The purpose of this study was to examine how Michigan State University (MSU) utilized Facebook as a tool for image repair following the Larry Nassar sex abuse scandal. Specifically, the researchers were concerned with the image-repair approach utilized by MSU during Nassar’s hearing and in its immediate aftermath. Additionally, the researchers examined users’ responses via Facebook comments to determine reactions to MSU’s image-repair strategies. MSU primarily employed the image-repair tactic of corrective action along with rallying, bolstering, and mortification. Overall, individuals posting comments did not appear to buy into MSU’s image repair. Users focused blame on MSU for mishandling the situation and discussed various aspects of the Nassar case as well as MSU’s mistreatment of the victims. Additionally, there was a call for MSU to change its culture, take ownership of its mistakes, and become a leader in dealing with sexual assault on campus.
BalsA. S.CampbellC. L.PittL. F. (2012). Viewer reactions to online political spoof videos and advertisements. In CloseA. (Ed.), Online consumer behavior: Theory and research in social media, advertising, and e-tail (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BenoitW. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
BenoitW. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177–186.
4.
BenoitW. L. (2000). Another visit to the theory of image restoration strategies. Communication Quarterly, 44, 463–477.
5.
BenoitW. L. (2006). President Bush’s image repair effort on Meet the Press: The complexities of defeasibility. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 285–306.
6.
BenoitW. L.HanczorR. S. (1994). The Tonya Harding controversy: An analysis of image restoration strategies. Communication Quarterly, 42, 416–433.
7.
BrazealL. M. (2008). The image repair strategies of Terrell Owens. Public Relations Review, 34, 145–150.
8.
BrownK. A.BillingsA. C.DevlinM. (2016). Image repair across the racial spectrum: Experimentally exploring athlete transgression responses. Communication Research Reports, 33, 47–53.
9.
BrownK. A.DickhausJ.LongM. (2012). LeBron James and “The Decision”: An empirical examination of image repair in sports. Journal of Sports Media, 7, 149–175.
10.
BrownN. A.BrownK. A.BillingsA. C. (2015). “May no act of ours bring shame”: Fan-enacted crisis communication surrounding the Penn State sex abuse scandal. Communication & Sport, 3, 288–311.
11.
CalderB. J.HollebeekL. D.MalthouseE. C. (2018). Creating stronger brands through consumer experience and engagement. In PalmatierR.KumarV.HarmelingC. (Eds.), Customer engagement marketing (pp. 221–242). London, England: Palgrave.
12.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163–176.
13.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2013). How publics react to crisis communication efforts: Comparing crisis response reactions across sub-arenas. Journal of Communication Management, 18, 40–57.
14.
CoombsW. T.TachkovaE. R. (2019). Scansis as a unique crisis type: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Communication Management, 23, 72–88.
15.
CvijikjI. P.MichahellesF. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3, 843–861.
DiSanzaJ. R.LeggeN. J.AllenH. R.WildeJ. T. (2013). The puck stops here: The NHL’s image repair strategies during the 2004-2005 lockout. In BlaneyJ. R.LippertL.SmithS. J. (Eds.), Repairing the athlete’s image: Studies in sport image restoration (pp. 319–358). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
19.
FrederickE. L.BurchL. M.SandersonJ.HambrickM. E. (2014). To invest in the invisible: A case study of Manti Te’o’s image repair strategies during the Katie Couric interview. Public Relations Review, 40, 780–788.
20.
FrederickE. L.PegoraroA. (2018). Scandal in college basketball: A case study of image repair via Facebook. International Journal of Sport Communication, 11, 414–429.
21.
FrederickE. L.PegoraroA.BurchL. M. (2016). Echo or organic: Framing the 2014 Sochi Games. Online Information Review, 40, 1–19.
22.
FrederickE. L.PegoraroA.SandersonJ. (2018, November21). Divided and united: Perceptions of athlete activism at the ESPYS. Sport in Society. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1530220
23.
GlantzM. (2010). The Floyd Landis doping scandal: Implications for image repair discourse. Public Relations Review, 36, 157–163.
24.
GrebeS. K. (2013). Things can get worse: How mismanagement of a crisis response strategy can cause a secondary or double crisis: the example of the AWB corporate scandal. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 70–86.
25.
HambrickM. E.FrederickE. L.SandersonJ. (2013, October). From yellow to blue: Exploring Lance Armstrong’s image-repair strategies across traditional and social media. Communication & Sport. doi:10.1177/2167479513506982
26.
HoltzhausenD. R.RobertsG. F. (2009) An investigation into the role of image repair theory in strategic conflict management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 165–186.
27.
JinY. (2009). The effects of public’s cognitive appraisal of emotions in crises on crisis coping and strategy assessment. Public Relations Review, 35, 310–313.
28.
JinY.PangA.CameronG. T. (2012). Toward a publics-driven, emotion-based conceptualization in crisis communication: Unearthing dominant emotions in multi-staged testing of the Integrated Crisis Mapping (ICM) Model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 266–298.
29.
JohansenB. F.JohansenW.WeckesserN. M. (2016). Emotional stakeholders as “crisis communicators” in social media: The case of the Telenor customer complaints crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21, 289–308.
Len-RiosM. E. (2010). Image repair strategies, local news portrayals, and crisis stage: A case study of Duke University’s lacrosse team crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 267–287.
MaierC.CristJ. R. (2017). From “wicked crisis” to responsive witness: Jean-Luc Marion and the American Roman Catholic sexual-abuse scandal. Southern Communication Journal, 82, 164–174.
34.
MeyerK. R.CutbirthC. W. (2013). No pepper: Apologia and image repair in the 2002 labor negotiations between Major League Baseball and the Players Association. In BlaneyJ. R.LippertL.SmithS. J. (Eds.), Repairing the athlete’s image: Studies in sport image restoration (pp. 267–282). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
35.
MuntingaD. G.MoormanM.SmitE. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 13–46.
SandersonJ. (2008). “How do you prove a negative?” Roger Clemens’ image repair strategies in response to the Mitchell report. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1, 246–262.
38.
SmithJ. S.KeevenD. (2018). Creating separation from the on-field product: Roger Goddell’s image repair discourse during the Ray Rice domestic violence case. Communication & Sport, 2018. doi:10.1177/2167479518769896
39.
SmithsonJ.VenetteS. (2013). Stonewalling as an image-defense strategy: A critical examination of BP’s response to the Deepwater Horizon explosion. Communication Studies, 64, 395–410.
40.
StephenA. T.SciandraM. R.InmanJ. J. (2015). The effects of content characteristics on consumer engagement with branded social media content on Facebook (Working Paper Series, No. 15–110). Cambridge, CA: Marketing Science Institute.
WalshJ.McAllister-SpoonerS. M. (2011). Analysis of the image repair discourse in the Michael Phelps controversy. Public Relations Review, 37, 157–162.
43.
WeitzlW.EinwillerS. (2018) Consumer engagement in the digital era its nature, drivers and outcomes. In JohnstonK. A.Taylor& M. (Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp 453–474). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
