Remote and hybrid work have received much attention since the expansion of off-site work following the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on the effects of these arrangements on workers’ well-being, however, is mixed, likely because studies rarely account for workers’ workplace preferences. Using data from the 2023 wave of the Study on U.S. Parents’ Divisions of Labor During COVID-19 (SPDLC), we assess the association between work-place mismatch (misalignment between preferred and actual work locations) and both work-family conflict and psychological well-being (stress and depressive symptoms) among partnered working parents. Results suggest that most parents report some degree of work-place mismatch, with on-site workers reporting the highest work-place mismatch. We also find that work-place mismatch is positively associated with work-family conflict and negatively associated with parents’ psychological well-being. After accounting for work-place mismatch, parents who work on-site report lower work-family conflict and higher psychological well-being than remote and hybrid workers. Overall, results highlight the need to account for workers’ preferences in understanding the association between work conditions, work-family conflict, and psychological well-being.
AllenTammy D.GoldenTimothy D.ShockleyKristen M.2015. “How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assess the Status of Our Scientific Findings.”Psychological Science in the Public Interest16:40–68.
2.
AmerikanerLayneYanHope XuSayerLiana C.DoanLongFishJessica N.DrotningKelsey J.RinderknechtR. Gordon. 2023. “Blurred Border or Safe Harbor? Emotional Well-being among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults Working from Home During COVID-19.”Social Science & Medicine323:115850. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115850.
3.
AngraveDavidCharlwoodAndy. 2015. “What Is the Relationship between Long Working Hours, Over-employment, Under-employment, and the Subjective Well-being of Workers? Longitudinal Evidence from the UK.”Human Relations68:1491–515.
4.
BarreroJose Maria M.BloomNicholasDavisSteven J.2021. “Why Working from Home Will Stick.”NBER Working Paper Series #28731. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w28731.
5.
BloomNicholasHanRuobingLiangJames. 2024. “Hybrid Working from Home Improves Retention Without Damaging Performance.”Nature630:920–25.
6.
BloomNicholasLiangJamesRobertsJohnYingZhichun Jenny. 2015. “Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics130:165–218.
7.
CarlsonDaniel L.McPhersonSkyePettsRichard J.2024. “Remote Work, Gender Ideologies, and Fathers’ Participation in Childcare During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”Social Sciences13:166. doi:10.3390/socsci13030166.
8.
CarlsonDaniel L.PettsRichard J.2023. Study on U.S. Parents’ Divisions of Labor during COVID-19, Waves 1-3 [Data set]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi:10.3886/E194725V1.
9.
ChoudhuryPrithwirajKhannaTarunMakridisChristos A.SchirmannKyle. 2024. “Is Hybrid Work the Best of Both Worlds? Evidence from a Field Experiment.”The Review of Economics and Statistics. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01428.
10.
ChungHeejung. 2022. The Flexibility Paradox: Why Flexible Working Leads to (Self-) Exploitation. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
11.
ClarkSue Campbell. 2000. “Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance.”Human Relations53:747–70.
12.
CohenSheldonKamarckTomMermelsteinRobin. 1983. “A Global Measure of Perceived Stress.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior24:386–96.
13.
DavisShannon N.2011. “Support, Demands, and Gender Ideology: Exploring Work-family Facilitation and Work-family Conflict among Older Workers.”Marriage & Family Review47:363–82.
14.
de WindAstridBeckersDebby G. J.NijpHylco H.HooftmanWendelade BoerAngela G. E. M.GeurtsSabine A. E.2021. “Working From Home: Mismatch Between Access and Need in Relation to Work-home Interference and Fatigue.”Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health47:619–27.
15.
FanWenMoenPhyllis. 2023. “Ongoing Remote Work, Returning to Working at Work, or in between during COVID-19: What Promotes Subjective Well-being?”Journal of Health and Social Behavior64:152–71.
16.
FanWenMoenPhyllis. 2024. “The Shifting Stress of Working Parents: An Examination of Dual Pandemic Disruptions—Remote Work and Remote Schooling.”Social Sciences13:36. doi:10.3390/socsci13010036.
17.
FanWenMoenPhyllis. 2025. “Remote/Hybrid Work in Flux: Work-place/Preference Mismatch and Adaptations.”Social Forces, published electronically February 24, 2025. doi:10.1093/sf/soaf035.
18.
FoxKimberly E.JohnsonSydney T.BerkmanLisa F.SianojaMarjaanaSohYenneKubzanskyLaura D.KellyErin L.2021. “Organisational- and Group-level Workplace Interventions and their Effect on Multiple Domains of Worker Well-being: A Systematic Review.”Work & Stress36:30–59.
