Few transition studies have involved training supervisors on interacting and relaying feedback to individuals with intellectual disability during vocational training. We used a multiple baseline across participants design to examine the efficacy of an adaptive check-in/check-out (CICO) intervention for increasing the rate of performance feedback statements given by a supervisor to an intern with an intellectual disability during vocational training. The CICO intervention was effective at increasing the rate of performance feedback statements given by each supervisor. We recommend research and practice focused on training supervisors to use the CICO intervention to assist in helping foster natural job supports.
AkkermanA.JanssenC. G.KefS.MeiningerH. P. (2016). Job satisfaction of people with intellectual disabilities in integrated and sheltered employment: An exploration of the literature. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 13(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12168
2.
AmadoA. N.StancliffeR. J.McCarronM.McCallionP. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.360
3.
AndiolaL. M. (2014). Performance feedback in the audit environment: A review and synthesis of research on the behavioral effects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 33(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2014.07.001
BodenL. J.JolivetteK.AlbertoP. A. (2018). The effects of check-in, check-up, check-out for students with moderate intellectual disability during on- and off-site vocational training. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 53(1), 4–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170975
6.
CroneD.HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
7.
DrevonD. D.HixonM. D.WyseR. D.RigneyA. M. (2018). A meta-analytic review of the evidence for check-in check-out. Psychology in the Schools, 56(1), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22195
8.
EllenkampJ. J.BrouwersE. P.EmbregtsP. J.JoosenM. C.WeeghelJ. V. (2016). Work environment-related factors in obtaining and maintaining work in a competitive employment setting for employees with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 26(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9586-1
9.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.SwoszowskiN. C.JohnsonM. L. (2012). Secondary prevention efforts at a residential facility for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Function-based check-in, check-out. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 29(2), 79–102. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ964611
10.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
11.
GilsonC. B.CarterE. W.BiggsE. E. (2017). Systematic review of instructional methods to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796917698831
12.
GormleyM. E. (2015). Workplace stigma toward employees with intellectual disability: A descriptive study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 43(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-150773
13.
GrigalM.HartD.MiglioreA. (2011). Comparing the transition planning, postsecondary education, and employment outcomes of students with intellectual and other disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0885728811399091
14.
GuoY.ZhangY.LiaoJ.GuoX.LiuJ.XueX.LiC.ZhangM.ZhangY. (2017). Negative feedback and employee job performance: Moderating role of the big five. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(10), 1735–1744. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6478
15.
HawkenL. S.BundockK.KladisK.O’KeeffeB.BarrettC. A. (2014). Systematic review of the check-in, check-out intervention for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 635–658. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070186
16.
HedleyD.UljarevicM.CameronL.HalderS.RichdaleA.DissanayakeC. (2017). Employment programmes and interventions targeting adults with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of literature. Autism, 21(8), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362361316661855
17.
HoldernessD. K.OlsenK. J.ThornockT. A. (2017). Who are you to tell me that? The moderating effect of performance feedback source and psychological entitlement on individual performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2(29), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51538
18.
KuvaasB.BuchR.DysvikA. (2017). Constructive supervisor feedback is not sufficient: Immediacy and frequency is essential. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1002.hrm.21785
19.
MeliusP.SwoszowskiN. C.SidersJ. (2015). Developing peer led check-in/check-out: A peer-mentoring program for children in residential care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 32(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2015.1004288
20.
MitchellB. S.AdamsonR.McKennaJ. W. (2017). Curbing our enthusiasm: An analysis of the check-in/check-out literature using the Council for Exceptional Children’s evidence-based practice standards. Behavior Modification, 41(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0145445516675273
21.
PapayC. K.BambaraL. M. (2014). Best practices in transition to adult life for youth with intellectual disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2165143413486693
SwoszowskiN. C.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D.HeflinL. J. (2012). Check-in/check-out: Effects on students with emotional and behavioral disorders with attention- or escape-behavior in a residential facility. Exceptionality, 20(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2012.694613
25.
SwoszowskiN. C.McDanielS. C.JolivetteK.MeliusP. (2013). The effects of tier II check-in/check-out including adaptation for non-responders on the off-task behavior of elementary students in a residential setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(3), 63–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42900212
26.
SwoszowskiN. C.PattersonD. P.CrosbyS. (2011). Implementing check in/check out for students with emotional and behavioral disorders in residential and juvenile justice settings. Beyond Behavior, 20(1), 32–36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ949525
27.
WinsorJ.TimmonsJ. C.ButterworthJ.MiglioreA.DominD.ZalewskaA.ShepardJ. (2018). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes through 2016. Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston. www.statedata.info/sites/statedata.info/files/files/statedata2018_web_F.pdf
28.
WolfeK.PyleD.CharltonC. T.SabeyC. V.LundE. M.RossS. W. (2016). A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1098300715595957
