Check-in/check-out (CICO) is an evidence-based multicomponent intervention widely implemented in elementary and middle schools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an adapted CICO intervention, with CICO components designed to be more developmentally appropriate for adolescents and contextually relevant for high schools, could be implemented with procedural fidelity and improve outcomes for students with and at risk for disabilities. The study included three ninth-grade students (two with Individualized Education Programs) in one U.S. public high school. We used a non-concurrent multiple baseline design conducted over two academic years during the COVID-19 pandemic to experimentally evaluate the effects of CICO-Secondary on student academic engagement. Results demonstrated that students participated with adequate procedural fidelity and that there was a functional relation between implementation of CICO-Secondary and improved student academic engagement. Students and school personnel also perceived CICO-Secondary to be socially valid. Implications for both future research and practice are discussed.
AlgozzineR. F.BarrettS.EberL.GeorgeH.HornerR. H.LewisT. J.PutnamR. F.Swain-BradwayJ.McIntoshK.SugaiG. (2014). SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. http://www.pbis.org
2.
AlgozzineR. F.HornerR. H.SugaiG.BarrettS.DickeyC. R.EberL.KincaidD.LewisT.TobinT. (2010). Evaluation blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support (2nd ed.). National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support. www.pbis.org
3.
BartonE. E.LloydB. P.SpriggsA. D.GastD. L. (2018). Visual analysis of graphic data. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 179–214). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666
4.
BruhnA. L.LaneK. L.HirschS. E. (2014). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multitiered models of behavioral prevention. [Article]. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 22, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613476092
5.
BundockK.FlanneryK. B. (2021). CICO in high school setting. In HawkenL. S.BundockK.HornerR. H. (Eds.), Responding to problem behaviors in schools (3rd ed., pp. 150–166). The Guilford Press.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
DanielaP. (2015). The relationship between self-regulation, motivation and performance at secondary school students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2549–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.410
8.
DrevonD. D.HixsonM. D.WyseR. D.RigneyA. M. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the evidence for check-in check-out. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22195
9.
FallonL. M.FeinbergA. B. (2017). Implementing a tier 2 behavioral intervention in a therapeutic alternative high school program. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1254083
10.
GageN. A.BeahmL.KaplanR.MacSuga-GageA. S.LeeA. (2020). Using positive behavioral interventions and supports to reduce school suspensions. Beyond Behavior, 29(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295620950611
11.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 239–281). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666
12.
HawkenL. S.AdolphsonS. L.MacLeodK. S.SchumannJ. (2009). Secondary-tier interventions and supports. In SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 395–420). Springer.
13.
HawkenL. S.BundockK.KladisK.O’KeeffeB.BarrettC. A. (2014). Systematic review of the check-in, check-out intervention for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0030
14.
HawkenL. S.CroneD. A.BundockK.HornerR. H. (2021). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The check-in, check-out intervention (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
15.
HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2003). Evaluation of a targeted intervention within a schoolwide system of behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025512411930
16.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.FixsenD. L. (2017). Implementing effective educational practices at scales of social importance. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0224-7
17.
HurwitzS.Garman-McClaineB.CarlockK. (2022). Special education for students with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic: “Each day brings new challenges.”Autism, 26(4), 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211035935
18.
KatoM. M.KittelmanA.FlanneryK. B.Cohen LissmanD. (2023). Adapting and monitoring daily CICO implementation in high schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 67(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2106933
KittelmanA.MonzalveM.FlanneryK. B.HershfeldtP. A. (2018). Adaptations of check-in/check-out to meet the needs of high school students. The High School Journal, 102(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2018.0017
21.
KittelmanA.Strickland-CohenM. K.HornerR. H.MorrisK.LewisT.FlanneryK. B. (2023). Measuring fidelity of core features of tier 2 systems and practices in schools. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org
22.
KlingbeilD. A.DartE. H.SchrammA. L. (2019). A systematic review of function-modified check-in/check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718778032
McIntoshK.FlanneryK. B.SugaiG.BraunD.CochraneK. L. (2008). Relationships between academics and problem behavior in the transition from middle school to high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708318961
25.
PustejovskyJ. E.ChenM.HamiltonB. (2021). Scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.5.2) [Web application]. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
26.
PustejovskyJ. E.HedgesL. V.ShadishW. R. (2014). Design-comparable effect sizes in multiple baseline designs: A general modeling framework. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39(5), 368–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998614547577
27.
SchifterL. A. (2016). Using survival analysis to understand graduation of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915619418
28.
SimonsenB.MyersD.BriereD. E.III (2015). Comparing a behavioral check-in/check-out (CICO) intervention to standard practice in an urban middle school setting using an experimental group design. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 13(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709359026
29.
SlocumT. A.PinkelmanS. E.JoslynP. R.NicholsB. (2022). Threats to internal validity in multiple-baseline design variations. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45, 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00326-1
30.
Swain-BradwayJ. L. (2009). An analysis of a secondary level intervention for high school students at risk of school failure: The high school behavior education program [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. (UMI No. 304979946).
31.
ValentineJ. C.Tanner-SmithE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.LauT. S. (2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer and tutorial using the scdhlm web application. The Campbell Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2016.1
32.
WangM.-T.FredricksJ. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
33.
WisnerB. L.JonesB.GwinD. (2010). School-based meditation practices for adolescents: A resource for strengthening self-regulation, emotional coping, and self-esteem. Children & Schools, 32(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/32.3.150
34.
WolfeK.PyleD.CharltonC. T.SabeyC. V.LundE. M.RossS. W. (2016). A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715595957
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
