295.
23.
DuffyM.GotcherM. (1996). Crucial advice on how to get the guy: The rhetorical vision of power and seduction in the teen magazine YM. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 20, 32–48.
24.
DumaisS. A. (2008). Adolescents’ time use and academic achievement: A test of the reproduction and mobility models. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 865–886.
25.
DumaisS. A. (2009). Cohort and gender differences in extracurricular participation: The relationship between activities, math achievement, and college expectations. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 72–100.
26.
EndC. M.WorthmanS.MathewsM. B.WetterauK. (2010). Costly cell phones: The impact of cell phone rings on academic performance. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 55–57.
27.
EnglanderF.TerregrossaR. A.WangZ. (2010). Internet use among college students: Tool or toy?Educational Review, 62, 85–96.
28.
FoehrU. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
29.
FoxA. B.RosenJ.CrawfordM. (2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 51–53.
30.
GaddyG. D. (1986). Television’s impact on high school achievement. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 340–359.
31.
GallikJ. D. (1999). Do they read for pleasure? Recreational reading habits of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42, 480–488.
32.
GrahamJ.OlchowskiA.GilreathT. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213.
33.
HargittaiE. (2008). Whose space? Differences among users and non users of social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297.
34.
HargittaiE.HsiehY.-l. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 515–536.
35.
HarrisonL.WilliamsT. (1986). Television and cognitive development. In WilliamsT. (Ed.), The impact of television: A natural experiment in three communities (pp. 87–142). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
36.
HonakerJ.KingG.BlackwellM. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–47.
37.
HuesmannL. R.Moise-TitusJ.PodolskiC.-L.EronL. D. (2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39, 201–221.
38.
HustonA. C.WrightJ. C.MarquisJ.GreenS. B. (1999). How young children spend their time: Television and other activities. Developmental Psychology, 35, 912–925.
39.
HysenbegasiA.HassS. L.RowlandC. R. (2005). The impact of depression on the academic productivity of university students. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 8, 145–151.
40.
IannottiR. J.KoganM. D.JanssenI.BoyceW. F. (2009). Patterns of adolescent physical activity, screen-based media use, and positive and negative health indicators in the U.S. and Canada. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 493–499.
41.
JacksonL. A.von EyeA.BioccaF. A.BarbatsisG.ZhaoY.FitzgeraldH. E. (2006). Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children?Developmental Psychology, 42, 429–435.
42.
JacobsenW.ForsteR. (2010). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 45, 275–280.
43.
JaruratanasirikulS.WongwaitaweewongK.SangsupawanichP. (2009). Electronic game play and school performance of adolescents in Southern Thailand. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 509–512.
44.
JeynesW. H. (2003). The effects of religious commitment on the academic achievement of urban and other children. Education and Urban Society, 36, 44–62.
45.
JohnsonJ. G.CohenP.KasenS.BrookJ. S. (2007). Extensive television viewing and the development of attention and learning difficulties during adolescence. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 480–486.
46.
JonesS.Johnson-YaleC.MillermaierS.PerezF. S. (2009). US college students’ Internet use: Race, gender and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 244–264.
47.
KaoG.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442.
48.
KimJ.LaRoseR.PengW. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 451–455.
49.
KitsantasA.ZimmermanB. (2009). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 97–110.
50.
KoolstraC.van der VoortT. (1996). Longitudinal effects of television on children's leisure-time reading. Human Communication Research, 23, 4–35.
51.
KubeyR. W.LavinM. J.BarrowsJ. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51, 366–382.
52.
KuncelN.CredéM.ThomasL. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63.
53.
LarsonR. W. (1990). The solitary side of life: An examination of the time people spend alone from childhood to old age. Developmental Review, 10, 155–183.
54.
LauzenM. M.DozierD. M.HoranN. (2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 200–214.
55.
LenhartA.PurcellK.SmithA.ZickuhrK. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
56.
LeungL. (2007). Unwillingness-to-communicate and college students’ motives in SMS mobile messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 115–129.
57.
LevineL. E.WaiteB. M.BowmanL. L. (2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 560–566.
58.
LucasK.SherryJ. (2004). Sex differences in video game play. Communication Research, 31, 499.
59.
MachinS. (2006). Social disadvantage and education experiences. Paris, France: OECD.
60.
MokhtariK.ReichardC. A.GardnerA. (2009). The impact of internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 609–619.
61.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
62.
NottenN.KraaykampG. (2009). Home media and science performance: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 367–384.
