The present study examined the transition component of the Individualized Education Program for 62 secondary students with autism. Plans were coded using a rubric adapted from Indicator 13 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Findings indicated a mean plan score of 10.5 out of 20.0, with a range of 3.0 to 20.0. Strengths were noted in Transition Services, with Course of Study and Transition Assessment as areas of relative need. Student characteristics—including adaptive behavior, IQ, and self-determination—were associated with components of transition plan quality. Plan quality differences were found based on diploma status and the quality of the school environment. Implications for supporting educators in writing and implementing quality transition planning are discussed.
BenitezD. T.MorningstarM. E.FreyB. B. (2009). A multi-state survey of special education teachers’ perceptions of their transition competencies. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0885728808323945
2.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
3.
ChandrooR.StrnadovaI.CummingT. M. (2018). A systematic review of the involvement of students with autism spectrum disorder in the transition planning process: Need for voice and empowerment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 83, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.011
4.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
5.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd Ed.). Routledge.
6.
ConstantinoJ. N.GruberC. P. (2012). Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2. Western Psychological Services.
7.
DorenB.FlanneryK. B.LombardiA. R.McGrath-KatoM. (2012). The impact of professional development and student and teacher characteristics on the quality of postsecondary goals. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932512468037
8.
EricksonA. S. G.NoonanP. M.BrussowJ. A.GilpinB. J. (2014). The impact of IDEA Indicator 13 compliance on postsecondary outcomes. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143413481497
9.
EversonJ. M.ZhangD.GuilloryJ. D. (2001). A statewide investigation of Individualized Transition Plans in Louisiana. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F088572880102400104
10.
FinnJ. E.KohlerP. D. (2009). A compliance evaluation of the transition project outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0885728808315332
11.
FlanneryK. B.LombardiA.McGrath KatoM. (2015). The impact of professional development on the quality of the transition components of IEPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143413489727
12.
GreeneG. (2018). The emperor has no clothes: Improving the quality and compliance of ITPs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143417707205
13.
GrigalM.TestD. W.BeattieJ.WoodW. M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 63(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440299706300305
14.
HumeK.OdomS.SteinbrennerJ.Smith DaWaltL.HallL.KraemerB.TomaszewskiB.BrumC.SzidonK.BoltD. (2021). Efficacy of a school-based comprehensive intervention program for adolescents with autism. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00144029211062589
KimS. Y. (2019). The experiences of adults with autism spectrum disorder: Self-determination and quality of life. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 60(2019), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.12.002
18.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
19.
KraemerB. R.OdomS.TomaszewskiB.HallL. J.DawaltL.HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.SzidonK.BrumC. (2020). Quality of high-school programs for students with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 24(3), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362361319887280
20.
LandmarkL. J.ZhangD. (2012). Compliance and practices in transition planning: A review of individualized education program documents. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932511431831
21.
LipscombS.HaimsonJ.LiuA. Y.BurghardtJ.JohnsonD. R.ThurlowM. L. (2017). Preparing for life after high school: The characteristics and experiences of youth in special education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012.Volume 1: Comparisons with other youth: Executive summary (NCEE 2017-4017). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/disabilities_nlts2012.asp
22.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of post school success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143420959793
23.
OdomS.CoxA.SiderisJ.HumeK.HedgesS.KucharczykS.ShawE.BoydB.ReszkaS.NeitzelJ. (2018). Assessing quality of program environments for children and youth with autism: Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3379-7
24.
PowersK. M.Gil-KashiwabaraE.GeenenS. J.PowersL. E.BalandranJ.PalmerC. (2005). Mandates and effective transition planning practices reflected in IEPs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F08857288050280010701
RubleL.McGrewJ. H.WongV.AdamsM.YuY. A. (2019). Preliminary study of parent activation, parent-teacher alliance, transition planning quality, and IEP and postsecondary goal attainment of students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(8), 3231–3243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04047-4
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022466913489733
31.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.BallaD. A. (2006). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Teacher rating form manual. Pearson.
32.
TaylorJ. L.SeltzerM. M. (2011). Employment and post-secondary educational activities for young adults with autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(5), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1070-3
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0885728809346960
35.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.SeoH. (2014). The Supports Intensity Scale—Children’s version: Preliminary reliability and validity. Inclusion, 2(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-2.2.140
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Young adults and transitioning youth with autism spectrum disorder: The Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education and Support Act (Autism CARES Act) of 2014 report to Congress. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/2017AutismReport.pdf
38.
WehmanP.SchallC.CarrS.TargettP.WestM.CifuG. (2014). Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorder: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1044207313518071
39.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuboisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. American Institute for Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
