This article presents results from a large-scale study of professionals who work with individuals who are deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH). Participants were 1,345 professionals who work in a variety of roles, including educators, administrators, interpreters, vocational rehabilitation agency staff, and allied service providers. Participants shared their perspectives on transition experiences for individuals who are DHH, as well as their own preparedness to support their clients through this process. Data come from a national survey, interviews, and focus groups. Results demonstrate that professionals’ years of experience was a significant predictor of multiple outcomes, even when controlling for characteristics of professionals and their clients. Discussion includes implications of these findings for practice and areas for future research.
AlbertiniJ. A.KellyR. R.MatchettM. K. (2012). Personal factors that influence deaf college students’ academic success. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 85–101.
2.
CawthonS., & the pepnet 2 Research and Evidence Synthesis Team. (2012). Pepnet 2 Needs Assessment: Final report. Available from www.pepnet.org
3.
CawthonS.CaemmererJ., & the pepnet 2 Research and Evidence Synthesis team. (in press). Parental expectations and transition outcomes for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf.
4.
ChuteP. M. (2012). College experience for young adults with hearing loss. Deafness & Education International, 14(1), 60–65. doi:10.1179/1557069X12Y.000000000
5.
EasterbrooksS. R. (2001). Veteran teachers of children who are deaf/hard of hearing describe language instructional practices: Implications for teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 116–127.
6.
FosterS.MacLeodJ. (2004). The role of mentoring relationships in the career development of successful deaf persons. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 442–458.
7.
GarberoglioC. L.GobbleM. E.CawthonS. W. (2012). A national perspective on teachers’ efficacy beliefs in deaf education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17, 367–383. doi:10.1093/deafed/ens01
8.
HumphriesT.AllenB. M. (2008). Reorganizing teacher preparation in deaf education. Sign Language Studies, 8(2), 160–180.
9.
IsraeliteN.OwerJ.GoldsteinG. (2002). Hard-of-hearing adolescents and identity construction: Influences of school experiences, peers, and teachers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 134–148.
10.
JohnsonH. A. (2003). U.S. deaf education teacher preparation programs: A look at the present and a vision for the future. Gainesville, FL: Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education. Retrieved from http://copsse.education.ufl.edu/docs/IB-9/1/IB-9.pdf
11.
Lee-TarverA. (2006). Are individualized education plans a good thing? A survey of teachers’ perceptions of the utility of IEPs in regular education settings. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 263–272.
12.
LeighI. W.PowersL.VashC.NettlesR. (2004). Survey of psychological services to clients with disabilities: The need for awareness. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 48–54. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.49.1.4
13.
LucknerJ. (1991). Skills needed for teaching hearing-impaired adolescents. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 422–427.
14.
LucknerJ. (1992). Preparing teachers to work with adolescent students who are hearing impaired: A survey of training programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 25–31.
15.
LucknerJ.CarterK. (2001). Essential competencies for teaching students with hearing loss and additional disabilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 146, 7–15.
16.
LuftP. (2008). Examining educators of the deaf as “highly qualified” teachers: Roles and responsibilities under IDEA and NCLB. American Annals of the Deaf, 152, 429–440.
17.
LuftP. (2012). A national survey of transition services for deaf and hard of hearing students. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143412469400
18.
MarscharkM.SapereP.ConvertinoC.PelzJ. (2008). Learning via direct and mediated instruction by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13, 546–561. doi:10.1093/deafed/enn01
19.
MaxwellM. M. (1985). Sign language instruction and teacher preparation. Sign Language Studies, 47, 173–180.
20.
McIlroyG.StorbeckC. (2011). Development of deaf identity: An ethnographic study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 494–511.
21.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/index.html
22.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) [NCSER 2011-3005] (NCSER 2011). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
23.
SchickB.WilliamsK.KupermintzH. (2006). Look who’s being left behind: Educational interpreters and access to education for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 3–20.
24.
SchroedelJ. G.WatsonD.AshmoareD. H. (2003). A national research agenda for the postsecondary education of deaf and hard of hearing students: A road map for the future. American Annals of the Deaf, 148, 67–73.
25.
ShroyerE. H.ComptonM. V. (1994). Educational interpreting and teacher preparation: An interdisciplinary model. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 472–479.
26.
SiegelL. (2005). The human right to language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
27.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.WhiteJ.RichterS.WalkerA. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition practices for enhancing school completion. Exceptionality, 17, 16–29.
