Viewership of traditional television programming has been steadily declining, particularly among younger audiences, who have turned to smartphones, social media, streaming services, and YouTube to consume video. These audiences also frequently engage in second-screening practices, using another device to virtually connect with others regarding what they are watching. Most prior research has focused on the effects of second screening via social media with televised content. Through a survey of teens in the Middle East (N = 258) and young adults in the United States (N = 643), the current study found second screening frequently occurs with both traditional TV and streaming content. Framed by co-viewing theory, results show both practices positively correlate with a constructed second-screen social capital affinity (SSSCA) scale, mirroring co-viewing in person. Findings also indicate that second screening need not take place simultaneously with video viewing to gratify social needs.
AbramsJessica R.GilesHoward. 2007. “Ethnic Identity Gratifications Selection and Avoidance by African Americans: A Group Vitality and Social Identity Gratifications Perspective.” Media Psychology9 (1): 115–34.
BarkerValerie. 2009. “Older Adolescents’ Motivations for Use of SNS: The Influence of Gender, Group Identity and Collective Self-esteem.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior12 (2): 209–13.
4.
BarkerValerieDozierDavid M.WeissAmy SchmitzBordenDiane L. 2013. “Facebook “Friends”: Effects of Social Networking Site Intensity, Social Capital Affinity, and Flow on Reported Knowledge-Gain.” Journal of Social Media in Society2 (2): 76–97.
5.
BlumlerJay G.KatzElihu. 1974. The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
CsikszentmihalyiMihalyKubeyRobert. 1981. “Television and the Rest of Life: A Systematic Comparison of Subjective Experience.” Public Opinion Quarterly45 (3): 317–28. doi:10.1086/268667
8.
DennisEverette E.MartinJustin D.WoodRobb. 2017. “Media Use in the Middle East, 2017: A Seven-nation Survey.” Northwestern University in Qatar. http://mideastmedia.org/survey/2017 (accessed July 12, 2018).
FinnSeth. 1992. “Television ‘Addiction?’ An Evaluation of Four Competing Media-use Models.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly69 (2): 422–35.
11.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroGarcia-PerdomoVictorMcGregorShannon C. 2015. “What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation.” Journal of Communication65 (5): 793–815.
12.
GroshekJacobKrongardSarah. 2016. “Netflix and Engage? Implications for Streaming Television on Political Participation during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign.” Social Sciences5 (4): 65.
13.
HaridakisPaulHansonGary. 2009. “Social Interaction and Co-viewing with YouTube: Blending Mass Communication Reception and Social Connection.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media53 (2): 317–35.
14.
HarwoodJake. 1997. “Viewing Age: Lifespan Identity and Television Viewing Choices.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media41 (2): 203–13.
15.
HarwoodJake. 1999. “Age Identification, Social Identity Gratifications, and Television Viewing.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43 (1): 123–36.
16.
HassounDan. 2014. “Tracing Attentions: Toward an Analysis of Simultaneous Media Use.” Television & New Media15 (4): 271–88.
17.
HockingJohn E.1982. “Sports and Spectators: Intra-audience Effects.” Journal of Communication32 (1): 100–108.
18.
JenkinsHenryItoMimiboyddannah. 2015. Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics. London: Polity Press.
19.
LeeMichael SangyeobHeeterCarrieLaRoseRobert. 2010. “A Modern Cinderella Story: A Comparison of Viewer Responses to Interactive vs Linear Narrative in Solitary and Co-viewing Settings.” New Media and Society12 (5): 779–95.
20.
LinNan. 2008. “A Network Theory of Social Capital.” In The Handbook of Social Capital, edited by CastiglioneDariovan DethJan W.WollebGuglielmo, 50–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
MaresMarie-LouiseSunYe. 2010. “The Multiple Meanings of Age for Television Content Preferences.” Human Communication Research36 (3): 372–96.
22.
MoeHallvardPoellThomasvan DijckJose. 2015. “Rearticulating Audience Engagement: Social Media and Television.” Television & New Media17:299–107. doi:10.1177/1527476415616194
23.
