Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of career determinants on the academic performance of undergraduate accounting students in Ghana, with a specific focus on the mediating role of career preference intention. Drawing on the social cognitive career theory and the theory of planned behaviour, we propose and test a model where career preference intention mediates the relationship between various career determinants and academic performance. Data were collected from 360 undergraduate accounting students from two public universities in Ghana using a structured questionnaire. We employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) for the analysis. The findings reveal that career preference intention positively mediates the relationships between career determinants and academic performance. Specifically, students who were determined to pursue an accounting career demonstrated higher academic performance. Interestingly, we found that job factors directly influenced students’ academic performance. These results suggest that by encouraging students’ career preference intention, educators and universities can enhance academic outcomes. The study provides important theoretical and practical implications for accounting education, especially in developing economies.

Keywords

career determinants academic performance career preference intention accounting students Ghana

Introduction

Accounting education is essential for developing the skilled professionals needed to manage financial systems and drive economic growth. Globally, educational policymakers recognise the importance of empowering students with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet the demands of a dynamic economy. A primary indicator of a student’s mastery of these skills is their academic performance, which serves as a foundational measure of their readiness for a professional career (Ahinful et al., 2019).

In Ghana, while there has been a consistent record of high pass rates for financial accounting at the high school level (WAEC, 2016–2020), this trend has not been mirrored in higher education or professional examinations. Reports from the Institute of Chartered Accountants Ghana (ICAG, 2016, 2018) and other studies (Ahinful et al., 2019; Issahaku, 2017) highlight a worrying decline in the academic performance of accounting students at the tertiary level, leading to student rustication and reduced enrolment. This underperformance is a significant concern, as it directly impacts the national supply of qualified professional accountants, which currently falls short of the country’s demand (ICAG, 2017).

A potential factor contributing to this academic decline is a lack of student interest and commitment, which can stem from inappropriate career choices (Igere, 2017; Saayir & Sande, 2020). Students’ career decisions are often influenced by career determinants, which include a range of factors such as personal interests, the influence of referent groups (e.g., family and peers), and job-related attributes like salary and prestige (Owusu et al., 2019). These determinants shape a student’s career preference intention, which reflects their willingness and determination to pursue a specific profession. This intention is a fundamental link between a student’s motivations and their academic effort, and it ultimately influences their academic performance (Yamen, 2019).

The existing literature on career determinants and academic performance has largely focussed on developed countries with established career guidance frameworks (Hammour, 2018; Jackling & Keneley, 2009; Muhamad et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2017). This creates a significant contextual gap, as there is a scarcity of studies examining these relationships within a less developed country context like Ghana, which presents unique educational, cultural, and socioeconomic factors that may alter these dynamics. Importantly, while existing research has explored the direct relationships between some of these variables (Agyenim-Boateng et al., 2025; Amaning et al., 2020; Nanjundaswamy et al., 2025), there is a theoretical deficit. Specifically, the cascading mechanism through which career determinants translate into academic success remains empirically untested in the extant literature. This study, therefore, introduces and empirically tests the mediating role of career preference intention, a central element of career theory, to better understand this complex process.

This study is thus designed to address these critical gaps by rigorously examining the mediating role of career preference intention in the relationship between personal, reference, and job factors, and the academic performance of undergraduate accounting students in Ghana. This research offers significant contributions to the extant literature, both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, by integrating career determinants, preference intention, and academic performance into a single, cohesive structural model, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the motivational framework that underpins student success. It extends social cognitive career theory by establishing the central role of mediation, demonstrating how external influences are internalised into career intent, which subsequently drives performance in a developing economy context. Furthermore, the findings will provide actionable evidence for accounting educators, university administrators, and policymakers. By identifying which specific determinants most strongly influence students’ intentions and subsequent performance, institutions can design targeted interventions, enhanced career guidance programmes, and curriculum reforms to improve student outcomes and directly address the persistent national shortage of qualified professional accountants in Ghana.

The remainder of the study is organised as follows: Section 2 reviews the related literature, Section 3 outlines the methodology, Section 4 presents the analysis and findings, Section 5 discusses the results, and Section 6 concludes the study.

Literature Review

Theoretical Foundation: Integrating SCCT and TPB

This study is anchored in a synergistic application of two foundational behavioural theories: Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). While both frameworks have been extensively applied in isolation to explain career-related choices, their combined application provides a more robust and comprehensive lens through which to examine the complex relationship between personal, social, and job-related factors, and their ultimate influence on students’ academic performance via career preference intention.

The Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), developed by Lent et al. (1994), posits that career-related choices are a dynamic interplay among personal attributes (self-efficacy), external environmental factors, and an individual’s behaviour. The core of SCCT lies in the relationship between an individual’s self-efficacy (confidence in one’s ability to succeed) and their outcome expectations (beliefs about the consequences of performing a specific behaviour). An individual who believes they are capable of performing a task and expects positive outcomes from that task is more likely to develop an interest, set a goal, and persist in that career path (Brown & Lent, 2019; Ho et al., 2025; Lent et al., 2000). In the context of this study, a student’s confidence in their ability to master complex accounting subjects (personal factors/self-efficacy) and their belief that this will lead to a high-paying, prestigious job (job factors/outcome expectations) directly influences their academic and career goals.

The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), introduced by Ajzen (1988), offers a complementary perspective by explaining the psychological drivers of human action. TPB proposes that an individual’s behavioural intention is the most immediate predictor of their actual behaviour. This intention, in turn, is shaped by three key determinants: attitude towards the behaviour, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control (Bin & Wahid, 2025). Attitude refers to the degree to which a person holds a favourable or unfavourable evaluation of the behaviour. Subjective norms are the perceived social pressures to perform or not perform the behaviour (e.g., from family or peers). Perceived behavioural control, which closely parallels the concept of self-efficacy in SCCT, is a person’s belief in their ability to perform the behaviour (Baba et al., 2025).

The integration of these two theories is essential for a holistic understanding of the research problem. While TPB effectively captures the immediate antecedents of intention (attitude, subjective norms, perceived control), SCCT provides a deeper explanation for the formation of these antecedents. Specifically, the “personal factors” in this study, such as quantitative skills and interest, can be conceptualised as aspects of SCCT’s self-efficacy and TPB’s perceived behavioural control. Similarly, the “job factors” align with SCCT’s outcome expectations and TPB’s attitude towards the behaviour. The “referent factors” directly correspond to TPB’s subjective norms. This integrated framework allows the researchers to examine not only what influences career preference intention, but also how these influences are formed and, ultimately, how they collectively predict academic performance, as shown in the conceptual model.

