Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Among Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Seen at a Tertiary Care Center

Abstract

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is among the most aggressive and lethal tumors, with a median survival of 12–15 months. Many patients use complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) therapies to supplement their cancer treatment.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of CIM use and identify the most frequently used types of CIM in a cohort of patients with GBM seen at a tertiary care medical center in the United States.

Methods

An anonymous survey was mailed through the US Postal Service from August 1, 2019, through February 21, 2020, to patients with GBM.

Results

A total of 346 surveys were mailed, and 146 responses (42%) were received. The median age of respondents was 61 years (range, 52–68 years), and 85 (58%) were male. Most patients had undergone surgery (90%), chemotherapy (96%), and radiotherapy (95%). The median time from diagnosis of GBM to survey participation was 18 months (range, 12–31 months). Most respondents (81%) used some form of CIM, most frequently meditation (22%), relaxation and other stress management techniques (19%), chiropractic therapy (16%), and acupuncture (12%). Compared with men, women more commonly meditated (32% vs 16%; P = .046) and practiced yoga (20% vs 6%; P = .04). We observed age-based differences, with younger patients more commonly meditating, practicing relaxation and stress management techniques, and receiving chiropractic therapy (P < .05 for all).

Conclusions

Providers should encourage patients with GBM to discuss their interest in CIM therapies and guide them to evidence-based treatments that may help improve their quality of life.

Keywords

alternative medicine cancer complementary medicine glioblastoma glioblastoma multiforme integrative medicine

Introduction

More than 30% of adult Americans and about 12% of children use health care approaches that are not typically included in conventional medical care or may originate outside of the usual Western practice.¹ The terms used for these approaches are continually evolving but include “complementary,” “alternative,” and “integrative.” The National Institutes of Health defines complementary medicine as the use of non-mainstream practice together with conventional medicine and defines alternative medicine as the use of non-mainstream practice in place of conventional medicine. Integrative health care unites conventional and evidence-based complementary approaches in a coordinated way.¹ Complementary health approaches include natural products (eg, herbs and dietary supplements), mind and body practices (eg, yoga, meditation, relaxation techniques, Tai chi, qi gong, and hypnotherapy), manual therapies (eg, massage therapy, tuina, chiropractic, and osteopathic manipulation), and many therapies that do not fit easily into categories (eg, acupuncture, Feldenkrais method, and Alexander technique). The use of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) is particularly widespread among cancer patients² and survivors,³ with meta-analytic evidence reporting that more than 40% of cancer patients use CIM.⁴ This widespread use has prompted development of the field of integrative oncology, which aims to provide “a patient-centered, evidence-informed field of cancer care that utilizes mind and body practices, natural products, and/or lifestyle modifications from different traditions alongside conventional cancer treatments. Integrative oncology aims to optimize health, quality of life, and clinical outcomes across the cancer care continuum and to empower people to prevent cancer and become active participants before, during, and beyond cancer treatment.”⁵

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal human tumors, with a median survival of 12–15 months for patients receiving standard treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.⁶ The incidence of GBM ranges from 0.59 to 5 per 100 000 persons, and its incidence is increasing in many countries.⁷ With most patients being aware that GBM cannot be cured, patients and their caregivers understandably inquire about alternative, complementary, and CIM treatments. Patients may search for these treatments to help fight the disease or to relieve symptoms caused by the brain tumor. In 2010, the German Glioma Network conducted a cross-sectional survey and reported that 40% of patients with glioma used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).⁸ CAM was used in conjunction with conventional therapies, and patients reported wanting to actively contribute to the treatments themselves. Similar studies from France⁹ and Switzerland¹⁰ reported CAM use in 44% and 49% of their GBM cohorts, respectively. Physicians caring for patients with GBM should therefore be aware of and explore these treatments to provide counseling and to identify potential interactions with standard GBM therapies.

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of CIM use and to identify the most frequently used types of CIM in a cohort of patients with GBM seen at a tertiary care medical center in the United States.

Methods

This study was determined to be exempt under 45 CFR 46.101, item 2, by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB), which had ethical oversight for the study. In addition, the authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the Mayo Clinic IRB guidelines on human experimentation and are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2008. During the study, all meaningful changes to study design and procedures continued to be reviewed by the IRB, which confirmed the exemption status. Protocol-approved passive consent was obtained from all study participants before study initiation.

