This article explores the discursive representations of Paralympians in South East Asia, particlarly in Singapore. One goal is to look at the extent and nature of media coverage of the Paralympics. Another goal of the research is to examine whether female Paralympians are exposed to the dual burden of sexist and ablest ideology in the media. Over 2 years, data from 100 articles were collected from three local Singaporean and Asian media sources; additionally, interviews and a survey were conducted with both Paralympians and citizens from the disabled community as well as a cohort of nondisabled Singaporean citizens. Findings suggest that coverage of Paralympic sport is significantly low, and that patriotism is more starkly linked to the Paralympics than the Olympics. Findings also suggest that othering (presenting the disabled as passive as well as challenged), or the supercrip narrative is apparent. Disabled women athletes tend to be overrepresented in passive poses out of the sport field. Finally, and more positively, the study finds that there are many images of Paralympian women as sophisticated and attractive without being sexually provocative. Therefore, evidence of sexual objectification or presentation of asexual disabled women tends not to be as present, as other similar studies have found.
AngR. P.HuanV. S. (2006). Academic Expectations Stress Inventory: Development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 522–539.
2.
BergerR. J. (2008). Disability and the dedicated wheelchair athlete: Beyond the “supercrip” critique. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 647–678.
3.
BillingsA. C.AngeliniJ. R.WuD. (2011). Nationalistic notions of the superpowers: Comparative analyses of the American and Chinese telecasts in the 2008 Beijing Olympiad. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 251–266.
4.
BirrellS. (1998). Discourses on the gender/sport relationship: From women in sport to gender relations. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 16, 459–502.
5.
BlindeE. M.McCallisterS. G. (1999). Women, disability, and sport and physical fitness activity: The intersection of gender and disability dynamics. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 70, 303–312.
6.
BourdieuP. (2001). Television. European Review, 9, 245–256.
BrayeS.DixonK.GibbonsT. (2013). ‘A mockery of equality’: An exploratory investigation into disabled activists’ views of the Paralympic games. Disability & Society, 28, 984–996. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.748648
9.
BrisendenS. (1986). Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1, 173–178.
10.
BrittainI. (2004). Perceptions of disability and their impact upon involvement in sport for people with disabilities at all levels. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 28, 429–452.
11.
BrittainI. (2010). The Paralympic games explained. London, England: Routledge.
12.
BrookeM. (2014). Bidding for a lion’s share: Singapore’s Olympic medal aspirations through the foreign sporting talent scheme. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 3, 152–158.
13.
BushA.SilkM.PorterJ.HoweP. D. (2013). Disability [sport] and discourse: Stories within the Paralympic legacy. Reflective Practice, 14, 632–647.
14.
BuysseJ. A. M.BorcherdingB. (2010). Framing gender and disability: A cross-cultural analysis of photographs from the 2008 Paralympic games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 308–321.
15.
ChangI.CrossmanJ. (2009). ‘When there is a will, there is a way’: A quantitative comparison of the newspaper coverage of the 2004 summer Paralympic and Olympic Games. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 21, 16–34.
16.
CheongJ. P.KhooS.RazmanR. (2016). Spotlight on athletes with a disability: Malaysian newspaper coverage of the 2012 London Paralympic games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 33, 15–32.
CoakleyJ. J.PikeE. (2009). Sport in society: Issues and controversies. London, England: McGraw-Hill.
20.
de BeauvoirS. (1973). The second sex. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
21.
DePauwK.GavronS. (1995). Disability and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
22.
de SilvaC. (2008). Media representations of Paralympian athletes: An athlete’s perspective(Unpublished master’s thesis). Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
23.
De SilvaC. F.HoweP. D. (2012). The (in) validity of supercrip representation of Paralympian athletes. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 36, 174–194.
24.
DevlinR. F.PothierD. (Eds.). (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
25.
DubbertJ. L. (1979). A man’s place: Masculinity in transition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
EllisK. (2015). Disability and popular culture: Focusing passion, creating community, and expressing defiance. London, England: Routledge.
27.
EllisK.GolgienG.Haller, B. (Eds.). (2017). Routledge companion to disability and the media. London, England: Routledge.
28.
FaircloughN. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman.
29.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge (GordonC., Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon.
30.
Garland-ThomsonR. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1557–1587.
31.
GeeJ. P. (2004). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
32.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, England: Penguin.
33.
GoffmanE. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
34.
GoldenA. V. (2003). An analysis of the dissimilar coverage of the 2002 Olympics and Paralympics: Frenzied pack journalism versus the empty press room. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23. Retrieved fromhttp://dsq-sds.org/article/view/437/614
35.
HallM. A. (1996). Feminism and sporting bodies. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36.
