Scholars have been increasingly engaging with discourse analysis as theory and method. At its essence, this approach is centered around communicative acts, and thus is foundational to the study of sport media and communication. However, to our knowledge, no overview of the use of discourse analysis in sport, exercise, and physical education studies exists. Therefore, we conducted a structured scoping review by identifying 1892 papers in 277 journals from 2000 to April 2022, then narrowed the sample to 587 papers that specifically conducted a discourse analysis of sport. We sought to understand which theoretical traditions are commonly utilized, which sub-disciplines embrace discourse analysis with specific attention to communication, and how this approach can enrich and add to the methodological and theoretical development of media and communication studies in sport. Our review illustrated a heavy reliance on Foucauldian discourse analysis and critical discourse analysis across a multitude of sport disciplines, though discourse analysis generally appears less frequently in sport communication journals. To advance our field’s use of discourse analysis, we suggest the need to emphasis a multimodal approach to discourse analysis, the integration of technology within this approach, and directions to theorize beyond dominant approaches to focus on mediated social interactions.
AlexanderD.DuncanL.BloomG. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of the dominant discourses being used to portray Parasport coaches in the newspaper media. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 14(4), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2021.1947885
2.
AlvessonM.KarremanD. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002
3.
ApseM.KerrR.MooreK. (2021). Sport and physical activity practices examined through parents’ discourse about children’s rugby league. Sociology of Sport Journal, 38(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2019-0090
4.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Science Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
5.
Arribas–AyllonM.WalkerdineV. (2017). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In WilligC.Stainton–RogersW. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 110–123). Sage.
6.
AttenboroughT. (2015). A forgotten legazy? Towards a discursive psychology of the media. In TileagâC.StockoeE. (Eds.), Discursive psychology. Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 224–240). Routledge.
7.
AugestadP. (2003). Architecture and the education of the body: The gymnasium in Norwegian physical training, 1889–1930. International Journal of the History of Sport, 20(3), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360412331305783
8.
BarkerD.Barker-RuchtiN.GerberM.GerlachE.SattlerS.BergmanM.PühseU. (2013). Swiss youths, migration and integrative sport: A critical–constructive reading of popular discourse. European Journal for Sport and Society, 10(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2013.11687916
9.
BernsteinB. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380
10.
BimperA.Jr.HarrisonH.Jr. (2017). Are we committed to issues of race? Institutional integrity across intercollegiate athletics. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(6), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215616270
11.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and power. Polity Press.
12.
BouvierG. (2015). What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: Connecting with other academic fields?Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381
CarpentierN.De CleenB. (2007). Bringing discourse theory in media studies. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
15.
CarvalhoA. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society rethinking the framework of critical discourse analysis. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162
16.
ChouliarakiL.FaircloughN. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.
17.
CoshS.CrabbS.KettlerL.LeCouteurA.TullyP. (2015). The normalization of body regulation and monitoring practices in elite sport: A discursive analysis of news delivery sequences during skinfold testing. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(3), 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2014.949833
18.
DemasiM.BurkeS.TileagâC. (2020). Political communication. Discursive perspectives. Palgrave.
19.
EkholmD. (2018). Governing by means of sport for social change and social inclusion: Demarcating the domains of problematization and intervention. Sport in Society, 21(11), 1777–1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1417986
20.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
21.
FaircloughN. (1995a). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Longman.
22.
FaircloughN. (1995b). Media discourse. Bloomsbury Academic.
23.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
24.
FaircloughN. (2005). Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
25.
ForchtnerB. (2010). Jürgen Habermas’ language–philosophy and the critical study of language. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 4(1), 18–37.
26.
FoucaultM. ([1969] 1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
FriesenN.LoweS. (2012). Learning with web 2.0: Social technology and discursive psychology. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2012.9.4.375
29.
GarretP.BellA. (1998). Media and discourse: A critical overview. In BellA.GarrettP. (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse, (pp. 1–20). Blackwell.
30.
GeeJ. (2004). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (2nd ed.). Routledge.
31.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.
32.
GlynosJ.HowarthD.NorvalA.SpeedW. (2009). Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review. Paper. August, NCRM/014.
33.
GongY. (2016). Online discourse of masculinities in transnational football fandom: Chinese arsenal fans’ talk around ‘gaofushuai’ and ‘diaosi’. Discourse and Society, 27(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515605964
34.
GrahnK. (2014). Youth athletes, bodies, and gender: Gender constructions in textbooks used in coaching education programmes in Sweden. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.722549
35.
HabermasJ. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In HabermasJ. (Ed.), Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 43–115). MIT Press.
36.
HammondA.BundonA.Pentifallo GaddC.KonovalT. (2022). Enactments of integrated, disability–inclusive sport policy by sporting organizations. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0151
HuR.HenryI. (2016). The development of the Olympic narrative in Chinese elite sport discourse from its first successful Olympic bid to the post–Beijing games era. International Journal of the History of Sport, 33(12), 1427–1448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1284818
39.
HumberstoneB.StanI. (2011). Health, (body) image, and primary schooling: ‘Why do they have to be a certain weight?’. Sport, Education and Society, 16(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.589641
40.
KarhusS. (2019). Pedagogization of elite sport in the school system: Vested interests and dominant discourses. Sport, Education and Society, 24(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1292233
41.
KavouraA.RybaT. (2000). Identity tensions in dual career: The discursive construction of future selves by Finnish judo athletes. Sport in Society, 23(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1669325
42.
KearnsC.SinclairG.BlackJ.DoidgeM.FletcherT.KilvingtonD.ListonK.LynnT.RosatiP. (2023). A scoping review of research on online hate and sport. Communication & Sport, 11(2), 402–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221132728.
43.
KhosraviNikM. (2022). Digital meaning–making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683
44.
