The literature on communication in team sports has also focused mostly on verbal interaction whereas the use of nonverbal cues to facilitate real-time collective sensemaking has been underdeveloped. Based on the coordination theory and the model of collective sensemaking as presented in the communication research, this observational-computational study focused on the topic of nonverbal communication in 24 professional games (12 football and 12 basketball) in Spain La Liga and ACB League. The nonverbal behaviors coded by computer vision-assisted video analysis and human verified are 14,287. The behaviors that were analysed were gestures, direction of gazes, body position, and proxemic modifications among players. The effectiveness of collective sensemaking was evaluated using indicators of coordinated changes in tactics, adaptive play, and quick rebound on mistakes. It was found that dynamic network analysis showed higher densities of nonverbal communication in teams were converging to shared tactical understanding 34% more quickly (p < .001). Hidden Markov model revealed three shared understanding states, with nonverbal signs being the most frequent event that caused a state shift 2.3 times higher than verbal command. These results indicate that nonverbal communication is an interactive system, which distributed and helps in collective cognition and coordinated actions in group sports.
AshfordM.TaylorJ.PayneJ.WaldouckD.CollinsD. (2023). “Getting on the same page” enhancing team performance with shared mental models—case studies of evidence informed practice in elite sport. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5, 1057143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1057143
BialkowskiA.LuceyP.CarrP.YueY.MatthewsI. (2014, February). Win at home and draw away: Automatic formation analysis highlighting the differences in home and away team behaviors. In Proceedings of 8th annual MIT sloan sports analytics conference (pp. 1-7). MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.
5.
BlumerH. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press.
ClementeF. M.MartinsF. M. L.MendesR. S. (2016). Social network analysis applied to team sports analysis. Springer.
8.
CoorenF. (2020). A communicative constitutive perspective on corporate social responsibility: Ventriloquism, undecidability, and surprisability. Business & Society, 59(1), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318791780
9.
DuncanS. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031
FilhoE. (2019). Team dynamics theory: Nomological network among cohesion, team mental models, coordination, and collective efficacy. Sport Sciences for Health, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-018-0519-1
15.
FilhoE.TenenbaumG. (2020). Team mental models: Theory, empirical evidence, and applied implications. In TenenbaumG.EklundR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (4th ed., pp. 611–631). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
FilhoE.TenenbaumG.YangY. (2015). Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: Towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(6), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.957714
17.
FosterW. M.CoraiolaD. M.BastienF. (2025). Repairing ontological security: The collective sensemaking of affective stakeholders in online communities. Human Relations.
18.
FurleyP. (2017). The social synapse in sports: Interpersonal coordination and nonverbal behavior in sports. BOOK OF, 99.
19.
FurleyP.SchweizerG. (2016). Nonverbal communication of confidence in soccer referees: An experimental test of Darwin's leakage hypothesis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38(6), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0192
20.
García-de-AlcarazA.CuiY.GongB.LiuT. (2025). Spatial-temporal metrics to assess collective behavior in team sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1743592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1743592
21.
GoodwinC. (1981). Conversational organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers.
GriffinE. M. (2006). A first look at communication theory. McGraw-Hill.
24.
GrundT. U. (2012). Network structure and team performance: The case of English Premier League soccer teams. Social Networks, 34(4), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.08.004
25.
HallE. T. (1966). The hidden dimension.
26.
HollanJ.HutchinsE.KirshD. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
27.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT press.
28.
JewittC. (Ed.), (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (1): Routledge.
29.
KarpathyA.TodericiG.ShettyS.LeungT.SukthankarR.Fei-FeiL. (2014). Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1725–1732). IEEE.
30.
KatzD.KahnR. (2015). The social psychology of organizations. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 152–168). Routledge.
KendonA. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.
33.
KuhnT. (2012). Negotiating the micro-macro divide: Thought leadership from organizational communication for theorizing organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(4), 543–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912462004
34.
LuceyP.BialkowskiA.MonfortM.CarrP.MatthewsI. (2015). Quality vs quantity: Improved shot prediction in soccer using strategic features from spatiotemporal data.
MaitlisS.ChristiansonM. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
37.
MaloneT. W.CrowstonK. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668
38.
McPheeR. D.ZaugP. (2009). The communicative constitution of organizations. Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication, 10(1-2), 21.
39.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
42.
Müller-BudackE.TheinerJ.EwerthR. (2025). Computer vision and deep learning for sports analytics. In Artificial intelligence and machine learning in sports science (pp. 65–77). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
43.
NaikB. T.HashmiM. F.BokdeN. D. (2022). A comprehensive review of computer vision in sports: Open issues, future trends and research directions. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4429. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094429
44.
NorrisS. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.
45.
PassosP.DavidsK.AraújoD.PazN.MinguénsJ.MendesJ. (2011). Networks as a novel tool for studying team ball sports as complex social systems. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.10.459
46.
PopC. L.ZamfirM. V. (2020). Nonverbal communication of young players in team sports. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 24(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0104
47.
RabinerL. R. (2002). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626
48.
RamosJ.LopesR. J.AraújoD. (2018). What's next in complex networks? Capturing the concept of attacking play in invasive team sports. Sports Medicine, 48(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0786-z
49.
RataG.RataB. C.RataM.MaresG.MelinteM. (2012). Verbal and nonverbal communication during hammer throw training and competitions. Ovidius University Annals - Series Physical Education and Sport / Science, Movement and Health, 12(2 Suppl), 370–375.
50.
RossiL. F.SannaA.ManuriF.Donna BiancoM. (2025). How AI-based computer vision algorithms are impacting the sports industry: A survey. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00586-1
51.
SantosR.RibeiroJ.DavidsK.GargantaJ. (2025). Developing performance in sports teams through a collective homeostasis model supports regulation, adaptation, and evolution in competition. Adaptive Behavior, 33(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123241309980
52.
SilvaP.GargantaJ.AraújoD.DavidsK.AguiarP. (2013). Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Medicine, 43(9), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9
53.
StreeckJ.GoodwinC.LeBaronC. D. (Eds.), (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
54.
SullivanP. (2004). Communication differences between male and female team sport athletes. Communication Reports, 17(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210409389381
55.
VaterC.WilliamsA. M.HossnerE. J. (2020). What do we see out of the corner of our eye? The role of visual pivots and gaze anchors in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2019.1582082
56.
WangQ.ZhuH.HuW.ShenZ.YaoY. (2015, August). Discerning tactical patterns for professional soccer teams: An enhanced topic model with applications. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 2197-2206). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
57.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
58.
WeickK. E.RobertsK. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372
59.
YinH.SinnottR. O.JayaputeraG. T. (2024). A survey of video-based human action recognition in team sports. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(11), 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10934-9
60.
ZamfirM. V. (2017). Verbal and non-verbal communication in sport environment. Marathon, 9(1), 99–106.
61.
ZhengF.Al-HamidD. Z.ChongP. H. J.YangC.LiX. J. (2025). A review of computer vision technology for football videos. Information (2078-2489), 16(5), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050355
