Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Patriarchy in collegiate athletics is perpetuated through structural hierarchies and the pervasive use of patriarchal and paternalistic discourse by authority figures – primarily coaches and administrators. These individuals position themselves as guardians of athlete welfare and decision-making, often employing language that frames their oversight as protective and benevolent. However, such discourse reinforces a structural hierarchy that infantilizes athletes and undermines their autonomy. This research critically examined the ways in which patriarchal and paternalistic language operates within the institutional setting of collegiate athletics. Conducting an analysis of coach and athlete interviews (n = 446), the study reveals how paternalistic narratives normalize dependency and constrain athletes’ self-determination. The findings highlight the ways that infantilizing rhetoric serves to legitimize hierarchical control and justify the marginalization of athlete voices, particularly in areas of representation, monetization, and the broader commercialization of college sports.

Keywords

paternalism NCAA collegiate athletics infantilized language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aycan

(2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In Kim

Yang

Hwang

(Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 445–466). Springer.

Bals

A. S.

Campbell

C. L.

Pitt

L. F.

(2012). Viewer reactions to online political spoof videos and advertisements. In Close

(Ed.), Online consumer behavior: Theory and research in social media, advertising, and e-tail (pp. 185–208). Routledge.

Brinton

C. S.

Hill

B. J.

Ward

P. J.

(2017). Authoritative coach: Building youth through sport. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 35(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2017-V35-I1-7296

Carter

S. M.

Entwistle

V. A.

Little

(2015). Relational conceptions of paternalism: A way to rebut nanny-state accusations and evaluate public health interventions. Public Health, 129(8), 1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.007

Clarke

(2002). A definition of paternalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 5(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230212331294554

Corr

Bopp

Stokowski

(2024). “Necessary evil”: The difficulties of establishing programmatic culture in the transfer portal era. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.143532

Corr

Southall

Hawkins

Southall

R. M.

(2023). College football “kids”: Infantilizing language in football bowl subdivision bowl game broadcasts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 41(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2022-0185

Corr

Southall

R. M.

(2022). The ESPNification of football bowl subdivision college football: The adoption of an integrated marketing communication televisuality in football bowl subdivision bowl game broadcasts. International Journal of Sport Communication, 15(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0124

Corr

Stokowski

Staurowsky

E. J.

Paule-Koba

A. L.

Southall

R. M.

(2025). The modernization of monitorization: Technological adaption and innovation as mechanisms for college athlete surveillance. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 49(2-3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235251330206

10.

Crofts

Bisman

(2010). Interrogating accountability: An illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 7(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091011050859

11.

Crouch

C. L.

Gutierrez

I. A.

Allard

Y. S.

Adler

A. B.

(2024). Training military units in social connection: A quasi-experimental randomized trial. Journal of Military Social Work and Behavioral Health Services, 12(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/28367472.2024.2376070

12.

Daughters

(2018, June 8). Breaking down the 5 biggest differences between coaching in college and the NFL. Bleacher Report. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1631779-breaking-down-the-five-biggest-differences-between-coaching-in-college-or-nfl

13.

Dworkin

(2015). Defining paternalism. In Schramme

(Ed.), New perspectives on paternalism and health care (pp. 17–29). Springer.

14.

Gems

G. R.

(2000). For pride, profit, and patriarchy: Football and the incorporation of American cultural values. Scarecrow Press.

15.

Hanna

(2018). Hard and soft paternalism. In Grill

Hanna

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the philosophy of paternalism (1st ed., pp. 24–34). Routledge.

16.

Harmon

(2018, June 28). Football coaches sometimes have to play a father figure role. See what other roles they take on. USA Football. https://blogs.usafootball.com/blog/6348/football-coaches-sometimes-have-to-play-a-father-figure-role-see-what-other-roles-they-take-on

17.

Harry

(2023). Hegemony and the National Collegiate Athletic Association: A critical discourse analysis of National Collegiate Athletic Association resources concerning name, image, and likeness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 41(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2023-0017

18.

Hatteberg

S. J.

(2018). Under surveillance: Collegiate athletics as a total institution. Sociology of Sport Journal, 35(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2017-0096

19.

Hawkins

(2010). The new plantation: Black athletes, college sports, and predominantly White NCAA institutions. Palgrave Macmillan.

20.

