Exploratory Study of a Team-Based Model of Transition Professional Development

Abstract

This article shares the results from a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study of a promising transition-focused professional development approach. The 12-week team-based intervention resulted in positive outcomes among intervention group participants’ knowledge and capacities. The intervention group exhibited statistically significant changes in knowledge of transition assessment practices as well as in using various types of age-appropriate transition assessments and implementing effective practices associated with a comprehensive transition assessment process. At the program level, findings indicated team-level indicators showed statistically significant improvements. The study demonstrated teams who received the intervention were more likely to attain a program-level goal, which was substantially greater than the comparison teams. Implications for future research and practice are shared.

Keywords

transition assessment or planning transition area professional development mixed methods research methodology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhattacharya

(2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.

Brantlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Brownell

M. T.

Lauterbach

A. A.

Dingle

M. P.

Boardman

A. G.

Urbach

J. E.

Leko

M. M.

Benedict

A. E.

Park

(2014). Individual and contextual factors influencing special education teacher learning in literacy learning cohorts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713487179

Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards. CEC. https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/specialty-sets-specific-practice-areas

Darling-Hammond

Hyler

M. E.

Gardner

(2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev

Dedoose Version 8.0.35. (2018). SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com

Desimone

L. M.

(2020). Nurturing teacher learning opportunities–experiences, leadership and technology. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 175–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1731264

Desimone

L. M.

Pak

(2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947

Doren

Flannery

K. B.

Lombardi

A. R.

Kato

M. M.

(2012). The impact of professional development and student and teacher characteristics on the quality of postsecondary goals. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512468037

10.

Feldon

D. F.

Kafai

Y. B.

(2008). Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9081-2

11.

Flannery

K. B.

Hellman

L. A.

(2015). Building strategically aligned individualized education programs for transition. Journal of Special Education, 49(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914521771

12.

Flannery

K. B.

Lombardi

Kato

M. M.

(2015). The impact of professional development on the quality of the transition components of IEPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413489727

13.

Gersten

Dimino

Jayanthi

Kim

J. S.

Santoro

L. E.

(2010). Teacher study group: Impact of the professional development model on reading instruction and student outcomes in first-grade classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 694–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361208

14.

Glover

T. A.

Reddy

L. A.

Kurz

Elliott

S. N.

(2019). Use of an online platform to facilitate and investigate data-driven instructional coaching. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418811593

15.

Harn

Parisi

Stoolmiller

(2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900204

16.

Holzberg

D. G.

Clark

K. A.

Morningstar

M. E.

(2018). Transition-focused professional development: An annotated bibliography of essential elements and features of professional development. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417742362

17.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).

18.

Inge

K. J.

Graham

C. W.

Erickson

Sima

West

Cimera

R. E.

(2016). Improving the employment outcomes of individuals with traumatic brain injuries: The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies to impact the use of evidence-based practices by vocational rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160815

19.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

20.

Kim

K. H.

Morningstar

M. E.

(2007). Enhancing secondary special education teachers’ knowledge and competencies in working with culturally and linguistically diverse families through online training. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300020201

21.

Kiresuk

T. J.

Smith

Cardillo

J. E.

(1994). Goal attainment scale: Applications, theory, & measurement. Psychology Press.

22.

Kohler

P. D.

Field

(2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030701

23.

Koziol

S. M.

Jr. Burns

(1986). Teachers’ accuracy in self-reporting about instructional practices using a focused self-report inventory. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885678

24.

Lichtenstein

Lindstrom

Povenmire-Kirk

(2008). Promoting multicultural competence: Diversity training for transition professionals. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 30(3), 3–15.

25.

Malec

J. F.

(1999). Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9(3–4), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/096020199389365

26.

Maxwell

J. A.

Loomis

D. M.

(2003). Mixed method design: An alternative approach. In Tashakkori

Teddle

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241–272). Sage.

27.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Plotner

A. J.

(2016). Implementing secondary transition evidence-based practices: A multi-state survey of transition service providers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414544360

28.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

W. H.

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

29.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Simonsen

Boaz

VanAvery

(2018). Steps for implementing a state-level professional development plan for secondary transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417741478

30.

Morningstar

M. E.

Benitez

D. T.

(2013). Teacher training matters: The results of a multistate survey of secondary special educators regarding transition from school to adulthood. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412474022

31.

Morningstar

M. E.

Clavenna-Deane

(2018). Your complete guide to transition planning and services. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

32.

Morningstar

M. E.

Lattin

D. L.

Born

Buller

J. W.

(2017, January). Transition coalition self-study: Building a transition assessment toolkit (National ed.). Transition Coalition, University of Kansas.

33.

Morningstar

M. E.

Lee

Lattin

D. L.

Murray

A. K.

(2016). An evaluation of the technical adequacy of a revised measure of quality indicators of transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 227–236. tps://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415589925

34.

Morningstar

M. E.

Mazzotti

(2014). Teacher preparation to deliver evidence-based transition planning and services to youth with disabilities (Document No. IC-1). Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center, University of Florida.

35.

Penn

J. D.

(2008). Faculty approaches to improving teaching: A mixed methods case study. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

36.

Plotner

A. J.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rose

C. A.

Carlson-Britting

K. B.

(2015). Factors associated with enhanced knowledge and use of secondary transition evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415599430

37.

Reddy

L. A.

Dudek

C. M.

Fabiano

G. A.

Peters

(2015). Measuring teacher self-report on classroom practices: Construct validity and reliability of the classroom strategies scale–teacher form. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000110

38.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

39.

Scher

Kisker

Dynarski

(2015). Designing and conducting strong quasi-experiments in education (Version 2) (ED 561293). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561293.pdf

40.

Schreier

(2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE.

41.

Simonsen

M. L.

Morningstar

M. E.

Dojonovic

S. L.

(2020). Trends in transition educator personnel preparation. In Shogren

K.A.

Wehmeyer

M.L.

(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 379–394). Routledge.

42.

Stemler

S. E.

(2015). Emerging trends in content analysis. In Scott

Kosslyn

(Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–14). John Wiley.

43.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Ed.). (2021). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE.

44.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Richter

S. M.

White

Mazzotti

Walker

A. R.

Kohler

Kortering

(2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336859

45.

Test

D. W.

Mazzotti

Mustian

Fowler

Kortering

Kohler

(2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960

46.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Williams-Diehm

K. L.

Little

T. D.

Boulton

(2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800201

47.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.1). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.57 MB