Survey Development

The survey was developed in collaboration with the Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center (MCSRC). The survey was designed to maximize participation and trust and to not be burdensome because it would be mailed only once. The paper–pencil survey contained 38 questions, with 33 questions having optional categorial responses that addressed 3 areas of CIM, plus a section about the responder. The questions covered (1) complementary therapies (17 questions); (2) use of antioxidants and vitamins (7 questions); (3) use of herbal supplements (9 questions); and (4) information on respondent demographic characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of GBM (5 questions). No patient identifiers were included.

Study Population and Survey Data Collection

This cross-sectional study was conducted among all patients with GBM diagnosed from August 1, 2019, through February 21, 2020, as identified through the Mayo Clinic electronic medical records. Survey packets were created that consisted of the anonymous survey, a cover letter inviting their participation, and a return stamped envelope addressed to the MCSRC. Surveys were mailed on August 15, 2020, and a reminder was sent 6 weeks later. Returned surveys were accepted from August 15 through December 31, 2020. All mailings were delivered and returned via the US Postal Service. The MCSRC received, collated, and entered the data from all returned surveys by using a dual data entry system (Entrypoint; Phoenix Software International, Inc).

Statistical Analysis

Categorical data were characterized with number and percentage. Continuous data were characterized with mean and standard deviation. We assessed the associations between gender and use of complementary therapies or supplemental treatments with the χ² test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. For continuous data, the relationship between variables was assessed with the Student t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. We used SAS statistical software (version 9.4m7; SAS Institute Inc) for the data analysis.

Results

Characteristics of Study Participants

Of the 346 patients invited to participate in the survey, 146 (42%) responded. The median age of respondents was 61 years (range, 52–68 years), and 85 patients (58%) were male. The majority of patients had undergone surgery (90%), chemotherapy (96%), and radiotherapy (95%). The median time between diagnosis of GBM and survey participation was 18 months (range, 12–31 months).

Use of Complementary Therapies

Survey results showed that 118 patients (81%) with GBM reported using some form of CIM (Table 1), most frequently meditation (21%), relaxation and other stress management techniques (19%), chiropractic therapy (16%), and acupuncture (12%). Compared with men, women more commonly meditated (32% vs 16%; P = .047) and more commonly practiced yoga (20% vs 6%; P = .04) (Supplementary Table 1). We observed age-based differences as well, with younger patients more commonly meditating, practicing relaxation and stress management, and receiving chiropractic therapy (P < .05 for all) (Supplementary Table 2). Although younger patients more commonly used homeopathy, naturopathy, and yoga than older patients, the differences were not significant (Supplementary Table 2).

Table 1.

Use of Complementary Therapies by Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme (N = 146).

Complementary Therapy	No. of Patients (%)
Meditation	28/129 (21.7)
Relaxation or stress management	24/126 (19.0)
Chiropractic therapy	20/127 (15.7)
Acupuncture	15/124 (12.1)
Homeopathy	14/123 (11.4)
Yoga	14/125 (11.2)
Naturopathy	12/122 (9.8)
Guided imagery	10/122 (8.2)
Reiki	10/124 (8.1)
Magnetic therapy	7/120 (5.8)
Reflexology	6/121 (5.0)
Tai chi	6/122 (4.9)
Acupressure	5/120 (4.2)
Biofeedback	4/120 (3.3)
Ayurvedic treatment	3/119 (2.5)
Hypnosis	3/120 (2.5)

We did not observe any associations between the use of CIM therapies and the number of months since diagnosis of GBM. Those with a longer time since diagnosis more commonly used chiropractic therapy, but the difference was not significant (P = .16) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Use of Complementary Therapies by Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme, Stratified by Time Since Diagnosis.