Jin

Kim

Love

Jin

Zhao

(2022). Effects of leadership style on coach-athlete relationship, athletes’ motivations, and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012953

21.

Kim

H. D.

Cruz

A. B.

(2016). The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(6), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116676117

22.

Leximancer . (n.d.). Leximancer. https://www.leximancer.com/

23.

LoMonte

Koller

(2022). Keep it in the locker room. In Colombo-Dougovito

A. M.

Everbach

Weiller-Abels

(Eds.), Not playing around: Intersectional identities, media representation, and the power of sport (pp. 19–43). Rowman & Littlefield.

24.

Mustafa

Lines

(2012). Paternalism as a predictor of leadership behaviors: A bi-level analysis. Eurasian Business Review, 2(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353808

25.

National Collegiate Athletic Association . (2023, April 6). Celebrating student-athlete success. https://www.ncaa.org/news/2023/4/6/media-center-celebrating-student-athlete-successes.aspx

26.

Nite

Washington

(2025). Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: Creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport. Sport Management Review, 28(1), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2024.2403725

27.

Pellegrini

E. K.

Scandura

T. A.

(2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063

28.

Roseborough

Kelly

(2023, August 5). Congress looks to rein in college sports: What to know about the legislation. The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4133853-congress-looks-to-rein-in-college-sports-what-to-know-about-the-legislation/

29.

Ross

H. G.

Milgram

J. I.

(2014). Important variables in adult sibling relationships: A qualitative study. In Lamb

M. E.

Sutton-Smith

(Eds.), Sibling relationships (pp. 225–249). Psychology Press.

30.

Saunders-Hastings

(2019). Benevolent giving and the problem of paternalism. In Greaves

Pummer

(Eds.), Effective altruism: Philosophical issues (pp. 115–136). Oxford University Press.

31.

Singer

J. N.

(2009). African American football athletes’ perspectives on institutional integrity in college sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599534

32.

Singh

J. P.

(2021). Racism and paternalism. In Pevehouse

J. C. W.

Seabrooke

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international political economy (pp. 99–112). Oxford University Press.

33.

Southall

R. M.

Karcher

R. T.

(2016). Distributive injustice: An ethical analysis of the NCAA’s “collegiate model of athletics” and its jurisprudence. The International Sports Law Journal, 15(3-4), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-015-0084-6

34.

Southall

R. M.

Nagel

M. S.

Staurowsky

E. J.

Karcher

R. T.

Maxcy

J. G.

(2023). The NCAA and the exploitation of college profit-athletes: An amateurism that never was. University of South Carolina Press.

35.

Southall

R. M.

Weiler

J. D.

(2014). NCAA Division-I athletic departments: 21st century athletic company towns. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 161–186.

36.

Springer

Harry

Heinrich

(2025). Investigating paternalistic attitudes in NCAA division I power 5 team conduct policies. Innovative Higher Education, 50, 1203–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09776-8

37.

Stieler

Germelmann

C. C.

(2016). The ties that bind us: Feelings of social connectedness in socio-emotional experiences. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(6), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2016-1749

38.

Stokowski

Corr

Smith

Toney

Bostick

E. K.

Russell

Prince

Godfrey

(2025). “I didn’t come here to make money”: Exploring Power-4 athletes’ perceptions of exploitation. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 18(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.51221/sc.jiia.2025.18.1.10

39.

Stokowski

Paule-Koba

A. L.

Kaunert

(2019). Former college athlete’s perceptions of adapting to transition. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 12, 403–426.

40.

Stokowski

Smith

A. B.

Fridley

Corr

Paule-Koba

A. L.

(2023). “The most important shot you will ever take”: The burgeoning role of social media activism in challenging embedded NCAA patriarchy. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(4), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0159

41.

Tang

Zhang

Fang

Jiang

(2025). The relationship between family functioning and defending behaviors among junior high school students: The mediating effect of empathy and moderating effect of gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 40(3-4), 780–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241253039

42.

Teaff

(2012). A coach’s influence beyond the game. Coaches Choice.

43.

Wang

A. C.

Chen

Hsu

M. S.

Lin

Y. C.

Tsai

C. Y.

(2022). Role-based paternalistic exchange: Explaining the joint effect of leader authoritarianism and benevolence on culture-specific follower outcomes. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(2), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09732-y

Big Games,Little Voices: Patriarchy and Power at SEC Football Media Days

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References