GagerConstance T.1998. “The Role of Valued Outcomes, Justifications, and Comparison Referents in Perceptions of Fairness among Dual-earner Couples.”Journal of Family Issues19:622–48.
21.
GajendranRavi S.HarrisonDavid A.2007. “The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown about Telecommuting: Meta-analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences.”Journal of Applied Psychology92:1524–41.
22.
GlavinPaulSchiemanScottReidSarah. 2011. “Boundary-spanning Work Demands and Their Consequences for Guilt and Psychological Distress.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior52:43–57.
23.
GoldenTimothy D.VeigaJohn F.SimsekZeki. 2006. “Telecommuting’s Differential Impact on Work-family Conflict: Is There No Place Like Home?”Journal of Applied Psychology91:1340–50.
24.
GutworthMelissa B.HowardMatt C.SimonetDaniel V.2023. “Mandated but Willing? Preferences and Expectations among Mandatory Work from Home Employees.”Human Resource Management Journal34:627–46. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12498.
25.
HaysSharon. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
HeidenMarinaHallmanDavid M.SvenssonMalinMathiassenSvend ErikSvenssonSvenBergströmGunnar. 2023. “Mismatch Between Actual and Preferred Extent of Telework: Cross-sectional and Prospective Associations with Well-being and Burnout.”BMC Public Health23:1736.
27.
IshizukaPatrick. 2019. “Social Class, Gender, and Contemporary Parenting Standards in the United States: Evidence from a National Survey Experiment.”Social Forces98:31–58.
28.
KadukAnneGenadekKatieKellyErin L.MoenPhyllis. 2019. “Involuntary Vs. Voluntary Flexible Work: Insights for Scholars and Stakeholders.”Community, Work and Family22:412–42.
29.
KalmijnMatthijsMondenChristiaan W. S.2011. “The Division of Labor and Depressive Symptoms at the Couple Level: Effects of Equity or Specialization?”Journal of Social and Personal Relationships29:358–74.
30.
KangasHilpiPensarHeiniRousiRebekah. 2023. “I Wouldn’t Be Working This Way If I Had a Family—Differences in Remote Workers’ Needs for Supervisor’s Family Supportiveness Depending on the Parental Status.”Journal of Vocational Behavior147:103939.
31.
KellyErin L.MoenPhyllis. 2021. Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
KimJaesungHenlyJulia R.GoldenLonnie M.LambertSusan J.2020. “Workplace Flexibility and Worker Well-being by Gender.”Journal of Marriage and Family82:892–910.
33.
Kristof-BrownAmy L.ZimmermanRyan D.JohnsonErin C.2005. “Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work: A Meta-analysis of Person-job, Person-organization, Person-group, and Person-supervisor Fit.”Personnel Psychology58:281–342.
34.
LaßIngaWoodenMark. 2023. “Working from Home and Work-family Conflict.”Work, Employment and Society37:176–95.
35.
LeonardiPaul M.ParkerSienna HelenaShenRoni. 2024. “How Remote Work Changes the World of Work.”Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior11:193–219.
36.
LevayKevin E.FreeseJeremyDruckmanJames N.2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.”SAGE Open6:2158244016636433.
37.
LingWanyingWangSenhuLuZhuofei. 2024. “Working Time Mismatch and Employee Subjective Well-being across Institutional Contexts: A Job Quality Perspective.”Work, Employment and Society39:–85. doi:10.1177/09500170241259330.
38.
MasAlexandrePallaisAmanda. 2017. “Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements.”American Economic Review107:3722–59.
39.
MatthewsRussell A.KathLisa M.Barnes-FarrellJanet L.2010. “A Short, Valid, Predictive Measure of Work-family Conflict: Item Selection and Scale Validation.”Journal of Occupational Health Psychology15:75–90.
40.
MirowskyJohn. 2011. “Wage Slavery or Creative Work?”Society and Mental Health1:73–88.
41.
MirowskyJohnRossCatherine E.2003. Social Causes of Psychological Distress. 2nd ed.Berlin, Germany: Aldine De Gruyter.
42.
MoenPhyllisKadukAnneKossekEllen ErnstHammerLeslieBuxtonOrfeu M.O’DonnellEmilyAlmeidaDavidFoxKimberlyTranbyEricOakesJ MichaelCasperLynne. 2015. “Is Work-family Conflict a Multilevel Stressor Linking Job Conditions to Mental Health? Evidence from the Work, Family and Health Network.”Work and Family in the New Economy26:177–217.
43.