Complementary Therapy	Time since Diagnosis, month			P value^a
Complementary Therapy	≤12 (n = 40)	12-24 (n = 55)	>24 (n = 48)	P value^a
Meditation				.82
Yes	9 (25.0)	10 (20.8)	8 (19.0)
No	27 (75.0)	38 (79.2)	34 (81.0)
Missing data	4	7	6
Relaxation or stress management				.38
Yes	7 (20.6)	6 (12.8)	10 (23.8)
No	27 (79.4)	41 (87.2)	32 (76.2)
Missing data	6	8	6
Chiropractic therapy				.16
Yes	3 (8.6)	7 (14.3)	10 (25.0)
No	32 (91.4)	42 (85.7)	30 (75.0)
Missing data	5	6	8
Acupuncture				.45
Yes	2 (5.7)	7 (14.9)	5 (12.8)
No	33 (94.3)	40 (85.1)	34 (87.2)
Missing data	5	8	9
Homeopathy				1.00
Yes	4 (11.8)	6 (12.5)	4 (10.5)
No	30 (88.2)	42 (87.5)	34 (89.5)
Missing data	6	7	10
Yoga				.87
Yes	3 (8.6)	6 (12.8)	4 (10.0)
No	32 (91.4)	41 (87.2)	36 (90.0)
Missing data	5	8	8
Naturopathy				.64
Yes	2 (5.9)	5 (10.6)	5 (13.2)
No	32 (94.1)	42 (89.4)	33 (86.8)
Missing data	6	8	10
Guided imagery				.45
Yes	4 (11.4)	2 (4.3)	4 (10.8)
No	31 (88.6)	45 (95.7)	33 (89.2)
Missing data	5	8	11
Reiki				.92
Yes	2 (5.7)	4 (8.5)	4 (10.3)
No	33 (94.3)	43 (91.5)	35 (89.7)
Missing data	5	8	9
Magnetic therapy				.49
Yes	3 (8.8)	3 (6.5)	1 (2.7)
No	31 (91.2)	43 (93.5)	36 (97.3)
Missing data	6	9	11
Reflexology				.88
Yes	1 (2.9)	3 (6.4)	2 (5.4)
No	33 (97.1)	44 (93.6)	35 (94.6)
Missing data	6	8	11
Tai chi				.77
Yes	2 (5.9)	3 (6.4)	1 (2.6)
No	32 (94.1)	44 (93.6)	37 (97.4)
Missing data	6	8	10
Acupressure				1.00
Yes	1 (2.9)	2 (4.3)	2 (5.4)
No	33 (97.1)	44 (95.7)	35 (94.6)
Missing data	6	9	11
Biofeedback				.82
Yes	1 (2.9)	1 (2.2)	2 (5.4)
No	33 (97.1)	45 (97.8)	35 (94.6)
Missing data	6	9	11
Ayurvedic treatment				1.00
Yes	1 (2.9)	1 (2.2)	1 (2.8)
No	33 (97.1)	45 (97.8)	35 (97.2)
Missing data	6	9	12
Nonthermal atmospheric pressure plasma				1.00
Yes	1 (2.9)	1 (2.2)	1 (2.7)
No	33 (97.1)	44 (97.8)	36 (97.3)
Missing data	6	10	11
Hypnosis				1.00
Yes	1 (2.9)	1 (2.2)	1 (2.7)
No	33 (97.1)	45 (97.8)	36 (97.3)
Missing data	6	9	11

^aFisher exact test.

Use of Antioxidants, Vitamins, and Herbal Supplements

The most commonly used antioxidants and vitamins were multivitamins (38%), vitamin D (34%), and vitamin C (27%) (Table 3). We did not observe any significant difference in antioxidant and vitamin use when stratifying respondents by gender, age, and time since GBM diagnosis.

Table 3.

Use of Antioxidants or Vitamins by Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme (N=146).

Antioxidant or Vitamin	No. of Patients (%)
Multivitamin	56 (38.4)
Vitamin D	50 (34.2)
Vitamin C	40 (27.4)
Vitamin B complex	25 (17.1)
Vitamin E	14 (9.6)
Niacin, B₃ vitamin	10 (6.8)
Vitamin A	9 (6.2)
Other	36 (24.7)

Turmeric or curcumin (24%) was the most commonly used herbal supplement, followed by Boswellia (12%) and garlic (8%) (Table 4). We did not observe any significant difference in herbal supplement use when stratifying respondents by gender, age, and time since GBM diagnosis.

Table 4.

Use of Herbal Supplements by Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme (N=146).

Herbal Medicine	No. of Patients (%)
Turmeric or curcumin	35 (24.0)
Boswellia	18 (12.3)
Garlic	12 (8.2)
Mushrooms	11 (7.5)
Quercetin	3 (2.1)
Resveratrol	3 (2.1)
Propolis	1 (0.7)
Zataria multiflora	0 (0)
Other	26 (17.8)

Use of Nonconventional Therapies

Three patients reported using fenbendazole, an anthelmintic drug with a broad antiparasitic effect in animals. Benzimidazole compounds, including fenbendazole, have been reported to have antitumor activities by destabilizing tubulin binding.¹¹