Specifically, the conceptual model, depicted in Figure 1, visually represents the hypothesised relationships among the study’s variables. This model is a direct application of the integrated theoretical framework, proposing that personal, referent, and job factors influence academic performance indirectly through the mediating role of career preference intention.

Figure 1.

Conceptual model of the study.

Hypotheses Development

Personal Factors and Academic Performance

Grounded in the Social Cognitive Career Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour, this hypothesis posits that personal factors such as a student’s interest, willingness to study, and quantitative skills are integral to their self-efficacy and perceived behavioural control. Individuals with a strong belief in their capabilities are more likely to set goals and persist in challenging tasks, leading to better academic outcomes. This theoretical link is consistently supported by empirical evidence. Academic excellence, often measured by the Grade Point Average (GPA) or Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA), is a primary objective for most academic institutions (Garkaz et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2021). Researchers have identified several personal factors as influential, including personal interest and aptitude for accounting (Jackling & Calero, 2006; Owusu et al., 2019; Uyar et al., 2011). Studies by Guney (2009) and Issahaku (2017) found that students with good learning attitudes and habits, such as spending more time on studies, achieve higher academic performance. Furthermore, research by Kukreja and Aali (2013) demonstrated that a high level of academic interest can lead to intellectual development and better performance, a finding supported by Fallan and Opstad (2014) and Ahinful et al. (2019). Moreover, while a number of studies have looked at accounting education and career (e.g., Agyenim-Boateng et al., 2025; Cuzdriorean et al., 2025; Ho et al., 2025; Nanjundaswamy et al., 2025), limited attention has been lent to personal factors of accounting students that may determine their academic performance. The convergence of theory and evidence leads the present study to propose that these personal factors will significantly influence academic performance.

H1: Personal factors significantly and positively influence the academic performance of accounting students.

Referent Factors and Academic Performance

This hypothesis is informed by the TPB’s concept of subjective norms, which recognises the influence of significant others such as family, peers, and mentors. These referent groups can provide a fundamental support system or exert social pressure that impacts a student’s commitment. When a student perceives that their significant referents approve of their academic and career choices, they are more likely to be motivated and committed, which can positively impact their academic performance. The influence of referent factors on academic performance is well-documented (Anis & Hanafi, 2015; Cotton et al., 2025; Zakaria et al., 2012). A study in Pakistan by Khan et al. (2019) found a significant correlation between a supportive family background and improved student performance. Similarly, Arora and Singh (2017) concluded that a positive family environment significantly predicts a college student’s academic success. Additionally, the occupational and educational levels of parents have been shown to have a significant influence on accounting students’ performance, a finding confirmed by Odoh et al. (2017) and Xiang and Yu (2018). Derrick et al. (2022) linked parenting engagement to academic performance. In all this, students in accounting education are rarely considered. We, therefore, hypothesises that:

H2: Referent factors significantly and positively influence the academic performance of accounting students.

Job Factors and Academic Performance

This hypothesis is derived from SCCT’s focus on outcome expectations and TPB’s attitude towards the behaviour. The more a student perceives a career to offer positive outcomes such as high remuneration and prestige, the more favourable their attitude towards the profession will be. This positive perception is expected to strengthen their resolve and efforts, which in turn influences their academic performance (Hoti & Zenuni, 2024). Job-related factors, including the availability of employment, high financial rewards, and desired working conditions, serve as powerful motivators for students (Bekoe et al., 2018; Tan & Laswad, 2006). According to the SCCT, these outcome expectations fuel individuals’ behaviours and help them sustain effort when confronted with challenges (Agyenim-Boateng et al., 2025; Brown & Lent, 2019). Akhter and Rahaman (2020) and Olufemi et al. (2018) revealed that students’ perceptions of the job market have a significant effect on their academic performance, as they are motivated to put forth greater effort to meet employer demands. This is further validated by a study from Brook and Roberts (2021), which concluded that the perceived availability of a job market motivates accounting students to study harder and achieve a better cumulative grade point average. Based on these, the researchers theorise that:

H3: Job-related factors significantly and positively predict the academic performance of accounting students.

Career Preference and Academic Performance

Drawing directly from the core tenet of the TPB, an individual’s behavioural intention is the most immediate predictor of their actual behaviour. In this context, a strong intention to pursue an accounting career is expected to translate into concrete actions, such as greater effort, focussed study habits, and a commitment to achieving high grades, which are necessary to secure a job in the field. Career preference intention, an individual’s readiness to pursue a particular career, is a key element in the TPB, as it is believed to directly precede and guide behaviour (Tang & Seng, 2016). A study by Igere (2017) found a significant relationship between career preference and academic performance. Her findings were consistent with studies by Aminu and Timothy (2014) and Hellen and Kitainge (2016), which demonstrated that students who were either forced into a programme or had no interest in it performed poorly. These studies underscore that a student’s commitment and effort are strongly tied to their personal preference for a career path. This is further supported by Owusu et al. (2019), Okwuduba et al. (2021), Slåtten et al. (2021), and Tadese et al. (2022), who found that students with a strong self-interest and preference for a given profession achieved higher grades. Thus, this study proposes that:

H4: Career preference intention significantly and positively influences the academic performance of accounting students.

Mediating Role of Career Preference Intention

This final hypothesis posits a complex relationship where career preference intention acts as a mediating variable. The theoretical arguments for the preceding hypotheses suggest that personal, referent, and job factors are the initial drivers that shape a student’s career preference intention. This intention then serves as the pivotal mechanism through which those factors are translated into tangible academic performance outcomes. The mediating role of career intention is crucial for a complete understanding of the relationships. As per the TPB, intentions represent the key elements that affect a student’s behaviour (Tang & Seng, 2016). When attitudes towards a career (job factors), subjective norms (referent factors), and perceived behavioural control (personal factors) are favourable, they enhance an individual’s career preference intention, which in turn influences their behaviour and, ultimately, academic performance (Ndovela & Mutanga, 2024; Phal, 2025). This is why studies like those by Aminu and Timothy (2014) and Hellen and Kitainge (2016) found that lack of interest (or intention) directly led to poor academic outcomes. While the literature supports this link, this study makes a unique contribution by empirically testing this mediation model within the specific context of Ghanaian undergraduate accounting students, a gap given limited attention in the extant literature (Agyenim-Boateng et al., 2025; Ho et al., 2025; Nanjundaswamy et al., 2025). We fill this lacuna by hypothesising that:

H5(a–c): Career preference intention mediates the relationship between personal factors, referent factors, job factors, and the academic performance of accounting students.

