Five Rings,Five Screens? A Global Examination of Social TV Influence on Social Presence and Social Identification During the 2018 Winter Olympic Games

Abstract

This study uses social presence theory and social identity theory as theoretical frameworks to examine global social TV usage during a mega-sporting event. A total of 2,296 people from six different nations (Canada, China, Germany, Japan, Sweden, and the United States) were surveyed about their social TV usage, degree of social presence, and team identification in the week following the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. Primary findings illustrate that increased social TV use predicts increased measures of social presence, social capital, and perceived sociability, which then influences one’s identification with their national team and Winter Olympics fandom. Additional insights are found regarding global social TV engagement and ancillary device usage habits.

Keywords

social presence theory social TV social identity theory Olympic Games team identification second screen

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anstead

Benford

Houghton

R. J.

(2014, June). Many-screen viewing: Evaluating an Olympics companion application. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, June 22–24, Chicago, IL (pp. 103–110). https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602304

Billings

A. C.

(2008). Olympic media: Inside the biggest show on television. Routledge.

Biocca

Harms

Burgoon

J. K.

(2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270

Biocca

Harms

Gregg

(2001). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the Presence, May 21–23, Philadelphia, PA.

Brown-Devlin

Devlin

M. B.

(2019). Winning with personality: Underscoring antecedents for college students’ motives for team identification. Communication & Sport. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2167479519832017

Brown-Devlin

Devlin

M. B.

Vaughn

P. W.

(2018). Why fans act that way: Using individual personality to predict BIRGing and CORFing behaviors. Communication & Sport, 6, 395–417.

Chang

C. M.

Hsu

M. H.

(2016). Understanding the determinants of users’ subjective well-being in social networking sites: An integration of social capital theory and social presence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1141321

Chu

Choi

S.M.

(2010). Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: A comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3, 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2010.516575

Cialdini

R. B.

Borden

R. J.

Thorne

Walker

M. R.

Freeman

Sloan

L. R.

(1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.3.366

10.

Cunningham

N. R.

Eastin

M. S.

(2017). Second screen and sports: A structural investigation into team identification and efficacy. Communication & Sport, 5, 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515610152

11.

Devlin

M. B.

Billings

A. C.

(2016). Examining the world’s game in the United States: Impact of nationalized qualities on fan identification and consumption of the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127243

12.

Devlin

M. B.

Billings

A. C.

Brown

K. A.

(2017). Interwoven statesmanship and sports fandom: World Cup consumption antecedents through joint lenses of nationalism and fanship. Communication & Sport, 5, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515593417

13.

Devlin

M. B.

Brown-Devlin

(2017). Using personality and team identity to predict sports media consumption. International Journal of Sport Communication, 10, 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2017-0050

14.

Ellison

N. B.

Steinfield

Lampe

(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

15.

ESPN. (2018). Sochi 2014 Olympics: Overall medal count. http://www.espn.com/olympics/winter/2014/medals

16.

Forehand

M. R.

Deshpande

Reed

A. II.

(2002). Identity salience and the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1086

17.

Gantz

Lewis

(2014). Sports on traditional and newer digital media: Is there really a fight for fans? Television & New Media, 15, 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414529463

18.

Global Broadcast and Audience Report. (2018, June). Olympic Winter Games PyeongChang 2018. Publicis Media. https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/Games/Winter-Games/Games-PyeongChang-2018-Winter-Olympic-Games/IOC-Marketing/Olympic-Winter-Games-PyeongChang-2018-Broadcast-Report.pdf

19.

Han

Min

Lee

(2015). Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.004

20.

Hassanein

Head

(2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018

21.

Henderson

(2017). Sports and the second screen. Stats, LLC. https://www.stats.com/industry-analysis-articles/sports-second-screen/

22.

Highfield

Harrington

Bruns

(2013). Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: The Eurovision phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.756053

23.

Hogg

M. A.

Abrams

(1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge.

24.

Hootsuite. (2019). Global social media research report 2019. https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/

25.

Hwang

Lim

J. S.

(2015). The impact of engagement motives for social TV on social presence and sports channel commitment. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.006

26.

Johns

M. D.

(2012). Two screen viewing and social relationships: Exploring the invisible backchannel of TV viewing. In Sudweeks

(Ed.), Proceedings cultural attitudes towards technology and communication (pp. 333–343). Murdoch University.

