This case study examines the difficulties multinational corporations (MNCs) encounter when sharing knowledge among their various business units. The study pinpoints four main challenges to knowledge transfer: the hoarding-of-expertise challenge (HEC), the foreigner challenge (FC), the not-invented-here challenge (NIH), and the absorptive capacity challenge (ACC) and presents approaches to tackle these issues. The case study centers around the A&A hotel chain, specifically its subsidiary, “Maria the Great Hotel,” located on Kish Island in Iran. The study identified challenges within the context of this multinational hotel chain. It introduced strategies that can be used to address these challenges, emphasizing the significance of knowledge transfer in attaining organizational success and gaining a competitive edge.
Abou-ShoukM.ZoairN.AburummanA.Abdel-JalilM. (2022). The effect of personality traits and knowledge-sharing on employees’ innovative performance: A comparative study of Egypt and Jordan. Tourism Management Perspectives, 44, 101024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101024
2.
AhmadN.DaghfousA. (2010). Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge networks: Challenges and opportunities in the United Arab Emirates. European Business Review, 22(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341011023506
3.
AmbroseS. C.MatthewsL. M.RutherfordB. N. (2018). Cross-functional teams and social identity theory: A study of sales and operations planning. Journal of Business Research, 92, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.052
4.
ArasliH.ArasliF. (2022). Digital transformation in workplace strategy. In ӦzsungurF. (Ed.) Managing the digital workplace in the post-pandemic (pp. 173–183). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003283386
5.
AyounB.EyounK.ChenH.ArasliF. (2022). Mapping the relationships between hotel employees’ perceptions of performance appraisal fairness, satisfaction, and the psychological contract. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 21(4), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2022.2106618
6.
BoaduF.XieY.DuY. -F.Dwomo-FokuoE. (2018). MNEs subsidiary training and development and firm innovative performance: The moderating effects of tacit and explicit knowledge received from headquarters. Sustainability, 10(11), 4208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114208
7.
BurkJ. (1994). Training MNC employees as culturally sensitive boundary spanners. Public Relations Quarterly, 39(2), 40.
8.
CabreraE. F.CabreraA. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020
9.
CaoT. T.LeP. B.NguyenN. T. M. (2022). Impacts of high-involvement HRM practices on organizational innovation capability: The mediating mechanism of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(5), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2021-0091
10.
CastroR.MoreiraA. C. (2023). Mapping internal knowledge transfers in multinational corporations. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010016
11.
ChatterjeeS.ChaudhuriR.VrontisD. (2022). Knowledge sharing in international markets for product and process innovation: The moderating role of firm’s absorptive capacity. International Marketing Review, 39(3), 706–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0261
12.
ChatterjeeS.ChaudhuriR.VrontisD.PiccoloR. (2021). Enterprise social network for knowledge sharing in MNCs: Examining the role of knowledge contributors and knowledge seekers for cross-country collaboration. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100827
13.
CounM. J.PetersP.BlommeR. J. (2019). ‘Let’s share!’ The mediating role of employees’ self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.001
14.
CuypersI. R.ErtugG.CantwellJ.ZaheerA.KilduffM. (2020). Making connections: Social networks in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 714–736. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00319-9
15.
DabicM.KiesslingT. (2019). The performance implications of knowledge management and strategic alignment of MNC subsidiaries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1477–1501. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2019-0129
16.
DarrE. D.ArgoteL.EppleD. (1995). The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science, 41(11), 1750–1762. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750
17.
DashD.FarooqR.UpadhyayS. (2023). Linking workplace ostracism and knowledge hoarding via organizational climate: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(1), 135–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2021-0080
18.
DuanY.YangM.HuangL.ChinT.FianoF.de NuccioE.ZhouL. (2022). Unveiling the impacts of explicit vs. tacit knowledge hiding on innovation quality: The moderating role of knowledge flow within a firm. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.068
FaroqueA. R.TorkkeliL.SultanaH.RahmanM. (2022). Network exploration and exploitation capabilities and foreign market knowledge: The enabling and disenabling boundary conditions for international performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 101, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.12.013
22.
FischerC. (2022). Incentives can’t buy me knowledge: The missing effects of appreciation and aligned performance appraisals on knowledge sharing of public employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20986839
23.
GnyawalịD. R.SingalM. (2009). Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: A multi-level conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 15(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.02.003
24.