Discussion

The evolving use of CIM by patients seen in various clinical specialties has been evaluated extensively at our institution.^12-16 Here, we describe the use of CIM by patients with a particularly aggressive malignancy, GBM. The overall CIM use in our cohort was 81%, which is similar to previously reported CIM rates for patients with GBM. Mulpur et al.¹⁷ conducted structured interviews with 477 patients, at a median of 6 weeks after GBM diagnosis, and 77% reported using CIM. A French GBM study⁹ surveyed 227 patients and reported that 68% used CIM. The German Glioma network reported CIM use by 40% of a cohort of 621 patients.⁸ Vitamins were the most common CIM in our study (taken by 38% of patients), which was consistent with the 45% reported by Mulpur et al.,¹⁷ 23% by Le Rhun et al.,⁹ and 32% by Heese et al.⁸ Although homeopathy was the most frequently used alternative therapy method (39%) in the German study,⁸ use of homeopathy was low in our study (11%). Acupuncture was used by 12% of our cohort, similar to rates reported previously.^8,9,17

The use of vitamins with antioxidant properties is controversial in gliomagenesis because of the delicate equilibrium between oxidants and antioxidants.^18,19 Preliminary studies examining the influence of various antioxidants have shown inconsistent findings that varied by histologic groups. High intake of vitamin C has been associated with decreased survival for patients with gliomas, although vitamin E might provide benefit.^20,21 Quercetin in combination with losartan has recently shown promising benefit in survival.²² Antioxidants may further increase sensitivity to radiotherapy. Whereas antioxidant supplements might provide some protection from radiation-induced brain injury²³ or even increased sensitization to treatment, precautions must be taken because of the potential reduction of therapeutic effects, possibly resulting in a higher risk of recurrence.¹⁸ The association between dietary antioxidants (higher oxidative index) and survival of patients with GBM needs further investigation.²⁴

The most frequently consumed phytochemical was turmeric or curcumin, which is indeed supported by extensive literature showing its benefit with GBM.²⁵ The antitumoral effects of curcumin have been reported to include growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest, antimigration, and anti-invasion, as well as chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-sensitizing properties.²⁵ Curcumin supplements further provide neuroprotection because of its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiprotein aggregation properties.²⁵ Additionally, curcumin may potentiate the effect of radiotherapy on cancer cells and have a protective effect on normal tissue.²⁶ Curcumin’s positive safety profile and widespread availability make it a promising compound for future clinical trials for GBM.

Women and younger patients more commonly meditated and used relaxation or stress management techniques. However, the overall proportion of respondents who used these techniques was approximately 20%. This is in concordance with a study by Keir et al.²⁷ documenting that although most patients with brain tumors report high stress levels, only 26% showed interest in receiving information about stress-reduction programs.

The antiparasitic veterinary drug fenbendazole was mentioned by 3 survey respondents. Fenbendazole and mebendazole, both members of the benzimidazole drug family, are speculated to be of use in the treatment of glioblastoma, given its involvement in several tumorigenic pathways and role in microtubule disruption.^11,28,29 However, further studies are needed to evaluate the possible usefulness of these agents in oncologic practice. Another compound of possible interest for patients with GBM is boron, a trace mineral that may have a role in improving inflammation, oxidation, and heavy metal toxicity in cancer.³⁰ Interestingly, boron supplementation seems to have a role in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) metabolism, which is closely related to CD38 expression, and CD38 is now understood to be a key player in cancer and glioblastoma.³¹ The interest in this compound for patients with glioblastoma is high enough that boron-based therapies are being evaluated in a number of small studies and ongoing larger clinical trials for intravenous infusions and irradiation.^31-33 None of our survey respondents mentioned using boron.

The usefulness of complementary medicine among patients with glioblastoma has been explored at other institutions.¹⁷ In one multicenter study, 77% of patients with GBM were users of CAM. A multivariate analysis showed that only users of herbal supplements (not those taking multivitamins or antioxidants) had prolonged survival, with a 42% reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .04). Vitamin E users had a nonsignificantly higher mortality rate than nonusers (hazard ratio, 1.54; P = .09).¹⁷ In a prospective study, the use of certain complementary and alternative practices showed improved quality of life only for patients who reported consistent practice and who were users before study enrollment.³⁴

Phytotherapy has recently been studied prospectively in 5 patients with glioblastoma. Trogrlić et al.³⁵ reported somewhat positive findings for 5 patients who took 5 types of herbal medicine mixtures (each containing 4–11 ingredients) during a 30-month period for either recurrent or residual disease after surgical resection and completion of chemoradiotherapy. Three patients did not show signs of disease after phytotherapy was introduced, 1 patient did not have disease recurrence, and another had a relatively long survival for the extent of tumor and recurrence. Although the authors attributed the positive outcomes to phytotherapy, a study with a larger sample size is required to be able to draw further conclusions about benefit.³⁵

All survey studies have strengths and limitations. One strength of our study was that it reduced barriers to participation by using anonymous surveys. However, it is possible that some respondents may have provided answers that they thought would please their health care providers and the study team. Survey data were collected with only 1 mailing and could not be linked to any individual’s health record. We could not determine reasons for a patient’s lack of response. Further, our findings cannot be generalized because these data were obtained from a sample of patients with GBM seen at a tertiary medical center.

