IEP/Transition Planning Participation Among Students With the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities: Findings From NLTS 2012

Abstract

This study used data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (NLTS 2012) to explore the individualized education program (IEP)/transition planning participation and role of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, compared to students with other disabilities. We viewed students with the most significant cognitive disabilities as those included in three disability categories—autism, intellectual disability, and multiple disabilities—who took an alternate assessment. The study also included an analysis of student’s participation in relation to their functional, communication, and self-advocacy skills, and student–teacher relationships. Although students with the most significant cognitive disabilities experienced greater limitations overall, students with other disabilities were experiencing similar challenges. Implications for practice were discussed from the lens of student engagement, self-determination, and student’s leadership role.

Keywords

transition assessment or planning transition area high school contexts autism disability groups intellectual disability multiple disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnard-Brak

Fearon

D. D.

(2012). Self-advocacy skills as a predictor of student IEP participation among adolescents with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(1), 39–47.

Benz

Halpern

(1987). Transition services for secondary students with mild disabilities: A statewide perspective. Exceptional Children, 53(6), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298705300604

Burghardt

Haimson

Liu

A. Y.

Lipscomb

Potter

Waits

Wang

(2017). National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 design documentation (NCEE 2017–4021). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Cameto

Levine

Wagner

(2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities. A special topic report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International.

Carter

E. W.

Austin

Trainor

(2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311414680

Carter

E. W.

Austin

Trainor

A. A.

(2011). Factors associated with the early work experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.233

Carter

E. W.

Brock

M. E.

Trainor

A. A.

(2014). Transition assessment and planning for youth with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912456241

Christenson

S. L.

Reschly

A. L.

Appleton

J. J.

Berman-Young

Spanjers

D. M.

Varro

(2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1099–1119). National Association of School Psychologists.

Donnellan

A. M.

(1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874298400900201

10.

Doren

Gau

Lindstrom

(2012). The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207900101

11.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, U.S.C. § 1177 (2015).

12.

Finn

J. D.

(1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educa-tional Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117

13.

Flannery

K. B.

Newton

Horner

R. H.

Slovic

Blumberg

Ard

W. R.

(2000). The impact of person centered planning on the content and organization of individual supports. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 23(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880002300202

14.

Fredricks

J. A.

Blumenfeld

P. C.

Paris

A. H.

(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

15.

Geenen

Powers

Lopez Vasquez

Bersani

(2003). Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880302600103

16.

Griffin

M. M.

Taylor

J. L.

Urbano

R. C.

Hodapp

R. M.

(2014). Involvement in transition planning meetings among high school students with autism spectrum disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913475668

17.

Hagner

Kurtz

May

Cloutier

(2014). Person-centered planning for transition-aged youth with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(1), 4–10.

18.

Harry

Allen

McLaughlin

(1995). Communication versus compliance: African-American parents’ involvement in special education. Exceptional Children, 61(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299506100405

19.

Hetherington

S. A.

Durant-Jones

Johnson

Nolan

Smith

Taylor-Brown

Tuttle

(2010). The lived experiences of adolescents with disabilities and their parents in transition planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357610373760

20.

Hollingshead

Carnahan

C. R.

Lowrey

K. A.

Snyder

(2017). Engagement for students with severe intellectual disability: The need for a common definition of inclusive education. Inclusion, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-5.1.1

21.

Hughes

Heron

Sterne

Tilling

(2019). Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: Multiple imputation is not always the answer. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48(4), 1294–1304.

22.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 101-476, § 602a, 20 U.S.C. 1401.

23.

Johnson

D. R.

(2012). Policy and adolescent transition education. In Wehmeyer

M. L.

Webb

K. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (pp. 11–32). Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.

24.

Jordan

Glenn

McGhie-Richmond

(2010). The supporting effective teaching (SET) project: The relationship of inclusive teaching practices to teachers’ beliefs about disability and ability, and about their roles as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.005

25.

Kearns

Towles-Reeves

Kleinert

(2009). Who are the children who take alternate achievement standards assessments? In Schafer

Lissitz

(Eds.), Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Policy, practice, and potential (pp. 3–22). Paul H. Brookes.

26.

Kearns

Towles-Reeves

Kleinert

Thomas

(2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. The Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909344223

27.

Landmark

Zhang

Montoya

(2007). Culturally diverse parents’ experiences in their children’s transition: Knowledge and involvement. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300020401

28.

Landmark

Zhang

(2019). Self-determination at a career and technical school: Observations of IEP meetings. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-019-0096-6

29.

Lipscomb

Hamison

Liu Albert

Burghardt

Johnson

D. R.

Thurlow

(2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across disability groups: Full report (NCEE 2017-4018). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

30.

(2008). Chinese families’ level of participation and experiences in IEP meetings. Preventing School Failure, 53(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.1.21-27

31.

Martin

J. E.

Marshall

L. H.

Maxson

L. M.

Jerman

P. L.

(1996). The self-directed IEP [Video, Assessment Tool, and Instructional Material]. Sopris West.

