The McGill Action Planning System (also referred to as Making Action Plans or MAPS) is a supportive, strengths-based process that enables teams to understand each other and work together to support students in achieving their dreams. This process can work very well with all transitioning students with disabilities and their families, including those who are culturally and linguistically diverse (including refugees and immigrants), as it brings together school personnel, community members, and family members who support the student, and each participant can learn from the others. This article explains nine steps required to implement MAPS with families whose children have disabilities.
HainesS. J.SummersJ. A.TurnbullA. P.PalmerS. B.TurnbullH. R. (2015). Fostering Habib’s engagement and self-regulation: A case study of a child from a refugee family at home and preschool. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 28–39.
2.
HasnainR.SotnikP.GhiloniC. (2003). Person-centered planning: A gateway to improving vocational rehabilitation services for culturally diverse individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 69(2), 10–17.
3.
HiranoK. A.RoweD. A. (2016). A conceptual model for parent involvement in secondary special education. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27, 43–53.
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, (P.L. 108-446), 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1400 et seq., 34 C.F.R. 300 et seq.
5.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (2012). Cultural reciprocity in special education: Building family-professional relationships. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
6.
LeakeD.BurgstahlerS.IzzoM. (2011). Promoting transition success for culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities: The value of mentoring. Creative Education, 2, 121–129.
7.
LynchW. W.HansonM. J. (2011). Developing cross-cultural competence with young children and their families (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
Marfull-JensenM.FlanaganT. (2015). The 2010 Chilean national disability law: Self-determination in a collectivistic society. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 26, 144–152.
9.
MartinezD. C.ConroyJ. W.CerretoM. C. (2012). Parent involvement in the transition process of children with intellectual disabilities: The influence of inclusion on parent desires and expectations for postsecondary education. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 279–288.
10.
NeeceC. L.KraemerB. R.BlacherJ. (2009). Transition satisfaction and family well being among parents of young adults with severe intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 31–43.
11.
ShepherdK. G.GiangrecoM. F.CookB. G. (2013). Parent participation in assessment and in development of Individualized Education Programs. In CookB. G.TankersleyM. (Eds.), Research-based practices in special education (pp. 260–271). Boston, MA: Pearson.
12.
ShogrenK. A. (2011). Culture and self-determination: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research and practice. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 115–127.
13.
TrainorA. (2007). Person-centered planning in two culturally distinct communities: Responding to divergent needs and preferences. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 92–103.
14.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR.ErwinE.SoodakL.ShogrenK. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15.
WellsJ. C.SheeheyP. H. (2012). Person-centered planning: Strategies to encourage participation and facilitate communication. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(3), 32–39.
16.
VandercookT.YorkJ.ForestM. (1989). The McGill Action Planning System (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 205–215.