Methodology

This study adopted a quantitative research approach to test the hypotheses and examine the relationships among the variables. The explanatory research design was selected as the most appropriate framework because it seeks to explain the connections and influence between factors, aligning with the study’s objective of testing the proposed conceptual model and the mediating role of career preference intention. This design, which relies on a deductive approach, is well-suited for a study that uses a survey to collect data and tests a pre-existing theoretical framework (Skinner & Dancis, 2020).

Population and Sample

The population for this study consisted of all Level 400 undergraduate accounting students (N = 438) from two universities in Ghana. These universities were purposively selected because they are known for their established accounting programmes. The decision to focus exclusively on Level 400 students was based on the fact that they have completed the majority of their coursework and thus have a comprehensive Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA), which serves as the key measure of academic performance. Afrogha et al. (2020) supports this approach, noting that a student’s final CGPA is rarely significantly different from their CGPA at the end of Level 300, making this cohort a reliable group for analysis. Given the manageable size of the population, a census approach was adopted, where all 438 students were targeted to participate. A total of 415 questionnaires were retrieved, resulting in a high response rate. After an initial data screening process, 360 valid responses were retained for the final analysis.

Instrument and Data Collection

Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, which was chosen to ensure confidentiality and anonymity, thereby encouraging more candid and reliable responses from participants. The questionnaire was structured into three main sections (see Appendix). Part A collected demographic information about the respondents. Part B was designed to measure the key variables, including personal, referent, and job-related factors, as well as career preference intention. These items were measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5). The scales were adapted from established instruments in the literature, particularly from Odia and Ogiedu (2013) and Awadallah and Elgharbawy (2021). Part C was dedicated to collecting self-reported data on academic performance, specifically the respondents’ Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) as of the end of Level 300 and their expected CGPA after Level 400. The use of self-reported CGPA is a well-established practice in educational research (Connely et al., 1998; Hensley, 1995; Mansfield et al., 2009).

Prior to final administration, the questionnaire was pre-tested to refine its content, eliminate ambiguities, and ensure legibility. The instrument’s reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha, with all scales demonstrating excellent internal consistency, yielding scores that ranged from .89 to .95, well above the acceptable threshold of .70 (Hair et al., 2014). Ethical approval was obtained from the universities’ institutional review boards to ensure the study adhered to all necessary ethical protocols. Participants provided written informed consent, and strict measures were implemented to ensure anonymity and confidentiality throughout the data collection process. Participation was entirely voluntary, with no coercion involved, and participants retained the right to withdraw at any time. Respondents were assured that all information gathered would remain anonymous and be used solely for research purposes. In accordance with the principle of anonymity, the questionnaire did not include any questions that could reveal respondents’ identities, such as names, home addresses, or telephone numbers. The study was designed to minimise any potential risks, and the expected benefits of advancing knowledge in career preference and academic performance outweighed any risk of harm to the participants.

Data Analysis

The collected data were first coded and organised for analysis. The analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 3.1.7. This technique was selected due to its suitability for a study with a relatively small sample size and for its ability to model complex relationships involving both direct and mediating effects (Hair et al., 2019). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the characteristics of the data. PLS-SEM was then applied to perform the inferential analysis, which included testing the hypothesised direct relationships between the variables and assessing the mediating role of career preference intention.

Analysis and Findings

Demographic Profile of Respondents

The demographic analysis of the 360 valid responses provides key insights into the study’s sample. As shown in Table 1, male respondents (64.7%) had a significantly higher response rate than female respondents (35.3%). The data also indicated that the majority of respondents were in a relatively youthful age bracket, with 60.8% of the participants aged between 21 and 23 years. This demographic profile is representative of a typical undergraduate student population in accounting education programmes.

Table 1.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents.

Characteristics	Frequency	Percentage
Gender
Female	127	35.28
Male	233	64.72
Age
Below 18	21	5.83
18–20	79	21.94
21–23	219	60.83
24–26	27	7.50
Over 26	14	3.89
Total	360	100

Source. Author computations (2025).

Assessment of the Measurement Model

The research instrument’s reliability and validity were assessed by evaluating the measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within SmartPLS. This assessment is crucial for establishing the quality of the data before testing the hypotheses. The five latent constructs (Academic Performance, Career Preference Intention, Job Factors, Personal Factors, and Referent Factors) and their 23 observed variables were evaluated.

The CFA model demonstrated a good fit with the data, as indicated by the following indices: CFI = 0.921, SRMR = 0.072, RMSEA = 0.005, and PClose = 0.087. These values all met or exceeded the recommended thresholds, confirming that the model provides a strong representation of the data (Table 2).

Table 2.

CFA Model Fit Indices.

Model	CFI	SRMR	RMSEA	PClose
Study model	0.921	0.072	0.005	.087
Threshold	>0.90	<0.08	<0.08	>.05

Source. Author computations (2025).

Note. CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardised root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; PClose = p-value for close fit.

Reliability and Validity

The individual item reliability was assessed by examining the outer loadings of each construct’s measure. As suggested by Hair (2014) and Taherdoost (2016), all observed indicators in the measurement model were found to have a convergence of above 0.60 with their respective latent constructs, as shown in Table 3. Internal consistency was measured using Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach’s Alpha. As shown in Table 3, all latent constructs showed CR and Cronbach’s alpha statistics above the recommended threshold of .70 (Bagozzi & Yi, 1988; Hair et al., 2014). This confirmed the internal consistency of the constructs. Convergent validity was further established as the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct exceeded the .50 threshold (Hair et al., 2014; Taherdoost, 2016).

Table 3.

CFA Loadings, AVE, CR, and Cronbach’s Alpha.