NeeRebecca Coates. 2014. “Social TV and the 2012 Election: Exploring Political Outcomes of Multiscreen Media Usages.” Electronic News7 (4): 171–88.
24.
NeeRebecca CoatesDozierDavid M. 2015. “Second Screen Effects: Linking Multiscreen Media Use to Television Engagement and Incidental Learning.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies2 (2): 214–26.
25.
ParkChang Sup. 2015. “Pathways to Expressive and Collective Participation: Usage Patterns, Political Efficacy, and Political Participation in Social Networking Sites.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59 (4): 698–716.
26.
PerksLisa Glebatis. 2014. Media Marathoning: Immersions in Morality. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
27.
PetersenTheodore G.2016. “To Binge or Not to Binge: A Qualitative Analysis of College Students’ Binge Watching Habits.” Florida Communication Journal44 (1): 77–88.
28.
PhalenPatricia F.DuceyRichard V. 2012. “Audience Behavior in the Multi-screen ‘Video-verse.’” International Journal on Media Management14 (2): 141–56.
Pires de SáFernanda. 2018. “Connected Co-viewing on Facebook: A Brazilian Telenovela and the Perception of Media Realism.” Television & New Media19:646–59. doi:10.1177/1527476417741672
31.
PittmanMatthewTefertillerAlec C. 2015. “With or without You: Connected Viewing and Co-viewing Twitter Activity for Traditional Appointment and Asynchronous Broadcast Television.” First Monday20 (7). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5935/4663 (accessed July 11, 2018).
32.
RaackeJohnBonds-RaackeJennifer. 2008. “MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites.” Cyberpsychology and Behavior11 (2): 169–74.
ReidScott A.GilesHowardAbramsJessica R. 2004. “A Social Identity Model of Media Usage and Effects.” Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie16 (1): 17–25.
35.
RubinAlan M.1993. “Audience Activity and Media Use.” Communications Monographs60 (1): 98–105.
36.
RuggieroThomas E.2002. “Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century.” Mass Communication & Society3:3–37.
37.
SelvaDonatella. 2015. “Social Television: Audience and Political Engagement.” Television & New Media17 (2): 159–73. doi:10.1177/1527476415616192.
38.
ShahDhavan V.1998. “Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual-level Assessment of Social Capital.” Political Psychology19 (3): 469–96.
39.
SlaterMichael D.2007. “Reinforcing Spirals: The Mutual Influence of Media Selectivity and Media Effects and Their Impact on Individual Behavior and Social Identity.” Communication Theory17 (3): 281–303.
StaldGitte. 2008. “Mobile Identity: Youth, Identity, and Mobile Communication Media.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by BuckinghamDavid, 143–64. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42.
SteinerEmilXuKun. 2018. “Binge-watching Motivates Change: Uses and Gratifications of Streaming Video Viewers Challenge Traditional TV Research.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Published electronically January 9. doi:10.1177/1354856517750365.
43.
SundarS. ShyamLimperosAnthony M. 2013. “Uses and Grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57 (4): 504–25.
44.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C. 1986. “The Social Identity of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by WorchelStephenAustinWilliam G., 7–24. Chicago: Burnham.
45.
ThorsonEstherHawthorneJoshuaSwasyAleciaMcKinneyMitchell S. 2015. “Co-viewing, Tweeting, and Facebooking the 2012 Presidential Debates.” Electronic News9 (3): 195–214.
46.
ValkenburgPatti M.SchoutenAlexander P.PeterJochen. 2005. “Adolescents’ Identity Experiments on the Internet.” New Media and Society7 (3): 383–402.
47.
van EsKaren. 2015. “Social TV and the Participation Dilemma in NBC’s The Voice.” Television & New Media17 (2): 108–23. doi:10.1177/15274764156161.
48.
WalshShari P.WhiteKatherine M.YoungRoss McD. 2009. “The Phone Connection: A Qualitative Exploration of How Belongingness and Social Identification Relate to Mobile Phone Use amongst Australian Youth.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology19 (3): 225–40.
49.
WilsonSherryl. 2016. “In the Living Room: Second Screens and TV Audiences.” Television & New Media17 (2): 174–91.