KressG. (2012). Multimodal discourse analysis. In GeeJ. P.HandfordM. (Eds), The routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 35–50). Routledge.
45.
KressG.van LeeuwanT. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
46.
KurosuM.MizukamiH. (2019). Complementary relationship between the Japan Sports Association and an information network support non–profit organization: Focusing on the public sphere created through the relationship between “mobilization” and “symbolic movements”. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 17, A9–A36. https://doi.org/10.5432/ijshs.16092
47.
LaclauE. (1993). Discourse. In GoodinR.PettitP.PoggeT. (Eds), A companion to contemporary political philosophy (pp. 541–547). Blackwell.
48.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. In Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). Verso.
49.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1987). Post–marxism without apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106.
MarkulaP. (2014). Embodied subjectivities: Intersections of discursive and critical psychology with socio–cultural exercise research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 31(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2013-0049
54.
MarkulaP.SilkM. (2011). Qualitative research for physical culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
Martinez–BelloV. E.García–OchoaY. C.Díaz–BarahonaJ.Bernabé–VillodreM. (2021). Bodies in the early childhood education classroom: A Bourdieusian analysis of curricular materials. Sport, Education and Society, 26(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1690442
56.
McGannonK. (2017). Critical discourse analysis in sport and exercise: What, why and how? In SmithB.SparkesA. (Eds), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 230–242). Routledge.
57.
McGannonK.McMahonJ.GonsalvesC. (2017). Mother runners in the blogosphere: A discursive psychological analysis of online recreational athlete identities. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.11.002
58.
McGannonK.SmithB. (2015). Centralizing culture in cultural sport psychology research: The potential of narrative inquiry and discursive psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.07.010
59.
McGlashanM. (2020). Collective identity and discourse practice in the followership of the football lads alliance on Twitter. Discourse and Society, 31(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519889128
60.
MillerP.BenkwitzA. (2016). Where the action is: Towards a discursive psychology of “authentic” identity in soccer fandom. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.11.002
61.
MillwardP. (2007). True cosmopolitanism or notional acceptance of non–national players in English football: Or, why ‘bloody foreigners’ get blamed when ‘things go wrong. Sport in Society, 10(4), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430701388772
62.
O’KeefeA. (2011). Media and discourse analysis. In GeeJ.HanfordM. (Eds), The routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 441–454). Routledge.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behavior. Sage.
68.
PuH.NewmanJ.GiardinaM. (2019). Flying solo: Globalization neoliberal individualism and the contested celebrity of Li Na. Communication & Sport, 7(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479517739390
69.
RavelB.GareauM. (2016). ‘French football needs more women like Adriana’? Examining the media coverage of France’s women’s national football team for the 2011 World Cup and the 2012 Olympic games. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(7), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690214556912
70.
RichE.MonaghanL.BombakA. (2020). A discourse analysis of school girls’ engagement with fat pedagogy and critical health education: Rethinking the childhood ‘obesity scandal’. Sport, Education and Society, 25(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1566121
71.
RortyR. (1967). The linguistic turn. Essays in philosophical method. University of Chicago Press.
72.
RoslyngM.DindlerC. (2023). Media power and politics in framing and discourse theory. Communication Theory, 33(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac012
73.
SakkiI.PetterssonK. (2016). Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2142
74.
SaussureF. (1916 [1991]). Forelæsninger i almen lingvistik. In SmithL. H. (Ed.), Det videnskabelige perspektiv (pp. 405–443). Akademisk Forlag.
75.
SayerA. (2017). Bourdieu: Ally or foe of discourse analysis? In WodakR.ForchtnerB. (Eds), The routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 109–121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-9
76.
ShawS.HoeberL. (2003). ‘A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch’: Gendered discourses and their Influence on employment roles in sports organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17(4), 347–375. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.17.4.347
77.
ShenL.FanH. (2021). Sport, ideology and nation–building in the early years of the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of the History of Sport, 38(17), 1774–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2021.1984892
78.
SperkaL.EnrightE.McCuaigL. (2018). Brokering and bridging knowledge in health and physical education: A critical discourse analysis of one external provider’s curriculum. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1406465
79.
SurkisJ. (2012). When was the linguistic turn? A genealogy (vol. 117, pp. 700–722). American Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.117.3.700
80.
TorfingJ. (2002). Discourse analysis and the post–structuralism of Laclau and Mouffe. European Political Sciences, 2(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2002.47
81.
TracyK. (2001). Discourse analysis in communication. In SchiffrinD.TannenD.HamiltonH. (Eds), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 725–749). Blackwell.
WaltersS. R.PayneD.SchluterP.ThomsonR. W. (2010). It’s all about winning, isn’t it? Competing discourses in children’s sport in New Zealand. European Journal for Sport and Society, 7(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2010.11687849
84.
WetherellM. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post–structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005
85.
WetherellM.PotterJ. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretive repertoires. In AntakiC. (ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation. A casebook of methods, (pp. 168–183). Sage.
86.
WhighamS.BairnerA. (2018). Analysing sport policy and politics: The promises and challenges of synthesising, ethodological approaches. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1450773
WoubeA. (2018). Racing against age? Gender, age, and body among senior participants in women–only sports races. Leisure and Society, 41(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2018.1482672
89.
WrenchA.GarrettR. (2018). Constructions of Australia’s sportswomen: ‘Race’, ‘whiteness’ and contemporary media. Sport, Education and Society, 23(8), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1493575
90.
YanG.PegoraroA.WatanabeN. (2021). Examining IRA bots in the NFL anthem protest: Political agendas and practices of digital gatekeeping. Communication & Sport, 9(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519849114
91.
YanG.WatanabeN. (2014). The Liancourt Rocks: Media dynamics and national identities at the 2012 summer Olympic games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2014-0047
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