Conclusion

Although CIM approaches are of general interest to most patients with cancer, patients with GBM may have unique needs because of their generally poor prognosis. Medical providers need to be aware of this interest in CIM and should be familiar with the expanding CIM armamentarium, including ongoing research studies. Our study showed that patients with GBM at our institution commonly used CIM. Specifically, mind–body interventions may help mitigate some of the negative effects of stress associated with the diagnosis and treatment. Providers should encourage patients with GBM to discuss their interest in CIM therapies and guide them to evidence-based treatments, which may help improve their quality of life and may be an important part of meeting their comprehensive health needs.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-gam-10.1177_2164957X221078543 – Supplemental Material for Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Among Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Seen at a Tertiary Care Center

Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-gam-10.1177_2164957X221078543 for Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Among Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Seen at a Tertiary Care Center by Amanda Munoz-Casabella, Dietlind L. Wahner-Roedler, Ivana T. Croghan, Tanya M. Petterson, Debbie L. Fuehrer, and Brent A. Bauer in Global Advances in Health and Medicine

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Mayo Clinic Survey Research Center, especially Libby J. Hammond and Ann M. Harris, for formatting and preparing the survey; Debra S. Albrecht, Laurie L. Prince, and Melissa S. Rathbun for monitoring and capturing data from the returned surveys; and Kandace A. Lackore for assisting with the data programming and analysis. Without their assistance, this study would not have been possible. June Oshiro, PhD, ELS, Mayo Clinic, substantively edited the manuscript. The Scientific Publications staff at Mayo Clinic provided proofreading, administrative, and clerical support.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported in part by The Head Foundation, Singapore (Dr Bauer’s time) and by the Integrative Medicine Program, Rochester, Minnesota (survey and statistical support).

ORCID iDs

Ivana T. Croghan

Brent A. Bauer

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

National Center for ComplementaryIntegrative Health . Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: What’s in a name? 2021. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name. Accessed Oct 4, 2021.

Molassiotis

Fernadez-Ortega

Pud

Ozden

Scott

Panteli

, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):655-663. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi110.

Gansler

Kaw

Crammer

Smith

. A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors. Cancer. 2008;113(5):1048-1057. doi:10.1002/cncr.23659.

Horneber

Bueschel

Dennert

Less

Ritter

Zwahlen

. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11(3):187-203. doi:10.1177/1534735411423920.

Witt

Balneaves

Cardoso

Cohen

Greenlee

Johnstone

, et al. A comprehensive definition for integrative oncology. JNCI Monographs. 2017;2017(52):2017. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgx012.

Krex

Klink

Hartmann

von Deimling

Pietsch

Simon

, et al. Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 10):2596-2606. doi:10.1093/brain/awm204.

Grech

Dalli

Mizzi

Meilak

Calleja

Zrinzo

. Rising incidence of glioblastoma multiforme in a well-defined population. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8195. doi:10.7759/cureus.8195.

Heese

Schmidt

Nickel

Berger

Goldbrunner

Tonn

, et al. Complementary therapy use in patients with glioma: an observational study. Neurology. 2010;75(24):2229-2235. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820202c6.

Le Rhun

Devos

Bourg

Darlix

Lorgis

Ahle

, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use in glioma patients in France. J Neuro Oncol. 2019;145(3):487-499. doi:10.1007/s11060-019-03315-8.

10.

Eisele

Roelcke

Conen

Huber

Weiss

Hofer

, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use by glioma patients in Switzerland. Neuro-Oncol Pract. 2019;6(3):237-244. doi:10.1093/nop/npy035.

11.

Dogra

Kumar

Mukhopadhyay

. Fenbendazole acts as a moderate microtubule destabilizing agent and causes cancer cell death by modulating multiple cellular pathways. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11926. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30158-6.

12.

Prasad

Sharma

Lackore

Jenkins

Prasad

Sood

. Use of complementary therapies in cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(3):339-345. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.010.

13.