Construct/indicators	Loading	AVE	CR	CA
AP		1	1	1
CGPA	1
CPI		0.7703	0.9436	.9248
CPI1	0.8777
CPI2	0.8524
CPI3	0.8901
CPI4	0.8715
CPI5	0.8643
JF		0.6923	0.8996	.8502
JF1	0.8032
JF2	0.8211
JF3	0.7589
JF4	0.8444
PF		0.6724	0.9249	.9027
PF1	0.7834
PF2	0.8123
PF3	0.7965
PF4	0.8041
PF5	0.8356
PF6	0.8502
RF		0.6542	0.9296	.9114
RF1	0.8012
RF2	0.8178
RF3	0.7845
RF4	0.7523
RF5	0.7761
RF6	0.7909
RF7	0.8120

Note. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors; CR = composite reliability; CA = Cronbach’s alpha; AVE = average variance extracted.

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Discriminant and Divergent Validity

To confirm discriminant validity, we first performed a cross-loading analysis. The results showed that all items loaded more strongly on their respective latent construct than on any other construct (Table 4).

Table 4.

Cross-Loadings.

Items	AP	CP	JF	PF	RF
CGPA	1	0.7263	0.6693	0.6892	0.6848
CPI1	0.6663	0.8881	0.6853	0.758	0.7466
CPI2	0.5756	0.8025	0.5813	0.7616	0.7829
CPI3	0.6647	0.9144	0.6799	0.7157	0.7693
CPI4	0.6365	0.8766	0.5699	0.743	0.7178
CPI5	0.6397	0.9025	0.6293	0.7234	0.7057
JF1	0.5344	0.6995	0.7414	0.7484	0.7071
JF2	0.6131	0.5959	0.8946	0.6099	0.61
JF3	0.5413	0.5489	0.84	0.5177	0.5897
JF4	0.5254	0.5197	0.8449	0.5578	0.5108
PF1	0.6501	0.7947	0.61	0.8233	0.7271
PF2	0.5741	0.7084	0.5827	0.8111	0.7787
PF3	0.5552	0.684	0.671	0.842	0.7017
PF4	0.477	0.6031	0.6699	0.811	0.6709
PF5	0.5465	0.6399	0.5449	0.7962	0.739
PF6	0.5625	0.6915	0.5707	0.8353	0.7626
RF1	0.6112	0.757	0.664	0.7834	0.8669
RF2	0.5211	0.6439	0.5724	0.6962	0.7957
RF3	0.5205	0.6178	0.5877	0.6092	0.7574
RF4	0.4991	0.6409	0.6496	0.6622	0.7721
RF5	0.5726	0.7331	0.5703	0.7534	0.8639
RF6	0.5592	0.7089	0.5588	0.7515	0.7952
RF7	0.5835	0.6899	0.5615	0.776	0.804

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. The results showed that all items loaded more strongly on their respective latent construct (bolded values) than on any other construct. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Additionally, the researchers used the Fornell-Larcker criterion, where the square root of each construct’s AVE (the bolded diagonal values) must be greater than its correlation with all other constructs. Table 5 shows that this condition was met for all constructs, indicating that each one is unique and does not capture the same phenomenon as another.

Table 5.

Fornell-Larcker Criterion.

Construct	AP	CPI	JF	PF	RF
AP	1
CPI	0.7263	0.8777
JF	0.6693	0.7183	0.8320
PF	0.6892	0.6213	0.7403	0.82
RF	0.6848	0.7165	0.7345	0.81	0.8088

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Finally, as proposed by Henseler et al. (2015), the Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) was assessed. A latent construct is considered to have discriminant validity when its HTMT ratio is below the recommended threshold of 0.850. The HTMT values for each of our constructs were 0.712, 0.788, 0.617, 0.502, and 0.601, all well below the threshold (Table 6). The constructs are, therefore, deemed to have discriminant and divergent validity.

Table 6.

Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT).

HTMT ratio	Value
JF	0.712
CPI	0.788
PF	0.617
RF	0.502
AP	0.601

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Assessing the Structural Model

The structural model was evaluated to determine the relationships between the latent constructs. This assessment included tests for multicollinearity, coefficient of determination (R²), and predictive relevance (Q²), followed by a detailed analysis of the hypotheses, including both direct and mediating effects.

Collinearity Assessment

We first assessed the model for multicollinearity between the predictor variables by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). According to Kock and Lynn (2012) and Kock (2014), VIF values greater than 3.3 indicate pathological collinearity and potential common method bias. The results of our analysis showed a minimum VIF of 1.322 and a maximum of 2.162, all well below the recommended threshold. This indicates the absence of multicollinearity and common method bias in the model (Table 7).

Table 7.

Collinearity Amongst Constructs (Predictors).

Construct	VIF
CPI	2.162
JF	2.099
PF	1.483
RF	1.322

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Predictive Accuracy and Relevance

The model’s predictive accuracy was measured by the coefficient of determination (R²). Our results, summarised in Table 8, showed an R² of 0.578 for Academic Performance, which is considered a moderate value (Hair et al., 2014). This indicates that 57.8% of the variation in Academic Performance is explained by the combined effects of job factors, personal factors, and reference factors. We also assessed the predictive relevance (Q²) of the model on the endogenous variable, with a result of 0.553, indicating a strong predictive relevance. This confirms that the exogenous variables are effective predictors of the endogenous variable. Furthermore, the effect sizes (f²) were evaluated. The results revealed that job factors have a large effect size on the endogenous variable, while personal factors and reference factors have a small effect size, following the guidelines of Hair et al. (2014) where 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 are considered small, medium, and large effects, respectively.

Table 8.

Summary of the Results.

Path	R ²	Adjusted R²	Q ²	p-value	f ²
AP	0.578	0.551	0.553
JF -> AP				.000	0.54
PF -> AP				.092	0.03
RF -> AP				.210	0.01

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. AP = academic performance; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Hypotheses Testing

This section presents the results of the hypotheses testing, including both the direct and indirect effects of the study’s variables.

Direct Effects

The study first assessed the direct relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variable, as well as the relationships leading to the mediating variable (Career Preference Intention). Table 9 presents the results for all direct paths, showing the beta coefficients (beta), T-statistics, and p-values.

Table 9.

Results of Direct Effects.

