We examined the self-determination of English learners with disabilities in secondary school, based on a secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (NLTS 2012). Self-determination characteristics of English learners with disabilities differed significantly from those of other students with disabilities, and of English learner students and students who are not English learners in the general population, including their being less likely to act autonomously or report empowerment-related or self-realization-related behaviors. Multivariate analyses identified several student and family characteristics associated with variations in aspects of self-determination, including age, gender, and postsecondary expectations. Implications for practice and research are discussed, including the importance of considering these factors when selecting, implementing, and evaluating self-determination interventions for English learners with disabilities.
AsmusJ.CarterE. W.MossC. K.BiggsE. E.BoltD. M.BornT. L.Bottema-BeutalK.BrockM. E.CatteyG. N.CooneyM.FespermanE. S.HochmanJ. M.HuberH. B.LequiaJ. L.LyonsG. L.VincentL. B.WeirK. (2017). Efficacy and social validity of peer network interventions for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 122(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.2.118
2.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57(1), 289–300. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Biological perspectives on human development. SAGE.
4.
BurghardtJ.HaimsonJ.LipscombS.LiuA. Y.PotterF.WaitsT.WangS.SekinoY.SilverbergM. (2017). National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 design documentation (NCEE 2017-4021). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
5.
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardo-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2018). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
6.
BurrE.HaasE.FerriereK. (2015). Identifying and supporting English learner students with learning disabilities: Key issues in the literature and state practice (REL 2015-086). Institute of Education Sciences.
7.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.MorganA. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336654
8.
ColbyS.OrtmanJ. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 (Current Population Reports). U.S. Census Bureau.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
10.
GothbergJ. E.GreenG.KohlerP. D. (2019). District implementation of research-based practices for transition planning with culturally and linguistically diverse youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418762794
11.
HarryB.KalyanpurM.DayM. (1999). Building cultural reciprocity with families. Paul H. Brookes.
12.
KlingnerJ. K.EppolitoA. M. (2014). English language learners: Differentiating between language acquisition and learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children.
13.
LamS.WongB. P. H.YangH.LuiY. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In ChristensonS.ReshleyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403–420). Springer.
14.
LipscombS.JohannA. (2017). The characteristics and experiences of English learner students with disabilities in secondary school: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (Working Paper No. 56). Mathematica Policy Research.
15.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
16.
MichaelsC. A.FerraraD. L. (2009). Promoting post-school success for all: The role of collaboration in person-centered transition planning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16(4), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768Xjepc1604_4
17.
NewmanL.WagnerM.HuangT.ShaverD.KnokeyA.YuJ.ContrerasE.FergusonK.GreenS.NagleK.CametoR. (2011). Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities: A special topic report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2, NCSER 2012-3000). SRI International.
18.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2, NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International.
19.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
20.
PetcuS. D.Van HornM. L.ShogrenK. A. (2017). Self-determination and the enrollment in and completion of postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(14), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416670135
21.
Povenmire-KirkT. C.LindstromL.BullisM. (2010). De escuela a la vida adulta/From school to adult life: Transition needs for Latino youth with disabilities and their families. Career Development and Exceptional Individuals, 33(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809359004
22.
RafteryJ. N.GrolnickW. S.FlammE. S. (2012). Families as facilitators of student engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. In ChristensonS.ReshleyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 343–364). Springer.
23.
RodriguezR. J.CavendishW. (2013). Differences in the relationship between family environments and self-determination among Anglo, Latino and female students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412461524
24.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.FowlerC. Y.TestD. W.MitchellV. J.ClarkK. A.HolzbergD.OwensT. L.RusherD.Seaman-TullisR. L.GushanasC. M.CastleH.ChnagW.VoggtA.KwiatekS.DeanC. (2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1) 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674
25.
ShogrenK. A. (2011). Culture and self-determination: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research and practice. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728811398271
26.
ShogrenK. A. (2012). Hispanic mothers’ perceptions of self-determination. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412461524
27.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.VillarrealM. G.LittleT. D. (2014). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data from NLTS2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413486927
28.
ShogrenK. A.LeeJ.PankoP. (2017). An examination of the relationship between postschool outcomes and autonomy, psychological, empowerment, and self -realization. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916683171
29.
ShogrenK. A.VillarealM. G.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (2016). Exploring student, family, and school predictors of self-determination using NLTS2 data. Career Development and Transition for Individuals with Disabilities, 39(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916683171
30.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-Pratt LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418788168
31.
SlamaR. B. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of academic English proficiency outcomes for adolescent English language learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025861
32.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (1995). Transfor-mations: Immigration, family life, and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford University Press.
33.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2019). Understanding teacher shortages: An analysis of teacher supply and demand in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(35), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3696
34.
TrainorA. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380030501
35.
TrainorA. A. (2010). Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: An analysis of cultural and social capital. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01086
36.
TrainorA. A.MurrayA.KimH. (2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797
37.
TrainorA. A.NewmanL.GarciaE.WoodleyH. H.TraxlerR. E.DescheneD. N. (2019). Postsecondary education-focused transition planning experiences of English learners with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418811830
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NCSER 2007-3006). SRI International.
40.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024981820074
41.
WehmeyerM. L. (2000). The arc’s self-determination scale: Procedural guidelines (rev ed). The Arc of the United States.
42.
WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. J. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice.. Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
43.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. H. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910392377
44.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 25–36.
45.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.121
46.
ZhangD. (2005). Parent practices in facilitating self-determination skills: The influences of culture, socioeconomic status, and children’s special education status. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.154