MoenPhyllisKellyErinFanWenLeeShi-RongAlmeidaDavidKossekEllen ErnstBuxtonOrfeu M.2016. “Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-tech Employees’ Well-being? Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network.”American Sociological Review81:1–31.
44.
NomaguchiKei M.MilkieMelissa A.BianchiSuzanne M.2005. “Time Strains and Psychological Well-being: Do Dual-earner Mothers and Fathers Differ?”Journal of Family Issues26:756–92.
45.
OakmanJodiLambertKatrina A.WealeVictoria P.StuckeyRwthGrahamMelissa. 2023. “The Effect of Preference and Actual Days Spent Working from Home on Stress and Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Workers.”International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health96:1113–21.
46.
OtsukaSouheiIshimaruTomohiroNagataMasakoTateishiSeeichiroEguchiHisashiTsujiMayumiOgamiAkiraMatsudaShinyaFujinoYoshihisa. 2021. “A Cross-sectional Study of the Mismatch Between Telecommuting Preference and Frequency Associated with Psychological Distress Among Japanese Workers in the COVID-19 Pandemic.”Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine63:e636–e640.
PearlinLeonard I.1989. “The Sociological Study of Stress.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior30:241–56.
49.
PearlinLeonard I.BiermanAlex. 2013. “Current Issues and Future Directions in Research into the Stress Process.” Pp. 325–40 in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA.New York: Springer.
50.
PearlinLeonard I.MullanJoseph T.SempleShirley J.1990. “Caregiving and the Stress Process: An Overview of Concepts and Their Measures.”The Gerontologist30:583–94.
51.
PeerEyalBrandimarteLauraSamatSonamAcquistiAlessandro. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70:153–63.
52.
PettsRichard J.CarlsonDaniel L.2023. “Managing a Household During a Pandemic: Cognitive Labor and Parents’ Psychological Well-being.”Society and Mental Health13:187–207.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2003. “You Can’t Always Get the Hours You Want: Mismatches between Actual and Preferred Work Hours in the U.S.”Social Forces81:1171–99.
55.
ReynoldsJeremyAletarisLydia. 2006. “Pursuing Preferences: The Creation and Resolution of Work Hour Mismatches.”American Sociological Review71:618–38.
56.
ReynoldsJeremyAletarisLydia. 2010. “Long Working Hours and Working-time Preferences: Between Desirability and Feasibility.”Human Relations66:1131–55.
57.
ReynoldsJeremyMcKinzieAshleigh Elain. 2019. “Riding the Waves of Work and Life: Explaining Long-term Experiences with Work Hour Mismatches.”Social Forces98:427–60.
58.
RoxburghSusan. 2004. “‘There Just Aren’t Enough Hours in The Day’: The Mental Health Consequences of Time Pressure.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior45:115–31.
59.
SchiemanScottGlavinPaulMilkieMelissa A.2009. “When Work Interferes with Life: Work-nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-related Demands and Resources.”American Sociological Review74:966–88.
60.
SomersMarkBirnbaumDeeCasalJose. 2019. “Application of the Person-centered Model to Stress and Well-being Research: An Investigation of Profiles of Employee Well-being.”Employee Relations41:649–61.
UrienBegoña. 2023. “Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-being: A Systematic Review.”Sustainability15:10631.
64.
VoydanoffPatricia. 2005. “Work Demands and Work-to-family and Family-to-work Conflict: Direct and Indirect Relationships.”Journal of Family Issues26:707–26.
65.
WaldrepCarolyn E.FritzMarniGlassJennifer. 2024. “Preferences for Remote and Hybrid Work: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic.”Social Sciences13:303. doi:10.3390/socscil3060303.
66.
WallerLee. 2021. “Fostering a Sense of Belonging in the Workplace: Enhancing Well-being and a Positive and Coherent Sense of Self.” Pp. 341–67 in The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-being, edited by DhimanS.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
WheatonBlairYoungMarisaMontazerShirinStuart-LahmanKatie. 2012. “Social Stress in the Twenty-first Century.” Pp. 299–323 in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
YoungM.MilkieM. A.SchiemanS.2023. “Mother–father Parity in Work–family Conflict? The Importance of Selection Effects and Nonresponse Bias.”Social Forces101:1171–98.
70.
YucelDenizChungHeejung. 2023. “Working from Home, Work-family Conflict, and the Role of Gender and Gender Role Attitudes.”Community, Work & Family26:190–221.
71.
YucelDenizLatshawBeth A.KimJaeseung. 2024. “When Change and Stability in Work Location Matter for Psychological Distress: A Study of Workers before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”Society and Mental Health14:73–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
