Most states recently implemented procedures for alternate assessment for students who cannot participate in state and district-wide assessment programs. The purpose of large-scale assessments is to provide data for evaluation of students' achievement of state or local standards. Promoting achievement for students who participate in alternate assessment requires both understanding the parameters of the alternate assessment selected by the state or LEA and considering variables related to the student's individual education. This article describes the variables that may influence alternate assessment outcomes and offers recommendations for how the school team can enhance student achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambaraL. M.KnosterT.Designing positive behavior support plansInnovations1325301998
BrowderD.Assessment of individuals with severe disabilitiesPaul H. BrookesBaltimore1993
4.
BrowderD. M.Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilitiesGuilfordNew York2001
5.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DezellL.FlowersC.KarvonenM.SpoonerF.AlgozzineR.How states define alternate assessment for students with disabilities. Paper presented at the An-nual Meeting of the American Educational Research AssociationNew Orleans2002, April
6.
BrowderD.DemchakM. A.HellerM.KingD.An in vivo evaluation of data-based rules to guide instructional decisionsJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps142342401991
7.
BrowderD. M.MartinD. K.A new curriculum for TommyTeaching Exceptional Children1842612651986
8.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.ThomasM. A.Criterion of ultimate functioningHey, don't forget about me!Council for Exceptional ChildrenReston, VA2–151976
9.
BurdetteP.Alternate assessment: Early highlights and pitfalls of reportingAssessment for Effective Intervention2661662001
10.
CampbellP. C.CampbellC. R.BradyM. P.Team environmental assessment mapping system: A method for selecting curriculum goals for students with disabilitiesEducation and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities332642721998
11.
CipaniE.SpoonerF.Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilitiesAllyn & BaconBoston1994
12.
ClayonJ.BurdgeM.KleinertH. L.KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.Systematically teaching the components of selfdeterminationAlternate assessment: measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilitiesPaul H. BrookesBaltimore93–1342001
13.
CristK.WallsR. T.HaughtP.Degrees of specificity in task analysisAmerican Journal of Mental Deficiency8967741984
14.
DenhamA.LahmE. A.Using technology to construct alternate portfolios of students with moderate and severe disabilitiesTeaching Exceptional Children33510172001
15.
ElliottJ.YsseldykeJ.ThurlowM.EricksonE.What about assessment and accountabilityTeaching Exceptional Children31120271998
16.
FalveyM.ForestM.PearpointJ.RosenbergR.ThousandJ.VillaR.& NevinE.Building connectionsCreativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachersPaul H. BrookesBaltimore347–3681994
17.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E.Making the most of student performance dataInnovationsAmerican Association on Mental RetardationWashington, DC31994
18.
FordA.DavernL.SchnorrR.Learners with significant disabilities: Curricular relevance in an era of standards-based reformRemedial and Special Education222142222001
19.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC. J.IversonV. S.Choosing options and accommodations for childrenPaul H. BrookesBaltimore29–951998
20.
GriggN. C.SnellM. E.LoydB. H.Visual analysis of student evaluation data: A qualitative analysis of teacher decision-makingJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps1413221989
21.
HagnerD.HelmD. T.ButterworthJ.This is your meeting”: A qualitative study of person-centered planningMental Retardation341591711996
22.
HilliardA. G.IiiExcellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testingJournal of Teacher Education512933042000
23.
HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.ToddA. W.SnellM. E.BrownF.Positive behavior supportInstruction of students with severe disabilitiesPrentice HallNJ207–2902000th ed.
24.
HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R.WilcoxB.B. Wilcox & G. T. BellamyDesign of high school programs for severely handicapped studentsPaul H. BrookesBaltimore61–981982Constructing general case programs for community activities
25.
KampferS. H.HorvathL. S.KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.Teachers' perception of one state's alternate assessment: Implications for practice and preparationExceptional Children673613732001
26.
Kansas extended curricular standards for mathematicsKS: Author2000Topeka
27.
KleinertH. L.DenhamA.GroneckV. B.ClaytonJ.BurdgeM.KearnsJ. F.KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.Systematically teaching the components of selfdeterminationAlternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilitiesPaul H. BrookesBaltimore93–1342001
28.
KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.A validation study of the performance indicators and learner outcomes of Kentucky's alternate assessment for students with significant disabilitiesJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps241001101999
29.
KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilitiesPaul H. BrookesBaltimore2001
30.
KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.KennedyS.Accountability for all students: Kentucky's alternate portfolio system for students with moderate and severe cognitive disabilitiesJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps22881011997
31.
KleinertH. L.KennedyS.KearnsJ. F.The impact of alternate assessments: A statewide teacher surveyJournal of Special Education33931021999
32.
KnowltonE.Considerations in the design of personalized curricular supports for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities33951071998
33.
KoretzD.StecherB.KleinS.MccaffreyD.The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Findings and implicationsEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice135161994
34.
LibertyK. A.HaringN. G.WhiteO. R.BillingsleyF.A technology for the future: Decision rules for generalizationEducation and Training in Mental Retardation233153261988
35.
MinerC. A.BatesP. E.The effect of person centered planning activities on the IEP/ transition process. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities321051121997
36.
MountB.ZwernikK.It's never too early, it's never too late: A booklet about personal-futures planning for persons with developmental disabilities, their families, and friends, case managers, service providers, and advocatesMetropolitan CouncilSt. Paul, MN1988
37.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
38.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2001). Report of student performance: North Carolina alternate assessment portfolio pilot program, 1999-2000. Raleigh, NC: Author.
39.
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities, Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities, and Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, U S Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, 62 Fed. Reg. 55026 (Oct. 22, 1997).
40.
SalendS. J.Using portfolios to assess student performanceTeaching Exceptional Children31236431998
41.
ShavelsonR. J.BaxterG. P.GaoX.National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student TestingReport on the status of generalizability performance: Generalizability and transfer of performance assessmentsLos Angeles, CA1993Sampling variability of performance assessments. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED359229
42.
SigafoosJ.ColeD. A.McquarterR.Current practices in the assessment of students with severe handicapsJournal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps122642731987
43.
SnellM. E.BrownF.Instruction of students with severe disabilitiesPrentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ2000Influences on Student Outcomes / 269
44.
SwicegoodP.Portfolio-based assessment practicesIntervention in School and Clinic3016151994
45.
TindalG.AlmondP.McdonaldM.CrawfordL.TedescoM.GlasgowA.Alternate assessments in reading and math: Development and validation for students with significant disabilities2002Manuscript submitted for publication
46.
ThompsonS. J.QuenemoenR. F.ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E.Alternate assessments for students with severe disabilitiesCorwin PressThousand Oaks, CA2001
47.
ThompsonS.ThurlowM. L.University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes2001 state special education outcomes: A report on state activities at the beginning of a new decadeMinneapolis, MNhttp://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/onlinedefault.html2001. September 5, 2001
48.
ThurlowM. L.JohnsonD. R.Highstakes testing of students with disabilitiesJournal of Teacher Education513053142000
49.
WestlingD. L.FoxL.Teaching students with severe disabilitiesMerrillUpper Saddle River, NJ2000nd ed.
50.
WilliamsG. E.CuvoA. J.Training apartment upkeep skills to rehabilitation clients: A comparison of task analytic strategiesJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis1939511986
51.
YsseldykeJ.OlsenK.Putting alternate assessment into practice: What to measure and possible sources of dataExceptional Children651751851999
52.
September 2002 Initial Acceptance: 3 October 2002 Final Acceptance10 December2002
