Delivering inclusive services to foreign residents is an important policy agenda, yet it is challenging when the preference for inclusive services is scarcely captured. This study examines the inclusion policy preferences of foreign residents through the association between welfare measures and variations in available inclusion efforts across municipalities in Japan. The situation in Japan presents a unique opportunity to examine the objective of this study in a context in which a comprehensive nationwide immigrant integration policy is absent and local governments have discretion as to which services to provide to foreign residents. This study found that reported welfare measures in the survey, such as satisfaction with the local government and the subjective well-being (SWB) of foreign residents, are positively associated with inclusive service availability. Further analysis indicates that assistance with accessing medical care and help with Japanese language learning opportunities are among the more relevant services sought by foreign residents.
AngeliniV., CasiL., & CorazziniL. (2015). Life satisfaction of immigrants: Does cultural assimilation matter?Journal of Population Economics, 28(1), 817–844. 10.1007/s00148-015-0552-1
2.
BălţătescuS. (2007). Central and Eastern Europeans migrants’ subjective quality of life. A comparative study. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 1(2), 67–81.
3.
BartramD. (2013). Happiness and economic migration:’ A comparison of Eastern European migrants and stayers. Migration Studies, 1(2), 156–175. 10.1093/migration/mnt006
4.
Cabinet Secretariat. (2006). Seikatsusha to shiteno gaikokujin ni kansuru sougouteki taiousaku [Comprehensive measure for foreigners as a residents]. https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/gaikokujin/honbun2.pdf
5.
CortinaJ. (2014). Beyond the money: The impact of international migration on children’s life satisfaction: Evidence from Ecuador and Albania. Migration and Development, 3(1), 1–19. 10.1080/21632324.2014.885635
6.
FlamantA. (2020). The local turn in integration policies: Why French cities differ. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(11), 1981–2000. 10.1080/01419870.2020.1738522
7.
GajdošJ., & HudecO. (2020). European cities: What matters for subjective well-being?Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 15(4), 5–20.
8.
GordonJ. A. (2015). Educational reform for immigrant youth in Japan. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16(1), 517–538. 10.1007/s12134-014-0365-1
9.
GreenD. (2014). Education of foreign children in Japan: Local versus national initiatives. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 15(1), 387–410. 10.1007/s12134-013-0299-z
10.
HendriksM. (2015). The happiness of international migrants: A review of research findings. Migration Studies, 3(3), 343–369. 10.1093/migration/mnu053
11.
IguchiY. (2016). International labor migration and social policy in Japan: Stocktaking and prospects for realizing reforms. Social Policy Labor Studies, 8(1), 8–28.
12.
Kawasaki City. (2020). Awareness survey on foreign residents. https://www.city.kawasaki.jp/250/page/0000116810.html
13.
KitawakiY. (2008). Nihon no gaikokujin seisaku: Seisaku ni kansuru gainen no kento oyobi kuni, chiho-jichitai seisaku no kensho [Japan’s migration policy: Analysis of policy concepts and a study of national and local government policies]. Tagengobunka—Jissen to Kensho, 1(3), 5–25
14.
KobayashiH., & TsuboyaM. (2021). Social resources and challenges related to the schooling and education of immigrant children at high schools in Japan. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(1), 369–384. 10.1007/s12134-019-00752-2
15.
KóczánZ. (2016). (Why) are immigrants unhappy?IZA Journal of Migration, 5(3). 10.1186/s40176-016-0052-4
16.
KomaiH. (2014). Migration studies in Japan: Achievements and tasks. Migration Policy Reviews, 6(1), 219–233.
17.
KomaiH., & WatadoI. (1997). Jichitai no gaikokujin seisaku: Uchinaru-kokusaika eno torikumi [Migration policies by local governments: Approaches to internal internationalization]. Akashi-Shoten.
18.
KondoA. (2009). New developments in immigration policy and multicultural coexistence policy. In ShojiH. (Ed.), Immigrants, local communities and the states: Transitions in Asia and Europe (pp. 171–184). Senri Ethnological Reports.
19.
Krause-OnoM., & YamajiN. (2012). Assessing factors involved in university-level foreign students’ satisfaction. Memoirs of the Muroran Institute of Technology, 61(1), 57–62.
20.
LaraJ. (2019). Subjective well-being among communities left behind by international migrants. Migration and Development, 8(3), 355–369. https://doi.10.1080/21632324.2019.1585683
21.
LeopoldL., LeopoldT., & LechnerC. M. (2017). Do immigrants suffer more from job loss? Unemployment and subjective well-being in Germany. Demography, 54(1), 231–257. 10.1007/s13524-016-0539-x
22.
LevineJ. R., & GershensonC. (2014). From political to material inequality: Race, immigration, and requests for public goods. Sociological Forum, 29(3), 607–627.
23.
MatsuoR. (1997). Hamamatsu-shi: Gaikokujin-konzai-shaki kara kyousei-shakai eno michinori [Hamamatsu city: Transitional process on the way toward an inclusive society]. In KomaiH. & WatadoI. (Eds.), Jichitai no gaikokujin seisaku: uchinaru-kokusaika eno torikumi [Migration policies by local governments: approaches to internal internationalization] (pp. 161–180). Akashi-Shoten.
24.
