Abstract
Stress is a global public health problem with several negative health consequences, including anxiety, depression, cardiovascular disease, and suicide. Mindfulness-based stress reduction offers an effective way of reducing stress by combining mindfulness meditation and yoga in an 8-week training program. The purpose of this study was to look at studies from January 2009 to January 2014 and examine whether mindfulness-based stress reduction is a potentially viable method for managing stress. A systematic search from Medline, CINAHL, and Alt HealthWatch databases was conducted for all types of quantitative articles involving mindfulness-based stress reduction. A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of the 17 studies, 16 demonstrated positive changes in psychological or physiological outcomes related to anxiety and/or stress. Despite the limitations of not all studies using randomized controlled design, having smaller sample sizes, and having different outcomes, mindfulness-based stress reduction appears to be a promising modality for stress management.
Introduction
Stress is a pervasive issue in modern society and has become a global public health problem. 1,2 Continuous stress may lead to unproductive rumination that consumes energy and reinforces the experience of stress itself. 3 Additionally, exaggerated stress can challenge resilience aspects 4 –6 such as hope 7 and capacity to forgive. 8 Although certain levels of stress may result in improved functioning, there is evidence that a great deal of stress can negatively affect both physical and mental health. 9 –11 Stress has been linked to autoimmune disease, 12 migraines, 13 obesity, 14 muscle tension and backache, 15 high cholesterol, 16 coronary heart disease, 17 hypertension, 18 stroke, 19 and other quality of life issues that affect humans.
Previous attempts to manage and disrupt the negative effects of stress on the mind and body have included various methods such as time management, conflict resolution, communication skills, social support, humor, spirituality, meditation, exercise, yoga, and massage. 20 Literature has shown a positive relationship between time management skills and stress levels. 21 Social support has helped patients adjust to their illnesses, 22 helped African American women feel connected to their neighborhoods, 23 increased HIV/AIDS patients’ adherence to their medication regimens 24 and helped alleviate their depressive symptoms, 25,26 and eliminated rates of abandonment of children with Down syndrome in Thailand. 27 Communication techniques, such as active listening, have been examined as an effective means of managing social stressors. 28,29 Humor can diffuse stressful situations and preclude negative life events from resulting in mood instabilities. 20 Humor also helps in managing stress by increasing cheerfulness, which often leads to increased social support. Spirituality, meditation, and yoga have all shown decreases in chronic pain, anxiety, stress, and depression. 30 –34
One stress management technique that has gained increasing attention is the concept of mindfulness, which originally has its roots in Buddhism and can be found in the
Mindfulness-based stress reduction 36 is a widely disseminated and frequently cited example of mindfulness training that has been shown to reduce stress, depression, and anxiety. 49,50 Mindfulness-based stress reduction programs have been widely researched and positive results reported among an array of clinical and nonclinical populations, including cancer patients, 51 –53 mixed illness populations, 49,54,55 health care professionals, 56 continuing education students, 43 and college undergraduates. 57 Mindfulness-based stress reduction teaches individuals to observe situations and thoughts in a nonjudgmental manner without reacting to them thoughtlessly and helps people develop a more automatic consciousness of experiences, and could represent an effective instrument for the reduction of stress. 58,59 This research gives some indication of how mindfulness-based stress reduction can help people cope with the impact on their lives, of various conditions and stressors.
Mindfulness-based stress reduction sessions provide training in formal mindfulness practices, including body scan, sitting meditation, and Hatha yoga. The body scan involves paying attention to parts of the body and bodily sensations in sequence, in a gradual sweeping of attention through the body from feet to head. In sitting meditation, the primary focus of this mindful attention is on breathing, the rising and falling abdomen, as well as on other perceptions and a state of nonjudgmental awareness of cognitions and the stream of thoughts and distractions that flow through the mind. Mindful movement is based on Hatha yoga and focuses on moving the body through a series of postures to develop greater strength, balance, flexibility, and body awareness. Hatha yoga is included in the program as a means of encouraging attentiveness to body sensations and movement. In all of these exercises, when thoughts arise and attention wanders, the practice is to return the attention to the intended focus. Participants are also encouraged to practice mindfulness informally by brining attention to emotions, thoughts, and appraisals that occur while engaged in everyday activities, including walking, eating, driving, working, and conversing. 60 MBSR is based on training attention through straightforward, secular, meditation techniques. It seeks to change our relationship with stressful thoughts and events, by decreasing emotional reactivity and enhancing cognitive appraisal. 61 From the Western psychological perspective, when individuals practice mindfulness in their own way, during both formal meditation and during engagement in everyday activities, an awakening process occurs. 62
The benefits of the standardized full-length mindfulness-based stress reduction curriculum are well documented, and the time commitment is significant. The full-length standard mindfulness-based stress reduction program is among the most widely researched mindfulness procedures. Mindfulness-based stress reduction is effective in fostering emotional well-being and reducing psychological distress among nonclinical healthy individuals and persons with chronic psychological disorders. Mindfulness-based stress reduction’s standard curriculum is conducted in a structured 8-week group format, during which participants meet weekly for 2.5-hour group sessions in addition to one 6-hour daylong retreat, for a total of 26 contact hours. Unfortunately, most people do not have the time, resources, or accessibility needed to participate in extensive meditation programs. 63
A literature review was published in 2009 that looked at all the trials till that time which had studied the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on stress management in nonclinical populations. 64 The study summarized the results from 10 such trials and found positive effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction though there were methodological shortcomings and the numbers of studies were too small. Since 2009 several additional studies have been published in this area. Hence, the aim of this review was to examine these additional studies and assess whether mindfulness-based stress reduction can be an alternative and complementary approach for stress reduction in nonclinical populations.