Mohabbat

Mahapatra

Jenkins

Bauer

Vincent

Wahner-Roedler

. Use of complementary and integrative therapies by fibromyalgia patients: a 14-year follow-up study. Mayo Clin Proc: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes. 2019;3(4):418-428. doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.003.

14.

Kalaaji

Wahner-Roedler

Sood

Chon

Loehrer

Cha

, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients seen at the dermatology department of a tertiary care center. Compl Ther Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):49-53. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2011.05.003.

15.

Sood

Narayanan

Wahner-Roedler

Knudsen

Sood

Loehrer

, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine treatments by patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med.2007;3(6):575-579.

16.

Wahner-Roedler

Elkin

Vincent

Thompson

Loehrer

, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medical therapies by patients referred to a fibromyalgia treatment program at a tertiary care center. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(1):55-60. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62958-3.

17.

Mulpur

Nabors

Thompson

Olson

LaRocca

Thompson

, et al. Complementary therapy and survival in glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol Pract. 2015;2(3):122-126. doi:10.1093/nop/npv008.

18.

Ramírez-Expósito

Martínez-Martos

. The delicate equilibrium between oxidants and antioxidants in brain glioma. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(4):342-351. doi:10.2174/1570159X16666180302120925.

19.

Olivier

Oliver

Lalier

Vallette

. Drug resistance in glioblastoma: the two faces of oxidative stress. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:620677. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.620677.

20.

DeLorenze

McCoy

Tsai

A-L

Quesenberry

Rice

Il'yasova

, et al. Daily intake of antioxidants in relation to survival among adult patients diagnosed with malignant glioma. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:215. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-215.

21.

Borek

. Antioxidants and radiation therapy. J Nutr. 2004;134(11):3207S-3209S. doi:10.1093/jn/134.11.3207S.

22.

Tsiailanis

Renziehausen

Kiriakidi

Vrettos

Markopoulos

Sayyad

, et al. Enhancement of glioblastoma multiforme therapy through a novel Quercetin-Losartan hybrid. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;160:391-402. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.007.

23.

Kale

Pişkin

Baş

Aydın

Can

Elmas

, et al. Neuroprotective effects of Quercetin on radiation-induced brain injury in rats. J Radiat Res. 2018;59(4):404-410. doi:10.1093/jrr/rry032.

24.

Il’yasova

Marcello

McCoy

Rice

Wrensch

. Total dietary antioxidant index and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Causes & Control. 2009;20(8):1255-1260. doi:10.1007/s10552-009-9338-7.

25.

Ryskalin

Biagioni

Busceti

Lazzeri

Frati

Fornai

. The multi-faceted effect of curcumin in glioblastoma from rescuing cell clearance to autophagy-independent effects. Molecules. 2020;25:4839. doi:10.3390/molecules25204839.

26.

Walker

Mittal

. Antitumor activity of curcumin in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9435. doi:10.3390/ijms21249435.

27.

Keir

Guill

Carter

Friedman

. Stress and intervention preferences of patients with brain tumors. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(12):1213-1219. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0087-9.

28.

Guerini

Triggiani

Maddalo

Bonù

Frassine

Baiguini

, et al. Mebendazole as a candidate for drug repurposing in oncology: an extensive review of current literature. Cancers. 2019;11(9):1284. doi:10.3390/cancers11091284.

29.

Bai

R-Y

Staedtke

Aprhys

Gallia

Riggins

. Antiparasitic mebendazole shows survival benefit in 2 preclinical models of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13(9):974-982. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor077.

30.

Pizzorno

. Nothing boring about boron. Integr Med. 2015;14(4):35-48.

31.

Levy

Blacher

Vaknine

Lund

Stein

Mayo

. CD38 deficiency in the tumor microenvironment attenuates glioma progression and modulates features of tumor-associated microglia/macrophages. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(8):1037-1049. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos121.

32.

Yamamoto

Nakai

Matsumura

. Boron neutron capture therapy for glioblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2008;262(2):143-152. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2008.01.021.

33.

Dymova

Taskaev

Richter

Kuligina

. Boron neutron capture therapy: current status and future perspectives. Cancer Commun. 2020;40(9):406-421. doi:10.1002/cac2.12089.

34.

Fox

Laws

Jr. Anderson

Jr. Farace

. Complementary therapy use and quality of life in persons with high-grade gliomas. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38(4):212-220. doi:10.1097/01376517-200608000-00003.

35.

Trogrlic

. Treatment of glioblastoma with herbal medicines. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1329-2.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.46 MB