Path	Beta (β)	T-Stats	p-values
PF -> AP	.1065	1.1446	.092
RF -> AP	.0619	0.5927	.210
JF -> AP	.2595	4.6763	.000
CPI -> AP	.3959	4.3422	.000
JF -> CPI	.1393	2.6367	.001
PF -> CPI	.3655	5.1107	.000
RF -> CPI	.4202	5.1665	.000

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. Age and gender were controlled for. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

From Table 9, the effect of personal factors on academic performance was found to be statistically insignificant (β = .1065, t = 1.1446, p > .05). The relationship between referent factors and academic performance was also found to be insignificant (β = .0619, t = 0.5927, p > .05). On the other hand, job factors were found to have a statistically significant positive effect on academic performance (β = .2595, t = 4.6763, p < .05). Similarly, career preference intention had a significant positive effect on academic performance (β = .3959, t = 4.3422, p < .05). All three career determinant variables (Job, Personal, and Referent Factors) had a statistically significant relationship with career preference intention, confirming the first part of the mediation model, while career preference intention’s statistically significant relationship with academic performance confirmed the second part of the mediation model.

Indirect (Mediation) Effects

A mediation analysis was conducted to examine the intermediate role of Career Preference Intention, particularly for the paths that showed insignificant direct effects. According to Nitzl et al. (2017), a significant indirect effect is the only prerequisite for establishing mediation. As shown in Table 10, the results indicate that Career Preference Intention significantly mediates the relationships between all three independent variables and Academic Performance.

Table 10.

Results of Indirect Mediation Effects.

Path	Beta	T-stats^a	p-values
JF -> CPI-> AP	.3144	5.2713	.000
PF -> CPI–> AP	.2523	2.6915	.001
RF -> CPI–> AP	.2289	2.3676	.002

Source. Authors’ computations (2025).

Note. The analysis controlled for age and gender. AP = academic performance; CPI = career preference intention; JF = job factors; PF = personal factors; RF = referent factors.

Computations were done using 10,000 bootstrap resamples.

Summary of Hypothesis Outcomes

Based on the criteria for mediation outlined by Nitzl et al. (2017), the study’s results revealed both partial and full mediation. Table 11 and Figure 2 provide a comprehensive summary of the outcomes for all tested hypotheses.

Table 11.

Summary of Hypotheses Test Outcomes.

Hypothesis	Path	Outcome
H1	Personal factors -> Academic performance	Not Supported
H2	Referent factors -> Academic performance	Not Supported
H3	Job factors -> Academic performance	Supported
H4	Career preference -> Academic performance	Supported
H5a	Personal factors -> Career preference -> Academic performance	Supported
H5b	Reference factors -> Career preference -> Academic performance	Supported
H5c	Job factors -> Career preference -> Academic performance	Supported

Source. Authors’ construct (2025).

Figure 2.

Structural model.

Discussion

This study examined the direct and indirect influences of career determinants – personal factors, job factors, and reference factors – on the academic performance of accounting students, with a particular focus on the mediating role of career preference intention. Drawing on both the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), the findings provide valuable insights into the complex relationship between a student’s career aspirations and their academic success within the unique educational context of Ghana.

Our analysis of the direct effects yielded a mix of expected and counterintuitive findings. First, personal factors (H1), such as a student’s interest and willingness to learn, do not directly predict their academic performance. While this may seem paradoxical, as intrinsic motivation is often assumed to drive success, it can be interpreted through the lens of Ghana’s highly structured and examination-oriented educational system. A student with genuine interest in accounting may possess a positive attitude; however, academic performance is ultimately predicated on mastering the rigid content required for high-stakes professional examinations. This finding suggests a critical disconnect between genuine academic curiosity and the pedagogical approach, where success is dependent on exam-focussed preparation rather than a broader understanding. This result is consistent with prior studies that found no significant direct influence of academic interest on performance, such as Olufemi et al. (2018) and Wu et al. (2019), and is further supported by recent works by Cotton et al. (2025) and Phal (2025) who note the diminishing direct returns of intrinsic motivation in highly standardised educational settings.

This study thus provides a nuanced explanation for these findings. We argue that in such educational environments, the link between personal interest and academic performance is not direct but is instead fully mediated by career intention. This offers a critical micro-level perspective that complements macro-level discussions regarding evolving business paradigms (Nanjundaswamy et al., 2025), by demonstrating that intrinsic interest, on its own, is insufficient to drive academic performance in this specific context.

Similarly, the results for reference factors (H2) showed no significant direct relationship with academic performance. This is a particularly noteworthy finding in a collectivist society like Ghana, where the influence of family and peers is typically a strong determinant in career choices. This result provides a critical clarification to both SCCT and TPB. While our findings support the TPB’s notion that subjective norms influence intentions, they reveal that this social influence is insufficient to directly sustain the rigorous academic effort required for success in a demanding programme like accounting. The burden of achieving academic performance appears to shift from the social group to the individual, who must internalise a sense of personal agency to navigate the curriculum. This is consistent with research by Gobena (2018), and Etiubon et al. (2018), and aligned with more recent analyses by Hoti and Zenuni (2024), Ndovela and Mutanga (2024) on career choice in African contexts. We extend this understanding by demonstrating that even in a collectivist culture, parental and peer influence must operate indirectly through a student’s solidified career intentions.

In contrast, job factors (H3) were found to have a significant positive effect on academic performance. This result is particularly essential as it highlights the powerful role of extrinsic motivation and outcome expectations, a central tenet of SCCT and a key component of a positive attitude in TPB, in the context of accounting education. Students who perceive that the accounting profession offers high demand, prestige, and a competitive salary are motivated to perform better academically. This finding not only aligns with the work of Guney (2009) and Ahinful et al. (2019) but also provides current empirical support for the powerful role of extrinsic motivation in accounting education, consistent with Cuzdriorean et al. (2025), who studied future career prospects as a driver of student effort.

Furthermore, the direct relationship between career preference intention (H4) and academic performance was also found to be significant. This highlights that a strong and determined behavioural intention to pursue an accounting career directly enhances a student’s academic success. This finding fills a crucial gap left by studies that focussed only on the formation of career intentions (e.g., Agyenim-Boateng et al., 2025; Ho et al., 2025). Our research empirically demonstrates this direct connexion, providing a major contribution that solidifies the importance of behavioural intention as a key driver of academic success and successfully bridges the conceptual gap between career aspirations and tangible educational achievements.

