This study represents a content analysis of 10 beach volleyball games for the men’s and women’s team USA during the 2008 Summer Games. Play-by-play commentary and between-play commentary were analyzed for all 10 games, and all court shots and camera angles were coded. Using earlier work examining the existence or presence of gender inequities in mediated coverage of sport in general, the goal was to identify how or if coverage of beach volleyball might still reinforce gender inequities. Findings from the coded visual and verbal coverage suggest that gender difference was not evident in the manifest content of the 2008 Olympic Games. Additional findings and implications are discussed.
AdamsT.TuggleC. A. (2004). ESPN’s SportsCenter and coverage of women’s athletics: “It’s a boys’ club.”Mass Communication & Society, 7, 237–248.
2.
AngeliniJ. R.BillingsA. C. (2010). An agenda that sets the frames: Gender, language, and NBC’s Americanized Olympic telecast. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 363–385.
BillingsA. C. (2004). Depicting the quarterback in black and white: A content analysis of college and professional football broadcast commentary. Howard Journal of Communications, 15, 201–210.
5.
BillingsA. C.AngeliniJ. R.EastmanS. T. (2005). Diverging discourses: Gender differences in televised golf announcing. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 155–171.
6.
BillingsA. C.EastmanS. T. (1999). Gender parity in the Olympics: Hyping women athletes, favoring men athletes. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 23, 140–170.
7.
BillingsA. C.EastmanS. T. (2003). Framing identities: Gender, ethnic, and national parity in network announcing of the 2002 winter Olympics. Journal of Communication, 53, 569–586.
8.
BillingsA. C.HaloneK. K.DenhamB. E. (2002). “Man, that was a pretty shot”: An analysis of gendered broadcast commentary surrounding the 2000 men’s and women’s NCAA final four basketball championships. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 295–315.
9.
BissellK. L.DukeA. M. (2007). Bump, set, spike: An analysis of commentary and camera angles of women’s beach volleyball during the 2004 summer Olympics. Journal of Promotion Management, 13, 35–53.
10.
BrodH. (Eds.). (1987). The making of masculinity: The new men’s studies. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ConnellR. W. (1990). Which way is up? Essays on sex, class, and culture. Sydney, Australia: George Allan and Unwin.
13.
DaddarioG. (1994). Chilly scenes of the 1992 winter games: The mass media and the marginalization of female athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 11, 275–288.
14.
DaddarioG.WigleyB. J. (2007). Gender marking and racial stereotyping at the 2004 Athens games. Journal of Sports Media, 2, 29–51.
15.
DavisK. K.TuggleC. A. (2008, August). A gender analysis of NBC’s coverage of the 2008 summer Olympics. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
16.
DuncanM. C. (1990). Sport photographs and sexual difference: Images of women and men in the 1984 and 1988 Olympic games. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 22–43.
17.
EastmanS. T.BillingsA. C. (2001). Biased voices of sports: Racial and gender stereotyping in college basketball announcing. Howard Journal of Communications, 12, 183–220.
18.
FinkJ. S.KensickiL. J. (2002). An imperceptible difference: Visual and textual constructions of femininity in sports illustrated and sports illustrated for women. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 317–339.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
GreerJ. D.HardinM.HomanC. (2010). “Naturally” less exciting? Visual production of men’s and women’s track and field coverage during the 2004 Olympics. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53, 173–189.
22.
HallmarkJ. R.ArmstrongR. N. (1999). Gender equity in televised sports: A comparative analysis of men’s and women’s NCAA division I basketball championship broadcasts, 1991–1995. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 222–235.
23.
HankeR. (1990). Hegemonic masculinity in thirtysomething. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 231–248.
24.
HardinM.LynnS.WalsdorfK.HardinB. (2002). The framing of sexual difference in SI for Kids editorial photos. Mass Communication & Society, 5, 341–359.
25.
HargreavesJ. A. (1986). Where’s the virtue? Where’s the grace? A discussion of the social production of gender relations in and through sport. Theory, Culture & Society, 3, 109–121.
26.
HiggsC. T.WeillerK. H.MartinS. B. (2003). Gender bias in the 1996 Olympic games: A comparative analysis. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 27, 52–64.
27.
KaufmanM. (Ed.). (1987). Beyond patriarchy: Essays by men on pleasure, power, and change. Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
28.
KilbourneJ. (1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
KilbourneJ.(Producer), JhallyS.(Director). (2000). Killing us softly 3: Advertising images of women[videorecording]. Retrieved from Media Education Foundation website: http:/www.mediaed.org
30.
KinnickK. (1998). Gender bias in newspaper coverage of the 1996 Olympic games: A content analysis of five major dailies. Women’s Studies in Communications, 21, 212–237.
31.
KimmelM. S. (1987). Rethinking ‘masculinity’: New directions in research. In KimmelM. S. (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 235–249). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
32.
KlomstenA. T.MarshH. W.SkaalvikE. M. (2005). Adolescents’ perceptions of masculine and feminine values in sport and physical education: A study of gender differences. Sex Roles, 52, 625–636.
33.
KnightJ. L.GiulianoT. A. (2001). He’s a laker; She’s a “looker”: The consequences of gender stereotypical portrayals of male and female athletes by the print media. Sex Roles, 45, 217–230.
34.
KnightJ. L.GiulianoT. A. (2003). Blood, sweat, and jeers: The impact of the media’s heterosexist portrayals on perceptions of male and female athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26, 272–285.
35.
KoivulaN. (2001). Perceived characteristics of sports categorized as gender-neutral, feminine, and masculine. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 377–393.
MessnerM. A.DuncanM. C.JensenK. (1993). Separating the men from the girls: The gendered language of televised sports. Gender and Society, 7, 121–137.
38.
PedersenP. M. (2003). Examining stereotypical written and photographic reporting on the sports page: An analysis of newspaper coverage of interscholastic athletics. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal, 12, 67–75.
39.
TankardJ. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
ThebergeN. (2000). Gender and sport. In CoakleyJ.DunningE. (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Studies (pp. 322–333). London, England: Sage.
41.
TrujilloN. (1991). Hegemonic masculinity on the mound: Media representations of Nolan Ryan and American sports culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(3), 290–308.
42.
WeillerK. H.HiggsC. T.GreenleafC. (2004). Analysis of television media commentary of the 2000 Olympic games. Media Report to Women, 32, 14–21.
43.
WennerL. A. (1989). Media, sports, and society: The research agenda. In WennerL. A. (Ed.), MediaSport (pp. 134–153). New York, NY: Routledge.