27.

Kietzmann

J. H.

Silvestre

B. S.

McCarthy

I. P.

Pitt

L. F.

(2012). Unpacking the social media phenomenon. Journal of Public Affairs, 12, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1412

28.

Kim

H. S.

Sundar

S. S.

(2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.039

29.

Kramer

N. C.

Winter

Benninghoff

Gallus

(2015). How “social” is social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the usage of social TV applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.005

30.

Kreijns

Kirschner

P. A.

Jochems

van Buuren

(2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a) synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104323024429

31.

Kruikemeier

van Noort

Vliegenthart

de Vreese

C. H.

(2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837

32.

Larkin

B. A.

Fink

J. S.

(2016). Fantasy sport, FoMO, and traditional fandom: How second-screen use of social media allows fans to accommodate multiple identities. Journal of Sport Management, 30, 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0344

33.

Lim

J. S.

Hwang

Kim

Biocca

F. A.

(2015). How social media engagement leads to sports channel loyalty: Mediating roles of social presence and channel commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.013

34.

Lin

Chiang

(2017). Dual screening: Examining social predictors and impact on online and offline political participation among Taiwanese Internet users. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309419

35.

Lombard

Ditton

(1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x

36.

Miah

(2017). Sport 2.0: #Transforming sports for a digital world. MIT Press.

37.

Nahapiet

Ghoshal

(1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.

38.

Nielsen Sports. (2018). Year in sports media report. Nielsen Sports. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2018/2017-year-in-sports-media.html

39.

O'Connell

(2018). Olympic Ratings, boosted by streaming, barely stumbled in Pyeongchang. The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/olympic-ratings-boosted-by-streaming-barely-stumbled-pyeongchang-1088615

40.

Octagon. (2013). Second screen research: The white space. http://europe.octagon.com/pdf/OCTA8ON_SECOND_SCREEN_RESEARCH.pdf

41.

Prasolova-Forland

(2002). Supporting social awareness in education in collaborative virtual environments. CSCW’02. https://doi.org/10.1109/3dcve.2014.7160928

42.

Preece

(2001). Sociability and usability in online communities. Behavior & Information Technology, 20, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683

43.

Proulx

Shepatin

(2012). Social TV: How marketers can reach and engage audiences by connecting television to the web, social media, and mobile. Wiley.

44.

Reysen

Branscombe

N. R.

(2010). Fanship and fandom: Comparisons between sport and non-sport fans. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 176–193.

45.

Rubenking

Lewis

(2016). The sweet spot: An examination of second-screen sports viewing. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9, 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2016-0080

46.

Shen

K. N.

A. Y.

Khalifa

(2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903156622

47.

Shin

D. H.

(2013). Defining sociability and social presence in social TV. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.006

48.

Short

Williams

Christie

, (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.

49.

Sochi 2014 Olympics Medal Tracker. (2018). ESPN. http://www.espn.com/olympics/winter/2014/medals

50.

Statista . (2017). Most common second-screen activities while watching TV among NFL fans worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2017. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/748597/second-screen-activity-nfl/

51.

Sutton

W. A.

McDonald

M.A.

Milne

G.R.

Cimperman

(1997). Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6, 15–22.

52.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7–24.

53.

Tang

Cooper

(2017). Predicting changing media use patterns via mega events: An examination of multi-screen viewing during the 2016 Rio Olympics. International Journal of Sport Communication, 10, 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2017-0091

54.

Vaccari

Chadwick

O’Loughlin

(2015). Dual screening the political: Events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65, 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187

55.

Wann

D. L.

(1995). Preliminary validation of the sport fan motivation scale. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 19, 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/019372395019004004

56.

Wann

D. L.

(2006). The causes and consequences of sport team identification. In Bryant

Raney

(Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 331–352). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

57.

Wann

D. L.

Branscombe

N. R.

(1993). Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 1–17.

58.

Wenner

L. A.

Billings

A. C.

(Eds.). (2017). Sport, media, and mega-events. Routledge.

59.

Witkemper

Blaszka

Chung

(2016). Establishing a typology of social media uses in the sport industry: A multidimensional scaling study. Communication & Sport, 4, 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2167479514544951