The core of this study’s theoretical contribution lies in the mediating role of career preference intention, which provides the missing explanatory mechanism for the influence of other factors on academic performance. The results revealed a full mediation for both personal factors (H5a) and reference factors (H5b). This provides a robust empirical application and refinement of the TPB and SCCT, as it demonstrates that the effect of a student’s attitude and subjective norms is completely transmitted through their behavioural intention. A student’s academic interest or parental influence only impacts their academic performance if it first solidifies their intention to become an accountant. This finding establishes career intention as an essential psychological mechanism that channels these external and internal influences into academic outcomes, thereby resolving the paradoxes of the non-significant direct effects observed for H1 and H2.

Additionally, the analysis showed a partial mediation for job factors (H5c). This indicates a dual-pathway effect: job factors influence academic performance directly through a student’s perception of career benefits (e.g., job availability and salary) and indirectly through their strengthened career preference intention. This dual influence demonstrates the powerful motivational role of job-related factors in shaping both a student’s resolve and their ultimate academic success. These mediation findings are consistent with previous literature, such as Etiubon et al. (2018) and Owusu et al. (2019), and further validated by current studies like Hoti and Zenuni (2024). Our work provides a more granular understanding by confirming that this is not a simple direct relationship, but rather a complex process where the mediator fully or partially processes the influence of all career determinants.

Implications

This study provides valuable insights with both significant theoretical and practical implications, stemming from our findings on the relationship between career determinants, career preference intention, and the academic performance of accounting students in Ghana.

Our research offers a nuanced perspective on the TPB, demonstrating how the link between attitudes (personal interest) and subjective norms (reference group influence) and the final behaviour (academic performance) is fully mediated by behavioural intention (career preference intention) in Ghana’s examination-focussed educational system. This finding extends the TPB by highlighting how the full mediating role of intention can be a function of the external environment. This provides a fundamental lesson for educators and curriculum designers, who must recognise that cultivating genuine interest and leveraging social support is not enough to guarantee academic success. The focus should be on building a student’s firm and internalised career intention, as this is the psychological mechanism that drives the behavioural effort required to excel.

Furthermore, our findings provide a specific application of the Social Cognitive Career Theory. We offer empirical evidence from a developing country that the link between extrinsic outcome expectations (job factors) and academic success is both direct and indirect. This partial mediation suggests that job-related motivators have a powerful dual effect: they directly drive students to perform well, and they indirectly strengthen their commitment to their chosen career path, which in turn enhances their performance. From a practical standpoint, this accentuates the importance for educators and university career services to continually emphasise the tangible benefits of a career in accounting, such as job security, high demand, and competitive salaries. By consistently reinforcing these extrinsic motivators, they can strengthen students’ resolve and ultimately improve academic outcomes.

Finally, the study’s findings on the mediating role of intention offer a clear strategic roadmap for accounting educators and policymakers. Given that both personal and reference factors are fully dependent on a student’s career intention to influence performance, a key focus should be on career guidance and mentorship programmes. These programmes should be designed not just to inform students about the profession, but to help them solidify a personal, determined career preference.

Limitations and Directions for Future Research

This study, while providing valuable insights, is not without its limitations, which in turn offer promising avenues for future research.

First, the research design is cross-sectional, meaning data were collected at a single point in time. This approach, while effective for testing our proposed model, limits our ability to establish definitive causality among the variables. Future research should employ a longitudinal design to better understand the evolution of the relationships between career determinants, career preference intention, and academic performance over time. Second, the data were collected from a specific context: undergraduate accounting students in Ghana. While this provides novel insights from a developing economy, the findings may not be generalisable to other disciplines (e.g., medicine, engineering) or to developed economies. Future studies could replicate this research in different sectors and in other geographical regions to test the universality of our findings.

Third, the data relied on self-reported survey measures, which may be susceptible to common method bias. Although statistical tests were performed to mitigate this, future research could use a multi-source approach, incorporating both archival data (e.g., official student grade records) and stakeholder interviews to provide a more robust and objective measure of the variables. Finally, as with many behavioural studies, there is the potential for omitted variable bias, since not all relevant factors influencing career intentions and performance can be fully captured in a single model. This study sought to mitigate this risk by including basic demographic controls, specifically sex and age, which are known to systematically influence academic and career-related outcomes. Nonetheless, future research should expand the set of control variables to include socioeconomic background, prior academic achievement, and institutional characteristics to further minimise bias and enhance the robustness of findings.

Conclusion

This study set out to investigate the direct and indirect influences of career determinants – personal, reference, and job factors – on the academic performance of undergraduate accounting students in Ghana, with a focus on the mediating role of career preference intention. By employing a robust analytical framework informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Cognitive Career Theory, our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex pathway from a student’s motivations to their academic outcomes.

The empirical results reveal that while personal interest and social pressures from referent groups do not directly influence academic performance, their effect is fully transmitted through a student’s career preference intention. This highlights that for students in a highly examination-focussed environment, a positive attitude or social support is insufficient; they must first internalise these factors and develop a firm, determined intention to pursue the career. In contrast, job factors, which represent powerful extrinsic motivators, influence academic performance both directly and indirectly via career preference intention, underscoring their pivotal role in shaping both a student’s resolve and their ultimate academic success.

These findings make several important contributions. Theoretically, our study extends the TPB by demonstrating that the full mediating role of intention can be a function of the external environment, providing a refined perspective on this foundational theory. It also provides a specific application of the SCCT, offering a granular, dual-pathway explanation for how extrinsic motivation and outcome expectations operate in a developing economy. From a practical standpoint, the study offers a clear strategic roadmap for accounting educators, policymakers, and university career services. The key implication is the need to shift from solely promoting interest in the profession to actively encouraging and solidifying a student’s career preference intention through focussed mentorship and career guidance programmes that continually reinforce the tangible benefits of the accounting profession.

While this study provides valuable insights, it is subject to several limitations, including its cross-sectional design and reliance on a specific context. Future research should consider longitudinal studies to better understand the evolution of these relationships, replicate this research in other disciplines and geographical regions, and use multi-source data to provide a more robust measure of the variables. In conclusion, this study provides a vital understanding of the psychological mechanisms linking career aspirations to academic success in an under-researched context, offering a clear path forward for enhancing student outcomes and addressing the shortage of qualified accountants.

