Research finds that discrepancies between individuals’ self-views and their perceptions of how others view them decrease psychological well-being. According to identity theory, certain characteristics of identities may exacerbate the impact of discrepancy on well-being, while stress process theory suggests they may have the opposite, weakening effect. Using telephone survey data from a national probability sample of adults, I investigate whether several identity characteristics—subjective importance of an identity (prominence), extensiveness (interactional commitment) and intensiveness of ties (affective commitment) to others that are based on an identity, and the potential costs of failing to fulfill the role obligations of an identity (role-based commitment)—moderate associations between discrepancy and well-being (depressive symptoms and self-esteem) in two types of identities (obligatory and voluntary). I find that identity commitment buffers the effects of discrepancy in obligatory identities and exacerbates the effects of discrepancy in voluntary identities. Implications of these findings are discussed.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2009. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 6th ed. Alexandria, VA: American Association for Public Opinion Research.
2.
BurkePeter J.1991. “Identity Processes and Social Stress.”American Sociological Review56:836–49.
3.
BurkePeter J.1996. “Social Identities and Psychological Stress.” Pp. 141–74 in Psychosocial Stress: Perspectives on Structure, Theory, Life Course, and Methods, edited by KaplanH. B.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
BurkePeter J.HarrodMichael M.2005. “Too Much of a Good Thing?”Social Psychology Quarterly68:359–74.
6.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2021. “The Microsociology of Self and Identity.” Pp. 247–76 in Theoretical Sociology: The Future of a Disciplinary Foundation, edited by AbrutynS.McCaffreeK.New York: Routledge.
8.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2022. Identity Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2023. “Prominence and Salience Effects on Identity Nonverification.”Social Psychology Quarterly. Published electronically October. doi:10.1177/01902725231202255.
10.
CastAlicia D.BurkePeter J.2002. “A Theory of Self-esteem.”Social Forces80:1041–68.
11.
ChouChih-PingBentlerPeter M.SatorraAlbert. 1991. “Scaled Test Statistics and Robust Standard Errors for Non-normal Data in Covariance Structure Analysis: A Monte Carlo Study.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology44:347–57.
12.
CobbSidney. 1976. “Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress.” Psychosomatic Medicine38(5):300–314.
13.
DerogatisLeonard R.2000. The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18): Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
14.
EndersCraig K.BandalosDeborah L.2001. “The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models.”Structural Equation Modeling8:430–57.
15.
GallagherMary. 2016. “Distinguishing Obligatory and Voluntary Identities.” Pp. 309–42 in New Directions in Identity Theory and Research, edited by StetsJ. E.SerpeR. T.New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GallagherMary. 2017. “Obligatory and Voluntary Identity Discrepancies, Self-evaluation, and Psychological Distress.”Society and Mental Health7:51–68.
17.
HuLi-tzeBentlerPeter M.1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.”Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6:1–55.
18.
JohnsonMichael P.1973. “Commitment: A Conceptual Structure and Empirical Application.”The Sociological Quarterly14:395–406.
19.
KiecoltJill. 1994. “Stress and the Decision to Change Oneself: A Theoretical Model.”Social Psychology Quarterly57:49–63.
20.
KlineRex B.2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
21.
LuhtanenRiiaCrockerJennifer. 1992. “A Collective Self-esteem Scale: Self-evaluation of One’s Social Identity.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18:302–18.
22.
MarkowskiKelly L.SerpeRichard T.2018. “Identity Theory Paradigm Integration: Assessing the Role of Prominence and Salience in the Verification and Self-esteem Relationship.”Advances in Group Processes35:75–102.
23.
PearlinLeonard I.MenaghanElizabeth G.LiebermanMorton A.MullanJoseph T.1981. “The Stress Process.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior22:337–56.
24.
RosenbergMorris. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
SerpeRichard T.1987. “Stability and Change in Self: A Structural Interactionist Explanation.”Social Psychology Quarterly50:44–55.
26.
SimonRobin W.1997. “The Meanings Individuals Attach to Role Identities and Their Implications for Mental Health.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior38:256–74.
27.
StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
28.
StetsJan E.AngeloEmilyFieldsBenjamin C.BurkePeter J.2023. “Identity Nonverification, Coping, and Depression and Anxiety during the Pandemic.”Society and Mental Health. doi:10.1177/21568693231213089.
StetsJan E.BurkePeter J.2014. “Self-esteem and Identities.”Sociological Perspectives57:409–33.
31.
StetsJan E.HarrodMichael M.2004. “Verification across Multiple Identities: The Role of Status.”Social Psychology Quarterly67:155–71.
32.
StrykerRobinSerpeRichard T.PowellBrian. 2020. “Structural Symbolic Interaction and Identity Theory: Current Achievements and Challenges for the Future.” Pp. 365–85 in Identity and Symbolic Interaction, edited by StrykerR.SerpeR. T.PowellB.New York: Springer.
33.
StrykerSheldonSerpeRichard T.1982. “Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: A Theory and Research Example.” Pp. 199–218 in Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior, edited by IckesW.KnowlesE. S.New York: Springer-Verlag.
34.
StrykerSheldonSerpeRichard T.1994. “Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?”Social Psychology Quarterly57:16–35.
35.
StrykerSheldonSerpeRichard T.HuntMatthew O.2005. “Making Good on a Promise: The Impact of Larger Social Structures on Commitments.”Advances in Group Processes22:93–123.
36.
ThoitsPeggy A.1995. “Identity-relevant Events and Psychological Symptoms: A Cautionary Tale.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior36:72–82.
37.
ThoitsPeggy A.2003. “Personal Agency in the Accumulation of Multiple Role-identities.” Pp. 179–94 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by BurkeP. J.OwensT. J.SerpeR. T.ThoitsP. A.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
38.
ThoitsPeggy A.2013. “Self, Identity, Stress, and Mental Health.” Pp. 357–78 in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health, edited by AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA.New York: Springer.
39.
TurnerR. JayAvisonWilliam R.1992. “Innovations in the Measurement of Life Stress: Crisis Theory and the Significance of Event Resolution.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior33:36–50.
40.
TurnerR. JayRoszellPatricia. 1994. “Psychosocial Resources and the Stress Process.” Pp. 179–210 in Stress and Mental Health, edited by AvisonW. R.GotlibI. H.Boston, MA: Springer.
WheatonBlair. 1985. “Models for the Stress-buffering Functions of Coping Resources.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior26:352–64.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