HarawayD. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London, England: Routledge.
37.
HardinM.ShainS. (2005). Female sports journalists: Are we there yet? ‘No.’Newspaper Research Journal, 26, 22.
38.
HargreavesJ. A.HardinB. (2009). Women wheelchair athletes: Competing against media stereotypes. Disability Studies Quarterly, 29. Retrieved fromhttp://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/920/1095
39.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
40.
HuangC. J.BrittainI. (2006). Negotiating identities through disability sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 352–375.
41.
JakubowskaH.ChannonA.MatthewsC. R. (2016). Gender, media, and mixed martial arts in Poland: The case of Joanna Jedrzejczyk. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40, 410–431.
42.
JanksH. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 329–342.
43.
KaneM. J.MaxwellH. D. (2011). Expanding the boundaries of sport media research: Using critical theory to explore consumer responses to representations of women’s sports. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 202–216.
LirolaM. (2014). Approaching the representation of sub-Saharan immigrants in a sample from the Spanish press: Deconstructing stereotypes. Critical Discourse Studies, 11, 482–499.
46.
MessnerM. A. (1988). Sports and male domination: The female athlete as contested ideological terrain. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 197–211.
47.
OliverM.BarnesC. (2011). Disability studies, disabled people and the struggle for inclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31, 547–560.
48.
PappousA.MarcelliniA.De LéséleucE. (2011). From Sydney to Beijing: The evolution of the photographic coverage of paralympic games in five European countries. Sport in Society, 14, 345–354.
49.
PurdueD. E. (2013). An (in) convenient truce? Paralympic stakeholders’ reflections on the Olympic–Paralympic relationship. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37, 384–402.
50.
PurdueD. E.HoweP. D. (2012). See the sport, not the disability: Exploring the Paralympic paradox. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 4, 189–205.
51.
RichardR.JoncherayH.DugasE. (2017). Disabled sportswomen and gender construction in powerchair football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52, 61–81.
52.
RoweD. (1999). Sport, culture and the media. Buckingham, England: Open University.
53.
RuddellJ. L.ShinewK. J. (2006). The socialization process for women with physical disabilities: The impact of agents and agencies in the introduction to an elite sport. Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 421–444.
54.
SchantzO.GilbertK. (2001). An ideal misconstrued: Newspaper coverage of the Atlanta Paralympic games in France and Germany. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 69–94.
55.
SchellB. L. A.DuncanM. C. (1999). A content analysis of CBS’s coverage of the 1996 Paralympic games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 27–47.
56.
SchellB. L. A.RodriguezS. (2001). Subverting bodies/ambivalent representations: Media analysis of paralympian, Hope Lewellen. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 127–135.
57.
SherrillC. (1993). Paralympics 1992: Excellence and challenge. Palaestra, 9, 25–42.
58.
SmithA.ThomasN. (2005). “The ‘inclusion’ of elite athletes with disabilities in the 2002 Manchester commonwealth games: An exploratory analysis of British newspaper coverage. Sport, Education and Society, 10, 49–67.
59.
SmithB.CaddickN. (2012). Qualitative methods in sport: A concise overview for guiding social scientific sport research. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 1, 60–73.
60.
SmithB.SparkesA. C. (2012). Narrative analysis in sport and physical culture, In YoungK.AtkinsonM. (Eds.), Qualitative research on sport and physical culture (pp. 79–99). London, England: Emerald Group.
61.
SmithB. G.HutchisonB. (Eds.). (2004). Gendering disability. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
ThomasN.SmithA. (2003). Preoccupied with ablebodiedness? An analysis of the British media coverage of the 2000 Paralympic games. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 166–181.
64.
van DijkT. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of CDA (pp. 62–86). London, England: Sage.
65.
VelijaP.MierzwinskiM.FortuneL. (2013). ‘It made me feel powerful’: Women’s gendered embodiment and physical empowerment in the martial arts. Leisure studies, 32, 524–541.
66.
WardL. M.HarrisonK. (2005). The impact of media use on girls’ beliefs about gender roles, their bodies, and sexual relationships: A research synthesis. In ColeE.DanielJ. H. (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67.
WilsonN. C.KhooS. (2013). Benefits and barriers to sports participation for athletes with disabilities: The case of Malaysia. Disability & Society, 28, 1132–1145.
68.
YeamC. T.BrookeM. (2016). Changing perceptions of disability through sport: The case of Singaporean wheelchair basketball. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 5, 1–8.
69.
ZhangL.HallerB. (2013). Consuming image: How mass media impact the identity of people with disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 61, 319–334.
70.
ZitzelsbergerH. (2005). (In)visibility: Accounts of embodiment of women with physical disabilities and differences. Disability & Society, 20, 389–403.