Footnotes

Appendix

Author Note

The authors declare that the submitted work is our original work and that it is currently not under review by any other journal

ORCID iDs

Emmanuel Yaw Arhin

Edward Marfo-Yiadom

Joseph Tufuor Kwarteng

Ethical Considerations

For ethical considerations, approval was secured from the University of Cape Coast Institutional Review Board with approval number UCCIRB/CES/2022/13.

Consent to Participate

The respondents’ written informed consent also ensured that the data collected from them would be used for academic purposes, including the publication of articles.

Consent for Publication

Respondents provided written informed consent, and strict measures were taken to maintain anonymity and confidentiality throughout the data collection process. Participation was entirely voluntary, with no coercion involved.

Author Contributions

Emmanuel Yaw Arhin was involved in the conception, literature review, design, analysis and interpretation of the data. He was also responsible for drafting the paper and revising the article critically for intellectual content and was involved in the final approval of the version to be published.

Edward Marfo-Yiadom was involved in the conception, design, and interpretation of the data. He was also involved in revising the article critically for intellectual content and the final approval of the version to be published.

Joseph Tufuor Kwarteng was involved in the literature review, design and analysis of the data; He was also involved in revising the article critically for intellectual content and the final approval of the version to be published

Emmanuel, Edward and Joseph agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the Public, Commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data gathered for the study is available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

Afrogha

Oladele

Wright

(2020). Influencing factors on academic performance in Bowen University: The perceptions of accounting undergraduate students. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(2), 120–138.

Agyenim-Boateng

Tetteh

L. A.

Mawutor

J. K. M.

Kwarteng

Susuawu

(2025). Social cognitive career theory and accounting students’ intentions to pursue an auditing career. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26, 905–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-05-2024-0172

Ahinful

G. S.

Tauringana

Bansah

E. A.

Essuman

(2019). Determinants of academic performance of accounting students in Ghanaian secondary and tertiary education institutions. Accounting Education, 28(6), 553–581.

Ajzen

(1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

Akhter

Rahaman

(2020). Factors affecting academic performance of university students: A study among the students of MBSTU. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(20), 16–25.

Amaning

Anim

R. O.

Kyere

Peprah-Amankona

(2020). Determinants of career intentions of accounting students. International Business Research, 13(12), 1–14.

Aminu

Timothy

(2014). Career choice and academic performance of Microbiology students in a Nigerian university. International Journal of Science and Technology Education Research, 5(5), 58–66.

Anis

Hanafi

(2015). Factors influencing students’ choice of an accounting major in Egypt. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 11(4), 225–254.

Arora

Singh

(2017). Factors affecting the academic performance of college students. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 47–53.

10.

Awadallah

Elgharbawy

(2021). Utilizing the theory of reasoned action in understanding students’ choice in selecting accounting as major. Accounting Education, 30(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1811992

11.

Baba

Keling

Yap

C. S.

(2025). The effect of subjective norms, attitude and start-up capital on the entrepreneurial intention of the indigenous people in Malaysia. Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy, 19, 853–880. https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-05-2024-0100

12.

Bagozzi

(1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74–94.

13.

Bekoe

R. A.

Owusu

G. M. Y.

Ofori

C. G.

Essel-Anderson

Welbeck

E. E.

(2018). Attitudes towards accounting and intention to major in accounting: A logistic regression analysis. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 459–475.

14.

Bin

Wahid

P. R. A.

(2025). The relationship between attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control and entrepreneurial intention among vocational school students in Henan Province, China: Family support as the moderator (pp. 1–11). City University eJournal of Academic Research.

15.

Brook

Roberts

(2021). What are the determinants of student performance on an undergraduate accounting degree? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1224–1239.

16.

Brown

S. D.

Lent

R. W.

(2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Progress in studying the domain satisfaction and career self-management models. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(4), 563–578.

17.

Connely

K. P.

DuBois

N. F.

Staley

(1998, April 15). Structured interview study of the long-term effects of a college study skills course: Traces and self-report measures. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

18.

Cotton

Hickman

B. R.

List

J. A.

Price

Roy

(2025). Why don’t struggling students do their homework? Disentangling motivation and study productivity as drivers of human capital formation (No. w34274). National Bureau of Economic Research.

19.

Cuzdriorean

D. D.

Fekete

Vladu

A. B.

Boţa-Avram

(2025). Charting the future: what drives accounting career choices in emerging economies? Review of Accounting and Finance, 24(1), 71–101.

20.

Derrick

G. E.

Chen

P. Y.

van Leeuwen

Larivière

Sugimoto

C. R.

(2022). The relationship between parenting engagement and academic performance. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 22300.

21.

Etiubon

R. U.

Ugwu

A. N.

Ado

I. B.

(2018). Career choice determinants and academic achievement of first year science education students of University of Uyo, Akwa ibom state, Nigeria. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6(7), 136–147.

22.

Fallan

Opstad

(2014). Beyond gender performance in accounting: Does personality distinction matter? Accounting Education: An International Journal, 23(4), 343–361.

23.

Garkaz

Banimahd

Esmaeili

(2011). Factors affecting accounting students’ performance: The case of students at the Islamic Azad University. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 29(2011), 122–128.

24.

Gobena

G. A.

(2018). Family socio-economic status effect on students’ academic performance at college of education and behavioural sciences, Haramaya University, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 207–222.

25.

Guney

(2009). Exogenous and endogenous factors influencing students’ performance in undergraduate accounting modules. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(1), 51–73.

26.

Hair

J. F.

(2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

27.

Hair

J. F.

Risher

J. J.

Sarstedt

Ringle

C. M.

(2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

28.

Hair

J. F.

Sarstedt

Hopkins

G. Kuppelwieser

(2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.

29.

Hellen

Kitainge

(2016). Influence of career preference on academic performance and graduation of male students: a case study of a university in western region of Kenya. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4(8), 9–20.

30.

Hammour

(2018). Influence of the attitudes of Emirati students on their choice of accounting as a profession. Accounting Education, 27(4), 433–451.

31.

Henseler

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

(2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

32.

Hensley

W. E

(1995, April 27–30). What do grades mean? A pilot study using sex, GPA, and cognitive/semantic consistency. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern States Speech Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.

33.

H. P. C.

Nguyen

T. K.

Trinh

C. D.

(2025). Intentions of accounting students: A study on professional accounting in Vietnam. Accounting Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2487480

34.

Hoti

A. H.

Zenuni

(2024). Factors influencing student academic performance and career choices. In 2024 8th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

35.

