Abstract
The past six decades have been marked by leaps and bounds in medical advances, while concurrently clinical outcomes and the quality of life continued to lag or decline. There is a need for more comprehensive approaches to delivering healthcare to patients that address illness and wellness within and outside healthcare settings. Mounting evidence shows that making sustainable changes in healthcare requires approaching patients’/individuals’ care as a continuum—within and outside healthcare settings—while addressing their capacity (ie ability) and workload (ie demands) and incorporating their values and preferences. Health and Wellness Coaching (HWC) has been proposed as a solution to create partnerships to empower individuals to take ownership, leadership, and accountability of their well-being, using nondirective, empathic, and mindful conversations that employ motivational-interviewing and evidence-based approaches. Insufficient clarity exists among healthcare professionals in understanding the definition, roles, and types of HWC. This primer summarizes HWC concepts and history and compares HWC types and its potential role in promoting, supporting, and improving the well-being, clinical outcomes, and quality of life of the pertinent stakeholders. This primer also highlights current and potential areas of application of HWC within different subpopulations and healthcare-related settings.
Keywords
The Past and Current State of Health and Wellness Affairs
Despite a steady increase in life expectancy and significant advances in medical discoveries in the United States for the past six decades, population health continues to show an overall lag or decline in comparison. The trends of increasing chronic conditions and associated worsening or disparities in quality of life have led to a diminished sense of well-being for many patients and their caregivers. 1 – 6 While patients still require cutting edge and advanced medicine, compassionate and thoughtful care remains the core of the mission of medicine—the art of healing.
Equally, public health is often threatened by misinformation, conflicting evidence, profit-driven practices, and/or lack of access to proper resources of education, information, promotion, and engagement,7–9 thus creating a sense of confusion, misinformation, and/or mistrust. This reflects that more work is needed and that the needs of the patient are not being adequately addressed. Evidence shows that helping patients make sustainable, modifiable lifestyle changes is significant to both curtailing the epidemic of preventable diseases and improving the health and well-being of those living with chronic disease.10,11 This requires approaching the care of the patients as a continuum: pre-, peri-, and postdiagnosis or care delivery. There is a need for care models that address a person’s capacity (ie resources and abilities) and workload (ie demands or necessary work) to promote intention, accountability, and sustainability of better healthcare delivery, improved outcomes, and promoted well-being.
Recognizing that medicine is always evolving, “Health and Wellness Coaching” (HWC) emerged as a practice model and approach to support the critical unmet need to addressing well-being/wellness, and life goals of the patients and their caregivers, when applicable, within and outside healthcare settings. There is paucity of knowledge about this field among healthcare professionals. This primer will summarize for healthcare professionals the evolution of HWC and outline its hypothesized and validated value, application, practice settings, and different approaches and strategies to support and improve the well-being, clinical outcomes, and/or quality of life goals. We also highlight known, novel, and potential areas of application of coaching to take on challenges certain subpopulations encounter.
HWC History and Evolution
Since the late 1990s, flourished by the tenants of Seligman’s theory of positive psychology,12,13 the HWC concept has been proposed as an approach to support the mission of helping individuals, healthy or with health challenges, to achieve certain goals through the support of a coach. Despite its increased popularity and adaptation in various settings within the past two decades, the definition and applications of HWC remained vague.12,14,15 A 2013 scoping review summarized the published evidence about HWC, its definitions, heterogeneity, application, methods of delivery, and outcomes assessment;
15
the most evidence extracted came from empirical studies (65%). The majority of these studies used patient-centered coaching (60.5%); were based on patient-driven goals (80%); and deployed self-discovery processes (63%), accountability (85%), and content education (91%) that was mostly related to condition- or disease-specific content (40%) in their approaches. The vast majority of persons delivering HWC were from various professional backgrounds with the highest being medical (53%) and allied health professionals (51%). Just over half of the studies reported adequate information about the length and ongoing relationship with HWC providers. Wolever et al.,
15
concluded with proposing defining HWC as a patient-centered approach wherein patients at least partially determine their goals, use self-discovery or active learning processes together with content education to work toward their goals, and self-monitor behaviors to increase accountability, all within the context of an interpersonal relationship with a coach. The coach is a healthcare professional trained in behavior change theory, motivational strategies, and communication techniques, which are used to assist patients to develop intrinsic motivation and obtain skills to create sustainable change for improved health and well-being.
The Spectrum of HWC
Despite the remarkable innovation in medicine through surgical and other technologic advances, addressing the well-being crisis in this country requires us to remain high tech and high touch, hand in hand. Despite appropriate medical care, a significant challenge for patients struggling with a suboptimal quality of life or well-being is addressing barriers within as well as outside the clinical setting to provide equal and equitable healthcare,19,20 with the goal of making sustainable changes to fit healthcare within their lives.21–24
For example, eating better, getting regular exercise, sleeping better, managing stress, fostering social connection, and/or cultivating gratitude, although often considered the “softer side” of health, are clearly a major component of the evidence-based recommendation for what ails many of our patients—not to mention our physicians, staff, and society as a whole. Yet for so many, this elixir remains elusive. Supported by a growing body of literature,12,14–16,25 it is increasingly clear that properly trained Health and Wellness Coaches, as part of care team, can contribute to providing certain aspects of support needed by many of our patients.
