With the understanding that the mass-participated mechanism of social media has led to an evolved lens of gatekeeping, this study incorporates the framework of digital gatekeeping to examine activities of Internet Research Agency (IRA) bots in the Twitter sphere of the National Football League anthem protest. To do so, the investigation employed data of IRA bots released from Clemson University. We conducted analysis by approaching bots’ gatekeeping activities from three perspectives: the overall behavioral patterns, the discourses and underpinning ideologies, and communicative tactics to sustain attention on Twitter. The results revealed that the majority of tweets came from the right trolls and left trolls. Meanwhile, the activity level of the bots displayed high sensitivity to emergent political events. Importantly, the two types of bots orchestrated a gatekeeping agenda that propelled antagonistic, hyperpartisan politics. The right-wing trolls’ tweets, in particular, propagated pro-White, malicious propaganda infiltrated with fake news. The results yield meaningful implications for digital gatekeeping, social media’s complex roles in knowledge production related to athlete protest, and sport’s engagement in broader political struggles in today’s mediated culture.
AbramowitzA. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AndersonB. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections of the origins and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso.
3.
BarnhurstK. G. (2011). The new “media affect” and the crisis of representation for political communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 573–593.
BerlantL. (2005). The epistemology of state emotion. In SaratA. (Ed.), Dissent in dangerous times (pp. 46–80). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2014). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
13.
ChadwickA. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
EdwardsH. (2016). The promise and limits of leveraging Black athlete power potential to compel campus change. Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation, 1, 4–13.
FaircloughN. (2005). Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization studies, 26, 915–939.
17.
FaircloughN. L. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
FalcousM.HawzenM.NewmanJ. (2018). Hyperpartisan sports media in Trump’s America: The metapolitics of Breitbart Sports. Communication and Sport. doi:10.1177/2167479518801557
19.
FarkasJ.SchouJ. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost—The Public, 25, 298–314.
20.
FlintJ.SharmaA.BeatonA. (2017, September26). DirecTV allows some NFL refunds after anthem controversy: Satellite broadcaster will let at least some customers get refunds for its Sunday ticket package of NFL games if they cite players’ national anthem protests. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved fromhttps://www.wsj.com/articles/directv-allows-some-nfl-refunds-after-anthem-controversy-1506453159
HallS. (1996). The question of cultural identity. In HallS.HeldD.HubertD.ThompsonK. (Eds.), Modernity: An introduction to modern societies (pp. 274–316). Cambridge, England: Polity.
23.
HardinM.WhitesideE.AshE. (2014). Ambivalence on the front lines? Attitudes toward Title IX and women’s sports among Division I sports information directors. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 49, 42–64.
24.
HardtM.NegriA. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
HartzellS. L. (2018). Alt-White: Conceptualizing the “Alt-Right” as a rhetorical bridge between white nationalism and mainstream public discourse. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 8, 6–25.
26.
JacksonS. (2013). Reflections on communication and sport: On advertising and promotional culture. Communication & Sport, 1, 100–112.
27.
JanssonD. R. (2003). Internal orientalism in America: WJ Cash’s “The Mind of the South” and the spatial construction of American national identity. Political Geography, 22, 293–316.
28.
KellnerD. (2003). Media spectacle. London, England: Routledge.
29.
KlingerU.SvenssonJ. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20, 4653–4670.
30.
KuszK. W. (2008). Remasculinizing American white guys in/through new millennium American sport films. Sport in Society, 11, 209–226.
MatiasC.NewloveP. (2017). Better the devil you see, than the one you don’t: Bearing witness to emboldened en-whitening epistemology in the Trump era. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 920–928.
MurthyD.PowellA. B.TinatiR.AnsteadN.CarrL.HalfordS. J.WealM. (2016). Bots and political influence: A sociotechnical investigation of social network capital. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4952–4971.
35.
OttB. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34, 59–68.
36.
PetersM. (2017). Education in a post-truth world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 563–566.
37.
PhillipsK. (2018) “The safest hands are our own”: Cinematic affect, state cruelty, and the election of Donald J. Trump. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15, 85–89.
SandersonJ.FrederickE. L.StoczM. (2016). When athlete activism clashes with group values: The “Boycott the St. Louis Rams” Facebook page and social identity threat management. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 301–322.
41.
SchererJ.JacksonS. J. (2008). Producing Allblacks.com: Cultural intermediaries and the policing of electronic spaces of sporting consumption. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25, 187–205.
42.
SchmidtS.FrederickE. L.PegoraroA.SpencerT. C. (2018). An analysis of Colin Kaepernick, Megan Rapinoe, and the national anthem protests. Communication and Sport. doi:10.1177/2167479518793625
43.
SchmittelA.SandersonJ. (2015). Talking about Trayvon in 140 characters: Exploring NFL players’ tweets about the George Zimmerman verdict. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 39, 332–345.
44.
ShaferJ. (2017). Donald Trump’s “political incorrectness”: Neoliberalism as frontstage racism on social media. Social Media + Society, 3, 1–10.
45.
ShawA. (2012). Centralized and decentralized gatekeeping in an open online collective. Politics & Society, 40, 349–388.
46.
ThorsonK.WellsC. (2015). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26, 309–328.
47.
VarolO.FerraraE.DavisC. A.MenczerF.FlamminiA. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. Paper presented at the 11th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved fromhttps://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15587/14817
48.
VosT.HeinderyckxF. (2015). Gatekeeping in transition. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
WebsterJ. (2014). The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
50.
WennerL. (2015). Communication and sport, where art thou? Epistemological reflections on the moment and field(s) of play. Communication and Sport, 3, 247–260.
51.
WhiteD.M. (1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Bulletin, 27, 383–390.
YanG.PegoraroA.WatanabeN. M. (2018). Student-athletes’ organization of activism at the University of Missouri: Resource mobilization on Twitter. Journal of Sport Management, 32, 24–37.
54.
YanG.WatanabeN. M.ShapiroS.NaraineM.HullK. (2018). Unfolding the Twitter scene of the 2017 UEFA Champions League Final: Social media networks and power dynamics. European Sport Management Quarterly. doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1517272
