This article engages with self-scandalization as a calculated communicative strategy that employs morally transgressive performances on social media to elicit public, often emotion-driven responses to gain attention and fame. To conceptualize the dynamics of self-scandalization, we draw from what Diana Zulli coined ‘socio-mediated scandals’, which are co-constructed by active online users who can become forceful communicative co-drivers of a scandal. Based on netnography, we analyze the feud between influencer Andrew Tate and environmental activist Greta Thunberg on Twitter/X in December 2022. We show how Tate’s strategy of self-scandalization enticed different online communities to (un)willingly amplify and co-construct the scandalous incident. Tate did this not only to provoke with his moral transgressions but also to create an entertaining drama connecting to both popular and Internet culture. Compelling conflict, sensationalism and exaggeration, paired with moral transgressions along politicized trenches, unfold the potential to pull in large and niche communities outside of the self-scandalizer’s usual sphere of influence.
AbidinC (2015) Communicative ❤ intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology8: 1–16.
2.
AgiusCRosamondABKinnvallC (2020) Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism: Masculinity, climate denial and covid-19. Politics, Religion & Ideology21(4): 432–450.
3.
AiroldiM (2018) Ethnography and the digital fields of social media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology21(6): 661–673.
4.
BarcellonaM (2022) Incel violence as a new terrorism threat: A brief investigation between Alt-Right and Manosphere dimensions. Sortuz. Oñati Journal of Emergent Socio-Legal Studies11(2): 170–186.
5.
BulatovicM (2019) The imitation game: The memefication of political discourse. European View18(2): 250–253.
6.
BurgessJMatamoros-FernándezA (2016) Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: One week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice2(1): 79–96.
ChenGM (2019) Social media and scandal. In: TumberHWaisbordSR (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal (1st edn). New York: Routledge, pp.165–173.
DavisJLLoveTPKillenG (2018) Seriously funny: The political work of humor on social media. New Media & Society20(10): 3898–3916.
11.
DövelingKHarjuAASommerD (2018) From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media + Society4(1): 205630511774314.
12.
DriessensO (2013) The celebritization of society and culture: Understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(6): 641–657.
13.
DuvallS (2023) Becoming celebrity girls activists: The cultural politics and celebrification of Emma Gónzalez, Marley Diaz, and Greta Thunberg. Journal of Communication Inquiry47(4): 399–419.
EntmanRM (2012) Scandal and Silence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
ErzikovaEMcLeanC (2020) Drowning out the message together: Analysis of social media comments on a political sex scandal. The Journal of Social Media in Society9(1): 207–234.
17.
FonsecaACastroP (2022) Thunberg’s way in the climate debate: Making sense of climate action and actors, constructing environmental citizenship. Environmental Communication16(4): 535–549.
18.
HallerA (2015) How to deal with the Black Sheep? An evaluation of journalists’ reactions towards intentional selfscandalization by politicians. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies4(3): 435–451.
19.
HortonDWohlR (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19(3): 215–229.
20.
IngrahamC (2020) Gestures of Concern. A Cultural Politics Book. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
21.
JerslevAMortensenM (2018) Celebrity in the social media age. Renegotiating the public and the private. In ElliottA (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Celebrity Studies (pp. 157–174). London: Routledge.
22.
JungJPetkanicPNanD, et al (2020) When a girl awakened the world: A user and social message analysis of Greta Thunberg. Sustainability12: 2707.
KepplingerHM (2018) Hidden traps: An essay on scandals. International Journal of Communication12: 3153–3166.
25.
KhamisSAngLWellingR (2017) Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies8(2): 191–208.
26.
KozinetsRV (2019). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
KozinetsRV (2021) Netnogrpahy today. A call to evolve, embrace, and electrify. In: KozinetsRVGambettiR (eds) Netnography Unlimited: Understanding Technoculture Using Qualitative Social Media Research (1st edn). New York: Routledge, pp.3–23.
28.
KrämerB (2018) Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication Theory28(4): 444–465.
LewisRChristinA (2022) Platform drama: ‘Cancel culture’, celebrity, and the struggle for accountability on YouTube. New Media & Society24(7): 1632–1656.
31.
LullJHinermanS (eds) (2005) Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
LünenborgMMaierT (2018) The turn to affect and emotion in media studies. Media and Communication6(3): 1–4.
33.
MarshallPDMooreCBarbourK (2020) Persona Studies: An Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
34.
MarwickAboydd (2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17(2): 139–158.
35.
MillsSPattersonAQuinnL (2015) Fabricating celebrity brands via scandalous narrative: Crafting, capering and commodifying the comedian, Russell Brand. Journal of Marketing Management31(5–6): 599–615.
36.
MortensenMKristensenN N (2020) De-celebrification: Beyond the scandalous. Celebrity Studies11(1): 89–100.
37.
MurphyPD (2021) Speaking for the youth, speaking for the planet: Greta Thunberg and the representational politics of eco-celebrity. Popular Communication19(3): 193–206.
38.
NagleA (2017) Kill All Normies: The Online Culture Wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the Alt-Right and Trump. Winchester; Washington, DC: Zero Books.
39.
PaasonenS (2021) Resonant networks. On affect and social media. In: FleigAvon ScheveC (eds) Public Spheres of Resonance: Constellations of Affect and Language. First Issued in Paperback 2021. Routledge Studies in Affective Societies. New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp.49–62.
40.
PapacharissiZ (2015) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
PignettiD (2021) Petty things and nemeses. Celebrity Studies13(1): 108–112.
42.
PollackEAllernSKantolaA, et al (2018) The new normal: Scandals as a standard feature of political life in Nordic countries. International Journal of Communication12: 3087–3108.
SugiuraL (2021) The Incel Rebellion: The Rise of the Manosphere and the Virtual War against Women. Emerald Studies in Digital Crime, Technology and Social Harms. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
48.
ThompsonJB (2000) Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell.
49.
ThompsonJB (2005) The new visibility. Theory, Culture & Society22(6): 31–51.
50.
TumberHWaisbordS (2019) Media and scandal. In: TumberHWaisbordS (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal (1st edn). New York: Routledge, pp.10–21.
51.
Van DrielLDumitricaD (2021) Selling brands while staying ‘Authentic’: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies27(1): 66–84.