63.
OgletreeS.DrakeR. (2007). College Students’ Video Game Participation and Perceptions: Gender Differences and Implications. Sex Roles, 56, 537–542.
64.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J.CarrollJ. S.JensenA. C. (2010). More than a just a game: Video game and internet use during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 103–113.
65.
PascarellaE. T.GoodmanK. M.SeifertT. A.Tagliapietra-NicoliG.ParkS.WhittE. J. (2007). College student binge drinking and academic achievement: A longitudinal replication and extension. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 715–727.
66.
PempekT. A.YermolayevaY. A.CalvertS. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.
67.
PoolM. M.KoolstraC. M.van der VoortT. H. A. (2003). The impact of background radio and television on high school students, homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53, 74–87.
68.
PrimackB. A.SwanierB.GeorgiopoulosA. M.LandS. R.FineM. J. (2009). Association between media use in adolescence and depression in young adulthood: A longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 181–188.
69.
Quan-HaaseA. (2007). University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671–693.
70.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.
71.
RideoutV.FoehrU.RobertsD. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
72.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.DavisD.LangleyR.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261.
73.
RobertsD. F. (2000). Media and youth: Access, exposure, and privatization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 8–14.
74.
RobertsD. F.FoehrU. G. (2008). Trends in media use. The Future of Children, 18, 11–37.
75.
RobinsonT. N.ChenH. L.KillenJ. D. (1998). Television and music video exposure and risk of adolescent alcohol use. Pediatrics, 102, e54.
76.
RocheleauB. (1995). Computer use by school-age children: Trends, patterns, and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 1–17.
77.
RubinD. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 473–489.
78.
RuggieroT. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3–37.
79.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
80.
SchaferJ. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
81.
SchlenkerJ.CaronS.HaltemanW. (1998). A feminist analysis of Seventeen Magazine: Content analysis from 1945 to 1995. Sex Roles, 38, 135–149.
82.
SchmidtM. E.VandewaterE. A. (2008). Media and attention, cognition, and school achievement. The Future of Children, 18, 63–85.
83.
SelwynN. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 11–22.
84.
SharifI.SargentJ. D. (2006). Association between television, movie, and video game exposure and school performance. Pediatrics, 118, E1061–E1070.
85.
SharifI.WillsT. A.SargentJ. D. (2010). Effect of visual media use on school performance: A prospective study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 52–61.
86.
SheoreyR.MokhtariK. (1994). The reading habits of developmental college students at different levels of reading proficiency. Reading Improvement, 31, 156–166.
87.
ShinN. (2004). Exploring pathways from television viewing to academic achievement in school age children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 367–381.
88.
SignorielliN. (1997). Reflections of girls in the media: A content analysis across six media. Oakland, CA and Menlo Park, CA: Children Now and Kaiser Family Foundation.
89.
SmithT. E. (1990). Time and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 539–558.
90.
SmithT. E. (1992). Time use and change in academic achievement: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 725–747.
91.
TaylorD. J.VatthauerK. E.BramowethA. D.RuggeroC.RoaneB. (2013). The role of sleep in predicting college academic performance: Is it a unique predictor?Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 11, 1–14.
92.
ThomeeS.HarenstamA.HagbergM. (2011). Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults—a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 11, 66.
93.
UllahH.WilsonM. A. (2007). Students’ academic success and its association to student involvement with learning and relationships with faculty and peers. College Student Journal, 41, 1192–1202.
94.
ValkenburgP. M.van der VoortT. H. (1994). Influence of TV on daydreaming and creative imagination: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 316–339.
95.
WalshJ. L.WardL. M. (2008). Adolescent gender role portrayals in the media: 1950 to the present. In JamiesonP.RomerD. (Eds.), The changing portrayal of adolescents in the media since 1950 (pp. 132–164). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
96.
WalshJ. L.WardL. M. (2010). Magazine reading and involvement and young adults’ sexual health knowledge, efficacy, and behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 285–300.
97.
WilliamT.Grant Foundation Commission on Work Family and Citizenship. (1988). The forgotten half: Non-college youth in America. Washington, DC: Author.
98.
WilloughbyT. (2008). A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls: Prevalence, frequency of use, and psychosocial predictors. Developmental Psychology, 44, 195–204.
99.
WilsonK.FornasierS.WhiteK. M. (2010). Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 173–177.
100.
YiX.-M.HuangJ.-X. (2008). Characteristics of the internet addiction college students in using web. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 34–36.