GooderhamP. N.PedersenT.SandvikA. M.DasíÀ.ElterF.HildrumJ. (2022). Contextualizing AMO explanations of knowledge sharing in MNEs: The role of organizational and national culture. Management International Review, 62(6), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00483-0
HallK. R.HarrisonD. E.AjjanH.MarshallG. W. (2022). Understanding salesperson intention to use AI feedback and its influence on business-to-business sales outcomes. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(9), 1787–1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2021-0218?
27.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
HiguchiY.YamanakaY. (2017). Knowledge sharing between academic researchers and tourism practitioners: A Japanese study of the practical value of embeddedness, trust, and co-creation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(10), 1456–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1288733
30.
HoltenA. -L.HancockG. R.PerssonR.HansenÅ. M.HøghA. (2016). Knowledge hoarding: Antecedent or consequent of negative acts? The mediating role of trust and justice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2015-0222
31.
HonA. H.FungC. P.SenbetoD. L. (2022). Willingness to share or not to share? Understanding the motivation mechanism of knowledge sharing for hospitality workforce. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1935384
32.
HuM. L. M.HorngJ. S.SunY. H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.009
33.
KatzR.AllenT. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
34.
KhalidB.IqbalR.HashmiS. D. (2020). Impact of workplace ostracism on knowledge hoarding: Mediating role of defensive silence and moderating role of experiential avoidance. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00045-6
35.
KucharskaW.EricksonG. S. (2023). Tacit knowledge acquisition & sharing, and its influence on innovations: A Polish/US cross-country study. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102647
36.
LakosA.PhippsS. E. (2004). Creating a culture of assessment: A catalyst for organizational change. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0052
37.
LenartowiczT.JohnsonJ. P.KonopaskeR. (2014). The application of learning theories to improve cross-cultural training programs in MNCs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1697–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.860384
38.
LiL. (2005). The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra-and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review, 14(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005
39.
LiuC.WilliamsA. M.LiG. (2022). Knowledge management practices of tourism consultants: A project ecology perspective. Tourism Management, 91, 104491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104491
40.
MaD.FeeA.GrabowskiS.ScerriM. (2022). Dual organizational identification in multinational enterprises and interpersonal horizontal knowledge sharing: A Conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 28(1), 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100907
41.
MalhotraA.GosainS.SawyO. A. E. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 145–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148671
MinbaevaD.PedersenT.BjörkmanI.FeyC. F.ParkH. J. (2014). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056
44.
MortaraL.NappJ. J.SlacikI.MinshallT. (2009). How to implement open innovation: Lessons from studying large multinational companies. University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing.
45.
PereiraV.MohiyaM. (2021). Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding. Journal of Business Research, 129, 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.011
RahmanS.HossainM.IslamM. Z.JasimuddinS. M. (2022). Linkage between culture, leadership, and knowledge sharing in MNCs: Moderating role of training and development. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.301200
48.
RibièreV. M.SitarA. S. (2003). Critical role of leadership in nurturing a knowledge-supporting culture. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500004
SantosR. F.OliveiraM.CuradoC. (2023). The effects of the relational dimension of social capital on tacit and explicit knowledge sharing: A mixed-methods approach. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2020-0094
51.
SchusterT.HoltbrüggeD.EngelhardF. (2019). Knowledge sharing of inpatriates: Empirical evidence from an ability–motivation–opportunity perspective. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(5), 971–996. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2018-0073
52.
ShujaatS.AlamR. (2013). Impact of non-monetary rewards on employees ‘motivation: A study of commercial banks in Karachi. IBT Journal of Business Studies, 2(2), 23–30. http://doi.org/10.46745/ilma.jbs.2013.09.02.03
53.
SundarayB. K. (2011). Employee engagement: A driver of organizational effectiveness. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(8), 53–59.
54.
SuppiahV.Singh SandhuM. (2011). Organisational culture’s influence on tacit knowledge-sharing behaviour. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111137439
TsaiW. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
57.
TsaiF.-S.CabriloS.ChouH.-H.HuF.TangA. D. (2022). Open innovation and SME performance: The roles of reverse knowledge sharing and stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Research, 148, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.05
58.
WatsonI. (2003). Applying knowledge management: Techniques for building corporate memories. Morgan Kaufmann.
59.
YadavA.PanditaD.SinghS. (2022). Work-life integration, job contentment, employee engagement and its impact on organizational effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(3), 509–527. http://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2021-0083?
60.
YiuM.LawR. (2014). Review and application of knowledge management and knowledge sharing in tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 19(7), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2013.812128
61.
ZhaoH.XiaQ. (2017). An examination of the curvilinear relationship between workplace ostracism and knowledge hoarding. Management Decision, 55(2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2016-0607