Igere

M. A.

(2017). Career choice and its influence on academic performance of library and information science students in a Nigerian University. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 8(2), 90–98.

36.

Issahaku

P. A.

(2017). An investigation of factors that influence the academic performance of undergraduate students of public universities in Ghana. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 259–275.

37.

Jackling

Calero

(2006). Influences on undergraduate students’ intentions to become qualified accountants: Evidence from Australia. Accounting Education, 15(4), 419–438.

38.

Jackling

Keneley

(2009). Influences on the supply of accounting graduates in Australia: A focus on international students. Accounting and Finance, 49(1), 141–159.

39.

Khan

F. N.

Begum

Imad

(2019). Relationship between students’ home environment and their academic achievement at secondary school level. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 5(11), 223–234.

40.

Kock

(2014). Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-Based SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2014010101

41.

Kock

Lynn

(2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580.

42.

Kukreja

Aali

M. H.

(2013). The determinants of students’ performance in introductory accounting course: Evidence from kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, 1(3), 183–201

43.

Kumar

Agarwal

(2021). Defining and measuring academic performance of Hei students – a critical review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 3091–3105.

44.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.

45.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49.

46.

Mansfield

P. M.

Pinto

M. B.

Parente

D. H.

Wortman

T. I.

(2009). College students and academic performance: A case of taking control. NASPA Journal, 45(3), 502–518.

47.

Muhamad

San

O. T.

S. W.

Safingi

A. R. B.

(2020). Accountant as a career choice from the perspective of secondary school and undergraduate accounting students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 613–636.

48.

Nanjundaswamy

Divyashree

M. S.

Suraj

Kulal

Rahiman

H. U.

Kodikal

(2025). Adapting accounting education to evolving business paradigm-an Indian perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 17, 1914–1943. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2024-0202

49.

Ndovela

Mutanga

(2024). Academic factors influencing students career choices in the IT Field: Insights from South African IT students. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 107–116.

50.

Y. H.

Lai

S. P.

Z. P.

Yap

J. Y.

Teoh

H. Q.

Lee

(2017). Factors influencing accounting students’ career paths. Journal of Management Development, 36(3), 319–329.

51.

Nitzl

Roldán

J. L.

Cepeda

(2017). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling, helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models: An Abstract. In Rossi

(Ed.), Marketing at the confluence between Entertainment and analytics. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (p. 693). Springer.

52.

Odia

J. O.

Ogiedu

K. O.

(2013). Factors affecting the study of Accounting in Nigerian Universities. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 89–96.

53.

Odoh

L. C.

Ugwuanyi

U. B.

Odigbo

B. E.

Chukwuani

N. V.

(2017). Influence of parental occupation and level of education on academic performance of accounting students in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(10), 21–27.

54.

Okwuduba

E. N.

Nwosu

K. C.

Okigbo

E. C.

Samuel

N. N.

Achugbu

(2021). Impact of intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional intelligence and self-directed learning on academic performance among pre-university science students. Heliyon, 7(3), e06611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06611

55.

Olufemi

O. T.

Adediran

A. A.

Oyediran

W. O.

(2018). Factors affecting students’ academic performance in college of education in southwest, Nigeria. British Journal of Education, 6(10), 43–56.

56.

Owusu

G. M. Y.

Bekoe

R. A.

Okyere

S. A.

Welbeck

E. E.

(2019). What influences the course major decision of accounting and non-accounting students? Journal of International Education in Business, 12(1), 26–42.

57.

Phal

(2025). Cambodian University students’ perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance. CJESS Online Library, 1–110.

58.

Saayir

P. T.

Sande

W. A.

(2020). Retention of senior high school Financial Accounting teachers in Ghana: A qualitative Elemental Analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Education, 4(4), 145–160.

59.

Skinner

Dancis

(2020). Descriptive and explanatory designs. Portland State University.

60.

Slåtten

Lien

Evenstad

S. B. N.

Onshus

(2021). Supportive study climate and academic performance among university students: The role of psychological capital, positive emotions and study engagement. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(4), 585–600.

61.

Tadese

Yeshaneh

Mulu

G. B.

(2022). Determinants of good academic performance among university students in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03461-0 article 395.

62.

Taherdoost

(2016). Validity and Reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36.

63.

Tan

L. M.

Laswad

(2006). Students’ beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to major in accounting. Accounting Education, 15(2), 167–187.

64.

Tang

L. C.

Seng

(2016). Factors influencing students’ choice of accounting major in Cambodian universities. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(2), 231–251.

65.

Uyar

Gungormus

A. H.

Kuzey

(2011). Factors affecting students’ career choice in accounting: The case of a Turkish university. American Journal of Business Education, 4(10), 29–38.

66.

Zheng

Guo

(2019). Does academic interest play a more important role in medical sciences than other disciplines? A nationwide cross-sectional study in China. BMC Medical Education, 19(301), 1–8.

67.

Xiang

(2018). Relation between family-related factors and students’ learning performance in the first post-secondary accounting course. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 28, 139–158.

68.

Yamen

(2019). Development features of the students’ career building skills. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 18–21.

69.

Zakaria

Fauzi

N. A.

Hasan

J. S.

(2012). Accounting as a choice of academic program. Journal of Business Administration Research, 1(1), 43–52.

Career Determinants and Academic Performance of Undergraduate Accounting Students in Ghana: Mediating Role of Career Preference Intention

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Literature Review

Theoretical Foundation: Integrating SCCT and TPB

Hypotheses Development

Personal Factors and Academic Performance

Referent Factors and Academic Performance

Job Factors and Academic Performance

Career Preference and Academic Performance

Mediating Role of Career Preference Intention

Methodology

Population and Sample

Instrument and Data Collection

Data Analysis

Analysis and Findings

Demographic Profile of Respondents

Assessment of the Measurement Model

Reliability and Validity

Discriminant and Divergent Validity

Assessing the Structural Model

Collinearity Assessment

Predictive Accuracy and Relevance

Hypotheses Testing

Direct Effects

Indirect (Mediation) Effects

Summary of Hypothesis Outcomes

Discussion

Implications

Limitations and Directions for Future Research

Conclusion

Footnotes

Appendix

Author Note

ORCID iDs

Ethical Considerations

Consent to Participate

Consent for Publication

Author Contributions

Funding

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Data Availability Statement

References