This article describes the field-test results of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction, a model of teaching designed to enable teachers to teach students to set goals, take action on those goals, and adjust their goals and plans as needed. Nineteen students, most of whom had intellectual disabilities, participated in the field test. Seventeen of the 19 students made dramatic changes from baseline to intervention conditions, at levels that exceeded teachers' expectations. Additionally, social validation data obtained from both the students and the participating teachers supported the utility of the model. The implications of the field test are discussed.
AgranM., & HughesC. (1998). Introduction to the special section: Self-determination: Signaling a systems change?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 1-4.
3.
AgranM., SnowK., & SwanerJ. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293-301.
4.
BiggeJ. L. (1991). Teaching individuals with physical and multiple disabilities (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
5.
BlackorbyJ., & WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-414.
6.
CarrR. W. (1979). Goal attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 46, 88-95.
7.
CardilloJ. E. (1994). Summary score conversion key. In KiresukT. J., SmithA., & CardilloJ. E. (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory (pp. 273-281). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
ClarkG. M., & KolstoeO. P. (1995). Career development and transition education for adolescents with disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
FieldS., HoffmanA., & SawilowskyS. (1994). Student involvement in transition planning: A proposal submitted to the U.S. Department of Education. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
10.
FieldS., MartinJ., MillerR., WardM., & WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
11.
GajarA., GoodmanL., & McAfeeJ. (1993). Secondary schools and beyond: Transition of individuals with mild disabilities. New York: Merrill.
12.
HasaziS., GordonL., & RoeC. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979-1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455-469.
13.
HewardW. L. (1996). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105-17, 20 U.S.C. §§1400 et seq.
15.
JaskulskiT., MetzlerC., & ZiermanS. A. (1990). Forging a new era: The 1990 reports on people with developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: National Association of Developmental Disabilities Councils.
KiresukT. J., & LundS. H. (1976). Process and measurement using goal attainment scaling. In GlassG. V. (Ed.), Education review manual (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
MartinJ. E., & MarshallL. (1996). Choice making: Description of a model project. In AgranM. (Ed.), Student-directed learning: Teaching self-determination skills (pp. 224-248). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
McDonnellJ., Mathot-BucknerC., & FergusonB. (1996). Transition programs for students with moderate/severe disabilities. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20.
MithaugD. E. (1996). Equal opportunity theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
MithaugD. E., HoriuchiC. N., & FanningP. N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of special education students. Exceptional Children, 51, 397-404.
22.
MithaugD. E., MartinJ. E., & AgranM. (1987). Adaptability instruction: The goal of transition programming. Exceptional Children, 53, 500-505.
23.
MithaugD. E., MartinJ. E., AgranM., & RuschF. R. (1988). Why special education graduates fail: How to teach them to succeed. Colorado Springs, CO: Ascent.
24.
MithaugD., WehmeyerM. L., AgranM., MartinJ., & PalmerS. (1998). The self-determined learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. In WehmeyerM. L. & SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in educational planning, decision-making and instruction (pp. 299-328). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
NirjeB. (1972). The right to self-determination. In WolfensbergerW. (Ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization (pp. 176-200). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
26.
SandsD. J., & WehmeyerM. L. (1996). Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
SchrinerK., RoesslerR., & BerkobienR. (1993). Employment concerns for people with mental retardation. Journal of Job Placement, 2, 12-13.
28.
SitlingtonP. L., FrankA. R., & CarsonR. (1993). Adult adjustment among high school graduates with mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 221-233.
29.
Van ReusenA. K., & BosC. S. (1994). Facilitating student participation in individualized education programs through motivation strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 60, 466-475.
30.
WardM. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination: A historical and personal perspective. In SandsD. J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 3-16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
31.
WatsonP. J., & WorkmanE. A. (1981). The non-current multiple baseline across individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 12, 257-259.
32.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302-314.
33.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996a). A self-report measure of self-determination for adolescents with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282-293.
34.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996b). Self-determination as an education outcome: Why is this important to children, youth, and adults with disabilities? In SandsD. J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
WehmeyerM. L. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Development and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175-209.
36.
WehmeyerM. L., AgranM., & HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination skills to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
37.
WehmeyerM. L., AgranM., & HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58-68.
38.
WehmeyerM. L., & MetzlerC. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Mental Retardation, 31, 111-119.
39.
WehmeyerM. L., PalmerS. B., AgranM., MithaugD. E., & MartinJ. E. (in press). Teaching students to become casual agents in their lives: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children.
40.
WehmeyerM. L., & SandsD. J. (1998). Making it happen; Promoting student involvement in education planning, decision-making and instruction. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
41.
WehmeyerM. L., & SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
42.
WehmeyerM. L., & SchwartzM. (1998a). The relationship between self-determination, quality of life, and life satisfaction for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3-12.
43.
WehmeyerM. L., & SchwartzM. (1998b). The self-determination focus of transition goals for students with mental retardation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 75-86.
