This case study describes a common foodservice business dilemma related to service inefficiency. Service inefficiency is typically multi-factorial, and operators need to reflect on several internal and external aspects to make needed changes. Therefore, this case aims to provide an analysis that includes aspects of various stakeholders, technology-involved business operation decisions, and service innovation solutions to diminish the negative effect of service inefficiency at a university-based coffee shop. The case describes possible solutions that connect the current trend of the ghost kitchen phenomenon with the technological evolvement of autonomous food delivery robots.
FliessS.KleinaltenkampM. (2004). Blueprinting the service company: Managing service process efficiency. Journal of Business Research, 57, 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00273-4
7.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (p. 46). Pitman.
SharmaA.MoonJ.BaigJ. I.ChoiJ. G.SeoK.DonatoneL. C. (2015).Cost–benefit framework for K-12 foodservice outsourcing decisions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45, 69–72.
19.
ShapiroA. (2022). Platform urbanism in a pandemic: Dark stores, ghost kitchens, and the logistical-urban frontier. Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(1), 168–187.
20.
ShostackG. L. (1984). Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review, 62(1), 133–139.
StaussB.WeinlichB. (1997). Process-oriented measurement of service quality: Applying the sequential incident technique. European Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 33–55.
WilliamsC.BuswellJ. (2003). Concepts of quality in leisure and tourism. In Service Quality in Leisure and Tourism (pp. 38–58). https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995410.0038
28.
ZeithamlV. A.BitnerM. J. (2000). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
