Gatekeeping in a Digital Media Habitat: The Role of Secondary Gatekeepers

Abstract

This study analyzed mission statements of mainstream news media in the United States and surveyed news consumers to investigate gatekeeping practices in a contemporary news ecosystem. Data show that news organizations expressed commitment to independence, truth-telling, and crafting news based on readers’ interests. However, the mission statements never mentioned any form of citizens’ active engagement in news creation. Looking into the citizens’ perspective, a survey of 280 participants shows that they primarily expect news organizations to provide opportunities for them to post comments on news and share stories, which is the most common form of “secondary gatekeeping.” Other forms of “secondary gatekeeping,” the practice that allows users to share information others might not be able to see otherwise were less likely to occur, partly because of limitations posed by news organizations as they strive to preserve their authority over information.

Keywords

digital journalism gatekeeping news media news websites secondary gatekeeping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

(2009). Histories of citizen journalism. In Allan

Thorsen

(Eds.), Citizen journalism (pp. 17–31). Peter Lang Publishing.

Amazon Mechanical Turk (n.d.). Amazon Mechanical Turk. https://www.mturk.com/.

Banjac

(2022). Audiences as a discursive institution?: How audience expectations disrupt the journalistic field. In The institutions changing journalism (pp. 75–88). Routledge.

Bertrand

Mullainathan

(2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.67

Bro

Wallberg

(2015). Gatekeeping in a digital era: Principles, practices and technological platforms. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928468

Bruns

(2011). Gatekeeping, gatewatching, real-time feedback: New challenges for journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research, 7(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v7n2.2011.355

Carlson

(2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088

Carlson

Usher

(2016). News startups as agents of innovation: For-profit digital news startup manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism, 4(5), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1076344

CNN (n.d.). About CNN digital. https://www.cnn.com/about .

10.

Ekman

Widholm

(2015). Politicians as media producers: Current trajectories in the relation between journalists and politicians in the age of social media. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928467

11.

Eldridge II

S. A.

(2022). Journalism coming into being: The timbers and planks of a changing institution. In Ferrucci

Eldridge II’s

S. A.

(Eds.), The institutions changing journalism: Barbarians inside the gate (pp. 1–14). Taylor & Francis.

12.

Elo

Kääriäinen

Kanste

Pölkki

Utriainen

Kyngäs

(2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401452263

13.

Ferreira

G. B.

(2018). Gatekeeping changes in the new media age: The internet, values and practices of journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research, 14(2), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v14n2.2018.1026

14.

Foster

(2012). News Plurality in a Digital World. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

15.

Francis

J. J.

Johnston

Robertson

Glidewell

Entwistle

Eccles

M. P.

Grimshaw

J. M.

(2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015

16.

Hermida

(2012). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269

17.

Hujanen

(2016). Participation and the blurring values of journalism. Journalism Studies, 17(7), 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1171164

18.

Jacobs

van Spanje

(2023). Gatekeeping, news values and selection: Factors determining the newsworthiness of hate crimes. Journalism Studies, 24(13), 1692–1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2246076

19.

Jensen

(2016). The emergence of second-screen gatekeeping. Digital Journalism, 4(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1054408

20.

Karlsson

(2011). The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism, 12(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388223

21.

Kovach

Rosenstiel

(2021). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (4th ed.). Crown.

22.

Kümpel

A. S.

Karnowski

Keyling

(2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society, 1(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141

23.

Leuthesser

Kohli

(1997). Corporate identity: The role of mission statements. Business Horizons, 40(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90053-7

24.

Lewin

(1947). Frontiers in group dynamics II: Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100201

25.

Lewis

S. C.

(2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150

26.

Los Angeles Times (2006). (October, 23). Our mission. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-oct-23-ed-mission23-story.html.

27.

Morgan

D. L.

(1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239300300107

28.

The New York Times (n.d.). Mission and values. https://www.nytco.com/company/mission-and-values/.

29.

Pantic

(2018). Participatory spaces in online media: Half-opening the gates to users. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291880689

30.

Pantic

(2023). Participatory journalism: A new approach for increasing public trust and engagement. In Schmidt

H. C.

(Ed.), Issues in contemporary American journalism (pp. 211–217). Routledge.

31.

Pantic

Cvetkovic

(2020). Journalism practice in a digital age: Utilization of social media in online news. American Communication Journal, 22(2), 1–12. https://www.ac-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Journalism-Practice-in-a-Digital-Age-Utilization-of-Social-Media-in-Online-News.pdf

32.

Pearson

G. D.

Kosicki

G. M.

(2017). How way-finding is challenging gatekeeping in the digital age. Journalism Studies, 18(9), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1123112

33.

Postman

(2000). Building a bridge to the 18th century: How the past can improve our future. Vintage Books.

34.

Quandt

(2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519

35.

Shoemaker

P. J.

Vos

T. P.

(2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.

36.

Singer

J. B.

(2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833

37.

Singer

J. B.

(2015). Out of bounds: Professional norms and boundary markers. In Carlson

Lewis

S. C.

(Eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation (pp. 21–36). Routledge.

38.

Statista (2021). August). Average weekday print circulation of selected newspapers in the United States from October 2020 to March 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272790/circulation-of-the-biggest-daily-newspapers-in-the-us/.

39.

Statista (2021). July 15). Leading ad supported broadcast and cable networks in the United States in 2020, by average number of viewers. https://www.statista.com/statistics/530119/tv-networks-viewers-usa/.

40.

Statista (2021). October 20). Media use in the U.S. - Statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/1536/media-use/#dossierKeyfigures.

41.

Statista (2021). October 21). Share of consumers who have used selected global online news brands to access news in the last week in the United States as of June 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262520/leading-online-news-brands-in-the-us/.

42.

Statista (2023). January 24). Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/.

43.

Swales

J. M.

Rogers

P. S

. (1995). Discourse and the projection of corporate culture: The mission statement. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002005

44.

Tandoc

E. C.

Vos

T. P.

(2015). The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811

45.

Treadwell

Davis

(2019). Introduction to communication research: Paths of inquiry (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.

46.

Vos

T. P.

(2015). Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transition. In Vos

T. P.

Heinderyckx

(Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 3–24). Routledge.

47.

Wallace

(2018). Modeling contemporary gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism, 6(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648

48.

Weaver

D. H.

Willnat

(2016). Changes in U.S. Journalism: How do journalists think about social media? Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162

49.

White

D. M.

(1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990500270040

50.

Zeller

Hermida

(2015). When tradition meets immediacy and interaction: The integration of social media in journalists’ everyday practices. About Journalism, 4(1), 106–119. https://revue.surlejournalisme.com/slj/article/view/202