This study provided an in-depth view of augmentative and alternative (AAC) team member's perceptions of AAC device use with older students. Six special education teachers and one speech-language pathologist (SLP) who worked as members of an AAC team were interviewed to determine their perceptions of AAC use in junior high and high school settings. Results of qualitative analysis yielded a variety of common themes which were classified into four primary response categories: Student Communicative Competence, Barriers of AAC Use, Instructional Benefits of AAC Use, and Facilitators of AAC Use. Results may help professionals establish effective AAC teaming practices.
AngeloD. H.GlennenS.DecosteD.AAC in the family and homeHandbook of augmentative and alternative communicationSingularSan Diego523–5411996
5.
ApelK.An introduction to assessment and intervention with older students with languagelearning impairments: Bridges from research to clinical practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools30228–2301999
6.
ApelK.SwankL. K.Second chances: Improving decoding skills in the older studentLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools30231–2421999
7.
BarbourR. S.Checklists for improving rigor in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog?British Medical Journal3221115–11172001
8.
BeigelA. R.Assistive technology assessment: More than the deviceIntervention in School and Clinic35237–2432000
9.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP.Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adultsBrookesBaltimore1998nd ed.
10.
BockS. J.StonerJ. B.BeckA. R.October)The Picture Exchange Communication System: Validating intervention practices for nonverbal individuals. Paper presented at the 9 th International Conference on Cognitive Disabilities/Mental RetardationLas Vegas, NV2004Related Disabilities
11.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.Assistive technology for people with disabilitiesAllyn and BaconBoston2003
12.
CalculatorS. N.GlennenS. L.DecosteD. C.AAC and individuals with severe to profound disabilitiesHandbook of augmentative and alternative communicationSingularSan Diego445–4801998
13.
CalculatorS.JorgensenC.Integrating AAC instruction into regular education settings: Expounding on best practicesAugmentative and Alternative Communication7204–2141991
14.
CostelloJ.ShaneH.Augmentative communication assessment and the feature matching process. Mini seminar presented at the Annual Convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationNew Orleans, LA1994, November
15.
DowningJ. E.Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilitiesBrookesBaltimore1999
16.
EhrenB. J.Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language servicesLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools31219–2292000
GlennenS. L.DecosteD. C.Handbook of augmentative and alternative communicationSingularSan Diego1997
19.
GrayS.GlennenS. L.DecosteD. C.AAC in the educational settingHandbook of augmentative and alternative communicationSingularSan Diego547–5971995
20.
HansonM. J.LynchE. W.HansonM. J.Families with Anglo-European rootsDeveloping cross cultural competence. A guide for working with children and their familiesBrookesBaltimore1997nd ed.
21.
HuerM. B.CroweT. A.Augmentative and alternative communicationApplications of counseling in speech-language pathology and audiologyWilliams & WilkinsBaltimore335–3621997
22.
HuerM. B.Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)Journal of Children's Communication Development19123–341997
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997P. LJune 4,1997
24.
U. S C § 1400 et seq Institute for Matching Person and Technologyhttp://members.aol.com/impt97/mptdesc.html2004. October 20. 2004Matching person and technology assessment process
25.
JanesickV.DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.The choreography of qualitative research designHandbook of qualitative researchSageThousand Oaks, CA379–3992000
26.
KraatA. W.University of WisconsinCommunication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report1987Madison, WI: Trace R&D Center
27.
LahmE.NickelsB.What do you know? Assistive technology competencies for special ed-ucatorsTeaching Exceptional Children32156–631999
28.
LockeP. A.MirendaP.Rules and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC servicesAugmentative and Alternative Communication8200–2141992
29.
MerriamS. B.Qualitative research and case study applications in educationJossey-BassSan Francisco1998
30.
MilesM.HubermanA.Qualitative data analysisSageThousand Oaks, CA1994
31.
MurphyJ.MarkovaI.CollinsS.MoodieE.National Joint Committee for the Communicative Needs of Persons with Severe DisabilitiesEuropean Journal of Disorders of Communication3171–81996. 1992. MarchASHA
32.
ParetteH. P.Interactive CD-ROM technology for family-centered augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) decision-making across culturesED4141998
33.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J.HuerM. B.Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities35177–1902000
34.
ParetteH. P.HuerM. B.BrothersonM. J.Related service personnel perceptions of team AAC decision-making across cultures. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities3669–822001
35.
ParetteP.McmahanG. A.Team sensitivity to family goals for and expectations of assistive technologyTeaching Exceptional Children35156–612002
36.
ParetteH. P.MarrD. D.Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologistsPsychology in the Schools34337–3461997
37.
ParetteH. P.VanbiervlietA.A prospective inquiry of the technology needs and practices of school-age children with disabilitiesJournal of Special Education Technology10198–2061990
38.
PrelockP. A.Multiple perspectives for determining the roles of speech-language pathologists in inclusionary classroomsLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools31213–2182000
39.
ReedP.BowserG.Education tech points: A framework for assistive technology planning and systems change in schoolsCSUN Conference on Technology and Persons with DisabilitiesLos Angeles, CA1998, November
40.
ReedV. A.McleodK.McallisterL.AAC Team Perceptions / 1531999
41.
Importance of selected communication skills for talking with peers and teachers: Adolescents' opinionsLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools3032–49
42.
SotoG.MullerE.HuntP.GoetzL.Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspectiveLanguage, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools351–562001
43.
StakeR.DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.Case studiesHandbook of qualitative researchSageThousand Oaks, CA435–4542000
44.
TanchakT. L.SawyerC.FlippoK. F.IngeK. J.BarcusJ. M.Augmentative communicationAssistive technology. A resource for school, work, and communityBrookesBaltimore57–791995
45.
VanbiervlietA.ParetteH. P.Southeast Missouri State University and University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesFamilies, cultures, and AAC (CD-ROM)Little Rock, AR1999
46.
WilliamsW. B.StemachG.WolfeS.StangerC.Lifespace Access Assistive Technology SystemsLifespace access profile: Assistive technology assessment and planning for individuals with severe or multiple disabilities (revIrvine, CA1995
47.
Assessing students' needs for assistive technology: A resource manual for school district teamsAuthorAmherst, WI1998
48.
Woodward, J., & Cuban, L. Technology, curriculum and professional development. Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilitiesSageThousand Oaks, CA2001
49.
YorkstonK.KarlanG.BlackstoneS.Assessment proceduresAugmentative communication: An introductionAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationRockville, MD163–1961986