32.

Martin

J. E.

Marshall

L. H.

Sale

(2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000302

33.

Martin

J. E.

Van Dycke

J. L.

Christensen

W. R.

Greene

B. A.

Gardner

J. E.

Lovett

D. L.

(2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200303

34.

Martin

J. E.

Van Dycke

D’Ottavio

Nickerson

(2007). The student-directed summary of performance: Increasing student and family involvement in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300010101

35.

Mason

Field

Sawilowsky

(2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000404

36.

McDonnell

Hardman

M. L.

(2010). Successful transition programs: Pathways for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. SAGE.

37.

Meyer

Rose

Gordon

(2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

38.

Nash

Clark

Karvonen

(2016). First contact: A census report on the characteristics of students eligible to take alternate assessments (Technical Report No. 16-01). Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, University of Kansas.

39.

Powers

L. E.

Turner

Westwood

Matuszewski

Wilson

Phillips

(2001). TAKE CHARGE for the future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880102400107

40.

Shogren

K. A.

Burke

K. M.

Anderson

M. H.

Antosh

A. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

LaPlante

Shaw

L. A.

(2018). Evaluating the differential impact of interventions to promote self-determination and goal attainment for transition-age youth with intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918779775

41.

Shogren

K. A.

Burke

K. M.

Antosh

Wehmeyer

M. L.

LaPlante

Shaw

L. A.

Raley

(2019). Impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on self-determination and goal attainment in adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318792178X

42.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Williams-Diehm

Little

T. D.

(2012). Effect of intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072

43.

Shogren

K. A.

Plotner

A. J.

(2012). Transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities: Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300406

44.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Soukup

J. H.

Little

T. D.

Garner

Lawrence

(2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300406

45.

Simons-Morton

Chen

(2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09334861

46.

Sinclair

Christenson

Thurlow

(2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100405

47.

Spann

S. J.

Kohler

F. W.

Soenksen

(2003). Examining parents’ involvement in and perceptions of special education services: An interview with families in a parent support group. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(4), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180040401

48.

Sugai

Horner

R. H.

Dunlap

Hieneman

Lewis

T. J.

Nelson

C. M.

Scott

Liaupsin

Sailor

Turnbull

A. P.

Turnbull

H. R.

Wickham

Wilcox

Ruef

(2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070000200302

49.

Test

Mason

Hughes

Konrad

Neale

Wood

(2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000401

50.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Richter

S. M.

White

Mazzotti

Walker

A. R.

Kohler

Kortering

(2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960

51.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Wood

W. M.

Brewer

D. M.

Eddy

(2005). A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 26(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260010601

52.

Thurlow

M. L.

Lazarus

S. S.

Albus

D. A.

Larson

E. D.

Liu

K. K.

(2019). 2018-19 participation guidelines and definitions for alternate assessment based on alternate academic achievement standards (NCEO Report 415). National Center and State Collaborative, University of Minnesota.

53.

Thurlow

M. L.

Quenemoen

R. F.

Towles

(2016). Characteristics of students with significant cognitive disabilities (NCSC Brief 8). National Center and State Collaborative, University of Minnesota.

54.

Towles-Reeves

Kearns

Flowers

Hart

Kerbel

Kleinert

Quenemoen

Thurlow

(2012). Learner Characteristics Inventory project report: A product of the NCSC validity evaluation. National Center and State Collaborative, University of Minnesota.

55.

Trainor

Murray

Kim

H.-J.

(2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797

56.

U.S. Department of Education (2016, December 8). Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged – Academic assessments. Federal Register, 81(236), 88886-88938.

57.

Wagner

Newman

Cameto

Javitz

Valdes

(2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311425384

58.

Wehmeyer

Schwartz

(1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300207

59.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lawrence

(1995). Whose future is it anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning with a student-directed process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572889501800202

60.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Soukup

J. H.

Garner

N. W.

Lawrence

(2007). Self-determination and student transition planning knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality, 15(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830709336924

61.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

(2008). The self-determination of adolescents with intellectual disability. In Lopez

(Ed.), Positive psychology perspective series Volume III: Growing in the face of diversity (pp. 89–108). Greenwood Publishing.

62.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Williams-Diehm

K. L.

Little

Boulton

(2012). Impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on self-determination: A randomized-trail control group study. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153.

63.

Wei

Wagner

Hudson

J. W.

Javitz

(2016). The effect of transition planning participation and goal-setting on college enrollment among youth with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515581495

64.

Williams-Diehm

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

Soukup

J. H.

Garner

(2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 25–36.

65.

Woods

L. L.

Sylvester

Martin

J. E.

(2010). Student-directed transition planning: Increasing student knowledge and self-efficacy in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810368056

66.

Zhang

Haddad

Torres

Chen

(2010). The reciprocal relationships among parents’ expectations, adolescents’ expectations, and adolescents’ achievement: A two-wave longitudinal analysis of the NELS Data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9568-8