Questions being addressed in this review include the following: Has mindfulness-based stress reduction been found to be efficacious in decreasing stress in otherwise healthy individuals since the 2008 review? Is there sufficient data available to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in stress management? What are the methodological limitations of present research studies and how can these be addressed in future research? What are the common outcome measures measured by studies and which ones are more important for future studies?
Methods
A systematic review of studies involving mindfulness-based stress reduction interventions among healthy individuals was the method used in this study. To be included in this study the article must meet the following criteria: (
Three phases of data review were conducted for this study (Figure 1). To identify studies meeting these criteria, Medline, Alt HealthWatch, and CINAHL database searches were performed for Phase I. Boolean terms used to identify studies meeting the criteria included “Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction AND Adults AND Intervention AND Mindfulness” for the time period January 2008 to December 2013.

The 3-step data extraction process.
Using the aforementioned terms/phrases, 396 articles were returned from Medline (n = 235), Alt HealthWatch (n = 18), and CINAHL (n = 143). Phase II included preliminary distillation of the articles by eliminating duplicates (n = 17), review/discussion/other articles (n = 68), and studies not in the English language (n = 7). In Phase III, comprising manuscript review of the remaining articles (n = 287), articles were eliminated that did not contain desired outcome results (n = 33), did not involve adults (n = 16), did not involve healthy individuals (n = 219), did not have quantitative results (n = 15), or did not focus solely on mindfulness-based stress reduction (n = 4). Hence, the remaining articles (n = 17) satisfied the eligibility criteria.
Results
As a result of the data extraction process, 17 articles were found satisfying the eligibility criteria. Table 1 summarizes the studies including the year of publication, authors/country where the study was performed, study design and sample size, age of participants, intervention modality, intervention dosage, outcome measures, and the salient findings. The studies are arranged by year of publication in the ascending order starting from 2009. Within a given year studies are arranged alphabetically by the last name of the first author.
Summary of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Interventions for Healthy Individuals, January 2009 to January 2014 (N = 17).
Abbreviations: MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; PHLM = philadelphia mindfulness scale; SOC = sense of coherence; DASS = depression anxiety stress scale.
Of the 17 interventions, the majority were done in the United States (n = 9), 63,65,68 –74,76 followed by the United Kingdom (n = 2). 67,78 One each was implemented in Australia, 77 Canada, 66 Netherlands, 79 Norway, 75 and Spain. 60 Of the 17 interventions, 5 were randomized controlled designs, 70,72,75,76,79 2 studies used quasi-experimental designs, 63,73 and 10 used pretest–posttest designs. 60,65 –69,71,74,77,78 The mean sample size calculated for all 17 studies in this review was 100.94, with a range of 11 to 288. Total sample sizes (n) were typically between 30 and 155, with 3 studies having sample sizes less than 30 60,67 and 3 studies with sample sizes more than 155. 69,75,78 The samples with which the mindfulness-based stress reduction interventions for stress management were conducted were in undergraduate students (n = 2), 63,70 general public in community settings (n = 5), 65,66,69,72,79 with health care students (n = 2), 73,75 with health care professionals/employees (n = 5), 60,68,71,74,77 with primary school teachers (n = 2), 67,76 and 1 study was online. 78
The duration of mindfulness-based stress reductions interventions varied from 8 hours to 32 hours plus home practice. The mode of duration was 4 weeks, 5 weeks, and 8 weeks (n = 4). The most common outcome measure was score on a perceived stress scale, which was used by 7 studies, 60,65,68,70,74,78,79 as well as scores on the self-compassion scale, which was used by 6 studies. 63,66,70,72,74,76 Maslach’s Burnout Inventory was most commonly used to measure perceived burnout stress. 71,73,75,76 Other common measures used were the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire 72,75,76 and the Positive and Negative Affect States survey. 60,70,79 Psychological outcome measures were used by all studies. Physiological outcomes measures were examined along with psychological measures by 3 interventions 68,76,79 and included pulse rate coherence, salivary cortisol, blood pressure, and heart rate variability.