A proper coaching process uses evidence-based interventions, including motivational interviewing, positive psychology, transtheoretical model of change, active listening, goal setting, aggregation, emotional intelligence, validated health outcome metrics, and/or methods of prevention.12,15,26 With any HWC type, the foundation is creating partnerships that empower individuals to take ownership and leadership of their own well-being through nondirective motivational interviewing with an empathetic, respectful, mindful, and conversational approach. A potential confusion and lack of clarity exists among healthcare professionals in differentiating health, and wellness or well-being, and any other type of related coaching; the natural evolution and the differentiation between the two has led to defining a health coach to be more closely focused on the state of physical health, while wellness, well-being, or life coach is more focused on the expanded state of happiness and content about one’s being that encompasses various components, including physical, spiritual, emotional, financial, intellectual, environmental, and occupational wellness. 27 Potentially adding to the confusion, Integrative Health Coaching, a term utilized by some organizations and programs, is more in alignment with the conceptual approach of well-being coaching. Wellness and well-being are used interchangeably and typically refer to the same type of coaching that serves their goals(s).
The Case for HWC
In efforts to clarify these challenges in the field of HWC, The International Consortium for Health & Wellness Coaching (ICHWC) 28 (the previously designated as the National Consortium for Credentialing Health and Wellness Coaches or NCCHWC) has moved past the confusion about “wellness” versus “health” coaching and provides the same rigorous and standardized process of credentialing through the National Board for Health & Wellness Coaching (NBHWC) 26 in collaboration with the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) in the United States. The goal of these organizations is to set minimum standard of reliability and integrity of education and training through standardized and accredited training programs to support the mission of effective and supportive HWC. While being a licensed Health and Wellness Coach is not a requirement as of the date of publishing this article, coaches who receive licensing credentials through these organizations showcase adherence to standards set by NBME, whose mission is to provide rigorous standards of assessment of health professionals. In the United States, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) has approved a new Category III Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) Codes for health. 29 While these are temporary codes for emerging technologies and practices, this provided a wider recognition to the importance and value of HWC, and potentially further future opportunities to propose and integrate HWC practices within various healthcare settings, especially in primary and preventive care.
Mapping out HWC
In this primer, we summarize and compare current coaching styles that are used within various healthcare settings, with the goal of enhancing clinical outcomes, quality of life, and/or any aspect of well-being. We also highlight known, novel, and potential areas of application of coaching to take on challenges certain subpopulations encounter. There are various examples of traditional and innovative programs incorporating HWC that exist within different healthcare settings. Some of these programs have been piloted and validated;14–16,25 others have been proposed as a novel approach to incorporating HWC within different clinical settings, especially within primary and community care settings. 30 Each of these programs may target one or more various populations and address strategic enterprise priorities, thus creating additional added value and positively contributing to a care that fits efficiently and effectively for the patients, caregivers, clinicians, and the health systems. It is not uncommon to find patients who seek or receive hybrid or incorporated forms of these types of coaching. An example of this would be patients working with a life coach to discuss their overall well-being goals while also receiving other health coaching techniques by the same coach, including smoking cessation (eg by registered nurses) or diabetes education (eg by licensed dieticians). Some individuals may receive health coaching with a focus on executive coaching by coaches who are also experienced and trained in effective leadership and other aspects of professional development. Our lives, goals, and preferences are dynamic, and evolution of these needs is part of the process of growth, support, and guidance that coaching provides; therefore, it is inevitable that many patients require one or more type of coaching. A coach may choose to practice or specialize in one or more areas of HWC. It is also important that, no matter what type of coaching is provided, it will involve partnering with the client/patient to support sustainable behavioral change to meet the needs of the patient and improve their quality of life, honoring that the patient/client is the expert and main driver of this process to achieve their best selves.
Table 1 shows summary and comparison of current and novel coaching styles that are used within various settings. Table 2 highlights current and potential areas of application of coaching to address various challenges within certain subpopulations.
Examples of HWC Types and Variations in the United States.
Abbreviations: AHNCC, American Holistic Nurses Credentialing Corporation; CCE, Center for Credentialing and Education; HWC, Health and Wellness Coaching; ICF, International Coach Federation; ICHWC, International Consortium for Health & Wellness Coaching; LEAN, Lifestyle, Exercise, Attitude, Nutrition.
Examples of Settings for HWC Integration.
Abbreviations: HWC, Health and Wellness Coaching; MDM, Minimally Disruptive Medicine.
Summary
As we look to the future, continuing to explore the best approaches to delivering thoughtful, comprehensive, and supportive healthcare that serves the needs of all patients, it is also clear that finding innovative ways of supporting patients and their need for enhanced quality of life and well-being, within and outside of the formal healthcare setting, should also be an integrated part and a priority of our healthcare models. HWC is a promising, cost-effective approach of this mission commitment to address that priority. It is not unusual to integrate or incorporate different or specialized forms of these types of coaching.
In the United States, the recent recommendations by the AMA for approval of new Category III CPT® Codes for health marked a leap forward in recognizing the valuable application and integration of HWC within healthcare settings. 29 This also lays out the foundation to move toward potential future implementation of Category II (supplementary practices) and I (contemporary practices) codes for reimbursement. The NBHWC and The National Commission for Health Education Credentialing (NCHEC) continue to develop and outline guidelines on use of these codes. Opportunities exist across various settings to integrate HWC and strengthen our overall approach to illness, health, and well-being care for patients, clinicians, and all allied health professionals and supporting staff. A true commitment to this priority will lead to healthier, more engaged, loyal, and content patients and healthcare-providing community.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