McCullaghP. (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(2), 109–127. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x
25.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2021). Tabunka-kyousei no suishin nikakaru shishin, keikaku no sakutei-joukyou [The current status of regional multicultural coexistence promotion plan]. https://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_seisaku/chiho/02gyosei05_03000060.html
26.
Ministry of Justice. (2020). Zairyu-gaikokujin toukei [Statistics of foreign national residents]. E-Stat. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/statistics/00250012
27.
NakamuraT. (2020). Tabunka-kyousei no suishin ni tsuite [Promoting multicultural coexistence]. Jichi Jitsumu Semin [Seminar Local Governance], 702(1), 2–8.
28.
Nihon Keizai Shimbun. (2019). Gaikokujin-seisaku, jichitai-taikakusa hirogaru osore [Foreigner Policy, Fear of Widening Disparity between Local Governments: Detailed data on support measures for 254 major cities and districts]. https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO41099830Y9A200C1ML0000/?unlock=1
29.
OgawaN. (2011). Population aging and immigration in Japan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 20(2), 133–167. 10.1177/011719681102000202
30.
Prime Minister’s Office Japan. (2014). Japan revitalization strategy—revised in 2014. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/keizaisaisei/pdf/honbunEN.pdf
31.
QiuY., & SunY. (2011). Support from schools and subjective happiness: A comparison of Chinese students in Japanese language schools and Chinese students attending college. Journal of International Students Education, 16(1), 57–63.
32.
SafiM. (2010). Immigrants’ life satisfaction in Europe: Between assimilation and discrimination. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 159–176. 10.1093/esr/jcp013
SchammannH., GlunsD., HeimannC., MüllerS., WittchenT., YounsoC., & ZieglerF. (2021). Defining and transforming local migration policies: A conceptual approach backed by evidence from Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(13), 2897–2915. 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1902792
35.
SchneiderA. L., & IngramH. M. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. SUNY Press.
36.
Soriano-MirasR. M., Trinidad-RequenaA., & GuardiolaJ. (2020). The well-being of Moroccan immigrants in Spain: A composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 148(1), 635–653. 10.1007/s11205-019-02215-8
37.
StrangesM., VignoliD., & VenturiniA. (2019). Comparison is the thief of joy. Does social comparison affect migrants’ subjective well-being? (Working paper no. 201906). Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza Giovanni Anania’–DESF.
38.
TegegneM. A., & GlanvilleJ. L. (2019). The immigrant-native gap in subjective well-being in Western European countries: Assessing the role of social capital. International Migration Review, 53(2), 458–485. 10.1177/0197918318769309
39.
TerumotoH. (2019). Why restrictive refugee policy can be retained? A Japanese case. Migration and Development, 8(1), 7–24. 10.1080/21632324.2018.1482642
40.
TranT. V., & WrightR. (1986). Social support and subjective well-being among Vietnamese refugees. Social Service Review, 60(3), 449–459. 10.1086/644387
41.
WakayamaM., TawaraK., & NishimuraY. (2018). Report of the examination regarding multicultural coexistence policies by local governments, report of grant-in-aid for scientific research [Kakenhi Hokokusho]. https://researchmap.jp/mw0328_aw/misc/17749887/attachment_file.pdf
42.
WatadoI. (2018). Jichitai no gaikokujin-shisaku [Inclusion policies by local governments]. In IguchiY., IkegamiS., EnoiY., OmagariY., KodamaK., KomaiH., KondoA., SuzukiE., & WatadoI. (Eds.), Imin-seisaku no frontier [Frontier of immigration policies] (pp. 133–139). Akashi-Shoten.
43.
YamanakaK. (1993). New immigration policy and unskilled foreign workers in Japan. Pacific Affairs, 66(1), 72–90. 10.2307/2760016
44.
YamawakiK. (2009). Tabunka-kyousei-shakai no keisei ni mukete [Toward the formation of a multicultural society]. Migration Policy Review, 1(1), 30–41.
45.
YamawakiK. (2016). Tabunka-kyousei-shakai ni mukete: kuni to chihou-jichitai no torikumi wo chushin ni [Towards an intercultural society: Focusing on national and local government initiatives]. Houritsu no Hiroba, 69(1), 4–11.
46.
YamawakiK. (2020). Tabunka-kyousei-shakai no keisei to tihou-jichitai [Forming the intercultural society and local governments]. Jichi Jitsumu Semin [Seminar Local Governance], 702(1), 9–13.
47.
Yashio City. (2019). Yashio-shi gaikokujin shimin-ishiki chousa-houkokusho [Survey on multicultural coexistence in Yashio city]. https://www.city.yashio.lg.jp/kurashi/sumai_community/kokusai-tabunka/absdefg.files/20200127.pdf
48.
YoshiakiT. (2020). Are foreign residents of Japan happy? Clues from a local government survey. Asia-Pacific Review, 27(2), 130–142. 10.1080/13439006.2020.1826684
49.
Zapata-BarreroR., CaponioT., & ScholtenP. (2017). Theorizing the local turn’ in a multi-level governance framework of analysis: A case study in immigrant policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2), 241–246. 10.1177/0020852316688426
50.
ZinconeG., & CaponioT. (2006). The multilevel governance of migration. In PenninxR., BergerM. & KraalK. (Eds.), The dynamics of migration and settlement in Europe (pp. 269–304). Amsterdam University Press.