Discussion
The aim of this review was to look studies published from January 2009 to January 2014 and examine whether mindfulness-based stress reduction can be an alternative and complementary therapeutic approach for stress reduction among healthy individuals. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The first question that this review addressed was, “Has mindfulness-based stress reduction been found to be efficacious in decreasing stress in otherwise healthy individuals since the 2008 review?” From the 17 studies, a majority (n = 15) demonstrated positive changes in psychological or physiological outcome measures related to stress, 60,63,65 –71,73,74,76 –79 whereas 2 studies had mixed results. 72,75 These findings are in consonance with the previous review published in 2009 that found positive results. Of the 15 studies that have shown positive results, only 2 have used randomized controlled designs. 76,79 This type of design is considered the most rigorous as it includes pretests and posttests, randomizes the participants or their group into a control and an experimental group, and minimizes potential threats to internal and external validity. In this design, changes in pretest and posttest scores can be contrasted by levels of intervention.
While the pretest–posttest design is the least costly and simplest to conduct, this design is unable to minimize threats to internal validity such as maturation and history due to the lack of a control group for comparison. Without having a control group, the findings from these studies must be interpreted with caution. Future studies should use the more robust randomized control design or, when it is not feasible, the group randomized control design.
The second and third questions this review examined were, “Is there sufficient data available to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in stress management?” and “What are the methodological limitations of present research studies and how can these be addressed in future research?” The review looked at 17 studies of which 5 were randomized controlled designs. Based on these studies, some conclusions can be made but one would need to consider the limitations.
Besides the design type, several other limitations need to be kept in mind while interpreting the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in stress management. The majority of included studies were of lower quality. This could result in potential unobserved biases that reduce the significance of examined findings. The main methodological shortcomings were small sample size, self-selection, nonrandomization, and the impracticality of conducting meditation studies under a double-blind condition. However, all the reviewed studies provided significant results in the same direction, emphasizing the nonspecific and potentially specific effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress reduction.
A second limitation is the administration of self-rated scales, which could be influenced by social desirability. A third limitation was that people in all studies were most often Caucasian females, thus limiting the generalizability to minority populations, and enhancing the necessity of further research in more diverse populations samples. An important final limitation is the differing durations of the studies and partially differing study designs, which could influence final values. Nonetheless, apart from the modified version for the online participants, and the shortened program for nurses/midwives and undergraduate students, mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques, programs, and lessons with home practice duration were not significantly different across the studies.
The sample sizes have generally been small with only 3 studies having sample size more than 155. Power calculations and sample size justifications are generally missing from most of the reviewed studies. There have been no large-scale, longitudinal studies that have been conducted with this research problem. Future research should look at the possibility of conducting large-scale, longitudinal studies. If the customary mindfulness-based stress reduction program is going to be modified for shorter duration interventions, a standardized shortened version should be developed.
The final question that this review aimed at answering was, “What are the common outcome measures measured by studies and which ones are more important for future studies?” Both psychological and physiological measures were used by the studies though psychological measures were more common and were used by all studies. The most common outcome measure was the score on a perceived stress scale, which was used by 7 studies and was measured mainly by Cohen’s perceived stress scale. 34 Cohen’s perceived stress scale is under public domain and is certainly a useful measure to use in studies examining mindfulness-based stress reduction and stress. The Self-Compassion Scale is also a useful measure for examining mindfulness, which is one of the main tenants of self-compassion. The common physiological measures that can be used by future studies are heart rate (and its variability), blood pressure, and, if possible, salivary cortisol.
Conclusions
Stress is an imminent public health problem and one of the approaches to address this problem is through mindfulness-based stress reduction. A total of 17 interventions from January 2008 to December 2013 looked at mindfulness-based stress reduction and its efficacy in decreasing stress in healthy individuals. Of these reviewed studies, all interventions were able to find some positive effects in psychological or physiological outcome measures related to stress. Despite the limitations of not all studies using randomized controlled design, having smaller sample sizes, and having different outcome measures, mindfulness-based stress reduction is a promising modality for stress management among healthy individuals. All practitioners teaching stress management must include mindfulness-based stress reduction as one of the approaches for stress reduction.
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
This work was performed by Dr Manoj Sharma and Sarah E. Rush.
Author Contributions
MS conceptualized the study, developed the inclusion criteria, collected the data, developed the table, analyzed the data, and prepared the article. SER developed the inclusion criteria, collected the data, developed the table, analyzed the data, and prepared the article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Approval
This study did not warrant institutional review board review as no human subjects were involved.
